givner: deputy city attorney jon givner.the board's mission is to determine whether or not the determination was correct. but in this case, it's the notice that the applicant provided after the determination was correct. the purpose of that notice is to inform the supervisor and surrounding areas about the determination so that members of the public can file a notice, be present at the hearing. that notice was defective in this case. rather than reversing the department's decision, i think the appropriate remedy for the board here is to continue the item and require the board to provide abcat notice under the code. the notice is in the code, and the applicant can review it themselves, but that's what i would recommend in this situation. >> president honda: thank you very much. i think vice president swig has a question directed to you. >> commissioner swig: no, i just want to say that's exactly right. that's exactly right, and we have done this before when proper notice was not provided. this is the only -- on this piece of

givner: deputy city attorney jon givner.the board's mission is to determine whether or not the determination was correct. but in this case, it's the notice that the applicant provided after the determination was correct. the purpose of that notice is to inform the supervisor and surrounding areas about the determination so that members of the public can file a notice, be present at the hearing. that notice was defective in this case. rather than reversing the department's decision, i think the appropriate remedy for the board here is to continue the item and require the board to provide abcat notice under the code. the notice is in the code, and the applicant can review it themselves, but that's what i would recommend in this situation. >> president honda: thank you very much. i think vice president swig has a question directed to you. >> commissioner swig: no, i just want to say that's exactly right. that's exactly right, and we have done this before when proper notice was not provided. this is the only -- on this piece of

givner: deputy city attorney jon givner.the board's mission is to determine whether or not the determination was correct. but in this case, it's the notice that the applicant provided after the determination was correct. the purpose of that notice is to inform the supervisor and surrounding areas about the determination so that members of the public can file a notice, be present at the hearing. that notice was defective in this case. rather than reversing the department's decision, i think the appropriate remedy for the board here is to continue the item and require the board to provide abcat notice under the code. the notice is in the code, and the applicant can review it themselves, but that's what i would recommend in this situation. >> president honda: thank you very much. i think vice president swig has a question directed to you. >> commissioner swig: no, i just want to say that's exactly right. that's exactly right, and we have done this before when proper notice was not provided. this is the only -- on this piece of

the final city attorney was john givner. thank you city attorney for all your hard work on this as well. essentially, folks, if you recall in 2018, we called for a hearing on our city zero waste goals and how we were doing to achieve those goals and how close we had come over a decade to diverting as much waste as we could from landfill. at the time it was very clear we had large refuse generators, hospitals, hotels, union iversy cities, handling buildings not separating like we do in our homes. they were just paying the fee and not participating in the program which was adding to our environmental degradation. we got that passed thank you to the sponsors of what the refuse compliance ordinance we called on it green job piece of legislation. violators were to beef up people dedicated to separate refuse and divert as much as we could from landfill this. is second peel about construction and demolition paste. 25% of what we send to landfill is construction and demolition waste. there are 12 facilities around the bay area that

the final city attorney was john givner. thank you city attorney for all your hard work on this as well. essentially, folks, if you recall in 2018, we called for a hearing on our city zero waste goals and how we were doing to achieve those goals and how close we had come over a decade to diverting as much waste as we could from landfill. at the time it was very clear we had large refuse generators, hospitals, hotels, union iversy cities, handling buildings not separating like we do in our homes. they were just paying the fee and not participating in the program which was adding to our environmental degradation. we got that passed thank you to the sponsors of what the refuse compliance ordinance we called on it green job piece of legislation. violators were to beef up people dedicated to separate refuse and divert as much as we could from landfill this. is second peel about construction and demolition paste. 25% of what we send to landfill is construction and demolition waste. there are 12 facilities around the bay area that