gladstone touched on some of the key points. the proposal maintains the scale and important relationships. [bell] it is fanciful and therefore displays historical development. thank you. >> good evening. i am john. i am one of the founding members of the liberty hill neighborhood association that was founded 25 years ago, and i stayed in this house 35 years ago when i was a kid in my 20's, as a kid for one week, and on other occasions, whenever i lost my keys. my friend had acquired this house because they love victorians, and they bought it in a state of total ruin. they completely remodeled the kitchen in the back, which is certainly not victorian, but you are allowed to do that. it is on the national register of historic places, and we were told when we established this district 25 years ago, the back wall and the back yard, out of sight from the street, was our own option, and we could bend rules a little bit back there. they have done what others do. another had a kitchen, and so does this house. they put big, huge -- [bell

gladstone. you have three minutes. >> hello again. mr. frye said this building retains a high level of integrity. not only is that something that mark holbert doesn't agree with and chris buckley from alameda and oakland historic but neither did the planning commissioner at the hearing. i would like quickly to read a couple of things from what he said "is there really enough integrity left for this structure to continue to convey its historic significance? haven't the alterations severely reduced all or some of the seven aspebts of integrity"? why wasn't this carriage house compared with other carriage houses? the greater neighborhood? i don't believe the description of what would have been allowed -- of what would be allowed in this alternative would meet the reconstruction standards stating by the planning department. the planning department here is really in a minority in its opinions. chief frye and discussed earlier the likelihood that the preservation board priest to this one or the h.b.c. has ever turned down all the e.i.r. alterna

gladstone? >> brett gladstone, representing the property owner. just to give you a little background on where we have been in previous hearings, the planning commission had three hearings. we unanimously approved the demolition and the new building. the a historic preservation board voted unanimously and had no problem with the new building. you buy a four-one, commissioner goh dissenting, approved the variants. -- the variance. the board of supervisors has upheld this. although your decision is not to be based on the support for the opposition, my client would like to thank the 900 member strong russian hill neighbors, all of the property owners who support, the only people who showed up at the board of supervisors hearing recently. only one of the six adjacent residents has ever opposed the project. we are looking forward to getting on with it. we do not believe the criteria is met. mr. butler can argue the merits of the case tonight, but the criteria before you is whether there are documents that could have been provided to you previously showi

gladstone -- the architect is not make any attempt to do so. i am not sure when this project was applied for internally. the 2010 code has a slightly different interpretations on doors and stairs. i do not even want to talk about it. i am really concerned about how this project meets the rest of the world. i think the neighbors support and we all support appropriate development where it can be done. at this moment, i do not have enough evidence that this will work. vice president miguel: this whole project and this whole area is exceptional and extraordinary. you first have to find the block. i grew up around it several times. i could not find a minibus stop two blocks away. if there is one, i have no idea where it is. i looked at the muni maps and i still could not come out to be truthful. there is no question in my mind that a 15 foot setback, if this project was going to be built, is an absolute necessity. i took a look at the one drawing that shows the scope of the garage, not very well done as far as i am concerned. i park pandemic on a st

abrio como parte de la fundacion san vicente de paul en la calle gladstone en pittsburgh....p ara alicias una bendicion pues ha descuidado sus niveles de azucar alicia navarro/instructora de aerobicos 35:46 maximo es 120 y ahora es 180 y 220, ha subido mucho por motivo de eso, la falta de seguro medico abrio hace un mes y se dedicara solo a adultos mayores de 17 anos, no importa en que ciudad vivan, ni sus ingresos ni su estatus migratorio. yolanda thompson/clinica medica "rotacare" 15:59 porque hay tanta necesidad 16:59 indispensable por que sabemos especialmente en la comunidad latina no tienen esos beneficios de salud porque no tienen muchos sus documentos 16:08 el personal es voluntario y funciona con donaciones privadas, por lo que el servicio es limitado...solo atienden los miercoles por la tarde, y se hace la cita el mismo dia. 17:00 oh ha sido un exito, verdaderamente un exito... 17:15 son lagrimas a la salida 14:23 hace un mes que empezamos y confiamos en que en el futuro se vaya a extender a dos dias... ademas de medicinas, hay disponible examenes de laboratorio, rayos x y diag

gladstone was reading. i made no claims about the site generating landslides. i made no concerns about the foundations of the building. i made no claims about errors in drainage. we are here about the empowerment to review given to this project. we are not here to decide whether or not these structures will cause an environmental impact. we are here to let you know that the review given by the department to determine what level of review the environmental impact that this project may cause was not properly assessed from the department. it is in a sensitive environmental area. the project is clearly mitigated. the network case is directly on point. they are using the exact same terminology that was rejected by the court bench. they are using another technique that was rejected by the court. these medications will come down the line. let's send it over to the building department and they will resolve it. i am going to let the engineer take the remainder of my time so that he can walk you through his report. >> i only have limited time. the california code of regu

this form of sculpture and that suited me down to the ground on one side sliced off a bit here in gladstone to work on freeing the statue from the tree trunk and it was long before something with a wintry feel to its began to take shape. so local coffee at five and hopefully you can make out a beautiful family penguin portrait here. lessons without. with some leaving glad to put the finishing touches to our run talk to friends i headed back into the city to visit some more crossman working on a slightly larger scale. one company bigger is better but the longest employer in the city territory is boss and the court may make just about fits. in that. this is the cross production association official. inside this time six brand new i am one forty eighth's of all into space. there ukrainian jet plane that's been around since two thousand and seven each one is worth around twenty five million dollars and muscle is aiming to produce fifty of them by two thousand and thirteen. bus to france they're going to have to considerably speed up production and that's when these cars come and. each of these

rick gladstone. i am pleased to be here today to prevent this project. i am here on behalf of ares cp,,er = = -- i am here on behalf of ares commercial property. i would like to think many people for their letters and calls for support, including the giants, the mission bay business association, the chamber of commerce, and many individual business owners, including some dor -- pdr users who have written letters of support. when is the market and timber company. i received this petition from 50 people and handed it to you, and today also received the mission bay business association muttra that is being distributed to you. we all the knowledge that brand new parking garages, new structures, do not follow our transit-first policy, even though this is not downtown, nor do permanent approvals for parking garages in existing buildings follow our transit- first policy. that is why our client is not proposing either one of those. this approval is for an existing building for a five year period, which can be extended only by coming back to your commission. for

. >> i am brett gladstone. i would like to introduce a new addition to our office. i represent tom and gene. i want to thank ben fu. we had three meetings with the neighborhood, three with the design review board separately. about muni, i am not going to go into it. as you probably know, the family behind me that is building this army and the people. the can tell you there is a bryant street stop two blocks away, and there is a turn -- [shouting from the audience] this is a case about parking and units. the design review board could not have said it more clearly. that board is not an overnight organization. it has been around a long time. i respect it more than some groups that just arrived overnight. your staff thinks that are wrong about compliance with the design review guidelines. some of what they say simply does not follow today's policies. we told you very simply. they have the extra parking requirement not only because they like cards, -- like cars, but they try to keep your lots than the zoning allows, and they want smaller units. it is a trade-off

gladstone stood up here and completely misrepresented. environmental analysis taken to the planning commission called this an alteration of an existing structure, period. i printed it verbatim in my brief. this was not a clerical error. this was not something that the department said, oh, oops, we made a mistake. if we hadn't filed the appeal, what would have been approved is a project which was reviewed as an alteration of the cottage. because that's all that's there. that's the only environmental analysis that's in this record. so it's as if they didn't even hear the presentation of the appeal. it's nice that they can show up with lots of people who didn't once address the merits of the appeal. just talked about how great it is to have this project. but the merits of the appeal are that this particular project was not reviewed. as a result of that, the adjacent resources which ceqa requires to be reviewed were never reviewed. that's clear. and ceqa requires that. it's in the forms that the department has. and to protect those adjacent r

>> brett gladstone representing the garage operator. i will be speaking later when the item comes up on a conditional use permit for that. i do not know the owners of this and never talked to them. i have nothing to say for this one. but if you have any questions on this prior to the later hearing, we will see you a little bit later. thank you. president olague: public comment is closed. i guess we are at the next item. >> thank you commissioners. we can move forward on your calendars to item 5, governor brown's proposed elimination of the development agencies. president olague: i do not know if there is anything to add to the discussion. >> i do not think i have anything new to report this week. there were no votes i am aware of in sacramento on this item this week. we are trying to keep close tabs on that. the item we talked about earlier, treasure island, is closely related to that. it is important to note the city is looking at this issue of infrastructure finance districts and how they may or not -- may or may not apply. there are