gleason first, if you just speak briefly. >> thank you for allowing me to be here today.for background, i worked as the associate director of conservatory. we work on the environmental impact of pulp and paper on the street. in 1999 through 2002 i worked to produce the ballots and reduce the boater information pamphlet. i have been the core supervisor of the elections committee. mr. osmond is a former colleague of mine at conservatory. it is like old home week for me. i will allow him to explain the environmental impact and savings on this. frankly, there is going to be tremendous potential for taxpayer savings on this. there is a lot of redundancy in the ballots with people getting vote by mail and then the sample ballot. i want to address a very narrow focus. i appreciate that the supervisor's staff has discussed about an issue the election commission has been concerned about. this is the fact that people would have to get their e-mails to have this work. there is an issue in that in the california elections code -- it is very broad. anybody has access to this, even tho

in these professional gleason's dual system equipment one i was dipping going to use for many years on it but for our consumer market. it's just a ball to be used. gives it go on our g.p.s. equipment works better. in the cedars when the big buildings. are. due to the. way belittle you can see more subtle it's. also. go on our. course and better. in the mountains for example which is also very important for something occasions. so. g.p.s. is not really perfect for many countries it's important to be independent from military system. and we feel we see the demander in different purpose. if you basic reasons but the quality of the positioning around but independence so from one system doesn't. neutrally one to have their own position system i can understand that but at the american army it relies on g.p.s. just as the other armies is it possible technically for americans to switch off for example the russian army or the certainly there are you over which they're off. g.p.s. but continue using g.p.s. for their own soldiers i think this is this is not possible is it for a little effort or a

one example, alternatives to gleason's heart drug policies are off-limits by the two major party platforms and their campaign agendas. political parties tend to have unforgiving hierarchies. the dispatchers are sife with subjects the vast majority of lawmakers prefer to ignore. until recently, the major parties took the ballast military budget and in the ongoing soviet-air weapons systems has given and not debatable. as is the gao's annual finding that it is unable to barter the pentagon's budget as a whole. in its turn, the media often -- toheads and since censorial nadir. -- behavior. for the first time before a national television audience, due to the presence of c-span, the subject of mandatory voting is to be addressed in its many dimensions and consequences. we want a flexible debate format that encourages multiple back and forth responses on any single assertion, questions by the debaters to one another, and questions from the audience submitted on cards. this will be a 90-minute event in the debate starts. for the debaters, in for mandatory voting is norm ornstein. is an advocate f