one quick comment in response to judge gleeson what you said. in 1980 congress killed the federal corrections you've act. that was in place in 1950-1984 and about alternative sentencing for people who work younger than 22 at the time of conviction. 20 to? sorry, 26. a commonsense piece of the law that was part of the wave of mass incarceration. the rest of my comments against the question directed to judge donald, you're right about the front end versus the vatican. i think we need to look at the systemic pressures in early periodic screening diagnosis treatment, medicaid program, special ed program. people feel that they are not budgeted to do the work that would have meaningful intervention that are required by law to do the kind of work you're talking about in a broad way. to any number of examples of that. i think in doing reform of which are suggesting we need to look at systemic pressures and figure out ways of creating the funding so the incentives are there to do what the law requires. people are violating the law left and right, and tho

we register court judge, judge gleeson and then the magistrate judge, judge wells.next year perhaps will have a supreme court judge and we'll have all bases covered. i did tell caroline it's kind of a risky proposition to put a seasoned criminal defense trial attorney with the microphone at a podium in a roomful of people, i'm going to resist the urge and keep it brief. i promise to do that. i'm also privileged to be a key member in an alternative sentencing set programs in our district in los angeles. we have two very distinguished programs. one is pretrial diversion program called conviction and sentence alternatives, has two tracks, track one will lead to a complete dismissal. after about a year in the program and to get the services that you may need, the issues that get you arrested in the first place. we also have a postconviction drug court to address repeat offenders instead of sending them right back to prison. do what they can and offering treatment. they key is we have really a good collaborative cohesive group led by the head of each of the department. i

over here. >> i have to tell judge gleeson. i'm an attorney by his or any notice that the defendants services committee and we are in mourning that he's leaving the judiciary. i just have to publicly say that it was wonderful. we thank you for your work on many fronts. >> thank you for your time. [applause] >> that's enough for the question. >> no. >> this is an invigorating experience and kind of free news are wished to go back and accomplish more. >> any final word? >> thank you for having me in this wonderful program. the mac thank you all. [applause] >> thank you for major honors, for that very enlightening presentation. just before we conclude for lunch, i did want to take one moment to acknowledge once again judge donald who is a cochair for the summit together with the judge. we look forward to your feedback through the e-mail, twitter to enhance the program. we will not break for lunch and welcome you back in one hour after 1:40, closer to 2:00. thank you. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible c

one quick comment in response to judge gleeson what you said. a 1980 for congress killed the act. i don't know if anybody mentioned that in place to 1950s to 1984 and allowed alternative sentencing for people who are younger than 22 at the time of conviction. 26? sorry, 26. a commonsense piece of law that was part of the wave of mass incarceration beginning. the rest of my comments and a question directed to you, you are absolutely right about the front end versus the backend. we need to look at the systemic rushers and early periodic screening diagnosis in the medicaid program, special ed program. people feel they are budgeted to do the work that would have meaningful interventions required by law to do the kind of work you are talking about in a broadway. give any number of examples of that. in doing the reform work you are suggesting, we need to look at systemic pressures and figure out ways so that the incentives that they are to do with the lie requires. people are violating left and right and those are two examples. and this is a question to do what you're talking about, we