by guys like rachel maddow does like adam schiff you know well actually i don't as a dog i think glenn beck co-opted it on fox and yet a brilliant career and then he moved over to some other network on his own accord because you want to bug you know once you go by guy you can start to go back you can slip down the rabbit hole and go insane alex jones glenn beck and is rapidly losing all connection to sanity it seems like back from the days of harry houdini like it seems like the bug guy thing is like i don't know who gets convinced by that like. see all you see telling that you know the people who works for would be the guy who ran the hell bob comic cult yeah gotta be white as they were in the comet and then they are jim jones from the ghana massacre those types of serial massacre perpetrators out in the jungles around the wilderness or adam schiff got the bug i think right he's trying to have a democratic party commit mass suicide right so he's got the bug he's got the bug i think. this is really working because the democrats are going down that rabbit all they won't you know when you hav

john solomon has investigated, glenn beck has reported it and has court records of proof of , and heit is on youtube has reports about people being convicted in ukraine for working for the dnc and being convicted for corruption and working against the election in 2016. guest: i think what she is capturing is part of the problem a lot of citizens have is that the democrats are saying look over here, this is really serious, but don't look over here, at the 2016 crane in connections, don't look at hunter haydn. biden, but let's talk about this. from the very beginning i've taken the position that i think all americans should take, a think should all let the --they should all be investigated. i think there was a need for the special counsel investigation, but i also think there is a need for what is the investigation into the 2016 russia investigation. it can only help us as citizens to know more. otherer one party or the says there is no need to look into that. that is when you've got to put away your partisan interest and say this is a time where we need transparency. on the ukrainian th

they said, oh, he just went on glenn beck and claimed you spent a lot of time in ukraine in 2016.een in ukraine in my life. i told him that, after we landed in washington, in an attempt to set him straight. and he said, oh, okay, i will look into it, we'll see if that's true. he did seem to think i really had been in ukraine. >> and the other part of the investigation that's still going on, and william barr is investigating, the assistant attorney general of connecticut is circling the globe, they're going into the origins of the investigation, the steele dossier. what about the original fisa warrant, peter, the carter page? we understand that the ig report is going to say there was some amending of a document by a lower level fbi official but not a finding of bias on the part of the fbi. we'll wait to see what comes out in the first part of december for that. but was there a justification for going after carter page, a campaign adviser to donald trump, and having that surveillance approved by a judge? >> first, i don't think we're prepared to comment on what the inspector general

. >> it's not only of interest to gl glenn beck. nysd prosecutors may want the names. the president was holding on the same conspiracy theory. >> they have the server from the dnc. >> who has the server? >> the fbi went in and told them get out of here. we're not giving it to you. they gave the server to crowd strike or whatever it's called which is a company owned by very wealthy ukrainian. i still want to see that server. the fbi has never gotten that server. that's a big part of this whole thing. why did they give it to a ukrainian company. >> are you sure they did that? >> that's what the word is. >> we have our own word. david corn is here back on the beat in person. we'll get into all of it when we're back in 30 seconds. of it we're back in 30 seconds >>> are you willing to testify and be the first hand evidence that a lot of these senators are looking for? >> i have no comment. if you'll please excuse me. >> john bolton, brand new, momentin moments ago at union station. this puts him in a pickle as well as everything we just

reportedly under criminal investigation, repeated that argument yesterday in an interview with glenn beckn't think it came out quite the way rudy intended it >> it's rumored they're investigating me for bribery i'd like to know who i bribed. i don't, you know -- i don't bribe people i've been doing this for 50 years of my life. i've never had a complaint i think people understand that i have a very, very great passion for corruption [ laughter ] >> seth: oh. no no, that didn't -- that didn't come out the way you wanted it to that -- you made it sound like corruption is one of your hobbies. [ laughter ] that's how someone would describe themselves in their tinder bio "i have a great passion for swimming, horseback riding, corruption, and puling the skin all the way back behind my head." [ laughter ] you got to be careful how you phrase stuff, man. rudy saying he has a great passion for corruption would be like oj saying, "man, i'd kill for a ham sandwich right now." [ light laughter ] two people [ laughter ] [ cheers and applause but obviously this was not about corruption in general, this

who are in foreign service, but as i encourage your listeners to see what was happening in the glenn becknvestigation into the state department, and i have great concern about corruption and personal vendettas that are happening among many people that are working for us in embassies all across the world. host: mark, let me ask you to questions. first of all, the testimony of yovanovitch, did lot o you find her credible or not? guest: she seemed credible, but when they asked her, did you sheess any time crimes, said no. her in may,ey fired and the call was in july. caller: why was she testifying about something that happened in july? it seems very much skewed to the democratic position, also using their political power for personal political gain. host: let me jump in on one other point. we're going to hear from a colonel, who was on the call, and we will also hear from ambassador sondland. caller: i wish they had been up front and center instead of these other folks who were not witnesses to what the congress as they are investigating. mark, thanks for the call. we go to mel, on the democ

john solomon has investigated, glenn beck has reported it and has court records of proof of , and heit youtube has reports about people being convicted in ukraine for working for the dnc and being convicted for corruption and working against the election in 2016. guest: i think what she is capturing is part of the problem a lot of citizens have is that the democrats are saying look over here, this is really serious, but don't look over here, at the 2016 crane in connections, don't look at hunter haydn. biden, but let's talk about this. from the very beginning i've taken the position that i think all americans should take, a think should all let the --they should all be investigated. i think there was a need for the special counsel investigation, but i also think there is a need for what is the investigation into the 2016 russia investigation. it can only help us as citizens to know more. otherer one party or the says there is no need to look into that. that is when you've got to put away your partisan interest and say this is a time where we need transparency. on the ukrainian thing, i