alabama as chief justice includes several references to god i as the medical ethics, professor glenn cohen of harvard law school about that. and if it is problematic from a legal point of view, here's a real stay. and assistant chief justice parker is concurrence. he talks about the idea that it would be at front to himself capital age for god. and this idea of the wrath of god might befall people. it's highly unusual to say this kind of language is claimed is that alabama by several statutes of the past. the cost you for a minute as indicated that this is the view of the people of alabama. but i can say if you're not a member of it, you do a christian religion. it would seem quite an unusual thing to be told. this is the law of alabama, that god is a part of that outlaw. but that is a d. but she just as parker's it how, how does this really, how does it relate to the abortion of question in the united states? and i'm wondering to, with idea of treatment you're trying to help a couple of conceive. and yet you're saying under this ruling, a doctor could be accused of, of what killing or hur

the best ways for patients who want to have children, but struggle to conceive natural. professor glenn cohen of harvard law school is a leading expert on medical ethics. i asked him what this really means for people who are already in the process of getting id of treatments in alabama. yeah, so the case was about on the alabama around the full death of a minor statute, in the case arose out of destruction, of embryos by mouth fees and allegedly, by the back. so uh that you know, that one of the largest providers, alabama has announced that they're going to suspend the us. there will be a question about whether people who already have frozen embryos to transfer them to another state for example. so when it comes to people who are starting out, they're gonna have a tough time finding an alabama, this one going to freeze their embryos and can you just store them? is that the king smell in alabama, a doctor who performs an idea of treatment. it could be what sued. yes, into the wrong full on that statue support statute. so that civil liability, right. so the idea is that you could be sued just a