in the meantime, here is glenn greenwald, independent journalist. of course, you know, he writes for substory and other places. we're happy to have him join suus tonight. how dodo you how do you assessu' this , glenn? you've been you've been on the story since dayry s one . pull the threads together forces if you would. yeah, i mean, the entire liberal wing of the corporate media, which iss basically the entire corporate media with a few exceptions, spent a year and a half now disseminating a cia lie, which is that the hunter laptop emails h published by the washington post were quote unquote russian disinformation. amazingly, the letter from those intelligence officials, the dozens of them on which. they relied did not even say that they admitted those officials did that they have no evidence for makingak this claim . they have no reason to believe it except this kind of like tingling sensation in their shemstomach that gives them lin intuitive sense that maybe it's the russians in the media went even further than the trained liars in the intelligen

glenn greenwald is an independent journalist and his work is on sub stack and he is an expert on detectingtion and explain what it means, we are grateful to have him joining us now. glenn, thanks for coming on. i guess the first and most obvious question is, this is kind of a blockbuster story. i have no idea what it means or where it goes, but it is clearly a case where the u.s. government has been lying and amounting a disinformation campaign, if you will, to cover up what it is doing and no one in the press corps seems interested in finding out what is at the bottom of this. why is that? >> right, so first of all, like you, i have heard the russian and chinese accusations for weeks that the united states is partnering with ukraine to have biolabs right on the other side of the russian border and never talked about it because there was never any evidence for it. i don't take the words of the russians were chinese. >> tucker: exactly. >> that was when vic toria nuland went before the senate and marco rubio asked her, are there biological and chemical weapon programs in ukraine expecting h

glenn greenwald. glenn, going back to whate i said in the angle, i'm sure you're not surprised that newsweek sends this reporter. i have no idea who this guy is. mr. ketanji based denuke 20 minutes before they publish an article gets tries totr get n touch with me or fox. i getsh you know,ey she's disagreeing with mitt romney and tom cotton on the importance of these midflight it's pretty obvious why escalation comes with risks and it's important to note that and and actuallyan weigh the benefits and the risks before youation embark on it. yeah, as you said, this is02 journalism in twentyre twenty two . there are no standards. there are no ethics. a lot of their readers who they write for or want them to lie to them or about their enemiese as long as it advances the cause. i think the more interestingn question is the fact that as you also pointed to, there is very little debate over something this cataclysmic potentially in the us congress . i haven'tthth seen the two parts united in lockstep to t thi

here now glenn greenwald pulitzer price winning journalist whose work can be found on sub stack.n it's nice they've acknowledged it is a story however was there any real mea culpas on the part of any of these sew-called journalists who were so quick to dismiss this. >> no, there's been none and remember they didn't just dismiss the story they peddled an outright lie that came from dozens of former intelligence officials that this material was russian disinformation, meaning two things. one, it came from russia, and two, the e-mails are forged. they asserted it over and over. i can show you a hundred clips from cnn and nbc and liberal digital outlets saying this lie over and over. the evidence was overwhelming from start that this material was authentic. a politico reporter published a book eight months ago with ample evidence concluding that it was true. the new york times ten days ago said they authenticated it, the, wa ton post today said the same thing that the materials are authentic. laura not one of the outlets that spread that lie that this material in the weeks before the

here now glenn greenwald, pulitzer prizeug winning journalist whose work can be found on substory nowenn, it's nice that kind of referenced it and acknowledge it is a story. however, was there any real media culpas on the part of any of these so-called journalists who are so quick to dismiss this ? no, there's been none.re and remember, they didn't just dismiss the story. they peddled an outright lie the that came from dozens off former intelligence officialse that this material was russian disinformation, meaning two things. one , it came fromo, russiaed and to the emails are forged. they asserted it over and over . i can show you a a hundred clips from cnn and nbc and from live liberal digital outlets saying fly over and over .de the evidence was overwhelming from the start o that this material was authentic. a politico reporter published a book eight months ago with ample evidence concluding that it was true . the newtr times 10 days ago said they authenticated that the washington post today said the same thing that these materials are authentic. laura , nottic. o one the outles th