the going rate to hack into somebody ooet's gmail account, $129. for corporate e-mails, they can be hacked for $500 or less. if you want to hack into an i.p. address, it's around $100. i'm sure the fbi can do it cheaper. this is the going rate. director comey, are you implying in that statement that the private e-mail servers of secretary clinton were perhaps less secure than a gmail account that is used for free by a billion people around this planet? >> yes. i'm not looking to pick on gmail. their security is actually pretty good. the weakness is in the individual users. yes, gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> i'd like to ask you, what kind of judgment. we talked a lot about judgment today, does this decision to potentially expose to hackers classified information on e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words? what does that suggest to you? what type of judgment does that suggest to you? >> it suggests the kind of carelessness

>> yes, and i'm not looking to pick on gmail. their security is pretty good. the weakness is in the individual users but, yes, gmail has full time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> i'd like to ask you, what kind of judgment -- we talked about judgment today. does this decision to potentially expose to hackers classified information on e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words. what does that suggest to you? what type of judgment does that snugt. >> it suggests the kind of carelessness that i talked about. in. >> in august of last year secretary clinton was asked by ed henry of fox news whether she wiped her entire server, meaning she did delete all her e-mails. her response "you mean with a cloth?" march of 2015 during a press conference secretary clinton assured us her private e-mail server was secure saying "the server was on private property guarded by the secret service." now this would be laughable if it wasn't so serious. i know, you know, my constituen

gmail has full- time security staff and thinks about p patch anything logging and protecting the system. in the way that that was not the case here. >> what kind of judgment today, does the decision to potentially expose to hackers on classified e-mail service on less secure gmail. what type of judgment does that to you? >> it suggests. careless i talked about p. >> secretary clinton was asked by ed henry on fox news if she cleaned the servers and she said you mean with a cloth? during a press conference secretary clinton assured the private server was secure and it was guarded by the secret service on private property. it would be laughable if it was not so serious. you know and i know. and people in iowa know you don't need to be a cat burglar to break in an e-mail or a cloth to wipe one. one would think a former senator and former secretary of state would know that as well. would you agree with that statement? >> you would think, though as i said before, one of the thingses i learned in the case the secretary may not be as sophisticated as people would assume and i would assume the s

the going rate to hack into somebody's gmail account, $129. for corporate e-mails, they can be hacked for $500 or less. if you want to hack into an ip address, it's around 100. this is the going rate. director comey, are you implying in that statement that the private e-mail servers of secretary clinton's were perhaps less secure than a gmail account that is used for free by a million people around this planet? >> yes. and i'm not looking to pick on gmail. the weakness is individual users. but, yes, gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> what kind of judgment -- we talked a lot about judgment today -- does this potentially expose to hackers classified information on e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words, what type of judgment does that suggest to you? >> it suggests the kind of carelessness i talked about. >> secretary clinton was asked by fox news whether she had wiped her entire server. her response, you mean with a cloth

the going rate to hack into somebody's gmail account, $129. for corporate e-mails, they can be hacked for $500 or less. if you want to hack into an ip address, it's around 100. this is the going rate. director comey, are you implying in that statement that the private e-mail servers of secretary clinton's were perhaps less secure than a gmail account that is used for free by a million people around this planet? >> yes. and i'm not looking to pick on gmail. the weakness is individual users. but, yes, gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> what kind of judgment -- we talked a lot about judgment today -- does this potentially expose to hackers classified information on e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words, what type of judgment does that suggest to you? >> it suggests the kind of carelessness i talked about. >> secretary clinton was asked by fox news whether she had wiped her entire server. her response, you mean with a cloth

the going rate to hack into somebody's gmail account, $129. for corporate e-mails, they can be hacked for $500 or less. if you want to hack into an ip address, it's around 100. this is the going rate. director comey, are you implying in that statement that the private e-mail servers of secretary clinton's were perhaps less secure than a gmail account that is used for free by a million people around this planet? >> yes. and i'm not looking to pick on gmail. the weakness is individual users. but, yes, gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> what kind of judgment -- we talked a lot about judgment today -- does this potentially expose to hackers classified information on e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words, what type of judgment does that suggest to you? >> it suggests the kind of carelessness i talked about. >> secretary clinton was asked by fox news whether she had wiped her entire server. her response, you mean with a cloth

they used what they said they were going to use which is the google idea of the gmail. >> they couldve access to. >> they are using a code from another thing they developed which is an adult multiplayer game. they'll use a lot of locations so a trainer club is the places they are not should be. strip clubs, churches, cemeteries. the national holocaust museum is trying to get them out because people are coming into capture pokimon and the holocaust museum. >> some of this video in central part. people walking around bumping into each other. >> last night with there was a robbery in and -- antelope park and also in missouri reports of robberies. >> they look for a pokimon trainer club where it is off the beaten path and they wait for people to show up. >> and we also want to talk about amazon prime. maybe not as much buzz but >> amazon prime is bigger than black friday for them. but here is the glitch, as you would add things to your cart, it would say add to cart failed which was resulting in the twitter handle. >> so i am clicking away. they're losing money. >> you try to add somethi

and i'm not looking to pick on gmail. their security is actually pretty good.he weakness is in the individual users. but, yes. gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> i would like to ask you what type of judgment -- we're talking a lot about judgment today. the decision to potentially expose to hackers to classified information on a e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words. what does that suggest to you? what type of judgment does that suggest? >> it suggests the kind of carelessness that i talked about. >> august of last year, secretary of clinton was asked by ed henry on fox news whether she had wiped her entire server, meaning did she delete all the e-mails on the server. her response? you mean with a cloth? march of 2015 during a press conference secretary clinton assured us her private e-mail was secure. saying the server was on private property guarded by the secret service. now, this would be laughable if it wasn't so serious. i know, you

the inspector said that wasn't so, not even as secure as gmail.e also says a number of e-mails weren't turned on over, undermining secretary clinton's claims of transparent similar when we think about trusting a president, there are two important qualities to look for in donald trump and hillary clinton: how will they behave when no one is looking, and will they be truthful when everyone is looking, as the state department inspector general found, the hillary clinton's server was set up outside the spirit and letter of the law and her answers after it was disclosed have not stood the test of examination. so on those two fronts, voters will have a lot that has been left unresolved. >> dubois: john dickerson, jan crawford tonight in washington, thank you very much. tonight a pentagon official is under investigation after pulling a gun on some young men outside his home. one of the men recorded the incident on his phone. david martin takes a look. >> reporter: the man pointing a gun is a senior navy official. >> get in the car. >> you're pointing a g

more porous than gmail?his is my independent investigation after five seconds talking to her saturday night? how could that be considered so thorough? >> after listening to my friends at the table, i concluded this. if you didn't like hillary clinton before, you are with wishing that her campaign would be undercut by the fbi. you still think she's guilty. for most democrats who didn't really care about this anyway and for independent voters who will decide the election -- >> no, next segment, juan, you will find out why you are wrong. >> great for donald trump. he gets to run across crooked hillary instead of biden. >>> house speaker paul ryan goes on the "kelley file" tonight. catch that exclusive at 9:00 pm eastern. greg is on the gift he thinks the fbi gave to the republican party today. >>> that weird screeching sound you hear that makes your ears bleed is hillary breathing a sigh of relief. she's not headed to jail. but now her party is in prison. comey's statement left more stains than on a baby's behi

>> yes, i'm not looking to pick on gmail, their security is good.ividual users, but, yes, gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> what we heard consistently from democrats on that oversight committee is that this was simply political circus. >> today's hearing is political theater. there's not even the pretense of trying to get at the truth. this is a desperate attempt under a -- an extraordinary set of circumstances and emergency hearing. i don't know what the emergency is. >> reporter: based on the statement from the attorney general the e-mail matter is closed. now what we anticipate is a second e-mail investigation will begin after this congressional referral, shep. >> thank you. secretary clinton's campaign has been closely watching and responding to the hearings. team fox coverage continues. jen griffin is live in. so florida no public estimates from hillary clinton put certainly from her campaign. >> no public statements from -- in fact, hill

because she was not using a government account, or even a commercial account like gmail, there was no archiving of her e-mail. so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on her system in 2014 when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the state. it could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails that we recovered were among those deleted by her lawyers. when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in 2014. lawyers doing the sorting for secretary clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails as we did. instead, they relied on header information and they used search terms to try to find work-related e-mails among the 60,000 remaining on her system in 2014. it is highly likely that their search missed some work-related e-mails and we found them later in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server. it is also likely that there were other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to the state and we did not find elsewhere and that are now gone. because they deleted all e-mails they did n

not just substandard by -- >> can you believe substandard by gmail. >> i feel so great about my gmail now. >> for a long time the phrase when she was using a home brewed server. this poor president of the united states. comey said yesterday it was kind of a home brewed server. i want to come back to the last political point you made. could you imagine what a jeb bush campaign a ted cruz campaign would have done with this. what were you leading there? >> what i was leading to is -- >> failure on the trump campaign. >> the failing of the trump campaign to have people out on tv, like the jeb team would have had four former attorney generals going out and they would have lacerated different parts of hillary clinton's campaign. you had donald trump and, yes, he was more effective than usual. but when you don't have people that go out and speak for you and you don't have a campaign operation, you have moments like this that you don't exploit. it's just like she's being interviewed on saturday morning, the fbi. that the jeb bush team or any other -- >> cut an ad. >> right. instead, they're t

because she was not using a government account or even a commercial account like gmail, there was no archiving at all of her e-mails. it's not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on secretary clinton's system in 2014 when she produced those 30,000-some e-mails to state. it could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails that we've recovered were among those deleted as personal by her lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in late 2014. the lawyers doing the sorting for secretary clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails as we did for those available to us. instead, they relierd on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on hir system at the end of 2014. it's highly likely that their search missed some work-related e-mails and we later found them. for example, in the mail boxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server. it's also likely that there are other work-related e-mails they did

if you want something to be private, keep it in gmail. it is fully encrypted and difficult to break in. we know this because everyone is complaining. happen rose: what would then is the fbi director came and said that we know this person is suspected of something and we think there is an exchange of information through gmail. please give us access. eric schmidt: america has a great law. it is called a legal proceeding. the front door. terrorism is a horrific thing. the fbi director would not call us. to thisld go three-judge panel and the panel would order us to give that information and we would give it. charlie rose: most of the time they have. than 50,000: less 40 -- it is a relatively rare event. now,ie rose: 10 years from the world will be dramatically different because of what we are doing? eric schmidt: think about the information that you have now that you did not have a decade ago. think about the company's that we talked about today that didn't exist 10 years ago. borrow one,ar-old, and watch this 10-year-old manipulate his or h

we think there is an exchange of information through gmail. please give us access. schmidt: america has the fisa court. that is a legal proceeding. all this terrorism is a horrific thing. the democracies have legal proceedings to deal with it. the fbi director without cause. he would go to the three-judge panel and they would give the information just like that. less than 50,000 times per year for access and we have billions of users. so it is a relatively rare event and that is for all national security matters. charlie rose: 10 years from now the world will be dramatically different because of what we do.

but just think of some of the things james comey said that her servers were not as secure as gmail system and used this system while she was in the countries of sophisticated adversaries. if you were a trainee for an investment bank and you were using your gmail to express and exchange information about your company, you would be shown to the sidewalk immediately. and i think donald trump had a good point. anybody who did these things should never be allowed to handle classified information again. it would happen to any other person, but she's running for the presidency. melissa: senator bayh, it has to do with the nature of this particular case and who's involved. >> well, context is everything, and again, she made a mistake, she admitted that. no criminal intent, as you observed previously. it's up for the american public to decide. there was no indictment, it won't affect her detractors, they'll be equally unhappy. for the 4 to 5% of the american public, they'll be focused on middle class issues, job growth, wage growth, college affordability, those kinds of things. by then, this will

if she had used gmail the servers would be much more secure. she said i did not send classified information. then she said i didn't knowingly send classified information. now she said i don't believe i sent classified information. lady, you sent and received classified information. you also withheld thousands of emails. how can you possibly say, when they found thousands of your emails that you didn't turn over, how could you possibly say you turned over everything. melissa: at same time, judge, it is over. she got away with it. it is over, right? >> may or may not be. looking whether or not she committed perjury in front ever congress. harris: did you think she did? >> it is really close. harris: what about your courtroom? >> i would have look over what her statements were and what were -- kennedy: chichi perjured herself. >> what i want to hear from comey, documents were wiped clean and could not be retrieved. why is she wiping server, because she doesn't want people to read wedding plans for chelsea? there is something else. why was the tech

the system wasn't as secure as gmail. he said a number of work e-mails were not turned over, undermining clinton's transparency. trusting a president there are two qualities to look for in donald trump, and hillary clinton. how will they behave when no one is looking? will they be truthful when everyone is looking. as the the state department inspector general found, hillary clinton's server was set up outside the spirit and letter of the law. her answers after it was disclosed have not stood the test of examination. on those two fronts, voters will have a lot that has been left unresolved. >> john dickerson, jan crawford in washington. thank you verych mu. >> the "cbs overnight news" will be right back. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tonight a pentagon official is under investigation after pulling a gun on some young men outside his home. one of the men recorded the incident on his phone. david martin takes a look. >> reporter: the man pointing the gun is a senior navy official. >> get in the car. >> you're pointing a gun at my friend. this i

because gmail, as he pointed out, they have an entire security staff. they worry about their people, their customers, and how -- whether they can be -- their e-mails can be read by untoward sources. her independent operation was less secure than just a regular g mails account which struck me as quite startling. it was news to me. >> hillary, as we were staying on these pictures here, this is a packed house. charlotte, north carolina. let's talk about the politics of north carolina and why this is also significant, why they're there. why know that obama won the state in '08. he lost it to romney in 2012. people have talked about this sort of conservative resurgence in the state of north carolina though. in some of my reading as a result of hb-2, the discriminatory transgender bill about to become law, democrats are hoping the uproar over that will get voters to the polls in november. why is north carolina so important? >> well, north carolina's been a swing state in the last three or four presidential elections, and as you said, president obama carried i

because she was not using a government account, or even a commercial account like gmail, there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it's not surprising we discovered e-mails that were not on secretary clinton's system in 2014 when she produced those 30,000-some e-mails to the state. it could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails that we have recovered were among those deleted as personal by her lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in late 2014. lawyers doing the sorting for secretary clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us. instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on her system at the end of 2014. it's highly likely that their search missed some work-related e-mails and that we later found them. for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server. it's also likely there are other work-related e-mails they did n

gmail has full-time security. they think about patching and logging and protecting systems and logging of protecting systems in a way that was not the case here. judgment doesf this decision potentially expose to hackers classified information on an e-mail service less secure than gmail? it suggests the carelessness i talked about. secretary clinton was asked if she had wiped her entire server, maybe she did and leave all the -- delete all her e-mails.her response , with a cloth? samba server was on private property guarded by circuit service. -- secret service. this would be laughable if this was not so serious. you don't need to be a cat burglar to hack into an e-mail server you don't need a cloth to wipe a server clean. one would think that a former united states senator, one would think that a former secretary of state know this as well. would you agree with this statement? director comey: you would think, as i said before, the secretary may not have been as sophisticated as people assume. , i would assume the

the system wasn't as secure as gmail. e-mails were not turned over, undermining clinton's transparency. trusting a president there are two qualities to look for in donald trump, and hillary clinton. how will they behave when no one is looking? will they be truthful when everyone is looking. as the the state department inspector general found, hillary clinton's server was set up outside the spirit and letter of the law. her answers after it was disclosed have not stood the test of examination. on those two fronts, voters will have a lot that has been left unresolved. >> john dickerson, jan crawford in washington. thank you verych mu. >> the "cbs overnight news" will be right back. ♪

the going rate to hack into somebody's gmail account, $129. for corporate e-mails, they can be hacked for $500 or less. if you want to hack into an ip address, it's around $100. i'm sure the fbi could probably do it cheaper. this is the going rate. director comey, are you implying in that statement that the private e-mail servers of secretary clinton's were perhaps less secure than a gmail account that is used for free by a billion people around this planet? >> yes. and i'm not looking to pick on gmail. their security is actually pretty good. the weakness is individual users. but, yes, gmail has full-time security staff and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here. >> i would like to ask you, what kind of judgment -- we talk a lot about judgment today -- does the decision to potentially expose to hackers classified information on e-mail service that's less secure than gmail, your words, what does that suggest to you? what type of judgment does that suggest to you? >> it suggests the kin

or gmail account, could actually be more secure than what she used. what was your reaction when you heard that? >> absolutely. this is about her own server. you're supposed to have somebody running it. if you're using a commercial e-mail device, then you have hundreds of millions of dollars providing security, you have probably thousands of people involved in security for that company. this was someone -- and director comey didn't even realize how many people are protecting it. he basically said not very many. and to me, this is not about political theater. this is about how do we make sure that the senior executive of our national intelligence infrastructure didn't know the difference between unclassified and classified information? what people need to realize is that even though the informs may not have been marked classified, the information itself is classified. and she should have known better. >> let me ask you about that. because you worked as a cia intelligence officer behind the scenes overseas for us. was the expectation that you as a cia of

secret special access information on a private server in her basement that had less security than gmail, in which case she's not qualified to be president of the united states. >> austin, can you take on that last point? >> well, i appreciate you having me back. i continue to think why you want legal insight from a guy with an economics ph.d. is beyond me. i doubt it's for my good looks either. >> this isn't about legal insight. this is about -- mark put it perfectly. either she had the intent, or she's too incompetent you know, to be president. that's his position. >> well, that is his position. i think what you saw from mark there is reflective of what you're seeing from some of the republicans on these committees what you may hear from the congressmen themselves as they come later, which is a tendency to dramatically overreach and overstate what the matters are. so if you looked at the testimony today, it's clear the lines you chose were picked -- i'm not going to say cherry picked, but they were picked to present an argument. one of the arguments about the level of sophistication th

because she was not using a government account or even a commercial account like gmail, there was no archiving at all of her emails so it's not surprising we discovered emails that were not on secretary clinton's system in 2014 when she produced so those 30,000 some emails. it could also be that some of the additional work related emails that we recovered were among those deleted as personal by her lawyers when they were viewed and sorted her emails for production in late 2014. the lawyers doing the sorting for secretary clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all her emails as we did for those available to us . instead, they relied on header information and use search terms defined all work-related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on her system at the end of 2014. it's highly likely that their search missed some work-related emails and that we later found them. for example, in the mailboxes of otherofficials or in the slack space of the server . it's also likely that there are other work-related emails they did not produce at state an

those registered with the google accounts no longer grant the company access to gmail, photos and documents. >>> at least two deaths are being blamed on flooding in northern wisconsin, and it's washed out sections of roads and bridges. a state of emergency has been declared in eight counties. rivers and creeks are expected to rise over the next two days. how are we looking with turning the corner here on this and looking ahead to the weekend? >> trying to get over the hump in many ways. we do have some severe storms to get over that hump in the midwest. they are rocking and rolling over portions of kansas this morning. that whole area from chicago west today will be under the gun for some severe weather. meanwhile, where it's not raining or pouring it's been to dry. we have red flag warnings across many portions of the west. relative humidity between 10 and 15%. burning campfires not advised. even a cigarette has to be disposed of carefully. meanwhile we're looking at temperatures in the 80s across the east coast. the heat will continue to expand. meanwhile, the west is best. we're looking

in had departments of the united states government, or even with a commercial e-mail service like gmail. i think it's also important to say something about the marking of classified information. only a very small number of the e-mails here containing classified information bore markings that indicated the presence of classified information. but even if information is not marked "classified" in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it. and while not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the state department in general and with respect to the use of unclassified systems in particular was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information that's found elsewhere in the u.s. government. with respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that secretary clinton's personal e-mail domain in its various configurations since 2009 was hacked successfully. but given the nature of the system and of the actors potent

agencies and departments of the united states government or even with a commercial e-mail service like gmail. to say something about the marking of classified information. of thevery small number e-mails here containing classified information indicating the presence of classified information. but even if information is not marked classified, the disturbance should know that the is classified and they are obligated to protect it. thatso developed evidence the security culture of the state department in general and with respect to the use of unclassified systems in particular was generally lacking in the kind of care over classified information that is elsewhere in the u.s. government. with respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that her e-mail domain since 2009figuration was hacked successfully. given the nature of this and the actors potentially involved, we assess we would be unlikely to see such evidence. we do assess that hostile acts gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom secretary clinton was in reg

agencies and departments of the united states government or even with a commercial e-mail service like gmail. it's also important to say something about the marking of classified information. only a very small number of the e-mails here containing classified information were markings that indicated the presence of classified information. but even if information is not marked classified in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified, are still obligated to protect it. although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. to the contrary. those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. but that's not what we're deciding now. >> despite the very tough criticism from comey, hillary clinton did not respond before the cameras yesterday. instead her campaign issued a statement. qu

those registered with their google accounts no longer automatically grant the company access to gmail, photos and documents. >>> let's get down to business with cnbc's landon dowdy. >> good wednesday morning. the markets will try to build on the new lofty highs today. the dow joining the s&p 500 in closing at a record level on tuesday. its first record in more than a year. and stocks were boosted by a rally in oil prices, and strong earnings from aluminum giant alcoa. look for data today on import prices. nissan plans to launch a new minivan next month that can automatically control steering, acceleration, and braking on the highway. the automaker's pilot pro technology also offers features such as lane centering and distance monitoring. nissan will launch vehicles that can change lanes by themselves in 2018. and amazon's prime day featured a little buzz but also little drama. amazon says more than 22,000 cds were sold in just the first eight hours alone. and sales were in line with last year. prime customers are key to amazon as they tend to spend more $1200 a year on average versus

i think he said even a basic free gmail account have better security. and she did that for the purpose of preventing access to those e-mails. as result of this, she exp osed top-secret information to foreign that actors, the e-mails could be of the sort them up with national security at risk. we had testimony the got you to acknowledge that that might even put agents overseas at risk. director comey: i don't know if i agree with that, but still important. representative: to get all of until after she left the state department. after it finally came to light, she ordered the destruction of evidence, evidence that was destroyed so thoroughly that you folks cannot do an adequate recovery. yet she receives no criminal penalty. so i guess this is my question to you, are we to assume as we sit here today that the next president of the united states does the exact same thing, sets up a private e-mail service for the purpose of concealing information from the public or anybody, that the result is that that potentially exposes national security level information

. >> reporter: comey setd server in her home in new york state was actually less secure than gmail. >ssible that hostile actors gained access to secretary clinton's personal e-mail account. >> reporter: then there was this often repeated clinton claim. >> i turned over everything that i could imagine. >> when in fact, comey missed quite a few. >> the fbi also discovered several thousand work related e-mails that were not among the group of 30,000 e-mails returned by secretary clinton. >> reporter: clinton has the staunchly defended her use of the private, unsecure e-mail server. on face the nation earlier this year she insisted it was absolutely permitted. it turned out to be a mistake. >>> on the campaign trail, presumptive republican donald trump bashed clinton's judgment also took aimt president obama. here's major garrett. >> reporter: donald trump said the system is rigged to his mind the events of the last few days proved it in big bold letters from former president clinton's tarmac meeting with the attorney general to the lack of criminal charges against hillary clinton for mis

because she was not using a government account or a commercial account like gmail, it's no surprise wenot on her system in 2014 when she produced 30,000 e-mails to state. it could also be that some of the additional work related e-mails we've recovered were among those deletes as personal by her lawyers when they reviewed and sorted the e-mails for production in 2014. the lawyers doing the sorting for secretary clinton did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails as we did. instead they relied on header information and they used search terms to try to find all work related e-mails among the reportedly among 60,000 remaining on her system at the ends of 2014. it's highly likely that their search missed some work related e-mails and that we later found them, for example in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server. it's also likely that there are other work related e-mails they did not produce to state and that we did not find elsewhere and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not produce to state and the lawyers then cleaned

the privacy issue was initially when you signed up, the app got a lot of your google or gmail accountmation. they have released an update that they say fixes it, but given your experience, how serious do you think this issue is? guest: i think is serious when it includes children. pokemon is making mobile gaming accessible for very young children at to you are seeing out in the street that are not necessarily engaging with their parents for permission. this brings into question the children's online protection act concerns and i think that whether it was a mistake or not on behalf of of niantic, it needs to be remedied quickly. emily: what about safety and security issues? and maybe even legal issues. guest: i think it calls into legal questions about possession, trespassing. do you own what is on your phone? people are clambering over fences to get access to certain pokemon's. does it raise questions about indemnification? questions like that come up as well. emily: you are very deep into this, you own equipment and play a lot of games. how it serious do you think these issues are? g

because she was not using a government account, or even a commercial account by gmail, there was no archivingf her emails. it's not surprising that we discovered emails that were not on secretary clinton system in 2014 when she produced those 30,000 emails to state. it could also be that some of the additional work-related emails that we have recovered were among those deleted as personal by her lawyers when they reviewed and stored her emails for production in late 2014. the lawyers doing is working for secretary clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails as we did for those available to us. instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work- related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on her system at the end of 2014. it is highly likely that their search missed some work-related emails and that we later found them, --. for example, we could've found in the slack space of the server or email of other officials. is also likely that there were other work related emails that they did not produce

because she was not using a government account or even a commercial account like gmail, there was norchiving at all of her emails. so it's not surprising that we discovered emails that were not on secretary clinton's system in 2014 when she produced those 30,000-some emails to state. it could also be that some of the additional work related emails that we recovered from among those deleted as personal by her lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her emails for production in late 2014. the lawyers doing the sorting for secretary clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails as we did for those available to us. instead, they relied on header information and they used search terms to try to find all work related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on her system tend of 2014. it's highly likely their search missed some work related emails and we later found them. for example, in the mailboxes of other officials, or in the slack space of a server. it's also likely that there are other work related emails that they did not produce t

multiple servers in that house that had no security staffers to back it up, even gmail.eeing here is unprecedented activity, outlining the case, not sure if -- that loretta lynch did meet -- ashley: ask about the timing. >> make one final point, what we need to discuss is whether an aid to hillary clinton will be brought up on charges. >> we have to step back and look at the reality of this event. i would have to go through the history books but i am pretty certain we never had a cabinet level indictment in which the fbi director doesn't quietly send the file to the ag and the ag makes a determination. in the history of the republic to have the fbi director, that is doj, didn't know what was going to happen. that tells you -- ashley: that is what one source claims, had no idea what he was going to say. >> that indicates the significance, the press conference without telling the agency where he was going. >> he left for lockheed martin, very well respected. he led the prosecution of martha stewart lying to an fbi agent so clearly for him to make the extraordinary move to

we think there is an exchange of information through gmail. please give us access. schmidt: america has the fisa court. that is a legal proceeding. all this terrorism is a horrific thing. the democracies have legal proceedings to deal with it. the fbi director without cause. he would go to the three-judge panel and they would give the information just like that. less than 50,000 times per year for access and we have billions of users. so it is a relatively rare event and that is for all national security matters. charlie rose: 10 years from now the world will be dramatically different because of what we do. schmidt: thing about the information you have now you didn't have a decade ago. the companies that we talked about today that didn't exist. and watchyear-old this 10-year-old manipulate his or her ipad or iphone. you will see the future. it is a good future. evidence is that people are getting smarter not dumber. educational achievement is getting stronger. a lot of that is connected to the interconnectedness of all of us. charlie rose: why is your 13-year-old wo

found in agencies and departments of the united states government or a commercial email service like gmails also important to say something about the marking of classified information. only a small number of emails here containing classified information or markings indicated the presence of classified information. even if class of it - even if not marked classified in the email participants who know or should know the subject matters classified are still obligated to protect it. while not the focus of the investigation we also developed evidence the security culture of the state department in general and with respect to the use of unclassified systems in particular was generally lacking in care for classified information found elsewhere in the us government. with respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors we did not find direct evidence that secretary clinton's personal email domain in its varied configurations since 2009 was hacked successfully but given the nature of the system and the actors potentially involved we assess we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.

allows the company to get full access of users google account and personal information that includes gmailompany who created the game so that only verifies the user's id and address . google does confirm however that no other information is obtained . google says it's currently working to fix this problem. >>> all-star game has come and gone and nothing happened. tonight tony glenn beautiful facility petco park and chris bryant and all starting infield for the cubs. boom there goes 1-0. the american league one the last three games coming into this all-star contest and johnny pitches a scoreless first inning comes out for a second inning and he shouldn't have. there goes eric cause more on his way to mvp the tide at one cueto of course with kansas city last year gave up one to osborne and another here to salvador perez. so too old teammate catch up with cueto. three runs and that was it . david ortiz the one sentimental moment playing in his tenth and final all-star game or so he says facing josi fernandez to the marlins. said he was in a grew one to ortiz as we can hit when out. he walked

it grants the game full access to your profile, gmail, contacts, just about everything in your phone. a few minutes ago we learned google will automatically reduce pokemon go's permission to only meet the basic data. you will not need to do anything if you sign on with google. the app maker said that they have not accessed any information beyond user i.d. and password. >> if you own a small s.u.v. your headlights may not work as well as you think after 21 small s.u.v.s were test asked not one got the "highest," rating of "good." and two-thirds were rated poor. only four of them got "acceptable." that included the ford escape, honda crk and hyundai tucson. the difference can various even by suvs made by the same manufacturer. >> they are both made by honda but the crv on left and giving drastically different visibility. low beams should reach 340' on a straight road and the worst only reached half the distance. so expect automakers to upgrade with a list of all of the vehicles tested on our website. >> south bay parentses want to get the word out on what they say is a danger at stanfor

fact that when you're looking at an unsecured system that for example was less secure than google gmail and the fact that she put our security at risk that brings up substantial questions. we were all in shock. no reasonable prosecutor would bring up this case. there is plenty of reasonable prosecutor spirit because she did not take care of the classified information appropriately. and those are the questions that need to be answered. and i think that went hillary clinton goes off up and says this is a simple mistake you have to wonder it was their was there preferential treatment. that's what we need to get to the bottom of. charles: any federal employee peered i was in the air force and worked for sack and sac and i saw a lot of people go to prison for interesting things a lot less agree than this. and it is baffling that there wasn't special preferential treatment here. >> this administration has investigated and prosecuted more people for leaking classified information what are the messages. i'm in the navy reserve, used to be in the diplomatic area what message does it send people