too often, goboc liaisons to the program are cheerleaders who do not represent the public and conduct little critical review. they absorb passive information without looking behind it. they have not looked into the rate of complainant interviews by program investigators or why that rate of interview is not disclosed. none have examined whether referring complaints back to the kpuzed departments enables cover ups oregon jeopardizes whistle blowers. they haven't investigated why some complaints take over six months to investigate. we don't know why political interference, stone walling or r is why it happens. all we're told is complexity is why long delays occur. my december 2016 complaint about the human services agency took 18 months to investigate. all i was told was that the case is closed, appropriate action taken. what does that mean? in sum, i agree with mr. dradler that this program is too secretive and it's too city hall centric to adequately serve the public interest and whistle blowers. as for the citizens audit review board, why not recommend an audit of the ethics commissio