managed to stand to the extent that google does but on the other hand would it be wonderful if a goebelmanaged in some way to arrange some kind of met the data in the way that they have and that is what i would like to to come together. the question on medicaid i'm going to pass over quickly that point you all to a paper mccaul record for the chronicle higher education, jeffrey numbered about google's as a meta data train wreck. he pulled up series after a series of things that google had gotten along. what is interesting and i will mention later he got qualified for that not so much by historians would very much wetter ian's the people who think him for it when actually the people that dan has mentioned both dan and john went to google and thanked jeff for the fact the of these millions of meta data errors in the database. so they took it seriously. one of the things they got from? this identification by title i will refer to one of those later. masses of the side of the kitchen by author with henry james writing madam boveri, masses of acidification by pacification with thomas brown's

the dead he says ralph, i knew there was under but he didn't know it was like that and in that per goebel in black churches and national cathedral king says god doesn't like the way his children are being treated. and he makes america into the parable of mass arrests and says the rich man did not go to hell because he was rich but because he wouldn't recognize the poor man. so there was this angry condemnatory part of king. jeremiah. jeremiah. there is a reason for that. i think there are differences between king and wright but we have sanitized king and lost track how much he was reviled in the years. "the washington post" and "the new york times" condemned his antivietnam speech at riverside and basically said almost that it was treason and king thus quote that famous line of black poetry. america was never america to me. now he gets beyond that always that is the king cullom and that he was tough-minded enough not to give an just to the emotion but to hold out the better way. so king was pretty much rafah bin this time and we've taken that all out and creating st. martin, and it is why

looks like a grant of almost unlimited authority to the treasury and it even says no court shall be goebel to oversee this as if there were a tactical mistake in the blood in their face and i think it does reflect a bit of paulson's inexperience in dealing with congress. i think that he was used to doing deals, getting things done. >> host: and this was his opening offer. >> guest: didn't play well and i did get hurt them because you still here today they said they were going to by the toxic acids and they didn't. why didn't they do it? i can imagine other treasury secretaries who might have handled that with somewhat more agility and about themselves less trouble. >> host: what they did do is buy shares in the bank's and the banks didn't all want to go along with this actually. they had to persuade them to take it. why was that? >> guest: well, i think one of the things interesting here goes to the lehman were the aig thing is that it turns out that it doesn't really matter exactly what your legal powers are. if it is a begin of crisis and the chairmen of the fertile reserve and treasury