today the majority of traffic that goes to google ends up either terminating on google are going to google secondary pages. so it stays on google.com and winds up going to some type of second page inside their walled garden. that was not always the case. if you rewind to 2004 when google went public, larry page, google's co-founder, was quoted in these quotes are included in their s1 documents, when they filed for an ipo with the fec, he is quoted as saying, at google we want to get you onto google and out into the web as quickly as possible. and, in fact, that is the entire point. today, not only is that not true, but google is steering all of this traffic to itself. and therefore in a sense the de-oxygenating the entire worldwide web and stifling innovation, and harming consumers because they are net getting access to the best information from across the internet. host: my sense would be that a yelp would depend on google in many ways. luther: it is a codependency. when google started it had a dual pledge to consumers it was "come to google and you will never use altavista or yahoo! ever

today the majority of traffic that goes to google ends up either terminate on google or going to googleecond or pages, so it stays on google.com and winds up going to some type of secondary page inside their walled garden. that wasn't always the case. if you rewind the 2004, 15 or 16 years ago when google went public, larry page was quoted in these quotes that are actually included in their s-1 documents when they filed for ipo with the sec, he's quoted as saying at google want to get you onto google and out into the web as quickly as possible. in fact, that's the entire point. today, not only is that not true, but google is during all this traffic to itself and, therefore, in a sense the oxygenating the entire world wide web and stifling innovation and ultimately harming consumers because they're not getting access to the best information from across the limit. >> host: license would be a yelp would depend on google in many ways. >> guest: it's a codependency. when google started it at sort of a dual pledge to consumers. it was a come to google and you will never use altavista or yahoo

well that is part of it i mean part of it is that these 2 tech companies apple and google are saying hey we'll gather the information we'll have the data and then we'll pass it to you and that's in range in a lot of public health officials and and politicians because they say no no no you collect the data you give it all to us and we'll decide what to do with it and there right now there's a battle between essentially the private collection and storage of this information versus government collection and storage of the nation and i don't think governments like the idea of not being the ones in control of it but there's also a technical issue here that's very important in order for this app to work you essentially have to have your bluetooth on the entire day 24 hours a day and then when you're out and about that bluetooth is connecting to other devices that also have their bluetooth on what apple and google are saying is listen a lot of our users are going to get mad when their phone batteries are dead right away because they're walking around with their bluetooth on and running this

s available on smartphones through google play and the apple app store by searching portable t.v. as always talked about on youtube dot com slash boom bust r.t. will see you next time. you try to be linked with yeah you like. a a. 'd bad thing. to you they can show you the world so yes you do so you can call upon the local co-op are. clear on that just look up one. piece in all the shows all the stuff but don't take care of the song was faked fixing to force you to put stinky human body we know it's way more lepage a lot more see if we're more. or less stiff by your lights too much bucks if we can fit me perfectly good news of. the bank leading the police and. i know the answer is likely to shift she's just put up a little. yes. you are no offense but you no longer a young woman in fact you are one of the last living survivors of the nazi ellis asked i'm aware of it. all your life. and you can never forget the no auschwitz was really like to be inhaled because he would never believe it was a human ghetto to have as a copy of a course for 30 years of milk and be very bad at all see

you know by now google is used to facing lawsuits but what they may be facing very soon is. antitrust problems from the department of justice are keys natasha's sweet as more tech giant google is in a bit of hot water on top of several lawsuits already in the works the wall street journal is reporting both federal and state regulators are preparing to file antitrust lawsuits against google according to the report the claim stems from google abusing its control of online searches and advertising both in its profits while lessening the competition the wall street journal reporting the justice department has been investigating google for nearly a year and according to the report the justice department could bring a case forward as soon as this summer some state attorneys including general ken paxton will likely follow in filing a case turny general william barra telling the wall street journal back in march i'm hoping that we bring it to fruition early next summer and by fruition i mean decision time the company acknowledges the investigation saying they continue to engage with

do more the what they're willing to do right now the issue is simply this apple and google are saying we can use this contact tracing app to be able to monitor where people are not everyone has to opt in under this system you can choose to opt in and if you do that it would tell you essentially what the notification within 2 weeks whether you've been in contact with someone who had coronavirus but what it doesn't do is give you a pinpoint a location of exactly where you were it doesn't track your movements from place to place and that's what governments don't like what they want they're complaining about is that they're not getting enough from apple and google they want to be able to trace exactly where someone was what they were doing who they were around. what point they were at and where they went to next and where they went to next and so they're complaining but that they're not getting enough information and apple and google are essentially saying you want too much information and privacy laws and the desires of our customers is that they not be tracked everywhere they go that's

and apple do it because then google and apple. we're the ones who are storing the data right the problem is going to be this that when the government comes in and says hey we can use this for a much wider applications then coronavirus where does it go away at what point did those ups disappear or do they become embedded in the framework of every smartphone i think most people are smart enough to know that's where we're headed and that's why it's a problem either way the data is going somewhere we all know that nothing nothing is actually free especially when it comes to the data collecting apps cohost spend so on thank you for your time and analysis. sort of thing. tensions between the united states and china are on the rise while it's creating concern that it could be the start of a new cold war and it could eliminate progress already made on the u.s. china phase one trade deal artie's rachel blevins joins me now to discuss the details rachel what's the current state where we saw them sign the phase one trade deal just a few mont

yes so essentially it's important for people to understand 1st of all that google and apple together have tried to create or they say they're creating it will be released this month this contact tracing app that is separate from the contact tracing apps that are being developed by different governments around the world so in the u.k. they're not using the google apple version not to say as necessary a good or bad thing but they're not using it they're creating their own and the reason they're creating their own is because they along with countries like france and germany have decided that the google and the apple contact tracing app doesn't go far enough so that's one of the concerns here so essentially what these apps have in common is they use bluetooth technology you have an app on your phone someone else has it on their phone it uses essentially the bluetooth to be able to connect and to determine whether or not you come in contact with someone who has a coronavirus the problem is that under the google apple system it's entirely voluntary and like in the u.k. they don't necessari

for the risk, i see it is google.eeeen times by the european commission for violating their monopolization laws. it is called abusive dominance but it is the same as the u.s. monopolization laws. just because that conduct by google violated europe's laws doesn't mean it violates hours but it gets the regulators partway there. it could violate hours. they have a head start with google. looking at the findings of the european agencies, i would say google and then facebook. but for different reasons. with facebook i think they will be looking carefully at its strategy for its past acquisitions and whether those acquisitions have a legitimate business reason or whether the only reason to buy the company was to kill off or get in the way of threatened competition. taylor: some of this has come on advertising, the pricing power. google is a big leader in how much money they get from advertising. amazon the distant third, slowly becoming a player within the advertising market, is that a risk as well? probablyazon i think not

that under the google apple system it's entirely voluntary and like in the u.k. they don't necessarily want it to be voluntary they want to be able to track as many people as possible and to have data that's included in that that tells you the person's location it gives you information about who they are where they are and where and where they're headed to so there's way more information being given to the authorities than there is under the google apple version well we've discussed this before here on boom bust panda a few weeks ago where france was asking apple and google to take some settings and do some resetting of some of these apps so that they could they could actually continue with this at this tracking app but the n.h.s. granted privacy international early access to the app the researchers actually used an internal version of the app auditing pop form it's called exodus and privacy what did they actually find it yes so one of the things that they found was that apparently the u.k. version includes something called google firebase analytics and also micr

google showed up with project which provide internet total communication coverage. at this time i thought what is going on with tech industry, they're not just making calendars and apps, they are getting involved that's way outside of their admission in areas that used to be before responsible the of government. with diplomacy, counterterrori counterterrorism, defense, infrastructure building, citizen services and i thought there had to be a better way to talk about them than just tech. they seem to have a role to play in geopolitics. so the problem was the term nonstate actor had already evolved to be the bad guy. so i started studying where the turn happened. >> so someone think is mark zuckerberg as a terrorist. >> there some that think of tech companies as a bad guy. >> i looked into it and i did research and as recently as 2010 the dictionary of social science defined nonstate actors with examples like the un and nato. even then they were not considered terrorists. it was sometime around 2012 - 2013 that you saw the term being used in reference to al-qaeda and

non-essential businesses so essentially we had all of the tech rally and all of the good earnings from google facebook essentially all the fanks talk it basically let all the market back up and we are now just a wall toss away from all time high so basically even with the unemployment numbers the news wire was bad but apparently this is less that because last week's tally was the lowest since shortly after the clinton virus was declared a pandemic so many analysts believe that we have kind of cycled through the worst of the 4 shutdown but on the other camp i don't think it's true many think that the aftermath of the disaster is going to be the much bigger problem than the disaster itself it's going to be the rebuilding and the reopening and this is not going to be a very quick recovery but the market in of itself they're still up on optimism because we're doing less bad the entire good news is bad news and bad news is good news narrative is still intact well we are waiting on a report for more numbers to come out for the month of april tomorrow we'll see if that has any effect on the market b

and then google keeps the bad actors out? i think those arguments were made at a time when first of all surveillance capitalism was not yet prevalent. when there were more security issues as far as viruses and so forth. >> but those issues have gone down to be centralized. >> that yes in centralizing the security model, as we have the close the window open the door so we are more protected from viruses and even then is not protected but the fact of the matter is that to centralize the harm, the corruption of the systems that are centralize there is now corruption in the model that affects every single one of us is not just the corruption against shoshana zuboff but on the global system that can shift elections and transformed the sanctity of democratic elections. i think we are well past the argument for centralization and i also think from a technical point of view we have many more tools for treating security in a decentralized atmosphere then we had 20 years ago at the beginning of the story. so that is one thing. >>host:

it's not like google built gmail and, therefore, google is successful. there's this underlying culture that is in place inside the tech giants that have led them to be so dominant and thought it would be a shame if they kept that to themselves. there was never going to be a point in time with the tech giants would say here's our manual for being successful, go ahead, rest of the world, take notes and in-depth figuring out what we do well and beat us that we. they just were not going hand it over. from my perspective as as a journalist with background attached on labor relations, organizational culture i could find a way to write this down and then put together in the book and then give it to the rest of the common in way that would allow them to compete with the tech giants and bring it into a new form of working which i believe we all headed to in the tech giants just have a head start on. that was the idea. i found this thing going on inside these companies and my plan was to reveal it in the biggest way possible, the most impactful way possible in a w

budget ahead of what google characterized as a difficult second quarter. we did reach out to google for a response on this crackdown but we have not heard back. >>> this airline was slammed for charging passengers to socially distance, the revised middle c policy. >>> a special surprise for seniors who can't walk across the stage this year. >>> as if 2020 couldn't like cordless phones. - ( phone ringing ) - big button, and volume-enhanced phones. get details on this state program. visit right now or call during business hours. and accessoriesphones for your mobile phone. like this device to increase volume on your cell phone. - ( phone ringing ) - get details on this state program visit right now or call during business hours. >>> a live look were future flights on frontier airlines will look a little different. the coen to keep the middle seat open. the airline plan to charge travelers $39 to keep the middle seat next to them open. lawmakers lashed out at using the airline of trying to profit from the pandemic. frontiers ceo reversed the decision and said

we have google and let's get to deidre bosa with the details >> hey, melissa. an antitrust lawsuit against google could be coming as soon as this summer according to dow jones citing sources the report says that the department of justice and state attorneys general are well into planning for litigation. melissa, of course, we know that investigations were under way and they're focusing on google's online advertising business, but investors may have thought that the threat was not imminent given google's critical role in work from home and it's creating a contract tracing app with apple that's going to be deployed by health authorities so shares fell quite sharply in after-hours trade. lawsuits could threaten the largest business and it's digital advertising and the eu has taken the hardest stance finding them in anticompetitive practices. here the u.s., critics are calling for more than fines and sanctions and even a breakup of the company. one thing, melissa, that is not clear in the report whether the states attorneys general will file a complaint and the doj

that's a step that they are really preparing a case against google.nd the case will be, you know, some antitrust case. we don't know exactly what it will be. will it be over search engine, will it be they use the search engine to essentially manipulate searches to outfits that pay for advertising, whether it's something else, but they are -- but they are moving forward with something, meaning they, the justice department, under attorney general barr. now, here's the interesting thing, liz. again, i'm pretty sure my tweet moved the stock on this. it's a fairly big step. as you know, david boyce was outside counsel for the justice department in bringing a case against microsoft. that, you know, made him a huge name in legal circles. they won the case. the justice department forced microsoft to make changes. when you go that step to hire an outside litigator, a tough outside litigator, i heard the guys they hired are very tough, you are preparing for a case. but the interesting thing is, i think bill barr will have to sort of explain this and you know, h

if you think about the google assistant, how many divisions come together inside google to build the assistant? there's android, search, mail, youtube, music, maps. it can go on and on and on, and the reason why it worked is because all these divisions are allowed to talk to each other. inside apple if you want to speak to someone working on a different prompt, you both need to be disclosed and know the codeword, but you can't say the codeword, and that's why siri is garbage. again, it's culture. but the google assistant, you know, actually works pretty well. so all the credit to musk and jobs. they're done, they did good work with, they've done good work, but i don't think that they're the model for what future work and leadership looks like going forward. >> thanks so much, alex. and just to kind of bring this all together in a way, the continuous theme in this whole conversation based on everything you're saying is that it's so easy to think it's all about, like, the secret sauce technology that a company has or how they can -- [inaudible] with one killer product and that's just f

so google is amazing, people say google has this search function and they wrote a success where it's not been the case. nothing but. it's not -- they started out as a website. then they became a browser extension, the google tool bar which is something people would download and use, pop it on the browser and internet explorer and people type their searches in. that was 60% of google searches so wasn't people going to the website, it was peopling type neglect the browser extension. then they reinvented to an annual browser with chrome when they realize microsoft would screw them in internet explorer and re-invented into a mobile operating system with android and now the cinderellas a -- voice assistant. microsoft says hit refresh. come from a windows company to a cloud company, and apple has done it well in the past. they've gone from the manufacturer of the ipod and pretty successful line of desk top computer and now their bread and butter this he iphone. the lowest the da one mentality inside apple and i think they're kind of in trouble if there's another transformation. we'll fine

at the time what the thought was at google about search, whether or not this should be something thatok a heavier hand in identifying the problematic content, he said we don't censor anything, but we can be ranked, and that kind of content so it does not, first, were putting on the skills of little bit behind scenes and this comes up to the question of the fact that we don't necessarily have visibility into these actions so i think one of the things that makes these companies interesting from her citizens perspective is this, and it shows the ranking or not, we just see the result and hope that they're doing a good job. >> a reminder, all the programs you're seeing right now are available to watch in their entirety at booktv.org, just like the authors name or the book title in the search box at the top of the page. next inner author program on technology, joanne mcneil speaking a harbor bookstore in cambridge massachusetts, she argued the internet news has shifted from being individualistic, spontaneous and voluntary to be in data and advertising driven. >> a part of your wildflower,

google had its own product, google video. i was starting to understand the dynamics.e a few things i saw. the first was that people were uploading their video to share their story. at first we said, upload your video if you want. thousands of people around the world uploaded video of their families, of them, whatever they thought was interesting. that was not that surprising but the second part really surprised me, that other people wanted to see regular people's uploads. at the time, user generated content did not exist. really, a lot of people want to see it. we realized this was a new type of video and it would be successful. i thought it was really important that we work in that market. that is why in the end we acquired youtube. it seemed expensive at the time but it was clear to me that this would be a huge market for us. david: eventually, they said to you that you should be the ceo of youtube. that was how many years ago now? susan: six or seven. david: the company has grown a lot. explain to people who might not be that familiar with youtube, you can upload y

on another day, it's google.see that one or the other is better positioned during the pandemic? march.w add declines in facebook said that was stabilizing in april. is google or facebook in a better position here? david: the folks who are able to take creative, adept messaging -- that's one of the greatest challenges for marketers, how does it make sense in the environment in which they are advertising. i think both google and facebook have complementary offerings in that space. google has a phenomenal search offering. facebook is a fantastic social platform. both give you the ability to add scale with very little friction. go to the market, read the results, and optimize it quickly. i don't see one benefiting over the other. i think both will be beneficiaries. iab, thankd cohen of you so much for joining us today. appreciate your insight. coming up, we have more of "bloomberg technology." ♪ emily: new jersey has been ravaged by the coronavirus, taking the lives of 11,000 people in the state. earlier today, bloom

it ultimately issued a finding of guilt for these practices against google. leah: do you think the efforts by the european commission to inject greater competition into search have been successful? luther: it is a bit of a mixed bag. i think -- i'm very thankful for the work of the european commission on this and the leadership, and, frankly, i do not think the so-called tech lash would exist without that in april of 2015, exhibiting that she was willing to square shoulders with a large company. on the other hand, the commission chose to take a pretty narrow case, this so-called comparison-shopping vertical. basically how we shop for products online. it was originally filed in 2010.

why are you suing google?has essentially done is create a business model where they make misrepresentations, they don't inform consumers as to what information they are collecting, and they use that information to basically sell it in advertising so they have created these models that are based on knowing about -- everything about you, where you go, where you go to the bathroom, the doctor's office, the dentist's office. the reality is they know more about where you have been than your spouse does and more about where you're going than a travel agent does. my problem and our issue is the fact that when consumers try to opt out of these services, google is still tracking them. so that's a big problem that people think they are opting out. they made it almost impossible to opt out. they are collecting all this private, personal information and using it to their financial benefit. stuart: that is their entire business model, as i understand it. they know everything about you and use that information to tailor-mak

facebook is learly smaller than google. a lotee, facebook of communities around there, a people are spending money. direct response is really high instagram is at doing very, very well and around commerce is extremely high, facebook and instagram and anybody on nstagram that has bought anything knows what i'm talking about. you end up buying things you need, you see the picture and you clear through. hat is so big for the advertisers that we speak to that sell sweatpants or stay-at-home gear. we think ultimately you know, again, no one is immune. we think they're all the risk. we do think again, we have earning e in the $10 number for facebook and again a low 20 multiple gets you into a stock.level of no one is going to be immune out of this. right, brent thill, always good to have your perspective here on the show. coming up, ime, thousands of food network cooking classes, only some them fore going to get free. we'll tell you who coming up speak with the c.e.o. direct consumers at discovery. e.a. is faring in the industry

think about the google system.re is android, mail, maps, youtube, music, and it can go on and on and on. the reason why google assistant works is because all these assistance are able to work together. you both need to know the code word so, but you can't like say the code word sages give up. that's why siri again is culture. but the google assistant actually works pretty well. all of the to musk and jobs. they have done good work. but i don't think there the model for the future work in leadership looks like going forward. beri: thank you so much alex. and i think let's bring this all together in a way, the continued pain and so conversation based on everything that you are saying is that it is so easy to think that is all about the secrets as far as technology or how they came up with one set of products like finance and every thing else. but the reality ultimately the companies offered is 100 percent correlated to the people who are there and what they are able to do. the more we can emulate these tech giants an

we see this with the case of google. they worked with the department of defense on a very small contract called project maven looking at how to apply ai to the recognition technology and drones. this is a very small contract. there were a handful of people out of google's empire working on it. when people found out inside google that this was happening, a number of people have resigned in protest. there was a companywide letter circulated saint we do not believe google should be in the defense business. google backed out. they let go of the contract. they let it expire. so a significant portion of the drive of people who work in these organizations that want to see tech being used to build things, to do good. >> so the belief is not totally unlike the governments, is constituted to the constituent parts. >> this is something that i think one of the interesting features of these particular companies that i call net states is of course their interest in the bottom line, interest in making sure they can be successful busine

as we got this reminder about google in the last week.his in itself i don't look at as being a regulatory issue. they definitely don't have particularly dominant share whatsoever on the commerce side. tracy: i totally hear you on that. i want to broaden out and talk about the advertising market. we came into this year thinking facebook, google, were going to be some of the best performers. then the pandemic hit. you had talked a lot about advertising market that was facing these companies, yet the first quarter results came out and things were looking a little bit better for facebook than we thought. how are some of these companies positioned now that you are looking at reopening when it comes to the advertising market, and if that demand on the part of the advertisers is really there coming back in full force? about astill hearing decent amount of hesitation on the brand side. direct response has been the big surprise. to me, the absolute -- the biggest take aways were these companies were doing terrific in advance of covid hitting. we h

the senior gaia google is very soft-spoken. he will do whatever he can to minimize his presence to make room for everybody else which is not what you imagine of a leader. zuckerberg. very interesting guy. the feedback thing is real. a lot of people i have spoken with walt tried to get and sign your mind and then make a decision that tim cook very well liked nice guy to the people that matter inside apple that much less willing to take feedback. it seems from the rest of the company but i think apple has any idea pipeline like the others do people generally like tim cook but there was a story someone in rank and file sought tim cook at headquarters and said good morning and then he said see you he said what do you mean cracks that's like telling me to fuck off. so that was interesting but those employees that was the middle manager to go out and say you are 22 but i will take you out to dinner and pick your brain which is interesting. even cook to some extent but they are not like traditional leaders to get up on a picnic table

things, with gyms closed and no free food from the office google employees have been trying to find ways to use their abundance of company covered expenses but that is no longer allowed and google told employees they need to stop expensing while working from home. this is in an effort to tightened budgets ahead of what google characterized as a difficult quarter. we reached out to google for a response on the crackdown and have not heard back yet. >>> disney is reopening parts of its parks and another retail store falls to coronavirus. >> reporter: wall street gained ground on thursday, the dow raleigh 211 points, the nasdaq jumped to hundred 25 and the s&p 500 rose 32. all eyes will be on the monthly jobs report set to be released this morning, economists predict more than 21 million jobs were lost in april and the employment rate is expected to be between 11 and as much as 20%. another retailer bites the dust, neiman marcus declared bankruptcy, the second major retailer to collapse due to the coronavirus pandemic following j.crew earlier this week. the high end department store ch

we see this with the case of google.hey worked with the department of defense on a very small contract, but can't how to apply ai to the recognition technology with drones. this is a very small contract they have a handful of people out of google's empire working on it. while people found out inside google this was happening, a number of people resigned in protest, there's a cup companywide letter circulating thing we don't believe google should be in the defense business prayed they let go of the contract they let it expire. it is a significant portion of the drive that people work in these organizations. so i went to see tech to build things and do good. >> so it's not totally unlike a government is constituted on its constituent parts. so this is something one of the interesting features of these particular companies as they are interested in their bottom line, interested in being successful businesses, you do hear about internal employee protest core beliefs that it should be used for good. i think one of the terms w

google is steering all this traffic to itself and it is deoxygenated the web. ands stifling innovation the consumers and not getting access to the best information. >> watch the communicators tonight at 8:00 eastern.

google, a really good quarter. i don't think it's that people don't appreciate the costs that they can take out and control. it's that they have been so inconsistent over the years. you don't have a consistent operating story. you don't have a good understanding or visibility on the earnings trajectory. we know the growth is there but we want the consistency. i think the new leadership will focus more on this and then you add in the other positives which is cloud they have two billion maus that they can scale i think there's more reasons to add to something like a google aren't these names going to be the ones they come after >> sure. especially because of these brands or the fang moniker with microsoft thrown in. if they really want that alpha, they will come here for these names. >> what happens if people want profits. if there's another economic hit or some negative news the market is likely not going to be where it is. first place people may look to do some selling is in the area with the biggest names. these w

good gel -- google facing anti-trust scrutiny, looking to file suit against google.e, the search giant's advertising business and whether google using the dominant search engine to stifle competition. joining me right now is judge andrew napolitano. great to see you. tell us the basis of this lawsuit. >> well, think links in the chain, so there are many links in the chain between the advertiser and the advertisement getting on google. google owns most of those links. the question is, will it permit you to use links that it doesn't own. so do you have to go through every channel that google wants you to go through before you actually can get the advertising placed and did google engage in anti-competitive behavior in order to control all of those channels. this is either going to be a monumental lawsuit, sort of like the one against microsoft, which will go on for many, many years through many justice departments, or it will be a payment of a lot of cash like when the european union went after google for the exact same thing. they send the check for 8 billion euros. t

tech companies like apple and google are jumping to help.se and potential abuses of high-tech contact tracing. >>reporter: apple and google, who quarter and a combined 95% of the u.s. cell phone market, announced a partnership to use phones to pinpoint if you have come in contact with someone who's tested positive for the virus. >> when your phone is there another phone or somebody else's, it's able to create a record of that connection. instead of going by where you are geographically, it is looking to see who's phones are near to the. >>reporter: the head of risk management for trusted tech a cyber security company. this is because they are recording who you've been in contact with instead of everywhere you go, it should his concerns about privacy at least a little. but safeguards built into the system have limits. >> there has to be some way to take and analyze data and link it to somebody. if you have someone that test positive you can go back and notify those people. >>reporter: company say that information would be shared with public h

and google backed out.hey let it expire. in a significant portion of the drive the people who work in these organizations, they want to build things. to do good. adam: subleased not totally unlike the government is constituted in its constituent parts pretty. alexis: i think this is something that is one of the interesting features of these particular companies that i call netscape is that of course they're interested in the bottom line and making sure that they can be successful businesses but you do here about internal employee protest when a company does not or does not think the beliefs of their core beliefs that tech should be used for good . and i think that is one of the challenges with this dynamic is that we may cheer them from the sidelines, say yay google. but we don't actually have any role as citizens to directly influence the process . and i think is another thing that makes us maybe is a phenomenon. adam: and we will come back to that pretty face on your experience and what you talk about in

google showed up to provide internet telecommute coverage. i thought okay, what's going on with the tech industry? , they are getting involved in areas that are way up that used to be personal response ability of government. this is promising terrorism, defense citizen services and i thought had to be a better place to talk about them and just tech. they seem to have a role to play in geopolitics. the problem was the term non- state actor kind of had already evolved so i started studying where this turn happens. >> mark zuckerberg. >> is definitely some who think of tech as the bad guys. i looked into some things, as recently as 2010, social science defined it as examples like the un and nato so even then, there were not considered terrorists interest sometime around 2012, 13, you start seeing this term being used and eventually isis. so it was taken as bad guys. tech companies were nationstates either so i thought maybe the needs to be a better way to talk about them are introduced this concept companies, internet -based companies working ou

series again google $3000.00 on d w and online. i'm doing great big thing in all the time. to handle on new lives in times of the koran a pandemic d.w. reporter keep your job just like everyone else and she's looking for answers and thankfully with the help of to name a fair few of them. thank you is not life as we know it. together our new web series. such. so it's africa has includes an extremely strict law that in order to curb the spread of the corona. is proving particularly tough on the many poor people the country. at the end the day we're not going to die of go of buying $1000.00 you're going to die of hunger. women are suffering too. as a lot thing continues to mess. violence has been on the rise. and you're going to be my kind of carry on like this my boyfriend hits me in front of my son. the war in the coronavirus is exacting a heavy toll on people across south africa. with . life and she turning to the streets of cape town more than is permitted at that countrywide lockdown began in late march restrictions have been min

this is what you see with facebook and youtube and google with that content that is problematic.nd information about the coronavirus. labeling that as potentially suspect and one way to make sure they are stripping away completely. >> do you have thoughts of that is working or can work? >> is still early days. and that they took the heavy hand to identify the content. we can d rank that type of content. it comes up to the question and from the citizens perspective what is interesting to these algorithms that show and then to see the results. >> that people cannot necessarily see you. and it's one of those things with the elements that make interaction online sound why it unusual. and to take for granted how much indication with that visual interaction want to make it clear of that title. >> and with that preferred way to acting with the internet. so i can ask you are there other specific places online that you consider yourself? where are you working? >> i have never had a wedded profile especially that is sweet and unexpected. and also that are created of those facing homelessne

series against google throws up on t w.

why is google taking a more cautious approach?acquelline: we were one of the startedcompanies who working from home earlier. our philosophy is that, if we can work remotely, if we can work from home, help flatten the curve, then we are going to do that. we will be going back to the office. we will have some workers who need to be on site. but it will be very gradual. towill be using science guide us in our decision-making. emily: how are you handling this with your own team? science, whatthe is it that you are concerned about? are you concerned about continued health and safety? jacquelline: my team at google.org, we are absolutely motivated in this moment. conduitlike we can be a to help bring resources. the people on the front lines who have really great ideas, as much as we are bearing the impact personally, having friends or family members coming down with covid, team members who have had loss in their personal lives, we also recognize, this is an unparalleled moment where we can come together and build solutions and be part o

google and microsoft are up double digits. also up this year, the work from home and stay-at-home stocks names netflix, zoom, maybe paypal all those stocks have soared since january. it is friday, which means we are going to bring you an exclusive look at what company insiders are getting bullish on company insights right now the top five companies with the most insider buying this week. keep in mind, these are not corporate buy backs. these are individuals using their own money to buy stock number five. a new name, virginia based insurer markel number four, boston properties third, chubb number two most insider buying last week is ford. check this out the chief operating officer at ford buying 195,000 shares after selling this stock last fall so the coo sold last fall and made some money and is reinvesting back in to ford. the company with the ceo buying the most is boyd gaming. bill boyd buying $1.6 million worth of his own stock last week obviously bill sees perhaps better times or some times ahead as casinos look to reopen