so the said with a 90 percent of share, most people use google google search. and because more people use google search, it creates a sense of reinforcing cycle. and i think it's very difficult for any other company to break this. this does boost dominance because the more people use global a bit as a result of so you get and there's no reason for people to shift to do it on the other to which gives inferior results. so this network effects, as we call them on the 7th, being forcing sites a mundane school with dominance. so best point number one, but the point number do that i have which is more important. know why i think this may not be the most appropriate approach is that regulation seems to be been catch up rather than being proactive. and then we'll look for regulation and bro regulation i'm parole a governance. but what i, what i am not so excited about is that this is like fighting yesterday's problem. so for me, the problem is that google search, google chrome, this is already being this top, disrupted by jenny. i think they opened me. i chatted, cpd c

now we hear what the states and the feds want google to do. >> google is a search monopoly is the u.sand anyone who has used the internet. >> now in the revenues phase, it should people's confidence a little bit, there is pretty severe ideas but i think investors think about what the justice department is looking for almost like a wish list, they want to end exclusive agreement, google pays money to apple, apple makes google the default search engine. they want that gone, maybe they should sell android or chrome, maybe they should license their search engine to other people give away the secret sauce essentially for free and babel has as a search engine that seems very severe but that's a wishlist. these things will be appealed and were looking at 2027 according to wall street before any of this is ultimately resolved. >> i'm not going to take another change order we will just say ask al. here's the next question, this is not the first problem google faced when a.i. hit us all like the biggest thing since sliced bread. there was a concern instead of giving these add responses on googl

>> that is google's argument.have surge dominance, and they do having two thirds of the global browser market, it is dominated by google's chrome but the company says it is because they have a superior product. we have seen in europe which has done quite a bit to rein in big tech companies like google, when consumers are given a choice and when they are asked what they would like to be as their default, overwhelmingly consumers pick google and the company says it is because their product is better than the rivals but the doj says no, that is because they have been able to maintain those iron grip on google search by operating like an illegal monopoly and by throwing its weight around whenever it can to box out rivals. now the question becomes will google actually have to sell chrome? and if it does sell chrome, who will buy it and what will that mean for consumers? these are questions we don't have answers for but the process will upend cilic and dolly in a meaningful way. reporter: and what about the issue that i

i google, they sent out to mass emails to every employee at google. and when i saw those 2 e mails i, i felt like we had already one. if the, if the entirety of google has to learn now about project and invest after something that we did google already lost in the fact that they fired 50 people lashing out after what we did is a sign that they know they messed up. they know they're trying, they're just reacting in the worst way possible. and again, we're seeing it with a 0 right now. the increased aggression in north gaza. just all the awful images that are coming out. i believe this assigned that is, will knows if that it's end and we can see what the economy is in free fall all the science point 2. there is no victory for israel. bella in terms of where to from here, when it comes to keeping the pressure i want your take on this particular when also for the b ds movement beads announced today. april 11th, that samson has officially pulled out of their offices in the settler colony of israel. this south korean giant, close their office until a beef.

ultimately, google uses chrome, its web browser, as a way to get users into the google ecosystem.y browse the web and therefore what kind of products to serve to them. and in the us, it has around about a 60% market share. so this is a key component really of google's business overall, which is generally generated its revenue through advertising online. and the things that they provide through the search results that many of us use. google has around about a 90% market share in the search engine world as well. so all in all, a pretty significant chunk of its business here that could be affected. and therein lies the problem, isn't it? thejustice department has looked at that and said, "you've got too much power." "one of the ways we might address that is selling it off." that straight away raises a lot of questions about not only what it means for google, but who would buy it and what it does to the market given its popularity. yeah, this is a massive business. and google is one of the biggest companies in the world. so there are very few people who could sweep in and buy what is

the us government is calling for the break—up of google, removing its popular browser from the rest ofhe business. hello and welcome to business today. i'm steve lai. shares of adani group are plunging, adani enterprises are down 10% in the green subdued 18%, after the boss gautam adani is charging new york over allegations of massive fraud. mr adani, one of the richest people in the world, has been indicted along with seven oven defendants in connection with a bribery scheme involving one of the world's largest solar energy projects. according to the indictment, on several occasions, mr adani, who has strong ties to indian prime minister narendra modi, personally met with an indian government official. the adani group did not immediately respond for more, let's get out to mumbai, where my colleague nikhil inamdar is standing by. what's the reaction in india this morning? the markets really don't look happy. the markets really don't look ha . _ �* , , the markets really don't look ha.--n_, , .,~ , happy. absolutely, the markets completely _ happy. absolutely, the markets completely pun

this is just the doj's ask and google will have a chance to respond in court.ltimately, it's going to be up to the judge and we don't expect that decision until the summer of '25. what the government is asking for here is a break-up of google, and we haven't seen something this sweeping since the government ordered the break-up of microsoft in the early 2000s, but remember, that decision was overturned on appeal. now, what the doj is asking for here is to force google to sell the chrome browser, which has about 65% of global browser market share and they're also asking for google to sell android or for the government to put in what they call behavioral remedies that would block google from using android to favor its own search services. now, finally, the doj requests that google be blocked from paying apple the billions of dollars each year that it pays now for default placement on apple devices. google reacted to all this harshly in a statement this morning, saying, "doj chose to push a radical interventionist agenda that would harm americans and america's glo

caroline: once again, google, alphabet, the parent company of google, speaks out saying these are radicalteps being taken by the u.s. government and sort of putting their come on the scale is how google has been articulating it. the intricacies around selling data and sharing data is a tough one. many in the market say this will take years to enforce. you will see an appeals process. but more broadly, you will potentially see other remedies coming to like that google could -- what do we think the reaction will be? michael: this will play out over a long time, and i am glad you brought that up in terms of the clock here. the judge set a two week hearing in april to actually walk through some of the potential remedies the doj and antitrust regulators at the state level are offering. and that will give the time, and then we have time to the company to think about, what can we offer perhaps as a settlement? what else can we do? what is may be a middle ground that could satisfy some of the concerns being raised by government authorities? likewise, the judge himself is not expected to rule unti

staying in the us — to the search giant google. to a federal court today, after it ruled in august that google operates an online search monopoly. bloomberg is reporting that google may be forced to sell its most used browser chrome as part of a break—up. alphabet — the owner of google — reacted to the reports saying it would harm consumers and it would challange any new proposals. bob 0'donnell is president and chief analyst at technalysis research. good to see you again, bob. thanks, sally. i good to see you again, bob. thanks, sally.— thanks, sally. i feel like i've been waiting _ thanks, sally. i feel like i've been waiting for— thanks, sally. i feel like i've been waiting for this - thanks, sally. i feel like i've been waiting for this day - thanks, sally. i feel like i've been waiting for this day for| thanks, sally. ifeel like i've. been waiting for this day for a long time to find out what the doj long time to find out what the d0] will say. long time to find out what the 001 will say-— d0] will say. yes, obviously a lot of

landscape and on google as google's battle with the doj goes on. >>> and why trump's pick for energy secretary is bullish for nat gas and for this name, our mystery chart today. our analyst calls it a direct beneficiary, and he joins us ahead to make his case. you know the deal. tweet me if you can guess this one. >>> let's start with the markets, though, and dom chu with the numbers which were red this morning. >> they were red this morning, but now, we are green again. and we're, believe it or not, working on a five-day winning streak for the broader s&p 500. that's where we're going to start in the large cap s&p 500, which currently sits at 5,968. at the highs of the session, we were up 24, so we're just about there. we were actually down 4 as kelly points out at the lows. that's the trade end. we're less than 1% away from record high levels. that high water mark in the s&p is 6,017. that's the number we're watching there. the dow industrial is at 44,225. it's up 354 points, about 0.75% gain there and relatively, maybe, about 0.1% gain for the broader nasdaq composite, 19,000 on t

the chamber of progress ceo on all things google.e were talking about how google might have to unwind anthropic invest and but another, -- another company is piling in with an additional $4 billion in it stake. it is the builder of generative ai software. when you saw this enormous set of money going towards anthropic, what did you think? >> we knew that they were raising money but this emphasizes that amazon has gone full bear hug. microsoft poked money into openai for the per board proof -- preferred provider for chatgpt and amazon decided that claude is good enough that they could seek to tie it to their platform and they will do that. caroline: how exclusive will anthropic be? google has an investment that they are hoping to keep? matt: it can still run on other clouds, it is not like the microsoft open i i deal. -- openai deal. amazon was pushing more of anthropic using its hardware will are to train its -- hardware to train its models. they think anthropic can help it make a good ai trip and -- chip and that is a good cloud pla

could google be forced to sell chrome?h world holds its breath — awaiting the fate of the world's most popular web browser. and a social media star under scrutiny — logan paul faces fresh questions over his cryptocurrency dealings. we will have tributes to the guitarist who played on the james bond theme. now we have the latest sport. uefa has awarded romania a 3—0 nations league victory over kosovo after the match in bucharest was abandoned in stoppage time last friday when kosovan players walked off pitch with the score at 0—0. they claimed that they had heard pro—serbian chanting from the home fans, something romania denied. uefa did find the romanian federation guilty of a number of charges and they will have to play the next home match behind closed doors due to racist and discriminatory behaviour by the team's supporters. but because kosovo walked off, they were deemed to have forfeited the match, the 3—0 win to romania doesn't change the standings with romania already promoted to the second tier and kosova going int

he attacks google, and he's going to defend google?ven a person could not move that. >> dollar sign being intimidated by a human being. >> i'm proud of that. >> as you should be. >> 27 years i've had that title. longest running dollar sign. >> you're one heck of a long running dollar sign. we have a rally here, guys. >> no kidding. >> as i always like to say, no one has the keenness for the obviouvideo of saquon bursting through -- >> yes, we already watched that, okay? we already watched that. >> there are other teams. for instance, the chiefs really win a lot. the lions may be the best -- >> the lions win by 50 points. >> but we never seabout the lio. why is that? >> because you're not from detroit. >> would he seal them in the nfc championship game. >> if my broncos get any better, i'm going to have to start competing for your air time. >> i think bo nix is better than people realize. courtland sutton, never talked about. >> speaking of dollar signs, jim, a lot of box office dollars being counted today for our parent, "wicked," $114

so you hear from some pundits that if you google, donald trump or you google a certain figure, that the type of information you guess is very slanted. would it break off of sure, it will provide us with more diversity in terms of the narrative on certain issues or not. do you think of so i think that's one of the metrics across which you'll see some innovation. how search results appear in a search engine. so yes, there might be a sort of political element to that. there's a market element to that. there's the phenomenon of paid add search results on top of a search page. all of that is where you're going to start seeing some differentiation between browsers. and so, so certainly that's possible. all right, and what is this then mean for good was relationship with apple? well, you know, one of the facts that emerged during this trial is that google has had an exclusive placement across every single apple device. and for the better part of a decade or longer and it pays over $20000000000.00 to maintain that at that contract. and that is a core distribution channel. so might argue it's th

it ruled in august that google operates an online search monopoly. forced to sell its most—used browser as part of a wider break up. alphabet — the owner of google has said such a move would harm consumers and it that it will challange any proposals. so what can we expect? here's the view of one expert... obviously a lot of people are wondering what's going to happen here. i mean, you know, the challenge i see with this in particular is that this is so backwards looking because really, the market for internet search is changing dramatically as we speak. generative ai is changing how we search for things. people are now searching through tiktok and other platforms that they never did before. so to be honest with you, part of me is a little concerned that this is looking the wrong way and really wouldn't have that much of an impact. but at the end of the day, we have to wonder, okay, what happens here? and the thing to remember about chrome is while it doesn't generate income directly for google, it offers a a avenue to their services. and that's the b

when it comes to the suite of google, it's important to note that youtube, google maps, google docs andy part of it. basically, the doj is looking at the way that google is trying to put in things like the search bar and also their chrome browser on an detroit phones, as an example. >> bottom line, i know we need to hear what google had to say, but is that affecting people who use android phones, or -- >> not immediately. google is fighting this. and i think that's what the next step of this court case is going to be. they have said in a statement that they feel that this is an overreach of their power. they said that the doj choosing to push a radical interventional agenda, saying that the way that these apps function could be disruptive if the doj has its way. it's really up to the judge to decide, and we're far from a ruling from that judge yet. >> has google faced this kind of pressure yet? >> the last time there was any kind of substantial anti-trust case, you have to rewind to 2001, which was microsoft. been a while. >> brian cheung, thanks so much. >>> still ahead, a warning for

wants to prevent google from paying companies to be the default search engine, google pays apple with year to be the default search engine on the safari browser. the proposal is overbroad says google, they will submit their own remedy next month, the d.o.j. is requesting that google be prevented from giving access to the search engine on any device that runs android that is billions of smartphones around the world. i want to add this with the d.o.j. i was just going through on the chrome investiture, this is what the d.o.j. wants, they must properly and fully divest chrome to a bright enter buyer approved by the plaintiff in their sole discretion subject to terms of the court of the plaintiffs approve. google may not release any other google browser during the time under term of the final judgment, absent approval by the court. that is overbroad i would use a more rude word to describe this, that is my opinion, the d.o.j. is really overreaching. >> what do you think. >> i would like to see google go down a little bit and i would like to see something that says we will not let you be a

also coming up — breaking up is hard to do when it comes to google.ould the tech giant be forced to sell off parts of its business — to end its monopoly over internet searches? and the world's busiest airportjust got busier. dubai international says it's on track for a record year — as the emirate becomes a destination in its own right. we hear from the ceo. welcome to business today, live from new york. nerves have taken hold on wall street. this is on the back of escalating tensions between the us and russia over ukraine. we also have strong earnings and forecasts in the last couple of hours from walmart. all this is the post—election euphoria from investors treats further into the rear—view mirror. let's cross to las vegas and speak tojimmy lee, ceo of the wealth consulting group. let's have a look at the market action today. we are seeing a rush into havens like bond and gold, and the fear of escalating tensions between russia and ukraine, how much of an impact could that have on the markets?— an impact could that have on the markets? thanks for h

now, i was talking to the google folks and i asked them why they have both google maps and waze. they have two products. the answer is people use them for different things. if you're trying to choose a hotel or airbnb, you might use google maps to see how far away it is from a train station or whatever. you don't use waze for that, but if you're driving, waze is far more powerful. back to you. okay. thank you very much, scott. all right. we're now just days away from the election, and even halloween is taking on a political tone. nbc bay area's william jones shows us the home in alameda, decorated as a so-called anti-trump carnaval. and why not everyone in the neighborhood is a fan. but it's not your typical halloween decorations. part of the original idea were whack a socialist. the maga fun happy wheel. owner dan balsom calls the political carnaval themed display in alameda a project. 2025 halloween carnival. he does an elaborate halloween display every year on san antonio in union street, but this year decided to focus on the election. i want to emphasize this is not against a

the justice department moves to break up google's monopoly on interet searches.it could mean for users next. ♪ ♪ that's a different story. i couldn't slow down. we were starting a business from the ground up. people were showing up left and right. and so did our business needs. the chase ink card made it easy. when you go for something big like this, your kids see that. and they believe they can do the same. earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase with the chase ink business unlimited card from chase for business. make more of what's yours. are you tired of your hair breaking after waiting years for it to grow? new pantene with more pro-vitamins, plus biotin & collagen. repairs as well as the leading luxury bonding brand. stronger, healthier hair, without the $60 price tag. if you know, you know it's pantene. no matter what kind of teeth you gotta brush, oral-b electric cleans better with one simple touch. oral-b's dentist inspired round brush head hugs em, cleans em, and gets in between em, for 100% cleaner teeth. your perfect clean starts with oral-b. i

on the department of justice side they said all but one of google's live witnesses are paid by googleed not on the google payroll. they said the last look provision inside the auctions in which google gets to look at the price and decide if it wants to bid at the very end gives google an unfair informational advantage and the court should draw a negative inference from google's destruction of internal communications near the 24 hour expiring chat and shifting conversation in that direction. they said that's an indication there might be more negative information that we can't put our hands on. as for google's closing arguments, they said prices are falling in the market, quality going up, publishers are making more money so what's the problem here. they said the rest of the industry is growing faster than google, its share is going up but not as fast as the size of the industry is going up. history, both sides debating this point looking at the big antitrust cases of the past back to standard oil at the beginning of the 20th century. at&t and microsoft arguing that those guys had histo

and did a major setback for google us. regulate is pushed. so the tech john to set its browser crow, the beginning garza, it stay full $112.00 as rails war on the strip. these riley mitre has now killed nettie faulty 4000 palestinians and wounded. most of the $104000.00 since the 7th of october last year. most of those who have been killed are women and children . no one and know where it's safe and garza so cold. say sevens. un schools used by displaced people. even hospitals have all been hit, hundreds of times in the course of the, the doctor has some of us. i. c, a is the direct. so we're all come out of the one hospital. he says most of the victims was sleeping when they were killed in on my just need. uh, a i need um, there's been a new mexico just a little while ago. a whole residential block need to come out. i had one hospital who was talking, most of the medical stuff are currently working, non stop retrieving bodies, collecting the remains of the monitors and rescuing those still alive from beneath the rubble. due to the proximity

really break up google?it's next. ♪ at harbor freight, we design and test our own tools and sell them directly to you. no middleman. just quality tools you can trust at prices you'll love. whatever you do, do it for less at harbor freight. ♪ do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy - even a term policy - for an immediate cash payment. call coventry direct to learn more. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized we needed a way to supplement our income. our friend sold their policy to help pay their medical bills, and that got me thinking. maybe selling our policy could help with our retirement. i'm skeptical, so i did some research and called coventry direct. they explained life insurance is a valuable asset that can be sold. we learned we could sell all of our policy, or keep part of it with no future payments. who knew? we sold our policy. now we can relax and enjoy our retirement as we had planned. if you have $100,000 or mo

now google controls about 90% of the search market.t here is that chrome provides it with extra data on users that it can sell to advertisers. so the doj said that the sale would improve competitiveness in the market and allow other entrants. this was part of a 23-page filing against google which also said it should be blocked from entering exclusionary agreements with partners like apple and samsung and that it should also be prevented from giving such service preferences to its own products. it also said the tech giant should be stopped from eliminating emerging competitive threats through acquisitioning, minority investments or partnerships. these proposed remedies are to end so-called unlawful practices from google. the request marks the doj's largest attempt to break up a tech company since the anti-trust case against microsoft in 2001. google has said itself the proposals would be anti-competitive for consumers and businesses and that it will appeal the charges and put forward the same proposals next month. >>> still to many come

injuly that year russia fined google 2.1 billion roubles forfailing to russia fined google 2.1 billionr in ukraine and other content. that figure has since escalated, multiplied today, friday, the first of november, it stands at 16 - first of november, it stands at 16 — here is a new word for you i6 — here is a new word for you — that is 16 with many zeros after it. that is 160 billion trillion trillion dollars. a lot of money, maybe too much for google to find on the back of the sofa. google is worth just $2.1 trillion. even the kremlin concedes it is a big sum. ~ ,, ~ ., sum. translation: i cannot even ronounce sum. translation: i cannot even pronounce this — sum. translation: i cannot even pronounce this number _ sum. translation: i cannot even pronounce this number but - sum. translation: i cannot even pronounce this number but the - pronounce this number but the amount is for symbolism. actually, these demands, they demonstrate the essence of the claim of our google channels. google should not limit the actions of our broadcasters on its own. in actions of our broadcasters on its

he says, google is chugs off whole competition and the search market. this has moved beyond the phase of allegations of federal court. i, in fact, 2 federal courts have determined that google has legally maintained to monopolies across various business lines, including the search market search advertising and the distribution of apps on android phones. so google is unequivocally a monopolist i that has really choked off competition and innovation in these spaces. so i'm actually optimistic that the path forward sees unwinding of that monopoly rent. one of the facts that emerged during this trial is that google has had an exclusive placement across every single apple device. and for the better part of a decade or longer. and it pays over $20000000000.00 to maintain that at that contract. and that is a core distribution channel. so might argue what's the most important contract controlling how information flows across the internet. and the proposal that we're seeing from the justice department call us for an end to that contract. so google would no longer

in prioritise google over competitors.- prioritise google over competitors. prioritise google over cometitors competitors. in the doj has the teeth to enforce this? - competitors. in the doj has the teeth to enforce this? it - competitors. in the doj has the teeth to enforce this? it is i teeth to enforce this? it is not at all _ teeth to enforce this? it is not at all clear— teeth to enforce this? it is not at all clear that - teeth to enforce this? it is not at all clear that they . teeth to enforce this? it is i not at all clear that they do. anything actually, it pretty unlikely that they are going to accept this proposal. so normally, in anti—trust, a court is going to be reluctant to implement sort of extreme remedy i could break up if it thinks there is a simple way to address this conduct are being challenged. so as i said, this is a case all about harmful contracts. in the court is going to think, well, why shouldn't ijust going to think, well, why shouldn't i just terminate these contracts? it seems like that would solve the problem that would solve the problem that we have just spe

y google maps.relativamente de dÓnde estÁs, aparte de eso vamos a tener informaciÓn de los resultados electorales comenzando el 5 de noviembre. linda: la proposiciÓn 34 impone poner bendiciones a ciertas prohibiciones de salud. —— la proposiciÓn 30 —— la proposiciÓn 34 impone poner ciertas prohibiciones a organizaciones de salud. ♪ [mÚsica] ♪ linda: por cuarto aÑo consecutivo la casa blanca da una ofrenda por el dÍa de los muertos para honrar la vida de los seres queridos que ya no estÁn con nosotros. tuvieron la oportunidad de colocar fotos de sus seres queridos. eso es mucho de lo que vamos a ver este fin de semana. nayarit: para el dÍa de maÑana en el evento no se esperan lluvias. para las prÓximas horas si se estarÁn esperando lluvias. presentador: ¿es buen momento para lavar el auto? nayarit: se te va a lavar con las lluvias. linda: que maÑana no nos llueva. va a estar todo este equipo que trabaja para ustedes, va a ser muy rico verlos en persona. nayarit: toca y muy arregladitos.abrazo y disfr

google gemini has results for the second attempt september 15 and it's not just because google ai doesn'tation attempt on presidents were showing because look at this. march 30, the attempt on reagan life is the first thing that pops up. big deal. do think it's a glitch? i'm assuming we will hear from cool, some sentence featuring the word glitch. [laughter] >> it's never a glitch. how many times we going to go through this? mark zuckerberg and others earning capitol hill giving us we didn't mean to and we are going to work, yet they just consistently do it and the american people are not going to put up with it and i think under this administration, those hearings have drug and ceos, they will have a lot more light than they have in the past because with republicans in charge to protect them and that's what you saw zuckerberg get out just before the election admitting he been pressured by the biden administration saying he wouldn't give political drive or party. they are worried about what's coming yet the usual tricks. >> ai scours the internet and find information and spit that you so

google to spin off chrome.ppen?— actually happen? there is a better chance _ actually happen? there is a better chance of _ actually happen? there is a better chance of me - actually happen? there is a | better chance of me playing actually happen? there is a i better chance of me playing in the premier league than that happening. i think investors think this will be a court battle for years and i think ultimately it will be some negotiated settlement. trump coming in, deregulation is going to be across the board, thatis going to be across the board, that is positive for big tech, google, apple. thanks to dan ives of wedbush securities. one of the world's richest men gautam adani, has been charged with a massive fraud. the indian billionaire has been indicted — along with 7 other defendants — with orchestrating a $250 million bribery scheme. us prosecutors allege the tycoon and other senior executives bribed indian officials to win contracts for his renewable energy company. the adani group — of which gautam ad

many feel that google has never been under quite such a threat when it comes to google search or usingai overviews with a gemini offering. from your perspective, selling off chrome, could you see ain tt from openai? >> sure. it's the largest browser in the world. i think what the doj proposed remedy set off was the first shot of browser war 3.0. you will see others like duck cho, firefox, more on the forefront. new browsers coming out built around genai. the idea being if we have a lot of entry points and can have some google monetization and results side by side, it will be the most innovative experience for users and searchers. either you get google and you have to take gemini, or you can use something else or try something different. the idea that we go to the search engine results page of google with one size fits all is what the detriment is to consumers and users of what we have in place currently. caroline: the problem is, it's very expensive to build chrome as access points. would anyone ever be able to offer such a great product for consumers without the huge deep pockets like

here's why this is important when it comes to google and alphabet broadly.chrome is the largest internet browser in the world. 61% of traffic goes to chrome and is competing with the likes of safari and firefox but this is the main way google is able to not only detect who is searching what but also collected data and give them targeted access. that's the crux of the case. the concern is what this may do in terms of raking out google given so much of their revenue comes as a function of this platform. we will see if that comes through. right now it is just a recommendation when it comes to actually pulling back on data licensing. it is just a recommendation. but some pretty strong words coming from the vice president. take a listen to what she had to say. the doj is continuing to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case. the government putting its thumb on the scale in ways that would harm consumers of it -- an american technological leadership at precisely the moment -- it is needed. being tough on tech has been a bipartisan

the big one here forcing google to divest the chrome web browser.inance in search across the web, has the largest market share with google search with gmail, youtube, and others built in. divesting android, the operating system for mobile devices. the doj also admits that would be difficult to do. those getting the most attention this week as these reports trickled out, another important element that would impact other companies especially apple. the doj recommends ending google's practice of paying companies like apple to be the default search engines on devices or other web browsers. that would be a huge pit to apple's services business, filings showing google paid apple a whopping $20 billion in 2022, but payments can vary based how many people are using google search on iphones. still that would be more it than a fifth of apple's total services revenue based on the recent report. kent walker, google's top lawyer, responded last night to the doj's recommendations. he pointed out it would hurt smaller companies like mow sfwlil a. they make the fir

google without chrome. android without google apapapapapps. that's what u.s. they want to break up google's dominance. the department of justice is arguing that google has abused its power in search for over a decade and now they're recommending several steps to fix that, including selling thme w w w w web browse to another company, making it so android doesn't favor google's own products like search in g mail and keeping google for making multibillion-dollar deals with the likes of apple and samsung to make google the default search engine on phones. google says the proposal would hurt consumers. hearings on the matter start in april. microsoft is making a tiny pc t cloud. it's all in an effort to fend off cyber attacks and make the lives of it. folks easier. the computer is called windows 3.65 link and it doesn't even have a hard drive inside. it makes a secure connection to a cloud version of windows over the internet. it supports to 4 k monitors and has usb ports. you can connect things like an rnalalal keyboard and monitor the computer wakes up instantly.

and if you want to use the new google search tools, you just fire up the google mobile app or go to google.comser. you look for the camera icon and then you can search by image and it's really an amazing tool. and pro tip this works for clothing too. >> becky says the big trend this year is hybrid shopping, which combines online and real life shopping to help better customize your experience on the peninsula. chicken lovers are excited for today's grand opening of raising cane's in colma. it's the first restaurant of its kind on the peninsula. customers are very dedicated. many even camped out overnight to get the first taste. look at that line. because the first 20 customers in line got entered into a drawing to win free chicken for one year. this location on coleman boulevard is the fifth raising cane's in the bay area. a child in the east bay has tested positive for bird flu without any known contact with an infected animal. ahead, we get some answers about our risk and learn what's your next favorite thing about this place is waiting to be discovered. did you know you can do this? ... pret

and they were founded in opposition to google. elon and other folks were afraid that google was racing ahead in ai technology and willpower be concentrated in the hands of a single corporation and was a really bad idea and dangerous. they wanted to create something that would be a counterbalance to this entity called deep line owned by google which is based in the uk where i am coming to you from today. they were based in london. seems at the time to be racing ahead in the develop of ai technology and create a fear that google will dominate the landscape so open ai was founded on opposition to that and was supposed to be everything google, a giant for profit corporation, and was seen as very secretive. open ai committed to publishing all this research and making models for people to use. what happened is it took a lot more money for ai models. they have to raise money and some debate about that. to take the nonprofit on. and other companies like tesla but the other cofounders did not want to do that. they need to come up with anot

continue to sort of pressure other firms to prioritise google over competitors.rce this? it's not at all clear that they do. i think actually, it's pretty unlikely that the court are going to accept this proposal. so normally, in anti—trust, a court is going to be reluctant to implement sort of an extreme remedy it could break up, if it thinks there is a simple way to address this conduct being challenged. so as i said, this is a case all about harmful contracts. and the court is going to think, well, why shouldn't i just terminate these contracts? it seems like that would solve the problems that we've just spent four years litigating. again, the doj is going to argue that they might still do other stuff, other harmful things. the issue is that that's sort of speculative at this point, it's not something, there is no sort of concrete evidence that that is going to happen, it isjust a concern that the doj is raising. so i think it's a long shot, it is a bit of a hail mary, it could work. but i think more than likely, the court is going to limit its remedy to less