google in search. >> yet, you argue for the last few decades, we have been in a tech slowdown. have facebook and apple and google not been innovative enough? >> as a society, i would argue we have not done as much as we could have. you have had less innovations in energy and biotechnology, and there has been some, but not as much as we would like. transportation, it is not moving any faster. >> one thing you tell aspiring entrepreneurs is don't copy mark zuckerberg, don't copy larry and sergei, don't copy bill gates. why not? >> the next mark zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. the next bill gates won't be starting an operating system, and so in some sense you cannot copy them because they did not copy somebody else. >> you also suggest that they come up with one very important truth that very few people agree with you on. why is finding something nobody agrees with you on the best way to get everyone believe in you? >> i think great companies have a sense of mission. there is a sense that if we want doing this, -- if we were not doing this, nobody would be doing this, and you would

apple pay. everybody assumes that google will respond to apple pay with a google pay that will work the same wayith android. >> google wallet has not worked out. why didn't it, and how optimistic are you that apple can get it right? >> this is what is interesting about apple pay. apple pay is viewed by the payments industry as revolutionary, but it is the most consistent with the existing payment system of any of these new systems. it does not require -- what is surprising is how many things don't change with apple pay. you put in your credit card. >> are you saying it's not that innovative? >> it's innovative but in a way that's consistent with the status quo. [laughter] it is very clever. it's very -- i acknowledge what i just said. it's very clever. it is cleverly done. if everyone has a way to pay and all the merchants take it, then it is all great. but until you have universal acceptance on both sides, nobody uses it. it is a network effects problem. apple pay is cleverly calibrated to skip through that to be in line with the status quo of payments. credit card companies -- it plugs into th

. >> samsung, if google, apple? are all these people looking for a category to create when the demand might not be so fervent really. >> you were messaging this morning. a new -- is it a software from under armour? >> under armour came out. and i downloaded the app this morning. it tracks how much you move throughout the day. you can follow athletes. i was fairly unimpressed with it actually. every single would have been these apps whether that one or the tracking in something like my fitness it just tracks how much you move. my fitness pal is the most interesting that actually allows you to log calories with an enormous database of food. but most are not that differentiated. >> under armour having a good day on the back of the retail numbers being good. >> i think there is a continuum here when it comes to the stuff like something that a watch tracks. between being a nanny which people don't like saying don't eat that. be sure you do that, to being a narcissist. the selfie age we're in right now. if it feels like y

phones i think it is swinging the pendulum too far because the victims are actually going to be apple and google'swn customers who are victims of crime. they will not be able to give lawyers access to the phones that may relate to how they got ripped off. >> let's transfer this not to apple and google what facebook. and access to someone's facebook, i assume you can get unless they take it down. are there issues here? >> there are issues. we again use a search warrant. there is one case in litigation and i will not comment on the pluses or minuses. there was a 99 page affidavit submitted by our office seeking authorization from the court to subpoena and search the facebook files for several hundred people. we litigated against twitter separately. >> right. but i guess, this whole conversation speaks to the fact that technology is changing. how we gather -- >> and you need new rules? >> you may need new rules and they may need to be updated. the new evidence will be on twitter and facebook. it is a new world and my commitment is that our office is going to be capable and up to the challenge and i t

aink about what happens in company, not just facebook, google, apple. extreme wealth creation. of the distraction that creates. incrementalnts of focus, attention, press. adulation. the acolytes come out of every single part of the woodwork. it takes a really, really special person to not be able to be affected by that. >> google and facebook are trying to do the same thing. who wins? >> i think they both win, but in different ways. to thewins with respect entry point. they own the front door to the internet, and they own the front door to the 90% of the mobile apps. the experience once you're there. >> speaking of another big company that you're not fond of, you once wrote that temp cook milquetoast, uninspiring, margin tweak her image for himself. you also said that apple should by tesla and make elon musk the ceo. do you still believe that? >> yes. he is very good at what he does. i think he is probably an exceptional operationally minded ceo. the question is can that hers creativere the type of types to build the next lily pad? i think, no. think of the amount of wealth tha

returns are lucrative for them and the iphone, such a runaway success, the relationship between google and apple so tenuous, i think that's a big potential weakness in google's armor if apple decides to go another way with default search on the iphone. >> they talked about that in the conference call for yahoo. it would be interesting if apple were to take some of oh the wind out of google's sales. but let's talk about amazon, your bailiwick. i know you've been poring over these numbers. >> it was a good day for amazon investors. got the top line beat. got a profit, a remarkable thing for amazon, over $200 million for the fourth quarter. maybe more important, they're listening to shareholders. there's two points in disclosure that i say they're going to start breaking out a.w.s. numbers in the first quarter so next quarter. >> really? >> yeah, they said that on the conference call. number two, they talk more, got into more detail about prime membership. they said it's up 53%. that's a key part of the business. if you're an investor, one of those long-term faithful shareholders, taken a beating o

have done with their encryption technology making it so that even google and apple, they wanted to, they couldn't decrypt their own devices. do you think the director will be successful in any effort to force google and apple to change their current -- >> right. the short-and-probably -- the short answer is probably not. the interesting thing, jim comby said this device, twisp, the iphone 6, is essentially a threat to law enforcement and obstacle to law enforcement because if you arrest somebody with this phone and they've incrept ited, it cannot be unincrepted including by the manufacturer. only i know the code and if i'm not giving up, the fbi is not getting into it. this is a proxy for a much larger mission that the fbi has been on to extend surveillance authority to the internet. not getting too much into the weedes, there are laws in place that require telephone companies to build their networks in certain ways so that they can be tapped win -- when the fbi or other agency has a lawful order to intercept communications but companies like google and apple have never been pre

have done with their encryption technology making it so that even google and apple, if they wanted to, they couldn't decrypt their own devices. do you think that the director will be successful in any effort to force google and apple to change their current -- >> right. the short answer is i think probably not. at least not in the near term. what is interesting about this argue. -- jim combie said among other things this device, for instance, the iphone 6 is essentially a threat to law enforcement and obstacle to law enforcement because if you l you arrest something with this phone and it's increpted it cannot be uneven crippled including by the manufacturer so the fbi won't get into it. so i think this is a proxy for a much larger mission the fbi has been on to extend surveillance authority to the internet. without getting into the weeds of it there are laws in place that require telephone companies to build their networks in certain ways so they can be tapped when the fbi or another agency has a lawful order to intercept communications. but internet technology in companies like g

apple. he strong-armed a lot of companies. googlee apple employees. >> it was really something he led. it was interesting, he has been lionized. he has an image about himself. the things he was doing were so interestingly anti-competitive whether the book deals and trying to take over the business or take it away from amazon through price-fixing, and now this. >> the testimony is embarrassing. we already see how the ceo eric schmidt was bending over backwards to not alienate jobs. the companies just do not want any more of that. >> who will get the settlement? >> it will be spread through tens of thousands of these. the lawyers get a quarter of it. then these tens of thousands of engineers part of the class-action. >> brad stone, thank you very much. we should take a selfie, don't you think? it will be our first selfie. put it on. there you go. we will figure it out. thank you very much. her member you can always get the latest headlines on your phone, tablet, and bloomberg radio. we will see you tomorrow with more of "bloombert west

apple. you like google. you have said so on this show. hich one do you like more with the payments process? >> apple now has clearly leapfrogged and taken the lead. it will benefit other players in the space. i question whether this type of pay system is a stand loon astand alone as a business. google is a currently popular company. it's on our phones. android system. i worry about these guys being outdone by the banks directly. we can use their own pay service. there's room for more than apple pay. it's clearing the way for google. >> the banks will get edged out here. i know i've been saying that for a while. paypal, they announce this had deal with microsoft where they'll start teaming up with small businesses, not only doing this payment system, but advising them on the business side for small businesses. you'll see a lot of these companies like google and apple have this integrated payment system with small businesses. where will the banks go? >> they still have to do the processing. the banks are the back bones. even this particular

apple. he strong-armed a lot of the companies in his orbit, like adobe and google, to not hire apple employeess interesting to see -- he has always been lionized, he has created this great image for himself. but there were some things he was doing that were so interestingly anti-competitive whether it was the book deal and try to take over the book business or take it away from amazon through price-fixing, and now this. >> the testimony is embarrassing. we have seen how google's then-ceo eric schmidt was bending over backwards to not alienate jobs. companies don't want anymore of that. >> he was on the board at the time. >> yes. >> who will get that settlement? >> that will be spread through tens of thousands of -- the lawyers get a quarter of it, then these tens of thousands of engineers part of the class-action. >> the lawyers get a quarter of it? $100 million and then some. brad stone, thank you very much. we should take a selfie, don't you think? our first selfie. there we go. we will figure it out. brad, thank you very much. if the latest headlines all the -- you can always get the latest

google and apple. >> yeah. they can now encrypt. >> yes. >> rose: and they don't even know how to access the information. >> what apple and google said in their most recent upgrades to their operating system is that they no longer have a key. we used to send them the phones, and they would take their key unencrypt, send it back to us. so we would get the data and we could deal with it. they no longer have that key and market their phones if you remember several months ago, saying we can't be-- we can't assist law enforcement. that-- . >> rose: did this all come out of the snowden business? >> i'm sure it came out of the snowden business an concern over the nsa. and i don't-- for a minute diminish the importance of right to privacy and-- i don't want the nsa looking at my e-mails. but where i strongly disagree with apple and google is that is not what we're talking about here. it's not the da's office willey thrilly trying to go into your e-mails. we have to get a warrant from a judge. we have to present probabl

>> i think apple's only problem is android. and google. and google's willingness to be aggressive. ple should have paid anything. flat out. if you're going to pay $3 billion for a headphone company, $2 billion for a maps company is a no-brainer. i also think they should have found a way to buy nest. i have a deep respect for tony fidel. >> should apple buy twitter? >> i don't know if they would know what to do with it, and that is why i would probably say no. >> twitter is one of your companies? >> yes, and i think they have one of the most amazing moats. they have the most important people in almost any field in the world, remarkably committed to their own persona within the system. >> peter thiel, a venture capitalist criticized twitter, calling it horribly mismanaged, probably "a lot of pot smoking going on over there." how do you respond to that? >> i think he is on a book tour, correct? >> i believe so. >> i would leave it at that. once you make a statement like that about a management team that has created a $30 billion company, taken in public, grown revenues to $1 billion, i

facebook, google apple.reme wealth creation, all the distraction that then creates extreme amounts of incremental focus, attention, press adulation. the accolades come out of every part of the woodwork. it takes a really special person to not be able to be affected by that. >> google and facebook are trying to do a lot of the same things. who wins? >> they both win, but in different ways. google wins with respect to the entry point. they own the front door to the internet, and they own the front door to 90% of the mobile world. >> don't miss much more of emily's interview on "studio 1.0" tonight, 8:30 on the east coast and west coast. facebook continued its growth with lots more users. the social network has managed massive ad revenue growth, especially mobile. the ceo mark zuckerberg spending faster to chase the opportunity of mobile advertising and messaging, as well as new hires. mark mahaney joins the right now. it was an interesting quarter for facebook. so much to talk about here. the growth in mobile,

there's pressure from the government on both apple and google. google now displays all the permissions. apple monitors the permissions. the problem is what it accesses it doesn't tell you why and what they'll do with it. i think we'll get to what first. you'll see the flashlight app says access my calendar. most people say ok. they don't know that address book will be data mined and folks will be marketed because you shared that. the next step is what's missing. >> there is that idiotic point of -- and i started with snap snapchat of people who download a third-party app to defeat whatever the first app is trying to do as well. >> it's frustrating but also scary. as a user you might think that the technology is protecting you. but the technology is always as secure as the users on the other end. you don't only have to place your trust in a start up but the users on the other end that will receive it. what will they do with that data now that it's easy to store that data? >> do you know what a good business would be a blocker app that sends it to

apple begins to rebound, energy will be loved again. >> reporter: russia will be an even bigger problem next year. though europe will surprise and google gets serious in its fight with apple. here are three predictions for 2015 boring they're not. first, russia defaults on its debt. russian ruble hits new lows against the dollar. oil dropped 40%. crude oil and petroleum products are half of russia's export revenues. how will they pay for imports? they will default on their debt. second the european stock market outperforms the u.s. stock market. no recession next year in core europe. the euro zone is stuck in a long-term and no growth environment but the core countries will not sink into a recession. the euro will remain weak boosting trade. after a year when expectations would constantly revise downward european corporate earnings will begin turning around. deflation will remain an issue. third, google buys paypal. paypal is scheduled to be spun off from ebay sometime in 2015. it won't happen. google will bye paypal and combine with google wallet to ward off apple pay. >> two guests tonight say 2015 could be another happy new year for

. >> $450 million, the settlement being proposed by google apple, adobe, and other companies to try to embarrassing lawsuit that accused them of colluding to not hire each other's employees. steve jobs was the ringleader of that that started in about 2005. it's suppressed opportunities for engineers in silicon valley. >> wasn't there a proposed settlement? >> there was, $325 million last year. a federal judge said they were getting off too easy and the companies had to go back and this was the latest proposal. if it doesn't work, the case goes to trial later in the year. >> if her all the notions that silicon valley is the lead of opportunity, it is an amazing thing that these big companies were keeping people from getting jobs. >> it was really about steve jobs' forceful personality and the fact that he hated losing people at apple. he strong-armed a lot of the companies in his orbit to not hire app or employees -- hire apple employees. >> it was interesting to see -- he has always been lionized. but there were some things he was doing that were so interestingly anti-competitive wheth

in los gatos, betty yu, kpix5. >>> tonight, apple, google, and adobe are not commenting. intel denies the allegations. >>> a close call in burlingane tonight. this car ended up wedged on the cal tran track. andria borba has the story. >> reporter: well, the good news is no one on the train was injured. the people in the car weren't injured and there was one little boy on board that first car you saw who wants to tell you the whole story. the video of this hyundai versus caltrain is self- explanatory, but we will let fourth grader neil alexander tell you what happened. >> it came on the track. it missed our target of turning by a few meters. >> reporter: and ended up on the track. wheels and all pointed south. >> i was like wait a minute. i need to get out. i need to get out of here right now. or else i'm going to die. >> reporter: five minutes later, he and his nanny were safely on the platform when the train slammed into the hyundai. >> oh my gosh. >> reporter: the car ended up nearly a quarter mile down the track. the train was cleared. no one was hurt. and that sign yo

apple is a narrow were based company. a hardware company. that is what it is. does it have the same potential as google? >> yes, it does. versus samsung. this is another thing. the market is not priced into apple stock. it looked like they increased downloads in 2014. a $15 billion run right here. that is enormous. this is a very fat margin business for them. a lot of potential with the watch and mobile payments. stuart: are you willing to admit you made a mistake with sandisk? >> no. i think that this is a goodbye. not yet. we talked about this in the past. the market has a tendency to overreact. sandisk is moving heavily into what is called flat data centers. the reason why that is important is everything is moving to the cloud. sandisk wants to take its expertise and put it into the data centers. it lowers the cost of corporations. they have apple and facebook as enterprise clients. they are aligned with hp. the dominant flash memory maker for all consumer electronics across the board. right now, they are getting hurt. samsung is just not executing. stuart: michael, you sound a little defensive. we will let you off w

next week, earnings from apple, ali baba, apple and google. rallying more than 5% this week ahead of their reports. how will next week's earnings change the game for technology? how do the rallies going into the earnings, guy, change the setup for the trade? >> obviously, apple, i am going to be focused on yahoo!. how does it change? to me, yahoo! this is the quarter that they now have to prove themselves. this is where the ali baba story, it's yahoo! who has to sink or swim on their own. floundering around this $50 level. the most important earnings release in quite some time. >> i don't expect anything out of these guys. i this i the stock has capped at 51, 52. ali baba is the story. i think ali ba ba is going to surprise. to that extent, maybe they get some boost. i would be looking at google. a big run going into earnings. i'm cautious. they are getting into wireless. for a lot of people, this is what they don't want to hear. this is a direct link to the consumer. they really already have sengies. the stock rallied hard off of 495. it is g

ibm, google apple, facebook. ing very clever algorithms using lots of computer power. google last year spent more money on computer service than the rest of the world, $8 billion. let me tell you about the effects. let's take an accounting business p or you have a junior accountant that will look for something called discovery. finding out about new european rules. you have a partner that looks for patterns across multiple configurations. if you have a computer doing that, the computer is more capable of doing patent recognition across huge data sets. you replace the partner and the junior accountant. >> what about journalists? >> do not answer that. in terms -- you say you seem to suggest that because you are a tech company you are going to do well. some must be doing this better than others. >> it has come down to cash and brain power. google has huge amounts of cash, apple has huge amounts of cash. google employs more phd's than any company in the world. you put that amount of brainpower and that an out of cash

it has the biggest license for operating system but lack behind competitors like google and apple for mobile. and they're banking on their latest strategy to turn things around and plan to release windows 10 in the second half of this year. >>> japanese leaders want to spark the economy and have a dem demographics society on their hand with a low birthrate and aging. they are looking at robots and could soon do some of the work people do. the government will look into drones to survey the country's condition of roads and bridges and something humans do currently. they will team up with japanese businesses to set international standards with technology. they want to catch up with germany and the u.s. the current leaders in this technology. a private-public partnership is expect expect invest billions of dollars in the next few years to move it four fold to $20 billion. that's it for tonight. let's close things out with the markets. >>> officials from the united states and cuba are taking a big step toward normalize inging diplomatic ties that have been strained over a half a century. t

what i do in the book is look at new companies that have essentially overtaken our lives, whether apple, google, facebook, amazon those are sort of the big four. we spent so many hours on any given day either on their devices or platforms. how they have built there software how that affects our relationship to each other and our relationship to god. >>host: you have a quotation from kevin kelly we tend to see god reflected in nature but my bet is technology is the better mirror of god. next next to that is the picture of jesus. >>guest: he has the world in his hands. kevin kelly is such a fascinating character one of the early editors of wired magazine and comes from a position of faith. he has looked looked at technology and how we organize our lives how engineers structure things as a way of talking about the ways in which god might be the original technologist. we look at our dna the human genome project to what degree is the information we have in our bodies a reflection? are we wired or encoded in an organized fashion? what role again does god may be the technologist play in that? >>host:

sxwroo we have it covered epiwhen we're not on the air download the new wusa9 app free tht google and apple stores, track live weather conditions with the radar, check closures and delays and get an alert when there's a closure that affects you. >>> also tomorrow morning you can wake up with us just a little earlier, we're going to be on the air starting at 4:00 a.m. to track the latest snowy conditions and any school closings or delays. >> well, tonight we know who died in yesterday's tragedy on a metro train the's name, carol glofr, she was 61 years old. a neighbor described her as a mother a dedicated person, not saying how mrs. glover died but the first person to die since the 2009 crash killed nine people. >>> and a top metro official says he is sorry for whatever happened on the rails yesterday board share tom downs offering his condolences and a heartfelt apology to people hurt or frightened and working with the ntsb to figure out what exactly went wrong in a statement today he said in a quote this will be a thorough process that often takes time and we understand that passengers wan

it's free available in the apple and google play stores. you'll be able to see where the snow is headed and check for delays or closings and tomorrow morning you can wake up with us earlier. we'll be on the air at 4 a.m. tracking the latest conditions and school closings. >>> the timing of this storm is what could cause such a big headache for commuters and school officials. >> today transportation officials in maryland told us they're doing everything they can tonight to get ready for the morning. >> reporter: i'm scott broom in montgomery county, maryland, where highway crews are prepared for the possibility that a little snow might make for brief but big headaches during tomorrow morning's rush hour. >> the issue will be if it hits during rush hour. all the trucks will get stuck in the same traffic as you and i and they won't be able to treat the roads. >> i'll let out early and beat everybody off. by the time i leave 5:00, nobody on the roads. >> reporter: salt brine was mixed in volume early today and motorists could easily see the tel

apple and google have made a new bid to sell that lawsuit over hiring -- settle that lawsuit over hiringord on how much apple and google are offering to pay for that. as we have been reporting the price of oil continues to plunge overnight. futures are positive by a hair. the big picture is a severe drop in demand. is this drop unprecedented? i want to get some perspective on this. isaac, painful as it is, we have actually seen worse collapses in oil before. cracks yes, and we don't have to look back that far -- x>> yes and we don't have look back that far. the financial crisis and global recession drove oil down. consumption contracted. right now, growth is slowing and that is an actual decrease. >> this seems to be also driven by oversupply. did we have a collapsed before on the supply side? >> for an example of a supply lead collapse, we have to look back to the 1980's. there are a lot of parallels. it was a situation where there was infighting in opec. they were not sticking to quotas. supplies outside of opec were expanding. supplies were loosening. saudi arabia is tired of balancin

until after that. >> we're waiting for twitter, kara, but investors are saying google is trading awfully close to where applen carl icahn got in there and stomped his feet for a buyback and a capital return. is that culturally possible at google? do you think they would be able to be amenable to an activist? do you think that's a risk for that company after yesterday's earnings. >> that would be interesting, wouldn't it? they would not care. they have such a not care attitude. you know, i don't know. i think it's very -- they're definitely in a low. the stock is in a low. and there's some questions around, for example, the apple search deal and things like that and where they're going next and what's going on with android and the strength of apple in the last quarter with the profits of that iphone, are really quite amazing. they've got to show some momentum in things besides being cool. great car, and things like that. but i think probably that would be interesting. i hadn't thought about that. that would be interesting. >> yeah. i mean jack's tweets talk about the way the brand is perceived around the worl

investors haven't been very vocal about what they want to see google do or see how they invest in the company or return to shareholders. but even apple wasn't immune to that. are we reaching a point where google -- >> that's it. it all comes down to whether the stock does. stocks going up, nobody cares. invest in whatever you want. glasses, who cares. but if the stock tanks and stays down you see people get vocal. one of the interesting thing about google is the founders have complete control. it is another series of stocks, the same thing as facebook. so you can make a lot of noise. but you have no real power to change anything. unlike yahoo which is different situation. >> and under activist pressure yet again from starboard. is there anything google needs to do to spark more valuation. >> i think they are doing the exactly right thing. they are investing very aggressively. this they were to show you the margins in the search business the profitability would be staggering. so they are investing heavily in a lot of other things. it's just they are not ready to take up the mantle of driving profit growth and it may be a while. >> kra

like it you're going to have to deal with it, the justice department telling companies like apple and google to give the government access to e-mails and your photos as well. and the more that we see incidents like this, the more that it galvanizes this effort to go after these companies and say, okay, you're going to have to start letting us in and letting us sneak sneak around. what do you say to that? >> there has to be a balance, we have to balance the right to privacy and the need for security, we want to fight against any of these things that they want to have. having said that the american citizens have a right to privacy and relative to that though the googles, the apples the ebay's, all of these folks have better and better encryption technologies that prevent our accounts from being hacked into by anybody. neil: but maybe not ody. neil: but maybe not enough. someone is getting through. so where do you draw the line and how do you balance that? >> are trying to deal with that now, the obama administration doesn't necessarily like that, they think that the government should have a ba

apple, google, facebook, and amazon.you worry at all that anyone one of them- any could become too powerful? >> yes. not specifically one of them, but more as a general system. when you have a navigation of platforms, you have to worry about leaving room for entrepreneurs, about leaving room for innovation. i worry about that on a general basis. not on those specific four companies. i have talked to all of the ceos of those companies. they are all trying to build great products and do great things. >> richard branson has a private island. steve ballmer is buying a sports team. mark benioff gives a lot away. what do you do? with all of the money you have made? >> most of it is still in linkedin stock. because i am building the world with linkedin. i serve on a number of different nonprofit boards. and kiva and endeavor dosomething. i try to finance projects that i think are interesting. >> are we going to see you start something else? another company? >> probably not. founders,s a and seed i work pretty closely with them,

so apple is killing it. if googlelies, you could have the qqq catching steam here. >> amazon shares popping on earnings. julia. >> yeah. that is right. amazon talking about how its $1.3 billion investment in prime instant video is paying off. he did not reveal the number of prime subscribers but highlighted a 53% increase despite a price increase. he says prime members do purchase a lot more than non-prime members and prime members get things faster than non-prime members saying that helps a lot. >> we remain heads down focussed on driving a better customer experience through price, selection and convenience. we believe putting customers first is the only reliable way to create lasting value for our shareholders. >> the earnings call said the company will break out amazon web services starting this quarter saying right now the quarter has over 1 million aws active customers. now one interesting comment that they just made talking about 2015, the company is investing heavily in improving productivity and is more focuse

. >> google has been interested in artificial intelligence for a long time. apple and facebook are hiring ai people. why do you think all of these companies are doing this? >> it is the thing to do right now. we are at the brink of making computers much smarter than people. there is enormous economic benefit. just imagine that you could make a white-collar worker and some a.i. and make him a thousand times more effective. it would transform society. and that is what artificial intelligence is, it is making machines really smart. picking what we do as people best and augmenting it. >> will machines replace people? >> i think they are in so many ways. >> is this always a good thing? >> we continue to live longer, safer, better. as a result. >> if machines can do everything for us, in the future, what can we do? >> we have to find more and more sophisticated jobs or we have to work less. at the end of the day, we have to engage and have an enjoyable life. and produce children. that is very human. i do not think that will be replaced anytime soon by machines. >> do you

suit target google play. apple i tone.tting from pre-1972 recordings without paying the copy right owners. among the plaintiffs the owner of the songs recorded by the flying burrito brother they say one of the songs had more than 330,000 plays on spot tie as of yesterday. california judge ruled last october that pre-1972 recordings are protect theed by copyright law. no response so far from those music services. >> are you missing out on lower mortgage rate. >> coming up next. how you can be saving thousands of dollars. how to take advantage of today's historically low alex jenny jenny carlos alex carlos good morning burrito team! we set out to make a bigger, tastier breakfast burrito and i think we nailed it. introducing bigger, better breakfast burritos. the grande sausage, packed with hash browns, sausage, and creamy sriracha sauce and the meat lovers, stuffed with ham, bacon and sausage, both wrapped in a warm guerrero tortilla. burritos so big, they make everything look smaller. >> you have heard about the mortgage ri

. >> you can bring in google or apple.ring the men and give them incentives but if it is two guys and their dog and a lady it you are probably not going to do as much to help them and that is a big obstacle. you can make headlines when you say google brings in 500 employees. you do not make headlines with two guys, a lady, and a dog. >> that was the chief research officer. it is time for the bwest byte. what do that? >> 150. the number university of -- of likes university of cambridge researchers want. they process that and look at different personality traits. >> that revealing. >> and your coworkers, it is 10. >> openness or extrovertedness. they can assess if you are a next divert better than your coworker could based on what you like on facebook. >> i would think that my coworkers know me better than that. >> it does show you how they can target. but maybe they do not target that will. you would think they would have to be more tailored. >> they are getting better. >> great to see you. you can always get the latest hea

next week, it is make or break time for apple, google, microsoft and maybe even "your money." 'll give you the best. >> talk about funky. look at the vix. >> it is mack or break for technology. we get earnings for apple, microsoft, facebook and ali ba ba. dan, what are you expecting particularly given the run we are having? >> that's a great report. two weeks ago, when we got into earnings season, the news wasn't fan it is tick. the guidance was fine. the mood in the markets was much worse in a way. we seem to be a little bit of a down trending in profit-taking mode. things feel better. obviously, ups put somewhat of a dire note on earnings here. those six stocks that you just mentioned, that's about $2 trillion in market cap. i do believe if we can get some sort of trend out of that, that's probably going to be reflective of the next 5% in the market over the next couple of weeks. >> you just pointed out ups and fedex probably the best to breed stocks. >> a lot of their peers were you have athe charts high. the down draft was sort of telling. if this is how they feel about the