three years ago there is no such thing as the google comcast or the amazon eire tv state. there is a time of further innovation will occur, but we know it will happen and it will happen fast. my mvpds and content creators spent years trying to implement the commission's rules, technology could render all of the work obsolete by the time it's ready to roll out. that would be a waste of time, energy and money for all involved. third, if the standard submission by the commission's proposal are ever implemented, would likely result of this consumers do it to boxes instead of one. much of the controversy surrounding the proposal has centered on whether it would require an additional box to be deployed in american films. to be sure, but noticed is that they of so many words mvpds would be required. that is likely to be the outcome if these rules are adopted and implemented. here is why. if you carry a standards in the notice, they would likely have one of two options. first, they can make substantial changes to the network architecture or sack and could provide each customer wit

in a flyer posted by a reddit user, comcast is trying to compare their internet service with google's, but as some reddit users pointed at, a lot of these bulletpoints come with signficant example, comcast's "fastest home wifi" claim leaves out the fact that anyone can simply buy a faster router with their google fiber service. also . google offers gigabit internet at $70 a month where comcast's 2gbps service goes for $300 $1000 in start-up fees. so yeah, i'd be for everything else head over to cnet.com. from our studios in new york, i'm jeff bakalar 3 there's an animal coming up on the show...who's living at the siouxland humane society right now.keep it right here.the "sunrise ray of hope" coming up next! 3 3 3 it's now (time) as we take a look outside (xxx) on the (xxx) cam. 3 3 here's a look at your weather 3 good morning, this is sgt todd sassmann with your todd sassmann this is sgt good morning, this is sgt todd sassmann with your siouxland news traffic to goofficers will be running radar on floyd and 6th st.have a safe drive to work and school this morning, for siouxland news,

apple, netflix, google, what used to be alphabet, comcast, gilead.fastest growing sectors of society. they don't pay attention. they are sector allocation. what most people don't know, qs, nasdaq 100 are growing revenues, earnings, dividends, more than double rate of s&p 500. if i give you two-ways to play qs as broad-based play, qqq is one. one our products would have downside protection. both use same basic broad-based index. pay attention to broad markets and focus on individual companies names within the indexes. liz: closing bell is coming up in a second. ward says no recession. we'll put sean's picks up on facebook.com/liz claman. "countdown to the closing bell," we're down. i hand it to david and cheryl for final lap. >> this is it, liz, thank you so much. david: bring it on. ted cruz is urging donald trump to file what cruz is call act frivolous lawsuit. we'll explain. >> new polls ahead of crucial voting in south carolina and nevada three days from now. find out who is on top and who may be in trouble. david: privacy versus national security

google at first wants to do fiber as a way to set an example to places like at&t and comcast.m reduce prices and up speeds. they are trying to turn it into more of a big business in itself. >> they do generate revenue from this. around $400 million in the most recent year. quarks -- >> much of it is making what we don't know yet. >> when you look at how much comcast earns or at&t, there is money to be made from selling the internet. corey: it is a very different kind of business model than the google business model. jack: renting it from someone else rather than laying down the cable yourself. corey: thank you, jack. deep mind technologies is pushing into medical technology. they have created a software called streams. it allows doctors to see medical results faster. this is a very different kind of business. jack: it is an early pilot project. it will not make money right now. i am an english person i have been to the nhs a lot. it runs off pen and paper. they're just trying to bring some software techniques into british health care. corey: it feels like this is an announceme

this would allow companies like google, amazon andtive tivo the chance to offer their own box to customers. cable companies like verizon and comcast argue that their apps already make it easy to see. >>> one person is saying that's it, she will not use uber again after she says the company mysteriously charged her for a ride 2,000 miles away. she was billed $40 for an uber trip in mexico. the problem is she lives in chicago and never even traveled to mexico. says the company didn't want to help. >> they basically said sorry. you should think about changing your password. maybe you lent it to a friend who had used it while they were in mexico. unfortunately we're not going to be able to refunds your money. >> she changed her password all right. she cancelled her credit card. uber eventually did call her back and offer her a refund saying she was misinformed by a customer service rep. >> you know what she should have done? better get baquero, right? what do you do when you return an item to a store with a receipt and it is declined? here's linda baquero. >> we try to help here. the issue did not involve time. in this case, he was we

google? if it is one of those, the question i have is, right now, we have tough negotiations with directv and satellite or dish, or with comcast and cable. time warner, you name it. those retransmission negotiations are happening all the time and 99.9 percent of them and without any difficulty at all. but they are paying for the contents. so, if it goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper, i guess my question, putting my broadcast hat back on, is, how about my copyrighted material? will they sale as on that? do they have no responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters? >> watch the communicators monday night at 8:00 eastern on c-span2. >> he describes how members of congress in the early 1800s bonded across party lines. for tobacco use, social clubs, and living together in boarding houses. however, leading up to the civil war, the friendships and alliances disintegrated, revealing the sectional divisions and national politics at the time. his class is one hour. prof. balcerski: welcome everybody. it is me, your professor. i'm excited to offer an election on the political culture of the antebellum

comcast and at and t. the company has had a hard time competing with google and facebook.// kirsten joyce > now let's turn it over to demetia. brian loftus how are the roads looking this morning. < demetria obilor delays in the spaghetti bowl have started along southbound i-15. no delays along summerlin parkway. this spring, crews are scheduled to build the cable barriers between buffalo and the 215. > < > back to you./// ((kirsten joyce)) > supreme court justice antonin scalia was laid to rest this weekend. his funeral service was held in washington dc saturday... the late justice's son, paul scalia, delivered mass for his father. scalia died in his sleep last saturday during a visit to texas. he was 79 years old./// ((kirsten joyce)) > the supreme court hears arguments in two cases today...its first action since scalia died. scalia could have been a deciding vote in those cases - which center on the rights of criminal defendants. president obama has vowed to pick a supreme court nominee to fill the vacancy. republicans say naming a successor should be a job for the next president./// ((kirsten joyce)) >

comcast and at&t. fate of the ceo is unclear she took over in 2012 and the company has had a hard time competing with google and facebook. samsung announced two galaxy phones with better battery life and they are dust proof and water proof for as long as 30 minutes in water that's 5 feet deep. also they can run the white pages app that identifies that aren't in your contact list. and the moon and beyond. more than 18,000 people applied for nasa's next astronaut class. that's a record that's triple the number that applied to the previous class. the only problem is there are only 14 spots and the future astronauts could be tapped for a mission to mars. chris and kathryn. >> i have been telling chris he has the good with his science knowledge. >> my science tahj? -- knowledge? this is good you are the first person to say i was good at science. >> knowledge. >> i am here for you. >> thanks very much jill. all right time to check our weather. >> and you i am telling you he would moonlight as a meteorologist. >> if i could. stopples i hope danielle gets stuck in traffic or can't get here -- sometimes i hope danie

beneficial to google and amazon and apple and netflix at the expense of say comcast, att and other video incumbents? >> i have heard that argument. i can't say that one way or the other. >> i have no idea. but i think it's consistently be argued that the government shouldn't be picking winners and losers. so i would hope there wouldn't be any motivation along those grounds. >> isn't this really a propole that goes well beyond set top boxes and are designed to encourage competition in the marketplace? and to the extent it would do that wouldn't it elevate the googles of the world? not to nk it's critical accept this false framing of the issue. it's not encouraging competition in the marketplace. the entire reason we are here is because of a regulatory framework that has created a noncompetitive marketplace. as i said in my statement, we've had 20 years now of highly interest of f.c.c. regulation of this marketplace with the integration ban as well as the cable card regime. we've had anything but a free market competitive approach to this marketplace. that's parted of the reason why we wou

google? and if it is one of those, the question i have is right now we have tough negotiations with directv and satellite or dish or comcast and, cable time warner. consenttransmission negotiations are happening all the time. end without any difficulty. but they are paying for the content. so if it goes to a new setup box with a different gatekeeper, my hey, how about my copyrighted material? are they point to sell ads on -- they going to sell ads on that? do they have no responsibility for what they take from broadcasters for nothing? >> watch "the communicators," monday night on c-span2. >> >> every president will let us know to be informed. >> there are a lot of c-span fans, my colleagues will say, i saw you on c-span. >> there is so much that c-span does. ♪ week until the election, white house rewind brings you coverage. up next, a primary debate between george w. bush, john mccain, and alan keyes. the event was hosted in south carolina. larry king is the moderator. thege bush was considered front runner, but john mccain in in newn me when -- w hampshire, to ask before. senator

google, i don't know. if it is one of those the question i have is, right now we have tough negotiations with directv, satellite, or dish, or with comcast and cable, time warner, you name it. those retransmission consent negotiations are happening all of the time. 99.9% handle without any difficulty at all. but they are paying for the content. so if it goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper i guess mike question putting my broadcaster back on is, what about my copyright material? of they can sell ads on that? if so, did i have no responsibility for what they will then take from broadcasters? i think there's some serious legal issues there we are paying attention, but this is something they'll vote on, i think it is likely to go to rulemaking at some point and we are going to be participant because we want to protect our content, it has a a value. and we are determined to protect that. >> speaking of negotiations, how worried are broadcasters that there's going to be a lot of changes to the negotiation rule. >> again, this is a solution looking for a problem. i understand as good business people and pay-tv colleagues are,

google? i don't know. if it's one of those, the question that i have is right now we have tough negotiations with directv and satellite or dish or with comcast and cable, time warner, you name it. those retransmission consent negotiations are happening all the time, and 99.9% of them end without any difficulty at all. but they're paying for the content. so if it quos to a new -- goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper i guess my question, putting my broadcast hat back on, is, hey, how about my copyrighted material? are they going to sell ads on that? and if so, do they have no responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters for nothing? so, i mean, i think there's some serious legal issues there. and we're paying attention. but this is something they're going to vote on. i think it's likely to go to rulemaking at some point, and we're going to be participants, pause we want to protect our -- because we want to protect our content. it has a value, and we're determined to protect that. >> speaking of negotiations, how worried are broadcasters that there's going to be a lot of changes to the retrans negotiation roles

comcast, and at&t. the fate of ceo mercy myers still unclear, she took over in 2012, and the company's really struggled to compete against other tech giants, like google and facebook. erika? >> see what happens with them. but meantime, one job that's getting a lot of interest, astronaut, a record number of people are applying to be nasa's next astronaut class. how about that? >> yes, there are more than 18,000 applicants, triple the number of people that applied to the previous class, there is one little problem, there are only 14 spot. these future astronaut could actually be tapped poor mission to mars, so will spend the next 18 months sifting through some of the resumes. >> okay, so 18 months, 18,000 applicants, you know, a thousand per month, they'll work their way through. >> you know what, cool job, so i understand why they're being selective. >> great to see the interest there, jill, thanks so much. >>> coming up after the break, meisha checks the early morning trouble spots on the road, katie tell us when to car that i umbrella. when "eyewitness news" continues. we'll be right back. >>> time for check on the forecast, katie, can we keep the ni

you see it as beneficial to google and amazon and apple and netflix at the expense of comcast, at&t and other video incumbents. >> i have heard that argument. i can't say one way or the other. >> i have no idea, but it's consistently argued the government should be picking winners and losers. i would hope there wouldn't be any motivational on those grounds. >> if i could follow-up, is an essay proposal that goes well beyond set-top boxes and is designed to encourage an end elevate the google of the world at the expense of incumbent players? >> i think it is critical not to accept baseball spamming up the issue. it's not encouraging competition in the marketplace. the entire reason we are here is the regulatory framework that has created a noncompetitive marketplace. as i said in a statement of commissioner rightly pointed out as well, with 20 years of regulation of this marketplace with the emigration ban as well as the cablecard machine. we had anything but a free market, competitive approach to this marketplace and not as part of the reason we would prefer getting rid of the box and a

enforce buyers. including verizon, comcast and at&t. the fate of melissa mayor is still unclear. she took over back in 2012. the company had a hard time competing with google and facebook. >> fortune is out with the most admired company's list. the winners are a trio of tech giants in the tech spot, apple. and followed by alphabet and amazon. the list is compiled with corporate reputation. coming at 21, procter & gamble. >>> energy stocks, as the price of crude oil surged. s&p 500 climbed 27 points. >>> to the moon and beyond. more than 18 thousand people applied for nasa's next astronaut class. that would be the record. triple the number applied to the previous class. 18 thousand for 14 spots. the future astronauts could be tapped for a mission to mars by the time they get through. >> yet i want to be in the simulator, where you get to float around. i wouldn't want to get to space. >> 18 thousand people applied to be an astronaut. >> . >> i happen to catch this live. and martin swiss, jr., by 11/100th a second. the closest in history. whole way down the stretch. >> and enforced the only thing we're close counts is in horseshoe definitely not in recovery.

comcast and at&t. the fate of the ceo is unclear. she took over in 2012 and the competing with google and facebook. samsng announced two new phones the galaxy s7 and s7 edge have longer batter life and dust and water proof. they can identify incoming calls even from numbers that aren't in your contact list. and to the moon and beyond. more than 18,000 people applied for nasa next astronaut class. that's a record. it's triple the number that applied to the previous class. there are only 14 spots. the future astronauts could be tacked for a mission to mars. chris i guess you will have to wait for the next round. >> i would be okay going to mars as long as we could keep tweeting back and forth. >> you could tweet your way to mars. >> thank you. >> reporter: do you follow scottkelly's twitter account. >> yes. >> and it's cool. >> reporter: i love it. >> it's really cool. see you tomorrow morning have a good one. your traffic and weather together. >> and a look at today's top stories including details on a stabbing in dorchester. what we are learning this morning about the investigation now underway. >>

google? if it is one of those, the question that i have is, right now we have tough negotiations with direct tv and satellite or dish. with comcast and cable. time warner, you name it. those retransmission negotiations are happening all the time. 99.9% of them end without difficulty at all. but they are paying for the content. if it goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper, putting my broadcast hat acback on, is how about my copyrighted material? are they going to sell ads? did he have no responsibility what they will take from broadcasters for nothing -- to have noey7 responsibility for what they will take from broadcasters for nothing. >> vietnam veteran and author talks about warfare on the mekong river delta in vietnam. the army, coast guard, and navy were successful and prevented the viet cong from transporting supplies. the u.s. navy memorial hosted this event. >> thank you for joining us. we are very pleased to welcome dr. edward marolda. his book was published by the navy and heritage command. it is available as a free pdf download and copies of the book are available at the ship's at the navy museum. dr. mer

google? if it is one of those, the question i have is, right now, we have tough negotiations with directv and satellite or dish, or with comcast and cable. time warner, you name it. those retransmission negotiations are happening all the time and 99.9 percent of them and without any difficulty at all. but they are paying for the contents. so, if it goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper, i guess my question, putting my broadcast hat back on, is, how about my copyrighted material? will they sale as on that? do they have no responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters? >> watch the communicators monday night at 8:00 eastern on c-span2. >> he describes how members of congress in the early 1800s bonded across party lines. for tobacco use, social clubs, and living together in boarding houses. however, leading up to the civil war, the friendships and alliances disintegrated, revealing the sectional divisions and national politics at the time. his class is one hour. prof. balcerski: welcome everybody. it is me, your professor. i'm excited to offer an election on the political culture of the antebellum

do you see it as an official to google and amazon and apple and netflix at the expense of say comcast, at&t and other video incumbents? >> i have heard that argument. i can't say that one way or the other. >> i have no idea but i think it is consistently argued that the government shouldn't be picking winners and losers. i would hope that it wouldn't be any motivation along those ground. >> is additionally a proposal that goes well beyond set-top boxes and is designed to encourage competition in the marketplace to the extent it would do that, wouldn't it elevate the googles of the world at the expense of incumbent players? >> i think it's critical not to accept this false framing of the issued its not encouraging competition in the marketplace. the entire reason we are here is because of a regulatory framework that has created a noncompetitive marketplace. as i said in a statement that i think commissioner o'rielly point out, we've had 20 years of highly regulation with the integration band as well as the cablecard machine. we've had anything but a free market competitive approach to

google, apple and tivo, instead set-top boxes from cae and satelle providers. arly all consumers musnow get their xes from tir cable companies, and pay an averagof231 a year to lease e devices. comcast has offered anpogy ong with customers impacted by monday's service tage. around 8:20 a.m. our time on monday... on demand video, as well as broadcast, local and ble tv channels were inaccessible for about 90 one spokeswoman says customers wi recei a credit for a day's worth of video service, whicshe esd be around 2-dollars. credits will vardepending on how stomers we impacted. new this morning... toyota m corp announces a recall of one-point-three million "rav's" in north amer.. due to the possibilityf seatbes beg damad by a metal seat frame part in event of crash. the recall involves models produced betweenuly 2005 and august 2014... the automaker will be adding resin covers to the tal seat cushion ames to prevent any mepieces from cutting the seatbelt in the event of a crash, after it received two reports in which reaseatbelts paratefollowing crashes. coming up... america's national parks are becoming very populavacation stinations tethe plus.. wee pectina major announcement from th

google? questions i have now is that we have negotiations with direct tv and satellite and cable, with comcast time warner -- you name it. retransmissions negotiations are happening all the time. withoutcent of them and difficulty at all but they are paying for the content. so if he goes to a new set-top gatekeeper,ifferent my question is, how about my copyrighted the cheerio? are they going to sell ads on that? do they have no responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters? communicators tonight. on c-span two. >> washington journal continues. norquist is a familiar face. -- americans for tax reform he joins us to discuss the budget and we will also be talking about the tax plans that the candidates are talking about on the campaign trail. trillionint -- a $4.4 budget. up 3.4this brings taxes trillion dollars over the next decade and it increases spending over projections 2.5 trillion dollars over the next decade. that is a bernie sanders wish list of more money for the government and more spending for the government. what's interesting is -- none of this is going to happen. th

as an example, we could argue is probably not as capital efficient as comcast is with nbc as a separate thing. and the same way googlelife sciences and investing in access, and energy and et cetera. >> we're going to get results broken out this evening for the first time, greater transparency. could your view change if you actually see that, say, the ebitda margin is better than we thought for the core business versus the other bets? a lot of the spending could be spent on the other bets and so therefore could you then rerate the stock to attribute a stronger core business? >> there is no question that the numbers will look better when you separate out the other bets from core google. no question. the question is how much better. and i think what i'm seeing is that investors are willfully optimistic in thinking that the vast majority of the capex sits in the other bets. youtube is intensive. google's margins are eroding because of their investments. nothing wrong with that those are sound businesses. but it is not as if it is all roses and sunshine if you separate out the other bets from core google. >> what do you s

google, i don't know. if it is one of those, the question i have is that right now we have tough negotiations with wreck tv, satellite, dish, directv,- with satellite, dish, comcast. 9% of those conversations in without any difficult at all. if it goes to a different gatekeeper, putting my broadcast hat back on, how about my copyrighted material? responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters. ? >> watch the communicators monday night at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span2. this weekend, the c-span ur takes you to greeneville, south carolina to explore the city's literary and historical culture. >> when europe went to war, our allies, primarily england and france, look to washington dc for goods and materials that they needed, so washington, d.c. looked down to the textile capitals of the world, and all of a sudden government contracts ,ame flowing into this area asking the mills here to begin producing for the war effort, initially for our allies, then of course for the united states as well. >> and on american history tv -- >> this really was a pretty nasty spot. it's hard to believe now looking at it, one of the best parks in the country, this was a ve

relatiships with comcast, our employer on e stock end i u have relationships with people that i didn't tnk you could haveelatnshipsith. >> wdon'alys agreen everything. at the key. >> rht >> you lk at googl we ptner with goog. peop say, how n yopartner with google? they build fiber. they'rnoover building ber on uand see opptunities to devop fiber. >> youe wearg a wiing jersey. that okay? >> well, >> wl, look, i'm focused on ings like how do we bring smt technologies to the ci of san francisco. don't tweet the discount carriers are going to take shots us. on shar >> on shark tank, i ked them whatompa therespect, vezo ple says verizon. rizon is a utility. it's not it's not meant to be cool. >> we don't think of ourselves as a ulity anymore. i an, there's a part of that that's our hitage. it's aat company we thi wcan build on it. you look at the access that we have the technoloes that we can bring to cie this example in san francisco, they can use that to become a smart city, of the smartest cities in the rld. >> is the u.s. behind or ahead in tecogy? >> i d't >> i don't thinkhere's a ques that wee ahead. >> i'm going to leave at at. chairman and ceo overizon, vz. yes, my number one recomme

with comcast, our you have relationships with people that i didn't think you could have relationships with. >> we don't always agree on everything. that's the key. >> right. >> you look at google. we partner with google. people say, how can you partner with google? they build fiber. they're not over building fiber on us and we see opportunities to develop fiber. >> you're wearing a winning jersey. number 50. is that okay? >> well, look, i'm focused on things like how do we bring smart technologies to the city of san francisco. i don't tweet so the discount carriers are going to take shots at us. >> on shark tank, i asked them what company they respect, verizon. apple says verizon. it's not meant to be cool. >> we don't think of ourselves as a utility anymore. i mean, there's a part of that that's our heritage. it's a great company. we think we can build on it. if you look at the access that we have and the technologies that we can bring to cities. this example in san francisco, they can use that to become a smart city, one of the smartest cities in the world. we want to be their partner there. >> is the u.s. behind or ahead in technology? >> i don't think there's any question

google? i don't know, and if it's one of those the question i have is right now, and we have tough negotiations with directv and satellite or dish or with comcast and cable, time warner, you name it. those retransmission consent negotiations are happening all of the time and 99.9% of them end without any difficulty at all, but they're paying for the content, so if it goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper, i guess, putting my broadcast hat back on is hey, how about my copyrighted material and are they going to sell all of that? if so, do they not have responsibility for what they will then take from broadcasters for nothing. >> watch the communicators tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span2. >>> every election cycle we're reminded how important it is for citizens to be informed and to me c-span is home for political junkies and a way to track the government for what happened. >> it's a way for us to stay informed. there are fans on the hill and my colleagues will say i saw you on c-span. >> there's so much more that c-span does to make sure that people outside the beltway know what's going on inside it. >> homeland security secretary

google isn't laying new fiber optic cables but relying on the existing cables and that will limit where it can go. other companies are working on faster internet, as well. al's fiber competitor, comcast, owns. >> in the interest of full disclosure. thank you very much, scott. >>> a danger are ecigarettes. look what happens to the kentucky man on the right-hand side of your screen. it exploded in his pocket. he desperately tries to douse the flames and ended up with second degree burns. >> that's frightening. >> you have bomb in your pocket? i was like that. you have a bomb in your pocket. i was probably shocked. like this my hand on my head. >> nope, that was fire in his pocket. dozens of users have report similar explosions from their ecigarettes. you notice where he's grabbing, too. you certainly have to feel some sympathy for that man. most of those explosions have happened while they were charging. note to self if you smoke ecigarettes. >> no ecigarettes while you're on a hoverboard. a bad combination. >> a line i would probably never use. >> two things you never brought together before. we are bringing right now cool temps to start. gorgeous temperatures, again. and then it all

google? if it is one of those, the now,ion i have is, right we have tough negotiations with direct tv and satellite and dish , or with comcastnd cable. time warner, you name it. those retransmission consent negotiations are happening all 99.9% of them and without difficulty. but they are paying for the content, so if it goes to a new set top box with a different gatekeeper, my question, putting my broadcaster hat back on, is, how about my copyrighted material? will they sell ads on that? if so, do they have no responsibility for what they take for broadcasters? communicators," monday night on c-span2. michael hamlin, back at our table from the broken institute -- from the brookings institute to talk about syria. john kerry announced he is over there, trying to broker some sort of peace deal. he says there is a provisional one in place. what do you make of the word provisional, and what you think? x i am skeptical, because first of all, as you know, he has been trying to negotiate humanitarian relief, a temporary five day or seven-day respite on the fighting so we can get food into places where people are literally starving.

google? i do not know. have is right now, we have tough negotiations with satellite or dish work -- or with comcast and cable. i warner, you name it. the retransmission consent negotiations are happening all the time. 99.9% of them and without any difficulty at all. paying for the content. if it goes to a new set-top us with a different gatekeeper, my question put in my broadcast cap back on is, how about my copyrighted material? are they going to sell ads on it? if so, do they have no responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters? i think there are serious legal issues there. and we are paying attention. this is something they will vote on. it is likely to go to rulemaking at some point and we will be participants and we want to protect our content. it has a value and we are determined to protect that. >> how worried are broadcasters that there will be a lot of changes to negotiation rules? gordon: again, this is a solution looking for a problem. good people and the pay-tv collies are, there -- that they can. far less, we are paid for our content than they pay themselves for their own conten

google? i don't know. and if it's one of those, the question that i have is right now we have tough negotiations with directv and satellite or dish or with comcast and cable, time warner, you name it. those retransmission consent negotiations are happening all the time, and 99.9% of them end without any difficulty at all. but they're paying for the content. so if it goes to a new set-top box with a different gatekeeper, i guess my question putting my broadcast hat back on is, hey, how about my copyrighted material? be are they going to sell ads on that? and if so, do they have no responsibility for what they then will take from broadcasters for nothing? >> watch "the communicators" tonight at eight eastern on c-span2. >> the white house marked african-american history month with several events last week. president obama delivered remarks to a crowd attending a reception celebrating african-american history in the white house east room. this is about 20 minutes. [inaudible conversations] >> ladies and gentlemen, the president of the united states and mrs. michelle obama. [cheers and applause] >> hello, everybody! [cheers and applause] well, it is

you see it as, you know, beneficial to google and amazon and apple and netflix at the expense of, say, comcast at&t and other video incumbents? >> i have heard that argument. i can't say that one way or the other. >> i have no idea, but i think it's consistently been our view that the government shouldn't be picking winners and losers, and so i would hope there wouldn't be any motivation along those grounds. >> but if i could just follow up, i mean, isn't this really a proposal that goes well beyond set top boxes and is designed to encourage competition in the mark marketplace? wouldn't it elevate the googles of the world at the expense of incumbent players? >> look, it's critical not to accept the false framing of the issue. not encouraging competition in the marketplace. the entire reason we are here is because of a regulatory framework that has created a noncompetitive marketplace. i mean, as i said in my statement, and i think commissioner o'reilly pointed out as well, we've had 20 years now of highly intrusive fcc regulation of this marketplace with the integration ban as well as the cabl

google's behavior. investigators maybe trying to build an antitrust case. yahoo! will start approaching possible bidders for its core business to naked that is according to people familiar with the process coul. s. comcastnterested. mayer is under pressure from activist shareholders after struggling to this sale boost s. volkswagen may be forced to clean up the air. a long list of penalties in the omissions cheating scandal, one of them forcing vw to clean up five times the amount of pollution released by its 30 engines. the government is not commenting. that is your business flash. jonathan: big moves in the oil market this morning. brent crude at 34.41. thisove to freeze output seemingly doing something to the oil market. larida andarca harry is with us. this is not seem to be much of a move and all. harry: if they do freeze, production is at a high wire -- ishis watermark could at a high wir watermark. we get a pick only to see that driven down right after. david: explain that to me because it seems to be more than a rumor at this time. saudi arabia says they will agree with russia on a freeze. it is not cutting it back, but itu have the start of th before cutting back could there's a little more tha

or google so then the question i have is right now we have tough negotiations with satellite or a dish or direct tv or comcast cable or time warner. every transmission consent happens all the time and 99.9% and without a difficulty but you pay for the content so vico's to the set top box with the gatekeeper is what about my copyrighted material? will they sell ads in do they have no responsibility that they will take from broadcasters for nothing? "wash" continues. host: karine jean pierre joins us with five days to go until saturday's south carolina primary. wife. >> joining us now with five days to go in the primary after hillary clinton's wind the strategists has worked lois three campaigns with different cycles but what is taking place this morning? >> first of all, this has been a crazy and unpredictable in save cycle of both sides. this saturday what happened in nevada was a huge for the clinton campaign nevada is the first racially diverse state of the contest there is also nine-point 1% african-american voters in she was able to get over 70 percent of the african-american voters to vote for her that i

google? if it is one of those, the question i have is, right now, we have negotiations with , dish,, satellite comcast, time warner, you name it. those transmission negotiations are happening all the time. 99% of them and without any box, goes to a new set-top my question, putting my broadcast had back on, is, how about my copyrighted material? on they going to sell ads that? do they have no responsibility for what they will take from broadcasters? watch "the communicators" monday night on c-span 2. each week, american history tv visits museums and historic places. the vietnam veterans memorial collection includes an estimated 400,000 items left at the memorial since it opened. the collections are ed