lobbying brussels alone the e use transparency register lists more than 200 meetings with google representativessince 2014. google is the busiest lobbyist in brussels. we finally get our interview not in california. but in munich germany. with one of the longest serving employees yes. how important is ai for google. is so important to us that 2 years ago we rebranded our entire research division into google a on this if you get a i drives a significant part of our product development. above all drives a significant part of our efforts to improve the quality of our products. take machine translation through the use of machine algorithm that we've seen faster progress over the last 2 years than we did over the entire previous decade. society will undoubtedly be propelled forward by the implementation of these services and the use of ai in the years to come. for what's key is that it's done responsibly under the principles of transparency we need to explain health things work why they are needed for people's data goes how they can control it how they can delete it if they want to delete it or forwa

ted cruz asked the google representative, why did you put mr. ideo on the restricted list. with a straight face the man from google said because it mentions murder. judge jeanine: has he mentioned tell special lately? the ten commandments are mature content? >> i said to senator cruz. we'll make it google preparedly 9 commandments. judge jeanine: youtube is a private company and operates on private property. so what can you do about this? >> this is -- i am a big believer my entire life, i have always said clarity before agreement. let's be clear. the most of powerful by far, almost a monopoly on information is google/youtube. they are left wing organizations that want to crush us. they admit it. we have the video of their saying after the 2016 election, an internal video somebody took, we cannot let this happen again. this is a disaster for america. we have an internal picture of an email calling' ben shapiro and bringing aer u nazis. project veritas has brought forth to whistle blow top the doctor can't cure you if we don't acknowledge there is

ted cruz asked the google representative, why did you put mr. er's video on the restricted list. with a straight face the man from google said because it mentions murder. judge jeanine: has he mentioned tell special lately? the ten commandments are mature content? >> i said to senator cruz. we'll make it google preparedly 9 commandments. judge jeanine: youtube is a private company and operates on private property. so what can you do about this? >> this is -- i am a big believer my entire life, i have always said clarity before agreement. let's be clear. the most of powerful by far, almost a monopoly on information is google/youtube. they are left wing organizations that want to crush us. they admit it. we have the video of their saying after the 2016 election, an internal video somebody took, we cannot let this happen again. this is a disaster for america. we have an internal picture of an email calling' ben shapiro and bringing aer u nazis. project veritas has brought forth to whistle blow top the doctor can't cure you if we don't acknowledge th

a represent asked google -- a representative asked google, it is true that 50% of searches go to googleebsites, and google was not able to give "no" as an answer to that question, so what we have is google taking over the internet because it has such a huge monopoly share. it is able to prioritize its own websites at the expense of every other business in our economy, so i am really not worried about china. rrit, one of the legal barriers here is talking about how the consumer is harmed. as said, google is a free service for consumers. what about the consumer being harmed? said, with, as sally consumers giving up their data without being paid for it in a fair way, that is something that google and other large tech companies have done for a long time, and in the united states at least, they have been able to push off some of these investigations, because they were services that were free to the end consumer, but there is the consumer who buys the advertising. they need to bid on advertisement so people can find them online. that is a consumer of the google product, and that is kind of wh

when i testified about this for senator ted cruz in the senate a few weeks ago, he asked the google represents mr. prager's video on the ten commandments, why is that -- why did you put that on the restricted list. and with a straight face under oath the man from google which owns youtube said, because it mentions murder. judge jeanine: oh my goodness. has he watched television lately? this is crazy. the ten commandments are mature content? >> yes. i said to senator cruz, all right, we're going to make a google friendly nine commandments. judge jeanine: this has got to be frightening for you. youtube is a private company and it operates on private property. so what can you do about this? >> okay. so this is -- i am a big believer -- my entire life i've always said clarity before agreement. let's be clear. the most powerful by far -- i mean almost a monopoly on information is google/youtube. they are left wing organizations that want to crush us. they admit it. we have the video of their saying right after the 2016 election, an internal video that somebody took, we cannot let this happen again

to , a hearing on efforts identify and remove violent and web.mist content from the representatives from google, facebook, twitter and the anti-defamation league testified the senate commerce committee. the

google. the attorneys general representing 48 states, d.c. and puerto rico, launched this probe. ia and alabama have not signed on. >> while many consumers believe that the internet is free, certainly, we know from google's profits of $117 billion that the internet is not free. this investigation is not a lawsuit. it's an investigation to determine the facts. right now, we're looking at advertising. but the facts will lead where the facts lead. >> silicon valley has faced criticism whether it's harming competition for consumers. it's a target from politicians. conservatives claim they face discrimination. liberals say the algorithms fringe voices and conspiracies. the probe will initially look into google's advertising but it may expand from there. regulators around the world have been critical of google. the e.u. fined google for antitrust violations over the past three years. its stock fell slightly on the news. google declined to comment. >>> looking at the global markets right now. a holding pattern around the world. chinese stocks fell after weak economic data fueled concerns

taylor: we should note there was big tech there, representatives from google.f senators and national security experts all participating. what was the collective decision, if there was one, about how to tackle this? is it more regulation? in thelatory solution united states is really tough, given our first amendment and supreme court doctrine on it. also, the state of the congress. i would not look to a regulatory decision as it relates to disinformation. issuesan be regulatory related to other aspects. tech platforms are trying to focus on manipulative behavior, inauthentic coordinated disinformation. that is where they should be focused, rather than the content asis of disinformation, but big thing we took away today was the role of the regular mainstream traditional media. they play a much bigger role in the disinformation front than has currently been recognized and we need to turn our attention to that other part of the media landscape. you are right and those 2020 elections coming up quickly. thank you. sorry to cut you off. way wehead, changing the watch.

representatives from google, facebook, twitter, and the anti-defamation league testified better the senate commerce science and transformation -- transportation committee. the hearing is two hours and 10 minutes. >> we will come to order, please. together the cometty gathers to discuss >> this meeting will come to order. thank you. this committee gathers to discuss what the technology industry is doing to remove sleep. and extremist content from their platforms. this is a matter of serious importance to the safety and well-being of our nation's communities. i sincerely hope we can engage in a collaborative discussion about what more can be done within the jurisdiction of this committee to keep our communities safe from those wishing to do us harm. to do us harm. representatives social world's largest media companies. several r from representatives. >> over the past two decades the ups has led the world in the and opment of social media other services that allow people to connect with one another. open platform providers like google, twitser, and facebook and roducts like instagram youtube

representatives from google, facebook, twitter, and the anti-defamation league testified better the senate commerce science and transformation -- transportation committee.

google headquarters. now at the center. it represents his concern about the impact of human activity on mother nature.s a perfect for the home of the san jose sharks. >> it will be at the shark tank. got it. >> remind me of a hershey kiss. >> it does. see the interpretation. >> that's what art is meant to be. >> we made it it friday. 94 saturday 90 sunday. fall arrives. the heat comes back. >> thanks for joining us on this thursday night. enjoy your friday. [ cheers and applause ♪ >> steve: from 30 rockefeller plaza here in new york city, it's "the tonight show starring jimmy fallon." and now, here he is, jimmy fallon

representatives from google, facebook, twitter and the anti defamation league testify at this summit

google did face tough questions by senators yesterday about their efforts to fight online extremism. lauren: hillary vaughn is on capitol hill and she has the details for us. >> reporter: good morning. representativesbook, google and twitter faced senate lawmakers, trying to explain how they put their data to good use, to catch extremist violent behavior before it happens. dan sullivan asked why facebook is able to use personal data for targeted ads but doesn't seem to use the same data to prevent a mass shooting. >> are you using theal grow thed technologies that you use in other spaces to help identify those threats? >> there's certainly cross-learnings across the company. different products work in different way. >> is it a priority for you, the way it would be for selling yellow sweaters. >> absolutely. >> reporter: they faced the most heat for the attack in australia. they super charged their ai tech and say they can flag violent content in a live feed in 12 seconds, 90% faster than a few months ago. they defended the decision to let certain violent groups use twitter. >> if we remove that person's account, it wouldn't change things on the ground. we need to bear in mind how do the other lever

representatives from google, facebook, twitter and the anti-defamation league testified. they discussed extremist behavior and how the major companies are trying to combat this through content using reporting, artificial intelligence, law enforcement tools and information sharing between companies. from yesterday, this is just over two hours and five minutes. >>> today we welcome representatives from the world's largest social media companies and online platforms. we hear from ms. monica bickert, head of the global policy management for facebook. and mr. nick pickles, public policy at twitter. mr. derrick slater, global director of information policy at google and mr. george saline, senior vice president of programs for the anti-defamation league. platforms have dramatically changed the way we skmcommunica and have been used positively for like-minded groups to come together and shed light on despotic regimes throughout the world. no matter how great the benefit to society these platforms provide, it is important to consider how they can be used for evil at home and abroa

representatives from google, facebook, twitter and the anti defamation league testify at this summit commerce committee hearing. the chair is roger wicker of mississippi. >> this hearing will come to order. good morning. today, we will discuss with the technology is doing to remove violent and extremist tenth from their platform. this is a matter of serious important to the safety and well-being of our nations communities. i hope we can engage in a collaborative discussion about what more can be done within the jurisdiction of this committee to keep our communities safe from those wishing to do us harm. today, we representative on the world's largest social media companies and online platforms, we hear from this monika bickert, head of the global policy management for facebook, and mr. nick pickles, policy director of twitter. mr. derek slater, global policy director, and senior vice president of program for the anti defamation league. over the past two decades, the united states has led the world in the development of social media and other services to allow people to -- sites like

. >>> less than an hour from now representatives from facebook, twitter and google will be on capitol hill testifies about digital responsible when it comes to mass violence and extremism online. >>> new at 6:00, we're learning more this morning about wide ranging collaboration among thousands of health professionals about limiting how many sugary drinks kids should drink. babies under the age of 1 shouldn't drink fruit juice. dr. jennifer ashton offered this tip on "good morning america." >> we have to lead by example. really don't drink your calories, water is best. and kids talk to your pediatricians about this. >>> a mystery solved at the winchester mystery house. house historians now know who made the glass window panes at the home, and it's not tiffany, as believed on previous tours. historians say the windows were made by john malon, a glass artist in the late 1800s. the winchester house historian had a suspicion that the windows were not made by tiffany because they did not look the same. during restoration work at the house, workers found an envelope tucked inside a wall cont

us so these people are in the fuss not heard by the judge but what you represent that so dangerous to them are the case why google does go of course is that yes that's an important point because this will explain the whole story. innocence and at the same time i'm a public figure in progress for the last 30 years they were describing me portraying me as the grandson of hasn't been a fundamentalist even supporting extremists when they came to us reminding the founder of the muslim exactly so so. being an extremist didn't work when they were talking about me being involved in you know illegal activities it didn't work and then i came in and what i'm saying in france is look there is no future in this country if you don't treat muslims on an equal for the citizens i'm not even a minority i'm a european citizen you have to dissent us now all this business that you are talking about the headscarf and let me be clear. you cannot impose the headscarf to a woman from an islamic perspective you cannot impose her to take it off from a human rights perspective you see disenfranchise you on extremists so i what i'm sure you'

in one minute or last, could because i have three minutes left, i would request that representatives from googlecebook and twitter should be confident that each of the companies is taking this issue seriously and white americans should be optimistic about your efforts going forward. >> one minute each. >> indeed. >> google. >> thank you, senator. i would start by appointing to youtube guidelines which details every quarter videos were reasons why and is being flagged first by machines. dealing with this issued in removing violent content is accommodation of technology and people, technology can find patterns and people can help you with the nuances. we have seen over the time that technology is getting better and better by taking on the content faster and before people have viewed it. with the od offset of 9 million videos that we removed in the second quarter of thisse year,% of those were first flagged by machines. 80% of those were removed before a single view and we talked to a violent extremism that is better in terms of removal before wide viewing. we are already seeing advancements in mac

. >>> every stated is investigating google over antitrust and scrutiny of the tech giant. a bipartisan group of attorneys general representing 48 states, washington, d.c. and puerto rico. only california and alabama have not signed on to the probe. >> while many consumers believe that the internet is free, certainly, we know from google's profits of $117 billion that the internet is not free. this investigation is not a lawsuit. it's an investigation to determine the facts. right now, we're looking at advertising. but the facts will lead where the facts lead. >> the probe will initially look into google's advertising but it may expand from there. the technology has faced antitrust scrutiny from lawmakers and the justice department. regulators around the world have been critical of google. the e.u. fined google for antitrust the past three years. google declined to comment to cnn. >>> the fda is warning juul about marketing its product as a safer alternative to cigarettes. the company has been responded with corrective actions within 15 working days. juul is reviewing the order and will fully cooperate. there's been an alarmi

google. that's expected to be announced next week. my next guest representsic congressman from california ro khanna. thank you for making it on the show today. the new york attorney general and the facebook review is citing concerns over control of personal data. our personal data, anybody pretty much is on facebook. talk about the effort to examine the impact of google on digital advertising markets. >> well, i think we absolutely need an internet bill of rights. consumers need to know what is happening to our data. we need to be able to consent when our data is transferred. there needs to be federal standards for safeguarding consumers and i think we need to pass that on a bipartisan basis. now, i do believe that the companies need to be held accountable to the legal standards already there but we need stronger leader standards that congress needs to pass. >> julie: the new york attorney general put out a statement on her facebook investigation. it reads like this. even the largest social media platform in the world must follow the law and respect consumers

among them tech giant google which announced it eighteen new energy deals with more than two billion dollars representing the largest ever corporate patches of renewable energy. the projects include knees so that i'm wind farms around the world at which will supply it six the one thousand six hundred throw that make a lot. of electricity. amazon meanwhile has pledged to be fully cover neutral by twenty forty. images include a new fleets of a hundred thousand elected delivery vans aimed at cutting its co two emissions which topped forty four million metric tons. last year as well amazon's chief executive had say. as this economy develops and people get serious about being carbon zero through real changes to their real business activities. that is going to be a gigantic signal to the market place to start inventing developing these new technologies with these global companies will need. as the race for clean energy continues south kororea's hyundaiai heavy industries has been fined forty seven million dollars in the united states. illegally importing dirty diesel engines us authorities say that's between t

platforms, some issues lately, transcription of holdings on syria and google devices it is a traditional ambassador role where you representase of denmark. that said, it goes without saying we are european union member country, so we've also had a function to try and explain what is europe doing, also the regulatory front, and how does that relate to the technology industry here in the u.s. >> that was my next question i'm wondering are you hearing complaints in the valley that the eu is unfairly targeting u.s. big tech and somehow trying to subsidize their own innovation with our funds? >> oh, yes i mean, if i received a dollar every time we got a complaint about what europe is doing, i would have been a wealthy man, not a civil servant any more what i would say, there's a lot of misconception, misunderstandings of what europe is trying to do, and some of the companies have come forward to say this is anti-american, we're trying to target u.s. companies, for example, with this data protection regulation which stipulates that your personal data is your personal data that cannot be misused by third parties. i think we have

google. larry page, sergey brin, eric schmidt. judiciary committee chairman, representative jerry nadler saying that the documents will help the committee understand, whether quote, they are using their market power in ways that hurt consumers and stop competition. they provided significant benefits to consumers. they also all maintain that they have competition. in other words each one is essentially tried to say we're not a monopoly. they have also expressed a willingness to work with authorities. if you look how the stocks have been performing, facebook is slightly lower today, but up 42% year-to-date. that is best performing of the "fang" stocks. amazon 22% year-to-date. google 18. apple, 38% higher year-to-date. long story short, connell, even with all this pressure, even with all this questioning they are still all-out performing the s&p 500. meantime, their legal teams will not be taking this lightly. this is a big deal. when you're asking for internal emails, that's serious. back to you. connell: sounds like it would be. melissa, thanks. melissa: amazon, facebook und

it made its debut at burning man and made a stop at google headquarters for a couple of years and now in the south bay. the sculptor says it represents his concerns about the impact of human activity on mother nature. as a bonus, it's also a perfect sculpture for the home of our san jose sharks. >> that was the music i heard. >> he never wanever want to hea you're at the beach. >> all right, this might be a beach weekend. you told us about a warmup. >> we're going to have some hot weather and it starts to warm up today but we feel the hot weather coming in tomorrow. a live look in san francisco, before you head out the door, skies are clear. we're going to get a lot of sunshine anywhere from 50 in napa and santa rosa to 60 in san francisco. 48 in half moon bay, while san jose we're waking up and walking out the door to 59 degrees and as we get out the door for the morning commute in brentwood we'll be at about 62 degrees and dropping down a couple more degrees headed into the sunrise hours, and then we'll see it warming up, we'll be in the mid-70s by 11:00 and as we go throughout the day the south bay high temperatures warmer than ye

google and facebook twitter. different bias ideological decision making choices with these companies. what does that represent in terms of this broader debate? i'm sure it's a little different. how do you see the president's role here? >> everybody loves that these days. i think it's political opportunism, in my opinion. it is effective political opportunity for him. i think the president's role should be limited and the more he weighs into this, the less effective he will come. algorithm development. less is more. >> congressmen jerry mcnerney. a member of the energy and commerce committee. egg our guest reporter from politico. thank you very much. this communicator and all other communicators are available. >> the house will be in order. c-span has been providing coverage of congress the white house, the supreme court and public policy events from washington, d.c. and around the country. created by cable in 1979. c-span is brought to you by your local cable or satellite provider. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. ♪ >> coming up at the top of the hour. baseball hall of famer mari and o rivera will

representatives from google, facebook, twitter and the anti-defamation league testified.hey discussed extremist behavior and how the major companies are trying to combat this through content using reporting, artificial intelligence, law enforcement tools and information sharing between companies. from yesterday, this is just over two hours and five minu

state attorneys general representing all 50 states announced an investigation into the tech behemoth google. the leader of the pack, the texas attorney general ken paxton. here's what to y. >> this investigation is not a lawsuit. it is an investigation to determine the facts. right now we are looking at advertising but the facts will lead to where the facts lead. liz: all right. should you be nervous about this? it's not the first time the tech titan has been under investigation. in 2011, the ftc brought the case against the company. we have that related placement of tracking cookies, et cetera. you have all kinds of issues. >> different times. the political environment right now is ripe for tech companies to be forking over billions and billions of dollars. i will tell you why. you have just -- not just state attorneys general and they are bipartisan here. ken paxton we should point out is a republican, looking at google, tish james is a democrat looking at facebook. i believe she's in this suit as well. but you have the white house. this reminds me of what happened with the banks about mo

their role in the spread of online hate which could lead to real-world violence representatives from facebook, twitter and googleies and practices on how violent and hateful content is identified and removed from their sights you're up-to-date. that's the news update this hour sarah, back downtown to you. >> sue, thank you. >>> quick check on some stocks made some big moves today. beyond meat under pressure after tim horton announced only offer products in providences of ontario and british columbia they've not yet offered beyond meat products in the u.s >>> whirlpool shares lower after being declared overweight on concerns of slowing global growth microsoft another one to watch after hours, higher after they announced a $40 billion stock buyback and raised its dividend to pay 11% overall, volatile market day after the federal reserve announced its cutting rates, quickly rebounded into the close after fed chair jay powell's news conference. joining us now with what to do next, lizann sonders jeff sherman with us as well deputy chief investment officer at double line capital a little stock, a little bonds biggest

the first is a study recently produced by rand fish kin a leading represent expert on search engine. opt mission i found that google traffic no longer goes for the goingle web but stays on google products. the second a research by cafra consulting finding that google is increasing keeping both majority and growing share of traffic within google's cosystem, walled garden. do you agree that these sites show that google is no longer thoeg showing people the best products or best results but instead is giving results to keep them on google products not on google's platform. >> thank you for the question, congressman. i'm not familiar with either of the studies. what i can say we send a lot of clicks and traffic to competitors in our own services we have aimed to connect merchants, airlines, a range of other services directly with consumers. making the consumer experience better and making the experience for advertisers and merchants better. >> i regret my time is expired. but i would just ask you to review these studies because if innovators and entrepreneurs don't have traffic to their websites because google -- the g

a leading representative of the google has just come out and and we are now taking authoritarian position when it comes to free speech on all social network constructs. when you look at the totality of this, you are seeing a framework of absolute tyranny in this country. takemerican people need to an approach like the french people who are saying enough is enough. you see french people in the streets every day. it has gotten so bad that the french government has used bullets. blind 24.alled the 24 people have been blinded. people around the country have had it with this insanity. thanks a lot for calling from pennsylvania. a reminder about some of the big policy proposals out there in congress. from republicans would have workers get into social security benefits, delaying retirement in exchange for time off after the birth of a child or adoption. another allows for tax exemptions for personal savings accounts. the democratic sponsored bill would create a new employer and employee tax. we will see how far those proposals go. the idea of using social security benefits came up at that joint

others will very loudly talk about google and facebook and twitter, and what he sees as different bias, ideological decision-making from these companies. what does that representn terms of this broader text debate? -- tech debate? how do you see the president's role here? mean, everybody loves to hate tech these days. i think he is using it as political opportunism, in my opinion. but there is some truthful concern, and that is why it is an effective political opportunity for him. i think the president's role should be limited. the more he weighs in to this, the less he will be in control. if he wants to be effective in less is algorithms, more. peter: our guest on "the communicators" has been jeffrey mcnerney, cochair of the artificial intelligence caucus. john has been our guest reporter from politico. thank you very much. this and all other communicators are available as a podcast. ♪ >> the house will be in order. >> for 40 years, c-span has provided unfiltered coverage of congress, the white house, and public policy events from d.c. and around the country, so you can make up your own mind. created by cable in 1979. c-span is brought to you by your local ca

today representatives from some of the internet's largest companies, facebook, twitter, and google sittingn for a joint senate hearing facing questions about mass violence and extremism spread through their sites. >> i think this is an area where it's an evolving challenge. >> reporter: experts say hate groups have been exploiting social media sites to radical iradicalize people. a mosque was live streamed on facebook. the video left for anyone to view for an hour. the tools didn't spot violence in that video. >> that's so we can stop the new at the time of upload. >> reporter: since 2015 twitter suspended more than 1.5 million accounts for violations of company rules related to terrorism public policy director said that doesn't fix everything. >> we acknowledge technology companies have a role to play. it's important to recognize content removal alone cannot solve the issues. >> reporter: an official with the anti-defamation league testified and said anti-semitic hate is on the rise and the environments of these online sites are amplifying the rhetoric. >> trevor, there will be more execu

going to see it again until next month so i still like them a lot i think they represent tremendous value, facebook and google i think is very specific as we were talking last hour about the disney story and ongoing threats and the valuation being too high for those threats. >> national economic council director larry kudlow spoke out earlier on "squawk on the street." here's what he had to say about the august jobs number. >> 130,000 is a very solid number but august is always a quirky month. usually the print comes in too low for seasonal reasons and then it's revised up household survey up 590,000. it's been unbelievable blowout number civilian labor force picks up by 571,000. all i want to say is america is working. >> mike, your take on not just the number, his take on it, and it fits the narrative that's going to get the fed rate cut that they want but doesn't derail the economy. >> the numbers themselves fit the narrative. larry is correct that august is often a soft print on the initial. the household survey is massive margin of error. there's a reason we don't look at the job creation based on the ho

represented in the local and. the local parliament of moscow also we've heard reaction from russia's official media watchdog accused google and facebook of tampering with the elections or meddling in the elections by allowing political ads to be run on the election day this is something in violation of russia's election law and we've already had reaction from the platforms for instance facebook has said it is it shouldn't be held accountable for this because it is essentially not the platform's business to tell advertisers when or which ads to run so basically they shifted all the blame saying it's the advertisers who are at fault not facebook when it comes to google it has been more vague in its statement i should say has the world basically they support so that they support all the legal political advertising on their platform now an ad run on the election day would certainly be illegal under russian law so again a mixed somewhat mixed picture painted by different by different bodies but generally overall the election hailed as a success. because dan of reporting there that region up to date we're back there with more a

have denmark representative, she will be the vice president for digital and she will keep her existing job as competition commissioner. that is going to have the big tech giants like google facebook's shaking in their bo ots, especially since during this announcement, von der leyen said that europeans to regain their digital sovereignty. some of the other interesting picks is that an italian commissioner was able to get an economic portfolio, and one other that will work very hand in hand. the reason the italian pic is interesting is it is very clearly a gift to the new italian government consisting of the centerleft and the populists. far-right party had put togogether a nominee, tt would not have gotten such a good portfolio. some of the other interesting picks is that the commissioner energytonia that got the portfolio will be by itself and not paired with climates, and we can expect the energy security issues are going to play high on the agenda. meanwhile, lithuania commissioner got the environment portfolio, one thing he has been notorious for in brussels the last couple of months, and he apparently keeps a make america great again hat on his desk. he says the hat

very loudly talk about google and facebook and twitter and what he sees as different kind of bias, ideological decision-making, choices of these companies. what does that represent in terms of this broader tech debate? it's distinct from what you mean when you're talking about that. how do you see the president's role here? >> guest: i mean, everybody loves to hate tech these days. i think he's just using it as a political opportunism, in my opinion. but i mean, there's some concern in the some truthful concern and that's why it's an effective clinical opportunity for him. i think the president's role should be limited, and the more he ways into this, the less effective he's going to become. if he wants to be effective in tech in algorithm development and so on and really against the companies, less is more. >> host: our guest this week on the committee caters has been congressman jerry mcnerney, a democrat of california and member of the energy and commerce committee as well as cochair of the artificial intelligence caucus. john hendel has been a guest report from political. thank you, gentlemen, very much for this community and all other communicators are avai

google says that it plans to work constructively with regulators. >>> on capitol hill, bay area representative mike thompson will lead a form on gun violence prevention as democrats continue to pressure senate republicans to take action. senator chuck schumer is among those calling for hr 8 to be brought to the senate floor for the boat. it is the bipartisan background checks act of 2019. the bill, passed by the house, establishes new background check requirements for gun sales between private parties. >> too many americans are losing their lives to gun violence. too many families are just weeping because they have lost loved ones. >> we are trying to take anyone's gun away was your person with mental illness and a convicted felon. >> hr 8 does not affect some weapons transfers like gifts between family members. in the meantime, mitch mcconnell says he will not bring a gun bill to the floor unless it has president trump's complete support. >>> the time is 6:07. a wild scene in british parliament. shoving and shouting matches are breaking out in the ongoing battle over brexit. we will have the

these people are in the fuss not heard by the judge but what you represent not so dangerous to them are if this were the case why google does go of course is that yes that's an important point because this will explain the whole story. innocence and at the same time i'm a public figure in progress for the last 30 years they were describing me portraying me as the grandson of hasn't been a fundamentalist even supporting extremists when they came to extremism being the founder of the muslim exactly so so. being an extremist didn't work when they were talking about me being involved in you know illegal activities it didn't work and then i came in and what i'm saying in france is look there is no future in this country if you don't treat muslims on an equal for the citizens i'm not even a minority i'm a european citizen you have to dissent us now all this business that you are talking about the headscarf and let me be clear. you cannot impose the headscarf to a woman from an islamic perspective you cannot impose her to take it off from a human rights perfect if you see disenfranchise your own extremists so i but i'm sure y

will very loudly talk about google and facebook and twitter and what he sees as different kind of bias, ideological decision-making in these companies so what does that represent the terms of this broader tech debate because it's probably distinct from what you mean when talking about that and how do you see the president's role here? >> guest: i mean everybody loves to hate tech these days. i think he's using it as a political opportunity, in my opinion. there are is some concern and some truthful concern and that's why we have political opportunity for him but i think the president's role should be limited and the more he weighs into this the less effective he will become. as he wants to be effective in tech and algorithm development and so on less is more. >> host: our guest this week on the committee gators has been kind of minute jerry mcnerney, democrat of california and member of the energy and commerce committee as well as cochair of the artificial intelligence caucus. john hendel has been our guest reporter from the go. thank you, gentlemen very much. this committee gators and all other communicators are available as podcast. ♪ >> house will be in ord

very loudly, talk about google and facebook and twitter, and what he sees as different kind of bias, ideological decision-making, choices from these companies. what does that represent in terms of this broader tech debate? i know it is probably distinct from what you mean when you are talking about that. how do you see the president's role here? railing against these companies? rep. mcnerney: everybody loves to hate tech these days. i think he is just using it as a political opportunism, in my opinion. but there is some concern and some truthful concern, and that's why it's an effective political opportunity for him. i think the president's role should be limited. the more he weighs in to this, the less effective he is going to become. if he wants to be effective in tech and algorithm development againstn and railing the companies, less is more. peter: our guest this week on "the communicators" has been jeffrey mcnerney, a democrat from california, a member of the commerce committee as well as cochair of the artificial intelligence caucus. john hendel has been our guest reporter from politico. thank you very much. this and all other communicators are available as po