from the decision of the judge of the economic court of the kyiv region pavlo gorbasenko.by prohibiting state registrars, notaries, the ministry of justice of ukraine and other bodies or persons, which perform functions in the field of state registration, to perform registration actions regarding jsc. bilotserkiv thermal power plant. namely: make changes to information about the manager. of a legal entity, about other persons who can act on behalf of a legal entity. having received a lawsuit after taking such security already on august 8, gorbasenko decided to recall the law and left bohdan's lawsuit motionless, demanding from him a written explanation as to which rights of the plaintiff were violated in the part of the claimed demands, taking into account that a decision was made on 19 issues at the extraordinary meeting, although judge gorbasenko had to ask bohdan about it before the decrees on security, so the previous decisions of the judge remain in force, and the rights of the shares are violated. now, thanks to gorbasenko's decision, the plaintiff bohdan is suing th

judges pakhs dymydo, khodakivska and vladimirenko overturned gorbasenko's decision and allowed tetstularny shareholders to participate in the case. previously, the head of the economic court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko , was scandalized by an unjust decision that had signs of raiding. on july 25, the judge granted the application to secure the claim of the former head of the bilotserkiv thermal power plant, vadym bohdan, who decided to appeal the decision of the company's shareholders' meeting 20 months later. by his own decision judge gorbasenko suspended all decisions of jsc meetings, including those that did not concern bohdan. shareholders emphasize that gorbasenko's decision has signs of raiding. after all, the decisions of the assembly were made on 19 issues. in addition, the economic procedural code of ukraine does not provide for such a means of securing a claim as suspending the effect of decisions of shareholders' meetings. therefore, it appears that judge gorbasenko used his powers to interfere in the economic activities of the newly elected supervisory board of t

judge gorbasenko's decision in this case.ously, the public council of integrity and journalists drew attention to the judge's property, which cannot be explained by official income, as well as his possible fictitious divorce. with the alleged purpose of concealing wealth. nab was exposed together with the sbu the judge of the brovary city and district court , volodymyr serdynskyi, for bribes of usd 4,000. according to the investigation, the judge received a bribe from a representative of one of the parties in a civil case, for making a decision in her interests. he received a part of the illegitimate benefit in the amount of 1. earlier, when the decision was made to evict the dock. in the case during the receipt of the second part of the funds in the amount of $3,000 for the debt collection decision in favor of the plaintiff, serdynskyi was hotly exposed by nabu detectives. the sbu added that under during the search , 15,600 dollars packed in different envelopes were seized from the suspected judge. the president delays the a

from the decision of the judge of the commercial court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko.curity measures by banning state registrars, notaries, the ministry of justice of ukraine and other bodies. or to persons who perform functions in the field of state registration, to carry out registration actions regarding at bilotserkivska teploelektrotsentral, and namely: to make changes to the information about the head of the legal entity, about other persons who can act on behalf of the legal entity. having received a lawsuit after taking such security, on august 8 gorbasenko decided to recall the law and left bohdan's statement of claim motionless, demanding written explanations from him as to which rights of the plaintiff were violated in part of the stated claim, considering that at the extraordinary meeting it was adopted decision on 19 issues, although bohdan, judge gorbasenko, should be asked about it had before issuing the decree on security, therefore the previous decision of the judge remains in force, and the rights of shareholders are violated. now, thanks to gorbasenk

regarding atbc have been ongoing since 2021, and this is not the first questionable decision of judge gorbasenko in this case. previously, the public integrity council and journalists drew attention to the judge's property, which cannot be explained by official income, as well as his possible fictitious divorce with the alleged purpose of hiding wealth. nabu tap together with the sbu exposed the judge. volodymyr serdynskyi of the prover city district court for bribes of usd 400. according to the investigation, the judge received a bribe from a representative of one of the parties in civilian clothes case, for making a decision in its interests. part of the illegal benefit in the amount of 1. he received it earlier, when the decision was made to suppress the evidence in the case. when receiving the second part of the funds in the amount of $3,000 for the foreclosure decision. debt, in favor of the plaintiff, serdynskyi was hotly exposed by nabu detectives. the sbu added that during the search of the suspected judge, 15,600 dollars packed in different envelopes were seized. the president delays th