because we ask our viewers. about the government of national unity, and we are asking this for a reasone kmis conducted a survey, and they asked about who they wanted to see at the head of the government of national unity, whether this government of national unity is needed, and in the context of what zelensky said, that he has five or six people in his team, perhaps it makes sense to ask our guests and guests what they think about the government of national unity, whether it is at all timely. do you need to do this? let's start with olga len. do you think ukraine needs a government of national unity? well, these recent speeches of zelensky showed that in principle there are such issues that are painful in principle, and it is difficult, probably, for him to be solely responsible for them, and therefore there should be some kind of more general consensus, that is, when it is not a decision one person, and you can... share the responsibility, but these conversations, you know, now about the government of national unity, to a certain extent we have, you know, such a spherical horse in a v

there was a lot of such parallel reality at the press conference, but when it comes to the government of national unity it seems to me that this is one of the traps that the government itself has set for itself, because... let's remember when there were parliamentary readings in transcarpathia, the so-called monet readings, a memorandum on the postponement of elections was already concluded there, as a rule, when they are postponed elections, then again on a new parliamentary coalition is coming to the surface, which signs a whole national program for the period between, well... the current and future elections and implements this program due to the fact that it is now impossible for society to vote for some, well, postulate the programs of this or that party and delegate one or another party governing the country, but as time begins to pass further and further, and the behavior of the servants reminds me very much, frankly, of some such maneuver at the end, in order to try to keep everything as it is, but again, well, restyling, keeping completely this union from opzzh, undeclared, but restyling and s

there was a lot of such parallel reality at the press conference. but when it comes to the government of national unity to me that this is one of the traps that the government itself has set for itself, because let's remember when there were parliamentary readings in transcarpathia, the so-called monet readings, a memorandum on the postponement of the elections was already signed there , as a rule, when the elections are postponed, then again a new parliamentary coalition emerges, which signs for the period between, well, the current state and the upcoming elections, a whole the national program and implements this program in connection with the fact that it is now impossible for the society to vote for some postulates of the programs of one or another party and to delegate. one or another party governing the country, but as time begins to pass more and more, and the behavior, servants it reminds me a lot, to be honest, of some such maneuver at the end, to try to keep everything as it is, but instead of restyling, keeping this union with opzzh completely undeclared. but restyling and somehow calling it

which i mentioned earlier, they will influence the president, push him to form. such a government of national unitya technocratic government that would be more autonomous in its decisions from the centers making decisions on banking, so that the decision is still formed in the cabinet of ministers, as a collective body, and the policy is formed by the ministries and the heads of these ministries and does not come down from the pechersk hills. therefore, yes, i think that the president can mature to this, and her indirect mediated messages, there are signals that indicate that this idea welcomes both the banking and the cabinet of ministers in goods, and from time to time there are even certain designs of a possible government, those technocratic of the government and they call one or other surnames at the head of it cabinet, that is, the situation is changing, maybe the president will come to this. regarding the elections, well, it is obvious that there is a memorandum, there is a consolidated position of political forces regarding the impossibility of holding elections in the 24th year, at the mom

conservatives, who had a majority in parliament, said: you know, if war breaks out, we need a government of national unityite you labor, you have no votes, to enter of this government, and labor said, we will go in, but... please, here is your party leader, neville chamberlain, who has brought about this situation, sit down the bench of deputies, he cannot be the prime minister in the government of national unity, because he made mistakes, and then they asked, what should we do, let us give this winston churchill, let him lead the government, he means absolutely nothing special to us, for us, for you , it doesn't mean anything special, just a compromising figure, and that's how chertel became the prime minister of great britain. and not because he was a great national leader, but because he was not taken seriously by both political parties of the country, as a leader, well, he became one, but at the time when he was elected, he was not, but cherchenko... shared his political responsibility with the leader of the labor party kliment metl, who became his deputy, and this was the essence that he could not be

turns into a government of national unity shit, no, i'm not talking about the national governmentlking about the technocratic wartime government, and i ... i specifically started with this because i understand that a large part of the audience will probably think because of the analogies with and israel because of pumping the thesis, now very active, this one is popular. and they will think that we are now talking about a government of national unity, but in contrast to this, we would really like to see a more technocratic government, and it would not be so important now and president zelenskyy answered, when asked the question, he said, name which of the factions to appoint, the problem is not in factions, the problem is that it is necessary to appoint strong professionals, specialists who would have consensus support among the political elites, who could not be opposed by other representatives, in particular the opposition from within the government. those for whom zelensky is ashamed within the government, which he admitted, of course , strengthening was needed here, but this i

respond, in fact, with the necessary actions to the challenges of the present time , when we talk about the government there of national unity, whether you don't like this name, a technocratic government or a government of specialists there, who... will not have a direct relationship with one or another political forces, you can look at it in different ways, but even such, in fact, from such a prism the authorities, unfortunately, for some reason do not consider why , because already my colleague absolutely rightly said, they, they are afraid, they do not, they do not understand how to manage all these processes in this way, relatively speaking, how to influence these processes , and the main thing is that of those people which can participate in the actual. in the formation of this government , new, new politicians or politicians of a new quality may then appear, arise, grow up, who will know how and will know when and how to react actually to what is happening in our state, and most importantly, on unfortunately, we are still observing, even during the war , the majority of our pro-government figures, they are thinking abo

pick up your phone or smartphone and vote if you support the idea of... creation of the government of national unityraine 0800-211381 no 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next , we have a special agent, an officer of the armed forces of ukraine, ihor lapin. mr. major, i welcome you and thank you for being with us today. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. first of all, mr. major, i would like to hear your impressions. about the results of the year from the supreme commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, whether he was convincing president at the annual press conference, and what aftertaste did you have after zelenskyi's public appearance in front of journalists? well, let's be honest, if we analyze it completely, of course, the format of the program should be delayed, but if we talk about the main... things that i expected to hear from the president, well, at least, i still expect for the second year that he at least once he will come out and say: sorry, yes, people, sorry, i still

president, so now, instead of talking about some kind of unity, it is necessary to take steps aimed at this unity, and i am sure that precisely, the concept of a government of nationalty would be the nullification of all those unnecessary contradictions, preparations for some kind of political elections, contradictions between the military and politicians, which are really seriously weakening us now, thank you, mr. volodymyr, ladies and gentlemen, after... a short break, we will return to the studio, this is what i say to our viewers and our guests, i will emphasize that we are conducting a survey and remind you, and this survey sounds like, do you see attempts to usurp power in ukraine, you are now seeing on the screens phone numbers by calling which you can vote, if you see these attempts to usurp power, vote on 0800 211-381, if you don't see it, then 08 700 211-382 all calls to these numbers are free, we will get back to you in a few minutes to the studio wait usual things become unreal, heavy bags are not for my sick back, from back pain, try dolgit cream. dolgit cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility, with dolgit cream you want to lif

the president did not answer clearly about the government of national unity, although it is absolutelycreation of a government of national unity is a request of ukrainian society and, by the way, a request of our western friends who keep saying if you can't hold elections... the only guarantee of your legitimacy is the government of national unity, it's the alphabet of politics, whoever doesn't want to learn the alphabet of his politics, sooner or later starts learning the alphabet of other people's politics, president should be aware of the great credit of trust in the ukrainian society today that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine has, and i do not discuss the issue of effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a particular person, because i am not a military expert, i believe that the issue of effectiveness, inefficiency - the question of the ukrainian president, who appoints the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. how did volodymyr zelenskyy himself say about it? olek, if the president realizes that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine ha

, well, take part in our survey, today we are asking you about whether ukraine needs a government of national unity please. vote on youtube and vote by phone lines if you are watching now on tv then if you support the government of national unity govt formation 0800 211 381 no 0800 2011 382 call all calls to these numbers are free. today we have the best journalists of ukraine on the air, olen natalya ishchenko and maryna danylyuk yarmalayeva. we are talking about the results of the 23rd year and the results of the annual year zelenskyi's press conference, but also about what to expect in the 24th year, because it is clear that all results make their own and everyone has their own results, but the goal and expectations from the 24th are obviously also the same, we all strive for victory, we want ukraine to defeat russia, he asks... only in what way, how it will happen and what will happen, how events will unfold in ukraine and in the world as well. let's, ladies, very briefly try to describe what to expect, what are your personal expectations from the 24th year, what can we get and in what perspect

this here is the story with the government of unity , that it should return to this again, because zelenskyi would only win, obviously, if this was a government of nationalty, because that is how he will have to still in the conflict with the zaluzhnyi, if he is real, then he will have to to answer absolutely. after all, as you know, i have never heard anything from the representatives about the government of national unity, this is exactly the position we have repeatedly emphasized to them, that in order for the government to finally become professional, well, we all see the problem with an unarmed eye of the current government, it is not a subject, there are no longer half of the ministers, and there are some acting responsibilities, unprofessional, not ready to rebuild... the economy in two years of the great war is already on military rails, and obviously, the statist political forces are considering how you are right, government of national unity. this is not a division of portfolios, there is nothing to divide now, and being in power right now is really not honey, but it is a division of responsibility, it is taking responsibility for very difficul

president, so now, instead of talking about some kind of unity, we need to take steps aimed at this unity, and i am sure , which is just a concept. the government of national be the nullification of all those unnecessary contradictions of preparations for some political elections, contradictions between the military and politicians, which are really seriously weakening us now. thank you, mr. volodymyr, ladies and gentlemen, after after a short break, we will return to the studio , this is what i say to our viewers and our guests, i will emphasize that we are conducting a survey and remind, and this survey sounds like this: do you see attempts to usurp power in ukraine, you now see phone numbers on the screens, by calling , which you can vote for if you see these attempts to usurp power. vote on 0800 211-381, if you don't see it, then 0800 211-382, all calls to these numbers are free, we'll be back in the studio in a few minutes, please wait, there are discounts on tsvetromondarny, this 10% in pharmacies, a pharmacist, a bump therapist knows what helps. problems with the forehead joints limit movement, it is unpleasant and painful. strengthen them with the

commission, where among those whom ukrainians would like to see at the head of the ukrainian government, the government of national unityenko, to what extent.. .is it possible or it is possible, and in what way , we will talk about all this with our guests, we will also mention foreign policy issues, in particular, regarding trump and his path to the future election, because in the united states of america , courts have begun to prohibit him from running for office in certain states, what it means, what consequences it will have in the presidential campaign. donald trump, we talk about it all in literally 12 minutes. wait for our broadcast, friends, the big broadcast of winter, the big evening of winter continues, vasyl, you have a word. thank you sergey, we are waiting for you 20-0, meet serhii rudenko, but for now i have a plot for your attention, a decorated house, delicious meals and the whole family at the table. this is one of the best christmas traditions that can cost a holiday this year. my colleagues from the white church counted the table. christmas is one of the most important holidays for ukrainians. believ

this is how the government of national unity was formed. ver, such a model may or may not be applied in ukraine. only ukrainians can decide this. the world admires president zelensky's leadership. he became the face of ukraine. but of course, we also realize that ukraine is a democracy. and even winston churchill was removed from office after a successful victory over the nazis. almost immediately after the war, therefore, politics can be relentless, however, we cannot and do not want to interfere in ukrainian politics, it is not our business. we want to see a democratic, sovereign, successful ukraine. whether in the united states and in general in the civilized world, in particular, i do not know, at the g7 level, recognize the process that in russia or in the kremlin is called presidential elections. we understand that putin himself will... appoint himself in a few months, but the key story is whether it will be recognized by the world and what consequences it may lead to if it is a matter of fixation the moment of usurpation or seizure of

aware of this debate. and even a greater part of those polled percentageally for such a government of national unityappear. nevertheless , the critics of this idea, they point out, perhaps rightly, that a government consisting of active leaders of political forces could be ineffective, i.e. imagine a government where, relatively speaking, the prime minister - minister poroshenko, and deputy prime minister tymoshenko, in principle, we already went through this once, and also boyko, for example, then also give him place, do not give in this configuration, zelensky, will yarmak, for example, then be some kind of minister of supervision over this cabinet of ministers and so on, that is, in your opinion, nevertheless such a government, strong, independent, in particular, the office of the president, needs a professional one, and how it could look like this government of national rescue, from my point of view, our country needs it badly, because you and i are still raking out the consequences of the fact that all branches of government are... monopolized by one political force, and frankly, one person, ye

therefore, in the understanding of the government, such a technocratic government can, in principle, already work, if we talk about the format of the government of national unityis , for example, was done in israel, there, and it is clear that in the current conditions it could be one of the options for exiting the political crisis, which is gradually, gradually now, well, as we can see, there is a certain cumulative effect, it is forming, but it is clear that the big question today is to what extent such a hypothetical government of national unity, it will be a subject, it will be authorized to adopt its policy. precisely technocratic, here i think that there may be certain nuances, so this issue will obviously be further proposed to the authorities, but in the near future months, i think that this issue will stand for now, if it is in the negotiation stage, but the further we go into the war, i think that such an option can be used by the current government in case it is not. presidential elections have been held and there will be no parliamentary elections, then a certain restoration of legitimacy among the people of the executive power will really be neces

think that this is not strategic history, if at the very beginning of the war we had a government of national unityhere would be joint responsibility, then, by the way, there would be no need to worry about a single telethon, because when there is joint responsibility, then, accordingly, there will be no sharp political battles in principle , it cannot be, so it would be a correct story, but unfortunately, it did not happen, by the way, it is not too late to make such a government of national unity, because it will at least give the authorities the opportunity to accept, even if not popular, but solutions are needed, that's for sure it will be better for everyone, including the president. thank you serhiy taran, a political scientist, was in touch with us, they talked about yesterday's final annual press conference of president volodymyr zelenskyi. now we pass the floor to our news editor, who will share with us the most relevant news, in general. news for the moment, because now a lot is happening around us and it is very important that you, our viewers, know about all the most important events, i

are postponed in side, as it was from october 7, 23, when hamas attacked israel and the government of national unity there is now a message about this memorandum, which was signed somewhere in the carpathians by the leaders of the parliamentary factions and the leaders of the parliamentary parties that before the end of the war, before our victory, there will be no elections, but there will be elections six months after the end of martial law in ukraine, these steps are there, but in general, what is preventing this whole organism, which we call ukrainian politics, from being the only ones, because everything that is happening, it shows that again someone is divided into their own and someone else's, someone is allowed to participate in parliamentary diplomacy, someone is not allowed to go abroad, someone can go to the united states of america and convince senators and congressmen, to give aid to ukraine, and someone is stopped at ravaruska or somewhere in kraków, at our border points, why does it still exist in your opinion, and someone should... be smarter in this situation in the end, look, well,

must be the food, if the unification , the idea of ​​national unity must be echoed in the circle from yes, from every iron. zelensky should create a governmentty, he should finally realize that this is a warring country, that everyone should unite, and instead we see some kind of political, internal, i don't know, showdowns , which i just don't know, but in the end, the ratings of the government itself collapse and act on her, well, harm her actually, so i think the eyes should be a bit of a toughening factor now measuring new ratings, should see that it is a lie, it always collapses the ratings, well, and start building this joint. to form a government of national unity, i don't see any other way for us to win, it's just a matter of survival for today . regarding the unity of the holiday, i have also already seen several posts that if you post some happy pictures of yourself from the christmas holidays, from new year's holidays, smiling with glasses, with pampuhs, and socks, then i will unfriend you, i'm sorry, and that's how it increases this gulf between the military. and civilian people, as it is right for us , today, by the way, if i ma

difficult stage, which we are moving to, the president did not answer clearly about the government of national unitygh it is absolutely obvious, that the creation in... of national unity is a request of ukrainian society and, by the way, a request of our western friends, who all the time say: if you cannot hold elections, the only guarantee of your legitimacy is the government of the national unity, this is the alphabet of politics, the one who does not want to learn the alphabet of his own politics, sooner or later begins to learn the alphabet of someone else's politics, the president should be aware of the great credit of trust in ukrainian society today that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine has and... i am not discussing the issue effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a specific person, because i am not a military expert, i believe that the question of effectiveness or ineffectiveness is precisely the question of the ukrainian president, who appoints the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. as volodymyr zelensky himself said about this. olek, if the president real

therefore, in the understanding of the authorities, such a technocratic government can, in principle, work already. if we talk about the format of the national government unitydone in israel, for example, there, and it is clear that in the current conditions this could be one of the options for getting out of the political crisis, which gradually, gradually now, as we see, there is a certain cumulative effect, it is being formed, but it is clear that the big... question today is how much such a hypothetical government of national unity actually is, it will be subject, it will be empowered to adopt its policy, precisely technocratic, and here i think that there may be certain nuances , so these questions will obviously follow to offer to the authorities, but in the coming months, i think that this issue for now ... will stand, if in the negotiation stage, but the further we go into the war, i think that such an option can be used by the current authorities, in case if presidential elections are not held and there are no parliamentary elections, then a certain restoration of legitimacy among the people of the executive power will really be necessary, and such

at the moment, there is simply an urgent need to form a government of national unity, which will work on issues of mobilization and ensure it, create... a responsible government and remind the whole world that we have a parliamentary-presidential, not an office-presidential republic. this is the only possible, in my opinion, way out of the situation that developed because the silencing of this problem will be negative for all of us, all of us without exception, and look at how actively russia is acting in this situation, how the russians, briskly, i would say, ... with fire use those contradictions that at the moment exist, we must fight back, fight back, we must all work for the victory of ukraine, clearly, each in the field in which he is engaged, and the more will be correctly stitched and correctly. sent messages to the president, to members of his team, the better it will be for all of us. now it is not time for elections, now is not the time for ratings, now is the time to fight for ukraine. 22 months of large-scale invasion have shown that ukraine has withstood the russian blow

need you , to correct the mistakes made at the beginning of the war, you need to create a government of national unity, you need to have the courage for the authorities to share the responsibility with all political forces, of course, this presupposes the absence of any political censorship and of course it presupposes the understanding that the political forces will take responsibility for myself, well, for everything that happens in the country, if i will. then everything will be better, if this does not happen, such political internal discord to the good, thank you, mr. serhiy, mr. andriy, do you think that the ukrainian government is showing unity today? look friends, i slightly disagree with my colleague, in general, everything is correct, but i think that in the 21 months of the great war we went through very different cycles, both military and political, and each of them required ... certain tools communication, political, it is clear that by definition, the banking sector there was not ready for some topic of the unity government there or something else in march-april, there in may of the 22nd

during the program, we conducted a survey, we asked you, friends, whether ukraine needs a government of national unity. so, 91% of those polled on tv said yes, 9% against. on youtube, 88% yes, 12% against. we put an end to this, i wish. have a good and peaceful weekend, take care of yourself and your loved ones, this was the verdict program of serhiy rudenko, goodbye, turn on well - it's when everything as you want, click, and you are in the world of cartoons, click and around the universe of cinema, then switch on the good. oh, what is needed. megogo, turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports. a special performance of the legendary group mertvyi piven with an orchestra at the lviv opera, with the program christmas and selections. early lyrical songs, new christmas compositions and favorite super hits. on january 8, the stage of the lviv opera. tickets on the website of the big show ua organizer. information partners are espresso tv channel and radio fm halychyna. live sound. try it flebodia 600. pink french pills for acute hemorrhoids. flebodia 600. treat hemorrhoids without any si

i heard calls for the creation of a government of national unity in ukraine, which would unite some ofosition. but that's not the position my government is taking, it's just an idea that exists. it is not for me to say which political agreements will bring the greatest benefit to ukraine. it is absolutely true that during the most difficult period of the second world war, winston churchill invited his political rivals to the war cabinet. however, such a model may or may not be applied in ukraine, it is up to ukrainians to decide. the world admires the leadership of president zelensky, he became ukraine, but of course, we also realize that ukraine is a democracy, and even winston churchill, after a successful victory over the nazis, was removed from office almost immediately after the war. therefore, politics can be relentless. however, we cannot and do not want to interfere in ukrainian politics, it is none of our business. we want to see a democratic, sovereign, successful ukraine. whether in the united states and in general in... in the civilized world, in particular, i don't know, a

the press conference, if you remember, the question about the possibility of creating a government of national unity raised, it was on condition, the idea of ​​such a government was meant, which was created in israel, and it seems to me, judging by the president's answers, that he didn't even understand what was being discussed, he started talking about some rotations in the cabinet of ministers, but well, it's not about rotations, not about individual ministers are being replaced, but what about... unification of absolutely all pro-ukrainian politicians in order to win this war, and not to think about elections. as for the excerpt from the press conference that you showed so briefly, but very revealingly , i think it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that in this passage it is about five or six people, and also about the impossibility of dissolving the parliament, because it is not possible to hold elections to spend there and so on, in fact the president, to his great regret , showed, first of all, neglect. the constitution of ukraine and laws of ukraine, neglect of democratic values, publ

is why the problems are difficult, and that is why i started, in fact, talk about the government of national unityout finding others of possible solutions, now it's about... only the search, and in order to still think more about the preservation of statehood, you are absolutely right, this is exactly what is at stake, and, unfortunately, i think we cannot say clearly. .. that we have already solved this problem forever, the threats are extremely serious, you have heard putin, his statements, you understand that the elections in russia will take place against the background of military escalation in ukraine, we understand that russia has human resources , well, much larger than in ukraine, and that russia has established the necessary production military elements, and even half-breeds. they have always had the production of missiles, which we do not have ballistic missiles, armored vehicles, we can talk about this for a long time here, comparing our capabilities and russian capabilities, but again, for us, this means making unpopular decisions and taking political responsibility for them. well, by

at a press conference if you remember, the question about the possibility of creating a government of national unity was raised, it was based on a condition, the idea of ​​such a government that was created in israel was meant, and it seems to me, judging by the president's answers, that he did not even understand what he was talking about it was about, he was talking about some he started talking about rotations in the cabinet of ministers, but hey, it's not about rotations, not about replacing individual ministers. the idea is yes, but about uniting absolutely all pro-ukrainian politicians in order to win this war, and not think about elections. as for the excerpt from the press conference that you showed , so short, but very telling , i think it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that in this passage it is about five or six people, and also about the impossibility of dissolving the parliament, because it is impossible hold elections there and so on, in fact the president, unfortunately,... i said , first of all, the neglect of the constitution of ukraine and the laws of ukraine, neglect of

in and created, that is, the positions of the authorities united in order to create a government of national unity have a lot of disputes there, of course, that benigans is just waiting for the war to end and he will give an account to netanyahu, and netanyahu understands this, but for the sake of the state, they united, and this and this and this are cool, because both those and first of all, on the same poroshenko, if we take him, that is, the deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada there allows or does not allow to go, for example , poroshenko to meet there with the invitation of the european people's party or for example meeting with the speaker of the congress, let's just think, poroshenko represents on average. each deputy represents at least 40,000 voters, well, it's just electoral mathematics, so you 're not stopping some pleasant or unpleasant man or woman, you're actually stopping a representative of 40,000 voters, in the case of poroshenko, it's even wider, wider scale, because we also have it, some electoral data of the 2019 presidential elections , however, let 's be formal, you just sa

we have seen since the beginning of the large-scale invasion, this is the creation of a government of national unity, and this is also a way of communication, when, for example, there are twice a day briefings from the spokesman of the idf and with the admission of all journalists, and not like this we will allow it, we will not allow it and so on, and only the military comment on military events and there is no political censorship, it is basically absent, that is, all kinds of things are interesting, so when, when you say, bohdan, about the lack of a system, but there is also and the simultaneous destruction of those systems that existed , but we have already been without a leader for, how many, several months, for example , the ministry of culture, how to explain this , is it a coincidence, is it culture in principle is not important now in the war, is there no people, perhaps who could lead the ministry of culture, but the point is that there is, and i mean, we know that there were discussions and yulia fediv was directly invited to head the ministry of culture, but at some point, something, som

in this case , by the way, they mentioned when we are talking about the government of technocrats or the government of national unitygotiators should be people who have relevant experience, we should not look at their political preferences or some kind of party... their affiliation, these should be people who have relevant connections in one or another country, who can represent ukraine very well there, so we are only at the beginning of the long journey, we will to hope that this path will not be , you know, overshadowed to a certain extent by some of our internal disputes, and also by the adoption of important european integration decisions, which, unfortunately, were often traditionally adopted in our country, for example, not in such a format as this it was necessary, and then it came well, we had to re-vote, we can't afford that today, why? because the price of a mistake will be very high and attention to reality is very serious. thank you, mr. viktor, does this mean that the european union's decision to start negotiations with ukraine means that, in principle, the european union made it clear to putin that ukr

think that oppressing the opposition during the war and ignoring the need to create a government of national unity, to form, if you will, an apparent unity, is bad, then it's bad if we think that thank god that as long as, say, territorial centers of assembly centers, as long as people are taken away by force, and people are not shot on the streets, well then there is another option, it all depends on what are the criteria of perception, forgive me, i do not like the recent trends that i observe in ukraine, i do not like them intensely enough, and this, well , i think that i am not alone in this. well, really, as i look at it, i, for example , do not see anything unusual, i understand that there must be mistakes, and people are all different, as when there are 30 million such people, then obviously it is impossible without mistakes, and without violating knowingly or unknowingly, some laws are also impossible, and when someone criticizes even so, i always think, well, how they wanted, they wanted there not to be, theft during the war, and theft. during war it is alpha and omega, everyone steals th

of hamas in netanyahu, despite the fact that there just... on a huge scale hatred between politicians, but invited the opposition to the government, and they went to form a government of national unityou and i understand that hamas does not pose such a danger to the existence of israel as russia poses to the existence of ukraine, so this was would be the right way, unfortunately, zelskyi is taking a completely different path, the establishment of absolutely such mutual power, well, or two persons, himself and andriy yermak, it is dangerous, it is a problem, it is already noticed in the world, it will be reflected very fundamentally on in all aspects of support for ukraine, and our european integration, euro-atlantic integration , well, this is already a serious challenge, by the way, president zelenskyi says that the war with russia is now at a new stage, let’s listen to what zelenskyi said, in our . the phase of the war is a fact, the war is complicated , winter in general is a new phase of the war, or war, winter, it takes place not only on the front line and in the middle of the cities, due to the large number of use of drones by the enemy, due to the large number of missiles, in

should be a slightly different formula, it should be formed, you don't want to talk about government of national unityteam of national unity, office of national unity, can office of national unity well, it's dangerous, because there will be encroachment on the president's office, you know, it's the back office of national unity, that 's possible, but, well, i mean, it should be then, and it's not necessary to include deputies from current opposition factions. we have, excuse me, several members of the former governments , well, not all of them are pensioners so much, well, for example, well, those surnames that may be heard in our country. you, for example, viktor penzenyk, that he refused to go to work for the government, well, we have, for example, roman bezsmertny, well, roman bessmertny, how humanitarian, let's say, the vice-premier, ihor mityukov, as the minister of finance, he actively worked with state finances, ivan plachkov, for example, plachkov as the minister of energy, well , for example, that is, we can, we can, remembering those , who was in the government, we can, we can in this way...

created, well, we talk about it a lot all the time about some teams, coalitions, about the government of national unityis a theory for political analysts, we have no other chance, if such a team is not created, a window of opportunity for ukraine, we will not take advantage of it, next year there will be elections, the situation can change, everywhere 70 elections in the world. including european parliament elections, european commission elections, elections in many member states, and the mood may be different, that is why it was so important that we pass the status, that we pass the beginning of the negotiations and even in march before the start of the election campaign, we received directives and began negotiations process, and in this case i want to emphasize that we went through several. of such stages, it was also an association agreement, i am proud that it was in june 2014 that my signature was under it, it was also a deepened free trade zone, it was a visa-free regime with 148 theses, what should be done now every government official, every politician, every activist should know what the copen

in this case, by the way, we mentioned when we were there about the government of technocrats or about the government of national unityshould be people who have relevant experience, we should not look at their political preferences or their party affiliation, they should be people who have relevant connections. in to some or other countries that can represent ukraine very well there, that's why we are only at the beginning of the long road, let 's hope that this road will not, you know, be overshadowed to some extent by some of our internal disputes, and the adoption of important european integration decisions, which , unfortunately, were often accepted by tradition , for example, not in such a format as it was required, and then it was necessary to re-vote, we cannot afford this today, why, because the price of a mistake will be. .. very high and attention to in fact, the chain is very serious. thank you, mr. viktor, does this mean that the european union's decision to start negotiations with ukraine means that , in principle, the european union made it clear to putin that ukraine is a part of the european space, and

europe, will call on kyiv, the political leadership and the president of ukraine, to form a government of national unityhaps even it will be a government not from representatives of the political forces of the parliament, perhaps even from those leaders who are leaders of civil society and technocrats who can provide, well a new breath, there after march 24, in political life and in the management of the government itself, the executive power of the country, who knows, we will see, but for now it is definitely in... it is impossible to hold elections, we need to be united, we need to unite and win this war, after the victory it is obvious that later we will be able to ensure the constitutional rights of the entire ukrainian people and all the players of the political process for the elections of ukraine, both presidential and parliamentary. mr. maksym, we can ask you, as an internationalist, whether you were actually in examples of world history when elections were held during war? "well, listen, it's a very good question, i think there were, to be honest, i can't remember right away, but i'll have to r

next difficult year, when unpopular decisions will have to be made, after all, surely a government of national unityld be ... one of those decisions that would unite a society that supports quite naturally, different political forces, and this could add impulses for the work of the parliament, and in particular, again in the adoption of unpopular decisions, what i saw today the president obviously does not want to take on herself these unpopular decisions, says that decisions about mobilization are requests of the military, first of all, unfortunately, she did not hear answers to questions, for example, about... strategic plan a and plan b, for example, for the country, considering to the geopolitical challenges facing the country today, the next elections in america next year, and in the european union, and in many countries of the european european union, all of this really needs such, such good communication with society, when people would understand how we we have to hold on why should we be based and how should it all move, well, we heard about maryana and valera, of course it would be better i

do they raise champagne, they say, what a great israelis, for one, for for one day, the government of national unitynt to the defense as one, we have this year too a lost opportunity, having what we have , as one kravchuk said at one time, we never launched the war economy, and the moscow occupier launched it in three shifts, if we need very high-quality and technological things, we have partners, we could do it would produce on the territory of poland right under the border, on the territory of nato, and calmly relicating a very important production there, already as of the 23rd year to have at least... a sufficient share of these weapons, when we do not have to depend on whether the trumpists will defeat the rest of the republicans, or won't they defeat the other side ocean, so this 23rd year is very difficult from the point of view of lost opportunities, on the horizon of this 24th year it is not yet visible that these are all illusions, that it is possible to fight with someone else's weapons, that it is possible. to completely rely on someone, no matter how close your allies are, you should thi

cooperate together, and to what extent it was actually possible to unite, here in this government of national unityparticular, the biggest opponent: netanyahu, benigans, general, what, what is the situation there, uh, let's say this, what is, on the front, you can say that, well, yes, what we see externally, yes, all, all systems are working, if , there is a military cabinet, where decisions are made, there are military personnel, everyone shows, one united front, but we... let's say so, from various sources and media, and those people who are in, let's say so, in this cabinet and there on levels of decision-making, there is, well, there is a constant conflict, because it is necessary to understand that what happened in israel on october 7 from the beginning of the country's existence, such there was no failure, no big failure. are now showing, for example, how many people have died in various terrorist attacks throughout our time, yes, the existence of the country, and what happened on october 7 cannot be compared to anything, so now it is ruled by this government, this government , they also deal

should be a slightly different formula, has to be formed, do not want to talk about the government of national unity unity, the office nationally. the office of national unity is possible, well, it's dangerous , because there will be an encroachment on the president's office , you know, it's the back office of national unity, so you can, but well, i mean, it should be then, and it doesn't have to be included there deputies from the current opposition factions, we have several members of the former governments, well, not all of them are pensioners so, well, for example, those surnames. which you and i may hear, for example, viktor penzenyk, that he refused to go to work for the government, well, we have, for example, roman bezsmertny, well, roman bezsmertny, as a humanitarian, let's say, vice prime minister igor mityukov, as the minister of finance, he actively worked with state finances, ivan plachkov, for example, plachkov as the minister of energy, well, for example, that is, we can, we can, remembering those who were in the government. we can, we can in this way, that is, those who do not current

zelenskyi... no understands the importance of this unification, the importance of creating a government of national unity, which at one time, which at one time israel, for example, created absolutely, despite the fact that they have opposition politicians there, there are pro-government politicians, they united because they feel this threat, why does zelenskyy not consider it necessary to use in a good sense opposition politicians who are pro-ukrainian in order for them to deal with international affairs... if petro poroshenko, if the european solidarity team has a suitable practical experience, there are contacts, and there are , well, they are valued in fact, by various international leaders, i mean the countries of the european union, and the united states, and canada, and other countries, well , due to the fact that they have already worked in they have this experience, why not send them abroad, why not unite and convey the importance of support. of ukraine, because it is obvious that we need the f-16 planes that you mentioned, and we have needed them for a long time, we need powerful weapons, and we

coming difficult year, when unpopular decisions will have to be made, after all, surely a government of national unityld be one of those decisions that would unite a society that supports completely naturally different political forces, and it could add impetus to the work of the parliament, and in particular, again, in the adoption of unpopular decisions, what i saw today, the president obviously does not want to take on these unpopular decisions, says that the decision on mobilization is the request of the military , first of all, to our great regret, did not hear answers to questions , for example, about strategic plan a and plan b, for example, for the country, given the geopolitical challenges facing the country today, the next elections in america next year and in ... the european union and in many countries of the european union, all this really needs such good communication with society, when people would understand how we should hold on, what we should be based on and how it should all move, well, we heard about marijana and valera, it would be better if we of course, they didn't hear about i