and so it integrates graham vs. connor but it goes about it in in a different man andt speaks to national and best practices standards. it's important testimony. testimony that is central to the case. >> is your plan to show yet again the videos? >> certain segments of videos that are already in evidence as demonstrative and these are very limited in duration. i'm not having him a place through an entire video and, on each and everything. what he's going to be doing is in the same manner in which he analyzes and reviews cases, so the threat, for example, or lack there of post i mr. floyd. he would be talking a specific segment of the video that he thought were key to his analysis for that, and we selected those, five-second clip, eight-second clip, not an extended play. and then going through the next portion of the analysis and also commenting on whether or not the bystanders would've had an effect on a reasonable officer. we highlight certain portions of those. not necessarily chronological order but in an orderly

senator graham, welcome back to "fox news sunday." >> senator graham: happy anniversary. >> chris: thank you! what are the chances that we are going to see a compromise on police reform before may 25th, the first anniversary of george floyd's murder, and how far are you and other republicans prepared to go on lifting the immunity for police officers and lowering the standard for prosecutions? >> senator graham: well, number one, we would have had police reform in the last congress but chuck schumer and kamala harris made a conscious effort to block tim scott's reform bill. they filibustered tim scott's bill because they didn't want tim scott and president trump to get credit for it. there's no reason we shouldn't have done it last time. we will try again. qualified immunity is a very big deal. if you want to destroy policing in america, make sure that every cop can be sued when they leave the house, so there's a way to find qualified immunity reform, take the cop out of it. my idea along with senator scott is you can't sue the police officer, you sue the department if there's an allegati

are you familiar with the graham versus connor factors? >> i am. >> and can you just very briefly provide your definition and your -- how you look at those facts? >> so, in my 35 years of teaching, it's not just dealing with tactics, but it's dealing with providing an officer the mindset that what they need to justify to use various tactics that they were trained in. and the standard of graham versus connor is, you know, what would a reasonable officer have done in a similar set of circumstances that you're doing. >> now, the graham versus connor factor, the first one is the severity of the crime at issue, correct? >> yes. >> how do you analyze that graham versus connor factor? >> so, i know in my experience, and the experience of officers that i've been in contact with is that the higher risk an arrest may be, like say an armed bank robber. an armed bank robber, you would pull your gun, order him to the ground to take them into custody. you know they're a danger, you know they're a threat level right off the bat. whereas, i can't imagine

chair durbin: senator graham. senator graham: thank you. to my dear friend, sheldon, i appreciate your consistency. so would account for the elephant herd is apparently marching in one way. h.r. 1, i believe, is supported by most every liberal group in the country. most of my democratic colleagues support h.r. 1. why? what motivates you? redistricting. under your proposal you would take redistricting away from state elected officials and give it to some independent commission. what's that got to do with voting? that's about trying to change the ability of red states to be able to draw new lines based on population shift. h.r. 1 has a 6-1 match for low dollar donation. what's that got to do with voting? nothing. it's got to do with political power, trying to have the federal government subsidize campaigns favorable to you. it's 6-1 match had been in place in my recent election, south carolina would have probably had over $1 billion spent. i think the people of south carolina deserve better than that. i raised $110, my opponent raised $132. i

here comes senator graham. senator from south carolina and head of the judiciary committee has to say. >> okay. i have to get there better shape here. so i miss john mccain a lot. probably no more than today because if john were with us, i'd be speaking second. he would be telling you a story about how unwise this decision is to withdraw all of our forces from afghanistan. so you can say on september -- 9-11, 2021 we're out. the conditions on the ground from the military advice runs counter to that decision. but the one thing i want to say, president biden, i respect him but i completely disagree. i've tried to work with presidents of both parties when it comes to the war on terror. i stood up to president trump when he announced our unilateral withdrawal from syria. to his credit he listened and adjusted his policies. i've been pushing the trump administration that if you want to do a deal with the taliban, make sure the conditions are met before we agree to the end game. the taliban had been trying to drive u

what do you think senator graham said?'t have enough time in this segment to talk about ways that its demonstrable there's racism in this country in everything from education, employment and housing. and to cite obama is as logical to cite oprah. it's false. here's thing. lindsey graham likely knows this is false because he's not a dumb man bath politically opportunistic one. it's not a coincidence he made these remarks on fox news and same talking points we saw from trump administration officials when trump was still in office. racism doesn't exist. 1776 commission was a few months ago. so he's speaking to a very large portion of the country that doesn't want to hear that the systems are flawed. >> a good point. i'm sure knees, there's no way doesn't know. >> so does tom cotton, by the way on the subject of things. this is connected. there's a battle about d.c. statehood going on. house passed it but senate won't. tom cotton senator from arkansas stood up and gave a speech comparing wyoming to washington, d.c. the reason

graham: absolutely.art of a wider pattern of misinformation, domestic misinformation that we are seeing accelerate for sure in the united states. one of the interesting things about this case of the misinformation, whether or not were all going to be able to eat to beef in the near future is particularly interesting, and one of the main promoters are influencers of this was congressperson lauren boebert. what was interesting is that she has a significant constituency that is a ranching constituency. this case is false, we will all be able to eat red meat, but it is literally and figurively redmeat conspiracy theories for her campaign strategy. amna: there is a clip i want to play for you from tucker carlsen, with this brandishing of information as cultural warfare. we are talking during a pandemic, masking has become a political issue. last night on fox news, tucker said this. tucker: your response when you see children wearing masks as they play should be no to eing someone be a kid at walmart. call the

that's part of the graham v. connor framework, as well as generally adopted police practices. >> so using your four-step analysis to identify facts and circumstances, would you please summarize to the jury what information would have been available to a reasonable police officer in the defendant's position prior to his arrival at the scene that day. >> yes. so the reasonable officer on the scene standard is an objective one. we don't adopt an officer's perspective. we take the reasonable officer and put them into the actual officer's position and say what would the reasonable officer have perceived, seen, heard, or believed? in this case, prior to the reasonable officer in the defendant's position arriving on scene, he would have been aware that there was a call about counterfeiting. the individual was described as possibly intoxicated. the individual later identified as mr. floyd was identified as possibly intoxicated. two other officers had taken the call. had, i believe, taken someone into custody and called a

that's part of the graham v. connor framework as certainly has been adopted into generally accepted police practices. >> using your four-step analysis to identify relevant facts and circumstances that would have been apparent to a reasonable officer on the scene, would you please summarize for the jury, based on your review, what information would have been available to a reasonable police officer in the defendant's position prior to his arrival at the scene that day? >> yes. so, the reasonable officer on the scene standard is an objective one. we don't just adopt an officer's idiosyncratic objectives. we take a reasonable officer and put them in the actual officer's position and say what would the reasonable officer have seen, heard or believed. in this case, prior to the reasonable officer in the defendant's position arriving on scene, he would have been aware that there was a call, i believe, dispatched about counterfeiting that the individual was described as possibly intoxicated. the individual later identif

we will be joined shortly by senator graham and senator cruz, and perhaps others. i will yield to senator graham when he arrives, but i have a few questions in the meantime. first, let me ask the panel, because i wasn't here, whether everyone got a chance to respond to the senator's questions. or if there's anything else you would like to say while we are waiting for others to come back. >> if available, i think it's important to make the case that in these situations -- we are talking a lot about civil asset forfeiture. i am not an expert in that law at all, so i cannot claim to that. but i do know the due process protections in these laws are similar to other civil orders, especially domestic violence orders, but in some cases of civil commitment as well as in child endangerment situations, where there is an urgency to act. i don't know that the analogy is exactly perfect for civil asset forfeiture, because we are talking about danger to persons, so i think the analogy is a little different. when you think about due process protections that have been upheld, you

sipri arms and military expenditure program and one of today's report's authors in singapore we have graham on the web an adjunct research fellow at the rajaratnam school of international studies and in washington d.c. we're joined by david or rush an associate professor and senior military fellow at the national defense university gentlemen welcome to you all one t.n. in stockholm coming to you 1st you coauthored the report the u.s. is the biggest exporter saudi arabia is the biggest in puerto hardly a big surprise. the usa is the biggest military spender my report looks at the global military spending and of course usa spending $778000000000.00 it's indeed they're the largest spender by far in the world this is followed by china the 2nd largest spender in the world saudi arabia actually has seen its bush spending for the last year by 10 percent are only the 6th largest spent in the world do you think that trend will continue. we see that the general increase in global spending is something that possibly can continue in the years to come given that militia spending often is seen as having

graham versus conner is a reasonable standard.hink most people would find it not reasonable regardless of the policy to use an excessive level of force to a prone person who is handcuffed on the ground. >> nbc's gabe gutierrez is in minneapolis as well and following every moment of this trial. gabe, you noticed something interest about the sergeant's testimony. how the police officers were interacting with the people on the scene? >> high, craig. in addition to the points you have already mentioned, one of the points that stuck out to me was the section where sergeant steiger was asked about that supposedly angry crowd of bystanders that the defense has been trying to insinuate was responsible for distracting the officers. sergeant steiger said officer chauvin had more than 160 hours of training and that should have prepared him to deal with a crowd of bystanders essentially blowing the defense's argument right out of the water. it has come it up repeatedly in the trial. it has perplexed people looking at this trial that the defen

v con authornor factors are comfortable discussing graham versus connor? >> yes, i am. >> and i'd ask -- >> can we have a side bar? >> looks like we've jumped into another quick side bar. let me get over to chief ramsey. your reaction to what we've been listening to. >> well, so far, i mean, he clearly has a great deal of expertise in this particular area. you know, i think that it also points out best practices. it is not just about minneapolis, minute. there are certain standards especially as it relates to use of force that are pretty much universal. so i think that that is pretty much established through his testimony thus far. >> and we're right back in. let's jump back in to it. >> within the minneapolis police department policy, i'd ask the court to -- i would like you to publish exhibit 106. there is at exhibit 106, the in-cooi incorporation of gramt swrer suc graham versus connor. >> yes. >> and it exists primarily from a state statute? >> yes . >> and then that state statute has to be consistent with the graham versus connor factors? >> correct.

but when you get down to the end of the 60s what you see billy graham do is put people in proximity to him and so he has other people and i call this the colorblind evangelicalism, but the colorblindness brings this leadership and then you have this whole other thing that happens which is when we still believe in these things that are kind of racist or roberts was interesting because what he does is he goes at the beginning when he puts on a television show and has the r and b singers that are inter- racially mixed, it looks like progressive in a certain way but it's not a progressive in this other way because it isn't leadership. it's not taking ownership or being allowed to do anything. the classic case for those that have seen pat robinson many years back with his black sidekick he was on with every day on television so these kind of proximities you can see with politicians and evangelical leaders and such, all of these proximities are important so by the time he gets to trump he picks a different kind of evangelical, he picks a pentecostal to be next to him and there's all these ot

but remember in graham's world, not the biggest.be the democratic effort at voting reform. >> the biggest power grab in the history of the country. >> this is from the guy who actually called the secretary of state of georgia himself while they were still recounting. the "washington post" reports that brad was stunned to find a way to legally toss ballots. that is grabby. graham denies that's what he was after, but he doesn't deny the call. there was a minute after the insurrection where he had some doubts. >> trump and i have had a hel helluva journey. i hate it this way. i hate it. all i can say is count me out. enough is enough. >> it's not enough. hi's hosting a golf classic with trump. it is classic. a guy side by side after he tried to overturn it, insurrection be damned. it was like thank you, trump, f fantastic. >> that was grabtastic. >> fantfantastalooza. >> grabby words. up next, a republican official setting the record straight on election fraud. >>> plus police in ohio after the shooting of a 16-year-old girl who appear

[silence] >> yes i believe so. >> the graham versus connor factor if you have a second. you talked yesterday and today about the graham d connor factors and you have done thousands of use of force reviews and you're comfortable discussing graham versus connor. >> yes i am. >> you me just a second. >> you reviewed the minneapolis police department policy that incorporates graham versus connor in the minneapolis police pdepartment policy i asked the court -- i would like you to exhibit 106, there is exhibit 106, there is the incorporation of grandma versus connor. >> yes. >> the authorized use of force in the state of minnesota exist primarily from a state statute, correct. >> that statute in terms of the police department policy have to be consistent with the graham graham versus connor. >> it's fair to say there's mora to the analysis of grandma versus connor of the severity of the crime, the threat or the active resistance. >> yes. >> in fact with the ultimateat police department policy says here is because the test of reasonableness under the fourth amendment is not ca

we will be joined shortly by senator graham and senator cruz, and perhaps others. will yield to senator graham when he arrives, but i have a few questions in the meantime. first, let me ask the

- [graham] i think these are more than six feet, actually. - all right, well, we're a ways away. - [grahamascar champ reflects on his fiery personality. - what do you think about that period? - um. - [graham] and navigating racing challenges during the covid-19 pandemic. - essentially, you just told me you quit on me. - [graham] also busch and his wife, samantha, detail his extraordinary recovery from a near career-ending crash. - we just saw like a bone sticking out. - [graham] and share how they're hoping to grow their family while struggling with infertility. - we have to start ready to keep fighting?", "u

lauren graham. and music from ajr. and now, jimmy kimmel! [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: hi there, i'm jimmy, thank you. i'm the host of the show. thank you nor watching. thank you for joining us on another major news day. and when i say "major" i am again talking about president biden's dog. [ laughter ] who last night, i informed you, bit an employee of the national park service. this was his second attack this month. and then today we learn, via the a.p., that major, or his colleague champ, has defiled the hallway -- [ laughter ] outside the reception room just off the white house south lawn. what a scoop that is. [ laughter ] i like that the white house dog making a bowel movement is a news story. a year ago, we were out of ventilators. okay? [ laughter ] meanwhile, it was a day of celebration for about half of college basketball fans here in l.a. our 11th-seeded ucla bruins beat number one seed michigan in a thriller last night. [ cheers and applause ] to advance to the final four, where they will face off against the fictional "scho

lauren graham, everybody!with ajr. sandwich. newn from the makers of the world's most-stolen fries. the juicy chicken sandwich... from the place that offers extra napkins for a reason. the tender chicken sandwich... from the creators of a sandwich phenomenon. so you won't just be biting into a chicken sandwich, you'll be biting into mcdonald's new crispy, juicy, tender chicken sandwich. ♪ ba da ba ba ba ♪ ah, great, the show's starting. urgh. come on, just trust me. oh, trust you. like with the dollar oysters? i don't think those were oysters. you survived, so... wait, we can't go that way. watch this, they'll think we're vip. wow, he does think we're vip. and backstage! trust me now? i never doubted you. i did for a second, but that's gone now, i trust you. the all-new sienna. toyota. let's go places. (cat 1) friskies world! (cat 2) thelook at that!na. (cat 1) it's made with real farm-raised chicken! (cat 2) i gotta get my paws on that! (cat 1) it's friskies farm favorites! (cat 2) the winning farm-ula. (woma

and the standard of graham vs. connor is, you know, what would a reasonable officer have done in a similar set of circumstances that you're doing. >> the first one is the severity of the crime, correct? >> yes. >> how do you analyze that graham v. connor factor? >> in my experience, the higher risk an arrest may be, like say an armed bank robber, you know, armed bank robber, you would pull your gun, order them to the ground to take them into custody. you know their danger, their threat level right off the bat, whereas i can't imagine how many times i've been exposed to, personally, or have seen other officers dealing with a simple thing as a traffic stop or a jaywalking violation or some minor offense, and they end up in a fight for their life just because of the conduct of the individual they're contacting. >> okay. so, in terms of the severity of issue, is it always what was the initial response, in your -- or is it something that evolves over time? >> well, the initial response, of course, is important, but it's

the graham -- >> i'd like you to contrast that with risk. >> sure. so, threat as i defined it can be contrasted with risk. risk you can think of as a potential threat. the person with the tire iron is 50 feet away and they don't present a threat. if they get close enough, they might have the opportunity now, or the apparent intention to strike the officer with of the tire iron, but they don't yet. so, risk is something the officers can use. tactics and communication to help address. the goal is to prevent risk from becoming threat, and really to prevent the threat from becoming whatever that relevant harm is. but while the threat can justify use of force, risk can't. an officer can't use force on someone who's holding a tire iron and two or 3 feet away while they are just changing a tire. if there is no apparent intention or threat there. the officer can do something like that away, distance so they are not two or 3 feet away, or interpose the vehicle between themselves and the individual they are interacting with. or use communications. they could a

graham: yes. ms.son: once you open up as the equality act does, you redefine what is public accommodation, and anything the church is doing is opened to the public, you will have discrimination claims brought sen. graham: if you had a worship hall and you rented it to the public, would that be enough? ms. hasson: absolutely. sen. graham: orthodox seminaries in the jewish faith, orthodox seminaries, i think that men and women worship separately when it comes to the service, could that be affected? ms. hasson: sure. what this does is it broadens the scope of public accommodation so that churches, houses of worship, social service activities, all the places where religious people carry out their faith, all of the sudden will be thrust under the rubrics of this act which means they will be subject to endless litigation. that is a problem because the act also specifically says -- sen. graham: if you are a catholic association and you participate in a sports league that is public, and you have a team from y

were first and foremost in the quotes proposed instructions with the authorized use of force and graham versus connor and the standards set forth in the proposed order proposed jury instruction did not include reference to the totality of the circumstances and it does not include the recognition of hindsight's in the language language regarding hindsight and did not include without the language without regard to his own state of mind intention or motivation and we addressed all of those and compared both the standard jury instruction and we compared that with the jury instruction provided in nor as well as the state defense proposed instruction and the, i would also note that the courts in terms it appeared to the defense that the court in terms of the inclusion of the three principal graham factors has emitted two of the three and i think we've addressed those in the court has taken those matters under consideration. in terms of our second issue your honor the defense was requesting a jury instruction pursuant to state versus -- to inform the jury that mr. hall had invoked his fifth am

and then again if we go back and look at the language of the graham versus conner and the policy that's contained by minneapolis police department it's. the use of force has no precise objective singular rule it's different in every case. the for example in the deescalation policy 5 dash 3 or 4 be one deescalation is advisable when it is safe and feasible correct yes and sometimes deescalation again includes the use of force. the use of force can be deescalation packed. into a thing of your example of displaying your your your weapon and so i don't have a lot of knowledge of. physical force being used to actually deescalate the situation but a very. very verbal a more with that ok so again if we were to talk to the use of force or defensive tactics. overall they would be the best source of that. overall. but the purpose of the escalation agreed is to attempt to slow down or stabilize the situations where that more time options and resources become available to the office. basically slow down everybody kind of calm down let's try to relax. but it's a lot more the process of deescalation

yeah yeah graham is exactly right you know north korea is a disruptive power they can mess things up china is an acquisitive power and it's seeking to solidify you know its control over the south china sea to basically an excess huge area and then permanently commit prevent people from from sailing into it so the technology needed to do that are not drones which are relatively cheap you know if people were to shift from mandir planes to drones you'd see a decrease in overall defense expenditure because drones are cheap and expendable what we're looking at that i think will drive spending particular for the united states is the assets needed to defend and challenge china in china's near abroad which is primarily ship building long range air strikes the army's looking at long range artillery basically reinvigorating its missile forces these are going to be the big elements the other stuff electronic warfare is relatively inexpensive as i said i don't think there's anything other than a defensive effort with biological warfare from the west china is suspect i think that drones are actua

thanks for making the time, graham brookie. revolution of this one red meat story that starts with a piece of information, represented, pack and as false claims and takes off online in some media circles. is this a pattern now? have we seen this with other issues? >> yes, absolutely. this is a part of a wider pattern of domestic misand disinformation that we're seeing accelerate for sure here in the united states. one of the interesting things about this case of this misinformation about whether or not we'll be able to eat beef here in the near future is particularly interesting. one to have the amplifiers of this is congressman lauren boebert. she has a ramping constituency, so this case in particular is false. we will all be able to eat rete meat, but it's interesting in that it's literally and figuratively red meat conspiracy theories for her political strategy. >> reporter: and one of the places we saw the claims being amplified was of course on fox news. there's a clip to play from host tucker carlson because there's the o

it integrates graham versus connor in a different manner to national and best practices standards. that's important testimony that is central to the case. >> is your plan to show yet again the video? >> certain segments that are already in evidence. these are very limited in duration. i am not having him play to the entire video and comment on each and everything. in the same manner in which he analyzes and reviews cases the threat posed by mr. floyd he would talk about specific segments of the video he thought were keys to his analysis and we highlight certain portions not just chronological order but in an orderly fashion i expect the testimony on - - testimony on direct will last more than 90 minutes. and then central to his report that the crowds distracted the defendant he was unable to render aid and perform his normal duties as a law enforcement officer. it's important to that issue as well and that has been raised and suggested by the defense throughout this trial. >> . >> the first concern was clear motion eliminate were not going to call every cop and say what would you d

and the chief spoke to graham so why do we need yet another person to talk about that?> because he comes from a completely different perspective and i think it is important to first focus on when we are looking at exclusion it would be under minnesota rule 403, cumin live evidence and would be unduly cumulative and unfairly cumulative and unnecessarily so. if you look at the importance of the relevant evidence here and the use of force or authorized use of force is a complete defense to all the charges in this case. it is primary and its front and center and it's important that we counter what is the goldilocks syndrome in viewing expert witnesses, this witness is too old for this witness is just an administrator and this witness is not a national expert in this witness has a knot testified as an expert witness before so in order to be able to convince the jury and we do have the sole burden of proof of doing so that the use of force here was unauthorized and was objectively unreasonable, we need to come at it at variety of ways and professor stoughton is able to comple

and there is an exhibit 106, there is the graham v. connor. now the authorized use of force in the state of minnesota exists primarily from a state statute. >> correct. >> in terms of the police department policy, it has to be consistent with the graham v. connor practice, correct. >> yes. >> it is fair to say that there's more to the analysis of graham v. connor then simile of the severity of the crime and immediacy of the threat or the active resistance. >> yes. >> in fact with the ultimate police department policy says here is because the test of reasonableness under the fourth amendment is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application, proper application requires careful attention to the fact and circumstances of each particular case including those three factors, correct, not limited to those three factors. >> correct rated. >> after the policy discusses those three factors, the policy goes on to read that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable. >> correct. >> on t

the former big brother star nikki grahame has died at the age of 38.nic following a fundraising campaign organised by her friends and family. the former presenter of big brother, davina mccall tweeted: i am so desperately sad to hear about nikki graham. my thoughts are with her friends and family she really was the funniest, most bubbly, sweetest girl. the australian prime minister said he had served with loyalty and honour. honouring a life of duty and service. a sign of respect for a man who for decades has had a long and enduring relationship with his country. the prime minister paid tribute to the duke of edinburgh, who he said was a reminder of stability needed in a world that can be uncertain. memories of him will tell stories of his candour. in a unique and forceful and authentic personality. but above all he was a man who was instead fast. who could be relied upon. man who was instead fast. who could be relied upon-— be relied upon. always standing by his queen. prince _ be relied upon. always standing by his queen. prince philip _ be relied up

yet we see lindsey graham and kevin mccarthy headed right back on. kevin mccarthy went to mar-a-lago shortly after january 6th to get his photo taken with president trump and remind his voters he still stands with the former president. >> in lindsey's defense -- >> there's no defense. >> in lindsey's defense, he said what he said and then he went to reagan national and three people -- >> yeah. >> and a puppy dog were barking at him. and it freaked him out. and everything changed after that. >> yeah. actually everything changed on january 6th. and if you've been at the capitol, as we were both yesterday. >> yeah. >> it's desolate. the capitol police are heroes, and they've been through a lot and it's sad. it's unbelievable how completely transformed the place is. it's quiet. it's empty. it's supposed to be the people's house. there's just a few people working there. and it is tragic. >> yeah. >> it is tragic what has happened. >> it is really something. i will tell you, willie, the one thing we did see when we walked past and saw the capitol hill poli

brandy graham is a senior n.r.a. lobbyist it's a good job to make sure congress maintains a pro-gun agenda. the united states a lot of times they don't look and i'm struck you know. there's a problem we have to make you know i mean. she has a tip for one nation on how to mobilize pro-gun advocates work from the ground up. i don't care if you are right only have 6 of your buddies. back and share them as long as their $20.00 for the organization or whatever it is try to raise if we have need to spend $40.00 or more and that's the reason it was. going to struggle is probably one of the most important thing it's a roy 1st brothers culture we're going to lose both drugs have you got to find a way. the n.r.a. would welcome one nation using the right to self-defense is an argument to change restraint used jungle was. i think very beneficial if you are all able to take steps in the right direction to start providing protection to people then again that helps us because the biggest hurdle i would get from fabs it's a look at

brandy graham said to survive as a become the puppets of anti gun educate his. basic classes and you're organizing in time what to say what to do they do interviews i did it so it all has strayed by he is going to have that word yes it was not. and so does conservation supported by the n.r.a. that allowed the continued slaughter of our children in our future i say get your resumes ready. the n.r.a. publicly mocked students who just witnessed the killing of their classmates. and these kids ought to be marching against our own hypocritical police structures they hate machines their constant except hold on no duty never going to take the constant. you want to attack a teenager who went to a school shooting that's who's your enemy now is a school shooting survivor a kid who doesn't want to die. but that it is but that it we hear the 1st gunshot echoed through the hallways. our 1st response was not sounded a lot like a gunshot or that very day. and now. it's time. for this like it. or. not actually. back. that was. decided. but david was at the shooting he recorded a

we'll speak with republican senator lindsey graham in moments. he's on the judiciary committee and we'll get a report on the politics involved in this from bret baier. we begin with constitutional attorney, jonathan turley and fox news contributor. welcome. this is an eye opener. this is something discussed throughout the campaign. biden was pressed on it a number of times, reluctant to put down a marker. nobody is shutting the door on it at this point. >> no, that's why i think this is first and foremost a real crisis of leadership. a failure on the part of president biden. he equivocated throughout the campaign, he didn't want to admit that he viewed court packing as he did in 1983 as a bone-headed idea. a dangerous idea. and instead, he fueled these demands to simply change the court so it would effectively carry out a more liberal agenda. it would reduce the court to basically the fcc with life tenure. it would just basically just increase the courts to the point where you have a liberal majority and call it a day. that's what we really need

the only good -- by steven graham jones narrated via sean taylor corbett.narrated by scott brick. when no one is watching by a list of coal narrated by susan gallion and jay osteen. yardwork by david narrated i kevin bacon. >> and the winner is when no one is watching by a list for coal narrated i susan balyan nj off thing >> there's something about hearing a skilled reader read into one character and the entire cast. it elevates the work and makes you feel like the movie truly is playing through your head as you're listening. >> when i first listened to i heard my ancestors voices in narration or the audio book is a part of the constellation. we have family members who fought against each other during the vietnam war. we could have been enemies that we came together to offer the world our story. >> discussing something as vulnerable as family history and the history of america period. >> it just gave me goosebumps. to this day when i read class act and still is me goosebumps so it's amazing to have an audio book to join so many other wonderful audio books.

. - [graham] this week, we're chatting with three of the greatest golfers of all time.nicklaus. - i wouldn't stand right there. i really wouldn't. (crowd laughing) - [graham] gary player. - i go cah, cah. - and the late arnold palmer. - you been to my aviation room? - known as golf's big three. the trio's won a combined 34 majors, 13 of those at augusta national. - now you can't put it into words. - [graham] the golf masters share stories of their friendly rivalries on the course. - if i hadn't shot 39, the last nine holes at cherry hills nobody ever heard of you. - i said, man, i'm going to beat you. - [graham] and impactful influences away from the game. - yeah, i told him things that i really probably never told anybody else. - plus, we get secrets in course design.

>> senator graham basically is trying to tell us that the sky is not blue. you know, it's as if saying, you know, we don't have poverty issues in this country because we have millionaires and billionaires. i really don't know what he was -- what point he was trying to make with that statement. but it is obvious that we have a long way to go in this country. if we have lawmakers who are refusing to acknowledge the fact that there is, you know, institutionalized racism that is embedded within our systems that we need to actively work in booting out. >> i want to remind our viewers how the minneapolis police department originally described george floyd's murder. we can put this up on screen. it is stunning the look at now. this is the press release from the day he was killed. it goes man dies after medical incident during police interaction. it goes on to say he resisted officers, officers were able to get him into handcuffs and noted he appeared to be suffering medical distress. he was put into an ambulance and brought to the hospital where he died later. if a

joining us now, south carolina senator lindsey graham.ator, i want to ask you for a reaction to that angle. corporations have long considered republicans to be their greatest defenders against the high tax, you know, big regulation of the left and the democrats. if they do this to georgia, are you prepared to say all bets are off with these corporations? >> well, i wish everybody could hear what you just said. he summed it up pretty well. number one, they ceos are full of crap, running scared. georgia is trying to make sure everyone can vote legally. georgia has a 17 day early voting period including weekends. delaware, where president biden is from, has no early voting. you don't have to have a reason to cast an absentee ballot in georgia. you just wantotha to. so you can vote robustly in georgia. but now you've got to prove you are who you are and that is driving the left crazy because it's harder to cheat.ow delta, microsoft, coca-cola, what do you think about h.r. 1? are you okay with h.r. 1, where redistricting will be done at the fe