i like the one i'm most familiar with, which is the graham leach bliley act that created a whole newregime of privacy regulation, subject to the new bank and on the other financial services to this regime in the banking industry for the first time had been acted to sec's supervision for new security activities. that's something glass-steagall didn't even do. by the way, peter emphasizes theropod station houses for the third 1999 legislation enabled banks during the recession to play a major role in taking up and taking on the ceiling on banks to ensure some of the more function continue to operate in an uninterrupted fashion. i do believe and take issue with someone's paper on the stress test. peter correctly demonstrates the stress tests were very rigorous. in fact be assumed obama administration's recovery program would fail, that it would not only fail to make things far worse, which is curious given the entity that created those stress test is a treasury department given the task of promoting and carrying out the recovery program. it's not the writer of the test i questioned, but