make sure the grand jury hears the full story. but those transcripts are really gold for the department of justice and the january 6th committee is so light years ahead of them in terms of gabbard gathering that roadmap. >> carol, as you are gathering information about what was included in the grand jury testimony, what piece of it struck you the most as focusing most clearly on donald trump? is there an oval office moment that the grand jury is studying most closely? >> i think it would be skewing the audiences impression about what we know and don't know to focus on two grand jury appearances, that of two very serious senior pence aides that we know about, we know the details of. it would be unfair to say from that we, can conclude that the department of justice is focused overwhelmingly on pressure pants, poly pants, tried to get eastman to agree to push an effort for fake electors. because we don't know about all the other willing grand jury witnesses who come in, and hey if you subpoena me i'll be happy to tell you what happe

grand jury investigation targeting targets like that. this is a separate grand jury involving a higher level of target? >> you could be my editor lawrence, so that answer i don't have an upside to say that. my sense is that that would be it is distinct grand jury. the rioting too trespasser to domestic extremist charges are being handled in one, and that this work starts a new this year with a fresh grand jury. but to be fair, i don't know for certain. >> so we have all, sitting out here, have the impression, some of this more confidently than others, i haven't been very sure about this, that the january 6th committee is running far ahead of the justice department in terms of investigating this arena. you have now jumbled that impression because you are now showing us the justice department running ahead of the january 6th committee on some of this? >> well, yes and no. i think it's right to say that the january 6th committee put intense pressure on the department of justice and its probe. but it's also accurate and news to me and frankl

the leaking from the grand jury, almost never comes from the investigators or the grand jurors, but it usually does come from the witnesses themselves, who have every legal right to reveal publicly everything that happened in a grand jury room or the leaking comes from lawyers for the witnesses or associates of lawyers for the witnesses or friends of lawyers for the witnesses. when prominent people in washington d. c. like marc short testified to the grand jury it's in virtually impossible for that to remain secret the other way we will get strong indicators of the progress of the federal criminal investigation of donald trump, or court filings by the justice department. and so we learned today that federal investigators obtained a second search warrant to look at the contents of the phone of john eastman, the trump attorney who advocated using fake electors to the electoral college, to fraudulently overturn the presidential election. a court filing today by the justice department says underlie 12th, 2022, a federal agent obtained a second federal search warrant from the eu district co

is a special grand jury that can set a longer than a typical grand jury that just sits the term of a court. the special grand jury can subpoena witnesses, but interestingly enough, in georgia, it cannot indict. so the decisional indicting would have to lie with the prosecutor in this case, unless there was -- grand tory subsequent to this. i don't know, maybe andrew knows, whether they can grant and manatee. and that's the other issue here. people forget, eastman cannot take the fifth like he did in front of the special committee. if they give him immunity. there's a lot of lawyers here that i think will stand in line for a ticket for immunity, if they can be done with this mess they got themselves in, where they have been actively committing crimes while pretending to get legal advice. >> andrew, if you are john eastman's lawyer, and you get an offer for immunity in georgia, do you immediately get on the phone to washington to the justice department and say i need federal immunity at the same time? >> well i don't think you actually need to do that. if you get state immunity you can

now, lindsey graham joins that exclusive club subpoenaed to testify to a grand jury. when blaine alexander asked fani willis today, why lindsey graham? district attorney willis said this. >> i'm not going to get into the details of the investigation, but this is what i will tell you. election interference is a very important subject. we have been granted a special purpose grand jury by the judges here, i think it is an important investigation. what is important is that the grand jurors hear from anyone that may have impacted this election. >> anyone that may have impacted this election. that's why lindsey graham has been subpoenaed. his criminal defense lawyers issued a written statement today saying, in my conversations with fulton county investigators i have been informed that senator graham is no longer a subject or target of the investigation, simply a witness. this is all politics, fulton county is engaged in a fishing expedition and in concert with the january 6th investigation in washington. any interview would be immediately shared with the january 6th committ

they can always present evidence to another grand jury. that's if it expires and there is no charges but that doesn't rule out further charges. host: they could have gone forward with charges but they haven't an unsealed yet? guest: or they could've convened without reaching a decision either way maybe david weiss will re-presented to another grand jury. the grand jury for the last caller, we've gotten from public reporting. we have had some of hunter biden's business is is testified and we've had some individuals testify. i think some of the names people want to hear. president biden has not testified and we know his brother jim, we have not heard whether he's testifying and those are some of the things which shed some light on some of these investigations and on the grand jury. there are some big names that would help a grand jury make a decision either way but we have not heard from them. host: i assume you have asked the white house about the president not testifying? guest: yes. host: how does that information come out? guest: people

it was there grand slam finals for the first time.he nerves are going to be but in many ways the way she handled her semifinal beating the former champion here she appeared to have no lads at all and she had the biggest serve but it took a little longer to get going. i think we all thought, oh, you know, their tricks and artistry she brings on centre court might be too much but rybakina brought her level right up after that first set and she was the better player by the end. there are auestions better player by the end. there are questions about _ better player by the end. there are questions about nationality. - better player by the end. there are questions about nationality. she i questions about nationality. she changed her allegiance four years ago because of the money invested in that tennis federation but throughout the rounds she has faced questions because of wimbledon's ban. at 23 it is not easy. it is questions because of wimbledon's ban. at 23 it is not easy.— ban. at 23 it is not easy. it is so ounu , ban. at 23 it is not

they spoke to the grand jury. how significant is that? >> it's very significant. and you know, not to undermine it all, the washington post is fantastic reporting here, and obviously journalistic jealousy is very big into what i'm about to say. there was really snow on the, ground and the washington post was able to report that it snowed last night because you had a situation where there was evidence of than testifying, marc short testifying for example before the grand jury. and mark short is the only reason you call him into a federal grand jury is a testify about systemically what we are talking about here. that's the only information that he would have that is up significance. so this is a big step forward and i think matt is right in terms of the doj being very revealed this is out. because there has been this public pressure on the doj, the sort of go further and make a public announcement of this. but of course, you saw garland's words were very measured. within the bounds of what he was allowed to say. he wasn't going to go outside of the rules. that is wh

your 21st grand slam title.— grand slam title. cheering how special. _ grand slam title.d slam title. cheering - how special. thank you so much. i grand slam title. cheering _ how special. thank you so much. i am at a loss of— how special. thank you so much. i am at a loss of words _ how special. thank you so much. i am at a loss of words for _ how special. thank you so much. i am at a loss of words for what _ how special. thank you so much. i am at a loss of words for what this - at a loss of words for what this tournament and what this trophy means— tournament and what this trophy means to — tournament and what this trophy means to me, to my team, to my family, — means to me, to my team, to my family, we — means to me, to my team, to my family, i've said this many times. it family, i've said this many times. it has _ family, i've said this many times. it has always been and will be the most _ it has always been and will be the most special tournament in my heart, the one _ most special tournament in my heart, the one that _ most special tournament in my heart, the one t

— pinnacle of the sport, winning a grand slam? , ., ~ grand slam?nning _ grand slam? yes, i mean, i think we all watched her winning and - grand slam? yes, i mean, i think we all watched her winning and just - all watched her winning and just witnessing — all watched her winning and just witnessing it _ all watched her winning and just witnessing it was _ all watched her winning and just witnessing it was unbelievable. i all watched her winning and just . witnessing it was unbelievable. she did something _ witnessing it was unbelievable. she did something amazing _ witnessing it was unbelievable. she did something amazing and - witnessing it was unbelievable. she did something amazing and yes, i. did something amazing and yes, i think— did something amazing and yes, i think she — did something amazing and yes, i think she has _ did something amazing and yes, i think she has been _ did something amazing and yes, i think she has been dealing - did something amazing and yes, i think she has been dealing with l did something amazing and yes, i think she

the first time at wimbledon at a grand slam. the biggest _ wimbledon at a grand slam.ament in the world. i think that — biggest tournament in the world. i think that is what me up at night last night— think that is what me up at night last night was the chance to play for the _ last night was the chance to play for the ultimate glory and a kind of become _ for the ultimate glory and a kind of become tennis immortality. kyrgios, 'ust hearin: become tennis immortality. kyrgios, just hearing from _ become tennis immortality. kyrgios, just hearing from him _ become tennis immortality. kyrgios, just hearing from him saying - become tennis immortality. kyrgios, just hearing from him saying he i just hearing from him saying he feels edges and nervous. how do you rate his chances tomorrow against the titan of the defending champion? it is really difficult to pick this one because i have stood courtside when he is beaten him and it is something about the matchup that does not suit him. nick has an unbelievable talent. i was he was the feared player out there and any draw becaus

this is lord richard and the grand some of refugees —— grandson of refugees. find and the grand some ofees -- grandson of refugees.— grandson of refugees. and this is brief, grandson of refugees. and this is brief. isn't _ grandson of refugees. and this is brief, isn't it? _ grandson of refugees. and this is brief, isn't it? the _ grandson of refugees. and this is brief, isn't it? the fact _ grandson of refugees. and this is brief, isn't it? the fact is, - grandson of refugees. and this is brief, isn't it? the fact is, the - brief, isn't it? the fact is, the government is _ brief, isn't it? the fact is, the government is excepting - brief, isn't it? the fact is, the government is excepting the l brief, isn't it? the fact is, the - government is excepting the support from trying to suggest otherwise. both, it is not a good look. if you want to be the country of the government tells us and wants to be, this should not be happening, should it? i'm sure it is not a delivery policy because mistakes are made —— deliberate. but these people are trying to find a new life, safe life which they s

a scary start to the british grand prix.f a dramatic race and a first time winner on the way. morejonny bairstow heroics at edgbaston — but india remain on top in the final test. welcome along. it's been one of those sundays you get in the british sporting summer where you don't quite know what to watch. we've got you covered, don't worry. we'll start at wimbledon where we had two brits aiming to reach the singles quarterfinals of a grand slam for the first time. chethan pathak�*s been keeping across it all. chetan — how have they fared? if you are not sure what to watch, ben, always watch the tennis is what i would say. that is what he been doing here. the british violins comic fans piled into heather watson and cam norrie, the first time anyone has ever had a schedule sunday of play well and truly gone and cam norrie feeling very good tonight in his first grand slam quarterfinal and was a great way to do it in straight sets over court one against american tommy bowe. these two are friends, they have been practising togethe

_ will win a grand slam title, cameron norrie? -- _ will win a grand slam title, cameron norrie?s next i would love to say yes. truthful, . norrie? -- to you think was next i i would love to say yes. truthful, no, because who _ would love to say yes. truthful, no, because who is _ would love to say yes. truthful, no, because who is coming _ would love to say yes. truthful, no, because who is coming up. - would love to say yes. truthful, no, because who is coming up. and i because who is coming up. and novak is going _ because who is coming up. and novak is going to _ because who is coming up. and novak is going to be around. but he is going _ is going to be around. but he is going to — is going to be around. but he is going to give them some a chance to do so _ going to give them some a chance to do so. it— going to give them some a chance to do so. . . going to give them some a chance to do so. , ., ., do so. it is great that he has raised his — do so. it is great that he has raised his profile, _ do so. it is great that he has raised his profile, the i do so. it is great that h

all the reporters know which are the grand jury rooms. individuals can say that they testified, but, you know, whether the grand jury issues an indictment or not, that is almost never known until -- it happens. >> if this investigation continues and there's a new president and that president appoints a new head of the department of justice, does the investigation automatically continue? zblit certainly does not automatically continue. it can continuity. the custom in the justice department, especially with career people, is that investigations continue from one administration to the next. but certainly the senior leadership will change. and i think if didonald trump i elected president in 2024, the odds of this investigation continuing in any form like that, i would say is remote at best. >>> perspective on this and the bigger picture, joined by thomas freedman, author of a virtual library of best sellers, including "from beirut to jerusalem." last time we spoke was right after cassidy hutchinson's testimony. you said the truth is of no v

tourand at second man from denmark to win a grand tour and at 25, he has risen quickly.d on a fish stand and last year was runner—up. but now all those hours on the road well worth it. this year's winner of the sport's greatest ride is from back where it started. joe lenski, bbc news. two days to go before england face sweden in the women's he has been on a bike in france this month almost 80 hours. now he could stop to drink it in. as the men's race finished in paris, the inaugral women's tour de france was just starting lorena wiebes winning the first stage. that also finished on the champs elysee. the dutch rider timed her sprint to perfection to beat her compatriot — the double olympic champion marianne vos into second. there was last a women tour in france in 1989, but this has been officially sanctioned and organised by those in charge of the mens race. there are seven more stages to go. two days to go before england face sweden in the women's european championship. they'll face each other at sheffield united's bramhall lane on tuesday night. germany will take on f

not a player had ever reached a grand slam final before wimbledon. but it was a 23 old russian born cassock. elinor bettina who claimed, made an major title smaller one, but in women's single spinal altima talkie jones renounce wrong deed of useful selma. nice to have you here. so tell us that little bit more about this historic final. yeah, fairly historic because we all, we always knew this was going to be historic regardless of the outcomes every but obviously either going to get a very 1st error in african women to win a grand slam title. but instead, we got a 1st cousin brand sam champion in elaina, rebec hannah, and he's a bit, i guess you can call it a bit ironic, but rebec cannot. and had she not switched allegiances from russia back in 2018, she would have not even been allowed to play because we all know since the russian invasion of ukraine, wimbledon has been russian players as for the match. but that's all politics, that's kind of focused on, on the much but the match. and i mean, this was really interesting. it was hot to predict from t

came before this grand jury. although marc short came on cnn earlier with erin burnett and was understandably careful about what to say, about what he said during the grand jury testimony, the fact that these 2 figures talked is telling, and all we have to do is look at the kind of things that they told the january 6th committee to understand how deep their knowledge bases. obviously it's connected to the previous conversation. how upset they were about how the former president handled himself in the days leading up to and on january 6th, given where they actually physically were with mike pence. trying to make sure that he was safe. >> mckay, i think we have your audio back. we're talking about pence. and you have descendants who obviously harry was just showing us, his numbers have been going up. so does pence have a lane? >> yeah, i mean i don't know. a problem for pence is that most of his political relevance in the current republican party is through his association with donald trump. now he is trying to wal

the grand duchess did not recognize the grand duchess completely foolish.phia of moscow grand duchess, this is my mother, and she is not yet great only by justice. why did you come? the princess wanted to go herself, but i could not get sick. she is upset by her family's quarrels. nothing your husband violated the inheritance law insulted the brothers. the grand duke of moscow will be undead andrey fight. listen to me. your brother, wants peace. you are not his enemy. if you become allies of the golden horde, you will become enemies to your brother. should return home and talk to the grand duke from the guards and don’t let us out, we can’t talk. mm, the grand duke regrets that the brothers quarreled, he was mistaken, but he admits. they admit it then. you kill a woman i don't kill. are you really making an enemy to your native land? don't you understand that women and children will die, please, i ask you to stop. so we delivered. write a reply to your mother. and i don't need you. i zhenya do not talk to enemies. vasilyevich is an evil man . we found brody

and she made history becoming the 1st cause like to win a grand slam title. but despite a job losing this final, she had a lot of impact when it came to the arab and the african world. right? most definitely. and she's been making a, she's had quite an impact the past few years. and you know that we shouldn't forget that she still the 1st era and african women to reach a grand sam final. she's also the 1st arab to minute w t, a title and the 1st era to ever make it to a semi's at a grand slam. and, and it's not just inspiration, of course she's, she will inspire a lot of a younger generations from that, from that region, but she's also been able to spread a lot of joy. she's always laughing, the media love her, and back home in to nidia. she's actually being, she's been given the nickname of minister of happiness. so let's see, you know, but she has to offer in the years to come 20 to come and i'm sure right, in the long term, i was a lot of happiness, a lot of joy. thank you, alina her talk, you thank you very much from d, w. sports or that's all coming up n

grand jury. the new york times in the wall street journal reporting that greg jacobs's general counsel has also testified. and what we are hearing from the january six committee. now maybe an even bigger deal. even more damning. then what they showed us last week. and their final hearing the september. remember they showed us that president of united states, donald trump? the day after supporters attacked the capitol. what does lawmakers in the halls. the police with an inch of their lives. the day after all that. they showed us how he absolutely refused to say the election is over. now the committee showing us more of what donald trump refused to say. top advisers and his own family begged him, the committee releasing a never before seen exhibit today. i'm going to play it for you. here it is. in its entirety. ok >> i'm not sure when those conversations began, because they could have started early the next morning, but i believe a started that evening, on the evening of the 6th. >> i thought we

neither player had ever reached a grand some title before. will win wimbledon. javert could have become the 1st african and arab woman to win the major championship. but instead it was a 23 roll for bettina who became the 1st ever grand sam single winner from kazakhstan. well, let's get more on the swim. alden's women singles final with a lima hotel. you joins me from dw sports cuz happy with lima. so talk us through this historic final it was always going to be very historic, regardless of outcome. so on the one site we have deborah who of course, could have become the 1st era and african woman to win a grand slam title. and on the other side, we had of course, elaine overbeck hannah, who did now become the 1st cousin to win a grand slam champion. so it was, like i said, it was always going to be very historic, and that's why i think it was a really great show down. and, and, and it's really interesting because when it comes to rebec cannot something that most, not all viewers may know is that she switched her an e g, insist her kazakhstan o

>> i think that's something that only fani and the grand jury will know up until the special grand jury's report has put together at the end of this process. >> the reporting on these target letters names three individuals -- state senator brandon beach, who i mentioned, and two of trump's fake electors in georgia, the republican party chair, david schaffer, and lieutenant governor who is running now for lieutenant governor -- board to jones. do you have any understanding of whether any of the others have received target letters? if, not would you be surprised that there would be more beyond these three? >> i wouldn't be surprised. remember, that fanny has sworn an oath to prosecute or investigate without any fear, favor or affection. that means that she is going to follow the evidence wherever it leads here and now it's not just her and her investigations team. but it's also a group of citizens and residents in fulton county, who may have questions that they want answered. so, he's operating on their behalf as well to be able to get some of the answers they need to write this final repor

for 11 of the republicans have asked the georgia judge to quash their subpoenas to testify to the grand jury. the motion says that for over two months, the district attorney's office told the criminal defense lawyers that the fake electors, quote, where witnesses, not subject for targets of the district attorneys, and the grand jury's investigation into the 2020 election. the motion goes on to express, surprise, on june 28th, 2022, quote, special prosecutor nathan wade informed us, for the first time, all of these 11 nominee electors were suddenly targets, stating, as our investigation has been short, and new evidence has come to life, in a spirit of integrity, we feel it only fitting to inform your clients status as changed to target. the criminal defense lawyers motion to quash the subpoenas to their clients says, quote, the abrupt, on support-able, and public elevation of all 11 nominee electors status wrongfully converted them from witnesses who were cooperating voluntarily, and prepared to testify in the grand jury, to persecuted targets of it. in light of the escalation, council a

pence's chief counsel, greg jacob, also appeared before the grand jury. making those two officials the most prominent witnesses that we know of that off testified as part of the department of justice's criminal investigation before a criminal grand jury they were both present for key meetings when donald trump tried to allied to pressure pans into halting the electoral votes for january six. today we got the stunning report from the new york times publishing previously undisclosed emails that shed new light on the ex presidents scheme. this is really something else. quote, the dozens of emails among people connected to the trump campaign outside advisers, close associates to mr. trump, show a particular focus on assembling lists of people who would claim,, -- with no basis -- to be electoral college electors on his behalf in battleground states that he had lost. he authored some of those emails and an arizona lawyer repeatedly called those very repeatedly called those electors fake, that is the word he used. he fully understood what they were up to. writi

a scary start to the british grand prix ends with a first—time winner.f a dramatic race to come. morejonny bairstow heroics at edgbaston, but india remain in control of the final test. hello there. it's been one of those sporting sundays where you don't quite know what to watch. so much sport going. but we've got you covered for the next 13 minutes or so. we'll start at wimbledon where for the first time we had play scheduled on a sunday. and for cameron norrie — this was no day to rest as he reached the last eight of a grand slam for the first time. chethan pathak�*s at the all england club us and chetan — norrie showed no signs of nerves out on court one. no. there were a few moments of tightness, times, but he is so good, isn't he, just that mental toughness and focus on the most consistent players on the men's and it is job done and who need a rest day? it is certainly not cam norrie. for the first time into a quarterfinal meeting his american mate who they had been together in four straight sets and what you see here is cam norrie just really playin

who killed the grand duke, the moscow ahmadkhan will soon come to moscow. i will also go.ed to go to muscovy to punish your brother. grand duke, we can't come with the filthy to our earth, we'll be cursed. you asked me for help. i give it to you for this, you owe me 8,000 balls, you will go in and it will be in the rear. how many of my brother's in the basement sat well to think only for a short time until the end. along the border of st. casimir, the guides help us somewhere here near vorotynskoye, they will go into the game. from it to moscow we will not have time to direct the road, they will soon go. the counter regiment sent. i'm all gun outfit. they can only be with great fire. how long does it take to bring the cannons to the ugra? we have time for the grand duke akhmatkhanov, he will not attack alone. kazimir will wait? here you will lead the counter. i'll go. thank you. detain ahmad khan until i bring the rest. how do you write? i will return to put all the exiled great perm and distant frontiers into the general system. when will we be banned? first i send gunner

will, i will not obey you grand duke rebuild in moscow yourself.'m your brother. you hurt me. lock up my scouts report in moscow the earth trembled the houses of the russian gods fell many dead and maimed you were late. i know about this, what further the moscow prince should give in 7 years. now he is weak. i think you think you are a thinker. forgive the greats no, go on. it's time to ask the moscow prince his friend will be the time, i'll ask. what if he doesn't pay? a gold ruble on one side grand duke, and on the reverse side the coat of arms of the vasilevites. what do you say? what, that ivan vasilyevich put his brothers on a chain like toadstool dogs? together, to be handy to plot against me. that such a lot is not planned by yuri they wanted. and i refused him and gave nothing to my brothers. so they are not poor. well-fed muzzles weapons in silver i told them, and i 'll tell you the russian lands must be united and ruled from moscow a. how are you going to manage all the russian lands when your brothers and sisters are your enemies. let th

there is a difference between a special grand jury and a regular grand jury. this grand jury can't indict, but they can certainly turn things over to a regular grand jury, which can proceed, correct? >> right. so georgia has this structure where a special grand jury sits for a longer period of time to be able to work on long-term investigations like this one, which does support the idea that she's not in a hurry. she's going to methodically talk to this group of witnesses. and so often one group of witnesses can give you the names of other witnesses or give you information that can form your questioning of other witnesses. the greatest example of that is cassidy who may not have admissible evidence because much is hearsay but she could lead you to the firsthand witnesses and tell you what questions you need to ask them about why you said this or why you said that. she is going to me thotically do that. once the grand jury has that evidence, they can turn it over to a regular grand jury that can issue an indictment. >> what do you make of the names of the peopl

now, what we don't know is exactly what he was asked during this grand jury testimony. but we know that marc short was there for a lot of things. you mentioned not only the fact that he was by the vice president's side on january 6th, but perhaps even more importantly, on january 4th, he was in a meeting in the white house where the former president trump and john eastman, one of his lawyers, were trying to persuade the vice president, the then vice president, that he had the power to not certify the election results. that he had the power to bypass the constitution, essentially, and try to keep donald trump in the white house. so those are some very, very important observations that marc short would have been a part of, and that would be very valuable for the prosecutors who are looking into not only the violence that happened on january 6th but also the efforts that went into trying to keep donald trump in power and of course inspired the violence on january 6th, erin. >> evan, thank you very much. >> and now, as promised, i want to go to marc short, the former chief

a special grand jury.ot issue an indictment. so, it would have to turn its evidence over to a different grand jury that would actually vote the indictment. all of this could be quite slow, but she does seem determined to proceed. >> and you heard the report from kara scannell. a judge has quashed jody hice's attempt to -- or squashed the subpoena to appear before a grand jury. how significant is that? >> well, you know, it's good for her. the more subpoenas that are quashed, the better. one of the pending requests to quash a subpoena is from linsdsy graham, the senator who made a call in to try to stop this investigation. so, you know, every time she wins a getting someone in the grand jury, that's good. but there is a long way to go before this turns into an actual criminal case. >> the fulton county d.a. has also just said racketeering charges. where is racketeering in this? >> well, racketeering is just another term for when you -- when a prosecutor takes a bunch of disparate crimes and combines them al

her grand duke. only just a modest little cake for he 60th birthday, a small neighborly gesture, so to speak. and while enjoying a cup of hot chocolate patrons can watch the changing of the guard in front of the palace across the street. a little bit of luck, they might even catch a glimpse of the grand duke himself. so where to next money, let's get back to see an accountant. i think the skate park is a great place for everyone to visit tcl. you can see people doing all kinds of cool tricks on b, m x bikes, scooters and skateboards game. everyone should stop by there on, i guess. the modern skate park lies right in the middle of the city's pe toast valley. it's especially busy during the day and a great spot for a family outing. and possibly you'll be watching some of tomorrow's prose trying to land a cake flip. our next tip pulls us right back into the old town with luxembourg. what's really present is that you have many killed sher inside, and the, i think museum is too good expression of the melt

jugÓ en mÁs de 2400 partidos en grandes ligas.mundiales. siendo el tÍtulo logrado en 2004 el primer equipo en 86 aÑos. >>> ortiz anotÓ en su carrera. >>> casi 2500 hits. el dominicano se une a sus compatriotas juan marichal, pedro martÍnez y vladimir guerrero, en tener su placa e cooperstown new york. >>> y precisamente en este lugar se hizo la ceremonia de exaltaciÓn de big papi, estÁ rogelio mora-tagle que ha dado seguimiento a los eventos rogelio, cuÉntanos quÉ estÁ pasando y cÓmo la gente celebra junto a david ortiz, a big papi, buena tardes. >>> johana, buenas tardes, estos nÚmeros que acabas de dar aparecen en la placa de david orz que se puede ver en el museo del salÓn de la fama. david amÉrico ortiz, big papi, un poderoso jonronero zurdo que respondiÓ en los mentes que se necesitaba. en una memoria marzada con su gigantesca sonrisa. >>> finalmente llegÓ el gran dÍa. y con la simpatÍa que le caracteriza. >>> wow! cooperstown. volviÓ a bear de jonrÓn con el discurso que durante meses lo tuvo nervioso. >>> mi gente de la repÚ

it is to the grand jury. >> it's a big deal to me, so the grand jury subpoena means that there is evidence a criminal investigation. and they have called in top white house officials, two of them, not random insurrectionists or anything like that. and it's a subpoena. it's not some nice request from prosecutors, stephanie. it's more than that. and these subpoenas, to, me are very strong indications that the justice department probe is not dancing. and merrick garland has been moving slowly in the investigation. but this does show movement, and let's hope that this shows the garland is gonna basically prove to us, slow and steady does win the race. and why this is different from the past? we've known that there is a gran torino's discussion grand jury investigation going into the fake electors plot in the arizona. we know that there is a grand jury investigation into insurrectionists at the capitol, those with relatively low level people. but what this is, it's a request about stuff going on in the white house around january 6th. and both marc short and greg jacobs have given testimony befo

just opposite the grand ducal palace. we find the chocolate house. it's known beyond luxembourg borders. fred sweet creations in french and belgian chocolate. and it's tasty cakes for ona natalie bon opening. the store in 2008 was a sweet dream come true. chalabi finished to marie chocolate. his joy. she had joy combined with endorphins. nixa more. yeah. we have a selection of 60 different kinds of hot chocolate ice cream shop. were loudon and summons ethan sure. glad to pull via than me findin sitting together tasting. and cheryl shocked with friends at the shop. it was all about to look at. natalie bon has even baked her grand duke. only just a modest little cake for he 60th birthday. a small neighborly gesture, so to speak. and while enjoying a cup of hot chocolate patrons can watch the changing of the guard in front of the palace across the street, a little bit of luck that they might even catch a glimpse of the grand duke himself. so where to next money, let's get back here. i got and i think the skate park is a great place for everyone to visit

the other grand slam tennis tournaments have not banned russians. why did wimbledon?combination of factors. you are right, wimbledon is an outlier on this issue in tennis, not so much in world sport but in tennis. i think it was the british government led by boris johnson was adamant there had to be some sort of concession by the russian players if they were to take part, a denunciation by their government, or some other gesture. i felt the club that runs wimbledon felt they had to do something. they did not want to make the players basically go against their country publicly, and put their families at risk. they decided to ban russians and belarusians altogether. it's been a long time since that happened in tennis, post-world war ii with germans and japanese. they took away the wrecking points, unprecedented, because a lot of backlash. some players will not rise in the rankings and will actually drop. nick: let's talk about ons jabeur. she is well-liked on the tour and is known as the nister of happiness. what is she represent for the women's game? christopher: peopl

they could just use that testimony in the grand jury. the issue with the grand jury is at some point, presumably, they're gonna be asked to issue indictments of some what -- they need to have evidence on which to base those indictments. hearsay evidence is admissible underground jury, they could go play the videos of the depositions, from the january six committee. but prosecutors usually want to see what this is for themselves. they may not ask exactly the same questions as those -- >> would they have to subpoena mark? short he said earlier today that they did. they're willing to subpoena someone as former high-level as marc short? >> it shows they're serious, that's why today is so important this grand jury testimony is so important. it shows the justice department is not just focusing on the small fish. whether there will be indictments of people up to and including president trump, i certainly don't know that. but, there certainly would be indictments of the people like -- merrick garland, no person is above the law, you can look at

kyrgios really wants to deliver, can he do it at this championships finally at a grand slam?t as we speak against lorenzo sonego, nadal serving first, i will keep you updated on that. for the month, back to ben in the bbc sport centre. from south london to south africa, where wales were beaten with the last kick of an extraordinary first summer international in pretoria, denying them a first win over the springboks in their homeland. 32—29 it finished. earlier, england coach eddiejones described their 30—28 defeat to australia as painful, whilst ireland were soundly beaten by by new zealand. patrick gearey rounds up the action. nearly n early a50 0 nearly a500 feet above sea level, up against a team on top of the world, wales could be forgiven a little vertigo. in pretoria, the air is thinner and oxygen is scarcer but gas is no problem for lewis rees—zammit and. flew around south africa, the world champions. twice in the first half, the winger took flight, while leading by 15 at the break. so, south africa return to what they are good at, master bulldozers. they smashed thems