grantees do you mean grantees that were never funded before, is this like an increase in dollars that we've normally not seen at the school district. >> for every rfp cycle for us it's a new cycle of grantees. even if we have had a history with them for many years, because technically the funding is, the funding is just reset. it resets funding. . >> i don't know if you have an example actually. >> if we fund peer resources or the wellness center, let's say we grant the wellness center the new cycle a million dollars, but we had already been funding the wellness center a million dollars from the children's fund, do we count that million dollars as part of the in kind dollars that we expect the city it allocate to the school district via p ?oo ?a i'm going to risk, i believe wellness centers have been used as in kind towards peace. >> that would not be good. i mean financially it might be good, but to do it, it would really detract from the purpose of what peace is all about. as commissioner wynns suggested, it's actually raising the poor people's spending which i think is the goal. th

we have developed a 3 prong approach to supporting our grantees. and that's to do fiscal oversight in which our grantees receive a visit from us to assess their problematic quality and we do joint monitoring around physical health. we provided capacity building. so when our program manager so out in the field and they identify some weaknessesness we bring in a program crouch so increase the quality of their program. we have several workshops we send our agencies to attend some are administered by controllers officer. and 15 we do data and evaluation we want to make sure we're constantly learning from the field and we want to make sure we're asking all the right questions to get to the outcome. it's - to me it's a process we need to check. so in conclusion we very happy that the property tax revenue is continuing to grow and the children programs are growing along with it. we're still working with the controllers office to know what the children's projections are. the revenue will help the department to meet the revenue challenges. and we're existed

focus in doing planning around summer which has been a peek in term of violent activity so those grantees and or partners at dph and probation, we've been working together to make sure we have a smooth summer this coming summer. the next your is trying to foster summer providers to think about quality. and to end hans their quality. one of the things we've worked on in the couple of years is a summer larning network is a coalition of workers across the city and has more than one hundred members and it's to share ideas and resources and things that can help programs improve their program quality. there's newsletters and meetings and the group puts together and plans two city wide training days for staff of any in the city and there's a fair where folks from different city agencies and cultural institutions come and talk about how they can bring students to their sites or field trips and the types of programs they he have, the library is there promoting their summer reading program, so it's a network of folks trying to expand for the low income family. the after school for all group creates

and one group i belong to is a recipient of that grantee. and tonight i am here to talk about another community project. it regards greater activation of mcclair park, the city's second largest park, and encompasses district 9, 10 and 11. but usually on the low end of funding with the city. i have been working with the rec and park division and many divisions within rec and park, to bring more activities to mcclarin park, and one is to activate the community theater and work with the police patrol and citizens to create supervision and added security for the park to add events for the public at low fees. we are excited about this project, but funding of course in this situation is also in need. we hopeful that the three supervisors that surround the park will provide for more funding from the park and to bring these programs. lastly i would like to say that our parks are very dear to all citizens of san francisco. and in the southeast part of san francisco, we suffer from lack of funding, and urge that full funding for rec and park departmen

. >> tudor jones: we started asking grantees, "what are your goals?hen holding them accountable. and yet, at the same time, providing management expertise and providing administrative help and legal help and help to secure buildings. so, we weren't just holding them accountable; we were helping them along the way. >> i need two on table nine, please. >> pelley: robin hood invested $5 million in the kitchen's expansion goals, and now they're serving more than twice as many as before. but when programs don't perform, robin hood takes the money back. >> tudor jones: every year, we probably defund 5% to 10% of our grantees-- not because the fact that they're not wonderful, not because of the fact that they're not trying real hard, but because we're not getting the results. >> pelley: you do that to 5% to 10% of your projects every year? >> tudor jones: yes, because we're always trying to find new things, and, by definition, you're going to fail at times. it's what you have to do to be at the forefront of actually finding a way to kick poverty's ass. >> pe

does that apply to health and human services grantees who might use those dollars to lobby state andcal officials? >> i'm sorry. i did not hear the last part. >> you responded to my letter in regards to the anti-lobbying act which was amended in 2002. you said the use of inappropriate funds -- my question to you, does your statement and evaluation of anti-lobbying act apply to health and human services grantees who might have used those dollars to lobby state and local governments? >> i think you might be referring to what i have only read in the newspapers. i do not know whether or not which funds are being used are whether that letter would apply to the effort. i do not know. >> can you get that to me? would you get back to me as to why you think it should not apply to health and human government agencies that might be grantees that would use it to lobby local and state? >> we will try to get back to you in a more timely fashion. >> that would be appreciated. thank you. >> the gentleman from north carolina. >> thank you. >> you're only supposed to do that at your confirmation heari

and che out our risk-free grantee. hurry. offer ends may 18th red hot deal days are back.ree. everything droid does in a compact design. or the droid razr hd by motorola in white, with google voice search that understands you the first time. just $49.99. hurry in, sale ends may 12th. powerful devices. powerful network. verizon. gotta get that bacon! yummy, crunchy, bacon bacon bacon there in that bag! who wants a beggin' strip? me! i'd get it myself, but i don't have thumbs! mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm it's beggin'! mmm, i love you. (announcer) beggin' strips...there's no time like beggin' time. [ male announcer ] pain not sitting too well? burning to feel better? itching for relief? preparation h offers the most maximum strength solutions for all hemorrhoid symptoms. from the brand doctors recommend most. preparation h. don't stand for hemorrhoids. >> steve: fox news alert. you're looking live at the police department there in downtown cleveland, ohio, where just in moments, we'll have a press conference to find out more about the house of horrors that kept three women alive in t

training for physicianphysician s whether through her health center programs in which 15 of the grantees serve rural minister for work supporting the 23 tracks across the country. studies indicate 70% of graduates of these rural training track stay in rural practice and we are focused on increasing student interest in this program and working with communities to start rural training tracks. rural areas benefit greatly from the hhs and state j. one visa waiver program which -- and communities who need them most. it works with essays the national rural recruitment and retention network and conscience in rural areas and passers. we have long supported grants to link urban specialist with rural communities in need need and yet we are seeing for grant programs and emerging technologies such as e. emergency care as well as telehome monitoring. telehealth technology plays a key role in extending the reach of mental health work orders particularly in areas where psychiatrists and psychologists are often scarce. we also currently our funding for telehealttelehealt h pilot that includes montana an

does that apply to health and human services grantees who might use those dollars to lobby state and local officials? >> i didn't hear the last part. appropriate money to -- >> i don't know if you understood. you responded to my letter last week in regard to the anti-lobbying act as amended in 2002. and you said that the act prohibits the use of appropriated funds to influence an official of any government. my question to you is, does your statement and evaluation of the anti-lobbying act apply to health and human services grantees who may have used those dollars to lobby state and local governments? >> i think you might be referring to what i only read about in the newspapers involving what h.h.s. is doing with implementation of the act. i don't know whether or not -- what funds are being used or whether that letter would apply to that effort. i just don't know. >> would you get back to me that if you don't think your statement, which is pretty clear to me that it would apply, would you get back to me as to why you think it should not apply to health and human services or other gove

including names of donees, recipients, and grantees. some bearing the signature of now former tax-exempt division chief lois lerner whose former boss has insisted that doesn't mean she is guilty of anything. >> her signature was on 70,000 applications so let's not personalize this one to ms. lerner. >> reporter: but this lawsuit is personal. singling out top irs and obama officials for wrongdoing. >> these were the decision makers, the people in charge of the offices or the divisions that we've sued and the idea here that you're just going to blame the line agents i found to be offensive from the beginning of this. >> he says he is hoping to win damages for clients who had to pay for accountants and attorneys to help answer those lengthy irs questionnaires. wolf, up next week, congress is going to be back in town and will have yet another irs hearing. this time they're going to call representatives from the tea party groups who say they were targeted and they want to really use this forum, public forum to allow them to formally share th

in this irs questionnaire, a tea party group is asked to provide names of donees and grantees.ss furious. >> how chilling is it for an organization to get a letter from the irs asking for its membership list. and that has nothing to do with the decision on whether or not tax-exempt status should be granted. >> what does that tell you? >> well, it raises questions whether there's a political motivation here. >> congressional investigators have now learned the scope of this is larger than the irs indicated last week. 471 organizations singled out for special scrutiny. compounding the irs's problems, lawmakers feel misled by its leadership. >> this was either one of the greatest cases of incompetence that i've ever seen, or it was the irs willfully not telling congress the truth. >> acting irs commissioner steven miller was informed of the targeting last year, but never told congress. >> how about answering our questions? >> on capitol hill today, he refused to answer reporters' questions about why. now, wolf, miller is going to be one of the witnesses on friday, when the house is

does that apply to health and grantees whos might use those dollars to lobby state and local officialsca -- officials? >> ansar. . i didn't hear the last part. -- i'm sorry. i did not hear the last part. >> you responded to my letter in regards to the anti-lobbying act which was amended in 2002. he said the use of inappropriate my question to you, does your statement and evaluation of anti-lobbying act apply to health and human services grantees who might have used those dollars to lobby state and local governments? >> i think you might be referring to what i have only read in the newspapers. i do not know whether or not which funds are being used are whether that letter would apply to the effort. i do not know. >> can you get that to me? to me as tot back why you think it should not apply to health and human government agencies that might use it tos that would lobby local and state? >> we will try to get back to you any more timely fashion. >> that would be appreciated. thank you. >> the gentleman from north carolina. >> their say. you. than k >> you're only supposed to do that at you

institute for scholars -- we have brought up 60 grantees. we continue to sponsor this. theave something called seed program, which provides scholarships to young people and educators. when i was in mexico, i resided over several ceremonies with these people, probably the most effective thing i have ever seen is to send an educator from the communities to the united states for a community college degree, for training in english, and see that person return. we have created an alumni network with a special focus on indigenous communities in mexico. it remains a high priority for us. >> i beg your indulgence -- let me correct myself so i do not the scorn of mr. brownfield -- i said ambassador. assistante is now an secretary. mr. secretary, let me ask you really quick, could you speak about the importance of regional partnerships, particularly when discussing the work of columbia and others in the area, working together to make sure -- they talk about the target effect -- that we are not pushing drugs one way because of that works -- networks. could you tell us that quickly?

. >> is any of the prevention fund being used by its grantees to support local lobbying efforts of?>> no, not that i'm aware of but again i can check into that and get back to you. >> what is the department's post on use of federal grant dollars for lobbying? >> it's not permitted. >> with respect to using this fund to the government the affordable care act and intimate to help insurance market places, i understand that you and the rest of the administration are in a very difficult position. because republicans in congress have refused to provide any funding to support this critical program and help the implementation works with the hhs was forced to leverage and reallocate existing resources to provide short-term and immediate funding. so my question is, can you please explain how the secretary has used her transfer authority to help implement the affordable care act? >> the secretary has used the statutory authority that she has to transfer funds within hhs. she used some funding from the fund as you mentioned and she has used some funding from nonrecurring fund for, particularly