you will be an adult jesus teyak, alas, the apostles, great asti and faith and you live in heaven to our jesus and at the same hour. if not from the centurion, nor from the one who fears the removal of the grave cloths, we will refuse this nourishment in the depths of our hearts. and our breeding is complemented by expectations not only on the semin. an empty grave, it seems to us empty words. you just don't have our expectations of eternity here, and he gives us the courage to take the brahm away. even eternally the joyful hallelujah will worsen on the joyful and full of faith illumination at rushing at the resurrection, our gapan of jesus christ, i bless both the son and the holy spirit dear brothers and sisters today is the feast of the lord’s entry into jerusalem, the week is true to sundays, this is the name of one of the great twelfth holidays, the arrival of the savior in his city on the eve of the feast of easter the lord in jerusalem is celebrated on sunday directly preceding easter and opening holy week. it occupies a special place in the church calendar , this time of reme

asty? gen. prelogar: i recognize and don't want to suggest i ve particular attachment to the urords, more than de minimus, in isolaon do i have great attachment to the body of lawhahas developed in the reliance on hardisonsing the cost and accommodations at issue theres one benchmark to sort going forward the types of accommatn that is will be required. the thing i'm trying to avoid is this idea the court wouldhr it all up for grabs and say we o do this over under some new standard and this case law irrelevant for helping to guide employers and understanding tirbligations and courts in applying the statute in this recurring fact pattern. >> you want to look athe development of law. the law has developed in this area in other respects, too. it is not the case, as i think people thought it was, that you can't treat ppls religious exercise any better than anyone else. in other words, strict neutralitys longer understood to be the law. it was not the case en hardison was decided you had cases like espinoza and carson saying there really is no establishment clause problem if you make accommodations for people's religious beliefs. if you