decision was not understood, even in europe, even those very close to usa allies, not great britain spain italy well canadaalso said enough. here is how you comment on this decision and whether the us initiative will become a real stumbling block for the entire western queen. well, i will not start from the end, because there is no democracy there. there is no collective decision making. that is pahan said. yes, this is the first. and this is the main thing, what they accepted was not accepted. it's rather more. this is me using this inhumane weapon. yes, it's yesterday. that is , as a rule, this is a blow to reputation, but another question. why are americans doing this? experts also know that this weapon has a very bad effect on the troops who are sitting in the dugouts. this is a weapon. it is dangerous first of all for the civilian population and for decades afterwards because it clogs this territory. he's statistically about thirty percent. on average, the main conclusion that i can draw from this does not explode is two of them. first , the americans no longer see the point in supplying weapons of hi

didn’t understand, even in europe, even allies very close to the united states, not great britain spain italy well canadaenough. here's how you comment on this decision and whether the us initiative will become a real stumbling block for the entire western coalition. well, i'll start from the end, there will be a place, because there is no democracy there. there is no collective decision making. that is pahan said. yes, everything will be done. this is the first. and this is the main thing, what they accepted was not accepted. it is rather more polite using this weapon is inhumane. yes this is yesterday. that is, as a rule, this is a blow to reputation, but another question. why are americans doing this? and why do experts also know that this weapon on the troops who are sitting in dugouts in the trenches works very badly. this weapon is dangerous primarily for the civilian population, and for decades afterwards, because it litters this territory, according to statistics, about 30% on average, the main conclusion that i can draw from this does not explode. first , the americans no longer see the point of

didn’t understand, even in europe, even allies very close to the united states, not great britain spain italy well canadahere is how you comment on this decision and whether the us initiative will become a real stumbling block for the entire western coalition. well, i will not start from the end, because there is no democracy there. there is no collective decision making. that is pahan said. yes, everything will be done. this is the first. and this is the main thing, what they accepted was not accepted. it's rather more use of this weapon inhumane. yes, it's yesterday. that is , as a rule, it is a blow. mutations, but another question, why do the americans do this ? experts also know that these weapons act very badly on the troops who are sitting in dugouts in the trenches. this is a weapon. it is dangerous first of all for the civilian population and for decades afterwards because it clogs this territory. in the same place, according to statistics , about 30% on average does not explode the main conclusion that i can draw two of them from this. first, the americans no longer see the point in supplying b