greg banks: mr. face, and at a distance of less than four inches, used a 380 semiautomatic handgun to put a bullet between his eyes. josh mankiewicz: the prosecutor began by calling the one person that police still believed knew more about this case than she was saying-- the state calls brenna douglas. josh mankiewicz: --brenna douglas, the dead man's widow. on the stand, brenna identified a picture of peggy thomas and said they used to cut hair together. in 2003, she said, she rented a house from peggy. greg banks: did you two become close? brenna douglas: yeah, we'd talk. it was just girl talk stuff. greg banks: did you talk about personal things with her? yeah. josh mankiewicz: according to brenna, her rocky marriage to russel douglas was among the things she talked to peggy thomas about. brenna douglas: he had a lot of issues-- throwing furniture around and different things. and how he treated the kids and i, it just wasn't ok. greg banks: when you and russ went through a separation, was that the

banks using 30 turns of lev rng. that, of course, has been reduced to a fractional level. i agree that greg makes a great point. are two things going on that bear watching number one, because of the raft of regulations imposed upon the banking system after the financial crisis, notably dodd/frank in 2010, the banking industry is largely safer today than it was then there are higher capital cushions, there are living wills. there are these stress tests intended to have banks show us how well they might fare under stressed conditions. there are all these measures a lot of risk has moved offshore, either into the hedge fund world perhaps or the shadow banking world, if you will, and other parts of the economy both here and abroad. however, not only are there other areas of focus in terms of risk and higher leverage at the moment, other than the banks, but we're also seeing a rewind or an unwind, i should say, in some cases of the very banking regulations. now, just this week, there's debate on capitol hill about this reform effort of dodd/frank and now it looks as though the house is, house leaders anyway, are dema

greg abbott won easily but he is facing a runoff between two democrats. >> they fall into their own category, a right up against the governor's campaign. governor abbott has $40 million in the bankd, and oppressive campaign, and andrew writes going into a runoff. governor abbott can start preparing for the november general election, no drop-off as we move into them and the biggest disappointment for democrats has got to be at work, who was seen as raising a lot of money, bringing voters to the polls and not only did it not materialize but he did 17 points lower than wendy davis did four years earlier when she was supposed to be the big democrat hope against greg abbott. if you look at his percentage in the county, he lost 20 of the most hispanic counties in the state showing running against ted cruz, he has real challenges and gives republicans an opportunity to win the hispanic vote which hasn't happened since 1998. >> george p bush, 51%. >> it is less interesting than it could become a gibberish absent, he was challenged, an interesting situation by the guy who had the office before him running for atty. gen. taking the office back, the bush dynasty thing. this wouldn't have g

greg barker sadly is the chairman, he now sits with majesty with the house of lords. he's chairman of this outfit. it's floated a lot of money went to ian plus. they go to pay the bank and they are sanctioned. they're sanctioned. london is being used to raise funds to give hard currency to banks that are sanctioned. we are almost enabling the russians to play the sanctions. now is that because lord -- >> if i may say, i hesitate to comment on any individual case. but i think it is very important in this whole conversation to make a hard and fast distinction to those who are -- the law enforcement agencies believe are responsible for crimes, and russian people, russian business people, russian businesses trading freely and living their lives in this country. >> can i come very quickly to chris? >> can i just ask one simple question? was vladimir putin validly elected in the election this week? >> according to the monitors, there was an absence of genuine competition. that slightly understates it. >> say what you really mean. do you think he was validly elected or not? >> i prefer to go with the judgment of the monitors, which was that there was -- as far as i can rem