good afternoon, my name is greg miller, land use council for the property owners. i ask that you concur with hpc staff recommendations regarding modifications to the proposed nomination, specifically we agree with staff that under criterion a, neither fireman's fund nor the insurance industry rise to the required level of significance. we agree with staff that most of fireman's innovations were prior to the move to the site and we agree that the development of the insurance industry has not made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of california's history and culture. we also agree with staff that under criterion c, the project's architect edward page is not a master architect. he was no prolific and we see no evidence of his influence in the community. and the city's exhaustive survey of mid century modern buildings relegates any mention of mr. page to one line in appendix b, which is quite telling when you consider we're talking about a 10-acre site with several large buildings on it. we also believe that the nomination reports this character defining

. >> greg and linda got to know the millers well over the years. hosted poker games with tom as a frequent guest. occasionally called him hockey puck. one thing the millers didn't envy about the clayton's. >> it's out in the middle of nowhere. we said we could never live in the woods like that. just being out in the woods is scary enough sometimes, you know what i mean. >> no one remembers kelly feeling uncomfortable, even at night. even alone. except for one evening in late september 2015. andrea was chatting on tb phone. she wasn't her usual happy self. >> she was like, all right. i'm tired good night. all right. leave me alone pretty much. >> why was it odd she might want to go to bed early one night. >> i think she was really stressed out, but she didn't -- she was a night owl. she stayed up. her kids stay up late, you know. >> neither, of course, was what followed. >> sir, you need to calm down so i can help you okay. what's your name. >> my name is tom. >> tom clayton was on the phone to 911. something about his wife. she wasn't breathing. >>

greg norman, but it's raining. he's fuming. and he has steven miller write a letter for him to justify the firing of comey. that is a diatribe against comey, and anyone to recount in public that he is not a target. when with get back from that weekend, he shows it to mcgahn. mcgahn said you can't say this letter. rosenstein said there is no way you can say this. they ultimately paired it down. so i don't read into a lot of what mccabe is saying as a new revelation. this is the same old revelation that the president wanted to be exonerated from the russia probe. >> and he was getting miller and mcgahn and rosenstein to try to you say that. none of them, except miller, but mcgahn and rosenstein refused to do it. >> mcgahn standing up for the worst instincts and impulses. it could provide information about intent and obstruction. that's the deeper problem for the president about these latest revelations. if he has got the notion that i'm going to fire this guy and is going to stepped it, that's obstruction. >> we have to leave it there. it raises questions for rosenstein who was told russia was part of the re

mike: greg palkot leading us off from seoul. thank you. let's bring in judith miller pulitzer prize winning author and journalist, and fox news contributor, great to see you. how optimistic are you that this summit will happen on or around june 12th? >>i'm not sure we're not going to have a number of different twists and turns until we get to the 12th. it might even be delayed a little bit but both leaders now seem determined to make this implausible improbable meeting happen. so i think it may happen, but then again, if president trump decides that he's annoyed by something that kim has said, he could very well put it on hold again. i think given that we are in the middle of a psychological warfare game here, the person who goes into that meeting seeming to hold most of the cards thinks that he will emerge the victor. and i think that's what we're watching. mike: the new york times has a statement saying basically that the measured response to the cancellation and the extraordinary diplomatic scramble that followed was a strong reminder analysts said that mr. kim not