we will get a legal analysis coming up from gregg jarrett. here with the very latest though, on the democratic infighting on capitol hill, we call it the hitchhikers guide to all things swamp and sewer all things swamp and sewer, washington, d.c., chad pergram is with us. i loved your note you sent out internally at fox news today the hitchhikers guide on how the left rolled both biden and pelosi today again. you want to break this down chad? >> good evening, sean. well, the president came to theb capital for the second time in a month and he failed to close the deal. the stagecraft of a presidential visit did nothing.nd they can't even convince progressives to support the bipartisan infrastructure built. they are holding the't bill hostage. >> if they vote on the bill today, i am a no.. that has not changed. i have held steady with what we talked about as progressives, at least some of the progressive caucus up until now. we don't have that right now. also a bit bamboozled because this was not what i thought was coming today. >> democrats ca

gregg jarrett break that down.o, the border crisis continues to worsen, sara carter and lara logan weigh-in, straight ahead. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> sean: at this hour, divisions among democrats ♪ ♪ >> sean: at this hour, divisions among democrats are threatening to derail the biden agenda and its serious tonight, and the house has yet to vote on the $1.2erid trillion infrastrue package, which, remember, is separate from the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bills democratic senator joe manchin and others say they oppose in its current form. he's only going to 1.5 trillion. >> here to explain all of the details, our own chad pergram, and, chad, the hitchhikers guide to all things the swamp, what i find interesting about this is "the squad" has been very firm, we either get the $3.5 trillion package or we are not voting yay on the 1.2 trillion.s is that holding, and is pelosi going to blink?otis >> the person who's getting olrolled right now is nancy pelosi. that might be the case at the end of the day but nancy pelosi does not have

gregg jarrett break that down.o, the border crisis continues to worsen, sara carter and lara logan weigh-in, straight ahead. working at recology is more than a job for jesus. it's a family tradition. jesus took over his dad's roue when he retired after 47 year. now he's showing a new generation what recology is all about. as an employee-owned company, recology provides good-paying local jobs for san franciscans. we're proud to have built the city's recycling system from the ground up, helping to make san francisco the greenest big city in america. let's keep making a differene together. ♪ ♪ >> sean: at this hour, divisions among democrats are threatening to derail the biden agenda and its serious tonight, and the house has yet to vote on the $1.2 trillion infrastructure package, which, remember, is separate from the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bills democratic senator joe manchin and others say they oppose in its current form. he's only going to 1.5 trillion. her tricks going all the details, our own chad pergram,

starting on the legal side, gregg jarrett.ified above the warrant and i've never seen one but i've been told by people who have. it's as verified. none of it is verifiable. none of it. but he still claiming without any evidence that it is true. has it all of it been debunked by now? >> totally, the fbi discredited steele and his dossier. they knew that christopher steele was a liar for hire. a serial fabulist in a world-class con artist. five years in, he's trying to resuscitate his reputation by justifying what he dead. at the lies of deceit he's spinning. the fbi knocked down steele's dossier after they fired him for lying to the fbi. they located the primary source for nearly all of the notorious allegations in the phony dossier. turns out it wasn't russian intelligence, it was an analyst in washington, d.c., working for the liberal think tank of brookings institution which was headed at the time by longtime hillary clinton ally who was also propagating the russia hoax. i sat down with dan cheng, four days after trump was i

fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett along with the investigative reporter fox news contributor sarat he was talking about was the primary source and he said we -- none of this was real. it was bar talk. now, here is the big question. the fact that christopher steele hired funnel money and we know the whole routine. that's not the point. it's the unverifiable document that says it was used on the top of the fisa application.at starting on the legal side, gregg jarrett. it says verified on the top of a visor warrant and i've never seen but i've been told by people who have. it's as verified. none of it is verifiable. none of it. but he still claiming without any evidence that it is true. has it all of it been debunked by now? >> totally, the fbi discredited steele and his dossier. they knew that christopher steele was a liar for hire. a serial fabulist in ach world-class con artist. five years in, he's trying to resuscitate his reputation by justifying what he did. the lies of deceit he's spinning. the fbi knocked down steele's dossier after they fired him for lying to the fbi. they l

here with the latest developments fox news legal analyst, gregg jarrett. split on what to do, but now they add a twist -- we ought to change much more often. break it down for us. >> term limits. good luck with that. packing supreme court has always been a noxious idea, everybody knows it, but i didn't know was that, he famously denounced it as a boneheaded and he runs for president and during the campaign he didn't have the courage to stand by his own convictions. he feared it would alienate the liberals in his party that he's been sucking up to. he did what he always does, he pandered to the idea and when elected, he dodged. then he appointed this commission to study it, hoping to buy time and shift responsibility elsewhere. this is the antithesis of leadership but it's classic joe biden. he's the charlie brown of presidents. tortiously wishy-washy. roosevelt tried packing the court, he failed spectacularly and biden is no fdr. as a practical matter it's not going to happen. you would need a constitutional amendment as you and i just said the term which

fox news analyst gregg jarrett joins me to break it down.nd i both know hopefully there was a camera where they were filming what happened here. but let's start with the fact there are two tracks here. a civil liability issue, and criminal liability responsibility. and let's talk about the fact that alex baldwin, the person who shot the gun, he's the executive producer of the company. it goes back to him from ruch rush"rust" production goes backo the company he apparently owns. >> there will certainly be a civil lawsuit alleging wrongful death arising out of negligence. that's an incredibly strong case. but you just don't have this kind of a tragedy happening absent some measure of negligence. the real issue is what about criminal culpability. if it's true that alex baldwin had no idea there was a live round bullet in the gun, then he would not be charged with murder. but there are other potential lesser charges. for example, in new mexico where this occurred. involuntary manslaughter which is grossly negligent or reckless conduct resulting

time.is here with reaction, fox news correspondent at large geraldo rivera, and fox's legal analyst gregg jarrett me start with yo. the wars between me and alec baldwin do not factor in my opinion here. i want to be straightforward. i would be shocked if thes evidence shows that in fact he did this on purpose. i don't believe that. i do not think we are going to come to that conclusion. i believe in due process. the presumption of innocence. i believe we need a full forensic investigation. in my heart, it seems like, looks like a tragic accident. intoid a live round get that weapon? it's really a gun supposed to fire blanks. >> wright, sean. but when the live round comes a later verified that by live weren't saying that it was a bullet, it could have been a blank. when you fire a blank, it leaves a residue in the barrel of the gun. we know guns very well. if you don't clean the barrel out, you put another blank behind it and you fire that blank, it can eject that projectile. the remnants of what was in the barrel at sufficient velocity, it is bullet-like. you mentioned charges. let me just say th

here with reaction, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett come along with weapons expert ryan carpenterve ammunition on the set like that, and as many incidents as we have been able to chronicle with people fearing the environment on the set, is that normal, too, brian? >> no, a live round anywhere near a set, as i've said previously, would be the nuclear option, the worst possible scenario, never to be anywhere near that. when you have complaints like that from cast and crew of a show that is run normally, it would be addressed by the producers. there would be, obviously, department head meetings where they would sit down and ascertain what is going on here, why are we having these problems, and what can we do to put a stop to it? prior to moving forward at all. >> sean: i was trained, my parents for law enforcement, gregg, as you know, my mom was a prison guard and since a young kid i was trained in firearm safety. if i was in charge of a weapon on a site, there would be no access to live ammunition by anybody at any time on that set. and i would never have a bullet, a live bullet out

involved him pointing a weapon at a camera lens and here to explain more, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrettith weapons master brian carpenter is with us. ryan. it guys, i just want to go through some of what we got here. chief electrician laying blame an accident on the armor and producers. then we've got report of at least two accidental gun discharges on the set of this movie in the days leading up to this fatal shooting of the cinematographer. in the discharges on october 16th, you know, prompting a complaint to a supervisor about safety practices. crew members asked, you know, not to be named. you have union members walk off the job as a result of a lack of safety on the set and then you've got, you know, other information that we are finding out too that there is a possibility of an involuntary manslaughter charge. you know, brian, let me ask you, what is the proper handling of a firearm on a set like this and how did of live round get in that gun? >> there are so many levels of safety protocols before it even gets to an actor. you start off with the weapon has been cleared before it's