larry:ly bring in gregg jarrett, fox news legal analyst, author of constitution of united states and other patriotic documents be we heard from jack smith is trying to do, good or bad move? >> well, i agree with you. you are right about your legal analysis. you could have been next clarence derrel, you missed our calling, agree that special counsel jack smith wants to butt in front of the line. and take it to supreme court for an expedited ruling, the supremes don't like that, the prosecutors want trial to happen in march in middle of primaries, why primaries, why? he fears it would interfere with his plan gain a trial. most americans see it that way, which is judge trump support continues to go up, the justices will likely see if there are what it is, it is rare for them to accept and case without a decision by the dc circuit court. so, i 1 tend to doubt they will take a trek appeal. but -- direct appeal, but there is no precedent for this case. all of the more reason why the supreme court will want to hear what the lower court has to say about a case that is untested. >> for that t

anyway, gregg jarrett, great stuff, we appreciate it.oming up, alan dershowitz, the great alan dershowitz, he will tell us why diversity, equity and inclusion, dei is ruining harvard and other colleges and why current president claudine gay should be fired. plus hold on at the your seat, folks. hillary clinton to the rescue. she didn't win in 2016 but democrats think she can help biden in 2024. honestly, they believe that. so we'll talk about it with two purely objective, non-legal observers, joe concha and mark simone. all when "kudlow" returns. ♪. ♪ ♪ ♪ be ready for any market with a liquid etf. get in and out with dia. be why choose a sleep number smart bed? because no two people sleep the same. only sleep number smart beds lets you each choose your individual firmness and comfort. your sleep number settings. it's so smart, it actively cools and warms up to 13 degrees on either side for your ideal sleep temperature, and effortlessly responds to both of you. for your best sleep, night after night. and now, save 40% on the sleep number

here was egal fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett and former white gregg jarrett and former white priebus. let's be clear. writes, this is anfo news le investigation into joe biden, the president. >> we have interviewed many times jason smith, house ways and means, james coleman, smids, jim jordan, judiciary. hthis is about bribery allegations. with they laundering.laun >> this is about taking official acts as vice president for the financial benefit of his family. >> the evidence is now growing every day. it seems to me. my opinion overwhelming and incontrovertible. and they have been stonewalling. this will hopefully stop the stonewalling correctl hope.g >> it will stop the stonewalling. but one thing to keep in mint or i think is key for everyone to understand in this storyoyexo about this next vote that that the speaker's talkingte about. it was the white house itself that sent the letter to the committee and in the letter said that they will not comply with the witnesses, witnesletter document requests without the formal vote. so the white house itselfis is telling speaker johnson an

fox news' legal analyst gregg jarrett on that coming up. ♪ ♪ have a second?e. more efficiency. more benefits. more growth. when you realize you can give your people everything, and more. thank you very much. [applause] ask, "now what?" here's what. you go with prudential to protect, empower and grow. with everything you need to deliver, you guessed it... more. one more thing... who's your rock? learn more at prudential.com david: the supreme court's decision on friday to smack down prosecutor jack smith's petition to speed if up the trump case was issued in one curt sentence. essentially, it said petition denied. so has this prosecutor with a very checkered past lost all credibility? joining me now is gregg jarrett, fox news legal analyst and author of this book, "the constitution of the united states and other patriotic documents." it's such a wonderful collection of what makes america great. thank you so much for putting this together, gregg. the scotus snack intowp of -- snackdown of -- smackdown of jack smith, it was just one sentence. did you read anythi

brett tolman and gregg jarrett, i'm glad you guys didn't dismiss my nonlegal theories completely. >> ellent stuff. [laughter] larry: gregg, i'm going to see you on the radio for more of this nonsensical stuff. anyway, folks, right here on "kudlow," we'll still doing tv, wisconsin senator ron johnson who really started this investigation a while back, he's going to weigh in on this. and i'm hoping senator johnson can talk to us about the immigration business. republicans could really conceivably make a difference to close the border over this foreign spending bill. so we will talk to senator ron johnson of wisconsin. i'm kudlow, i'm not a lawyer. i'm glad i'm not a lawyer, but i can -- what do i do? i can smell a fish when i smell one. [laughter] i'll be right back. ♪ three forks ranch is the destination for luxury and adventure. enjoy private skiing with 23 runs for every level. kick back for intimate performances from the best in country music. enhance your wellness and longevity through our mayo clinic programs, or plan your meeting for a memorable corporate retreat. discover the we

gregg jarrett called it bribery.f i am wrong, correct me. >> remember it's beyond the statute of limitations. we don't have a statute of limitations on impeachment. can you impeach a president who committed an impeachable offense while vice president? that's an interesting issue. >> what do you think gregg jarrett? >> look, it is burisma as you explained is exhibit "a" in bribery. 18 usc 201. also under the impeachment clause in the constitution. there is far more than that. investigators have tracked at least 24 million from beijing sent to hunter and funneled through this labyrinth of shell companies and eventually to his family members. that figure is actually a fraction of the total cash halt. factor in millions from china, millions from ukraine, kazakhstan, romania and half a dozen other countries over which joe biden exerted influence. you're probably closer to $15 million banked by the bidens in these suspected influence peddling schemes. i think, frankly, the committee has only spent a few months uncovering m

fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett on that coming up.e is running out to give a year-end gift like no other, a gift that can help st. jude children's research hospital save lives. ava: it is my first time having cancer, and it's the very worst. woman: you just have to give. you have to give someone that hope. because of st. jude, she has a chance at life. narrator: every gift counts, and whatever you can give will make a difference for children like ava. make your donation today to help st. jude save lives. i'm a little anxious, i'm a little excited. i'm gonna be emotional, she's gonna be emotional, but it's gonna be so worth it. i love that i can give back to one of our customers. i hope you enjoy these amazing gifts. oh my goodness. oh, you guys. i know you like wrestling, so we got you some vip tickets. you have made an impact. so have you. for you guys to be out here doing something like this, it restores a lot of faith in humanity. - did you know up to 40% of our food supply goes to waste? that's also a waste of energy and water. an

bring in fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. nobody bet tore talk about this, gregg.ant to get right to it because it seemed significant to me that the high court wasted no time in a single seasons with no dissents saying no. go with the regular appellate process. we're not taking this. what's your read? >> hi, griff. always highly unlikely the supreme court would take this at his juncture and the justices want to hear from the appellate court and dc circuit and that's the normal process and for good reason. the intermediate court refines the issues and scrutinizes what is essentially a novel, legal theory here of immunity and untested so their opinions are quite valuable to the supreme court and the justices also don't like it, griff, when somebody tries to butt to the front of the line and rob them. the justices, of meaningful legal judgment. here the special council really offered no compelling reason except obviously want as trial of trump in the middle of a presidential campaign i think to damage him to the benefit of democrats and joe biden. and perhaps the just

gregg jarrett, thank you. to more bad news out of the middle east.eting american service members abroad. democrats seem to be more threatened by republicans here at home. crazy. this special edition of "hannity" continues after the break. ♪ ♪ his a1c? it's down with rybelsus®. my doctor told me rybelsus® lowered a1c better than a leading branded pill and that people taking rybelsus® lost more weight. i got to my a1c goal and lost some weight too. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to de

because i think i have a pretty good handle on it gregg jarrett. that is, with each new piece of information that the house judiciary commit 0 or ways and means committee came up with, they had to come up with an excuse to explain away the previous lie. is that a good theory on my part? >> sure, absolutely. you know, joe biden continues to double down on his lies. nearly 70% of americans don't believe it. they think he either committed actions that are illegal or unethical. so, you know, americans have wised up to joe biden's lies and the allegations against him, you know, sean they're serious and credible, evidence of impeachable conduct. he actively aided and a betted in corrupt schemes operated by his sons netting tens of millions of dollars from foreign interest while selling access and promises of influence. there's documented testimonies that implicate the father as complicit. so, you know, exploiting a public office to enrich your family, even if you don't profit yourself, that's both a criminal offense, sean, and it's an impeachable one. >>

joining me now is gregg jarrett, fox news legal analyst and author of this book, "the constitution ofes and other patriotic documents." it's such a wonderful collection of what makes america great. thank you so much for putting this together, gregg. the scotus snack intowp of -- snackdown of -- smackdown of jack smith, it was just one sentence. did you read anything into that? was that done by purpose by the supremes? >> well, it could have been, but actually it's knot up common to simply reject a case that's premature. i suspect the u.s. supreme court is going to step in halt this other effort to kick trump off the ballot. you know, the colorado ruling was absurd to the point of laughable. the crustieses twisting -- justices twisting facts, contorting the law. they absolutely mangled the constitution's meaning of the 14th amendment, and at the same time they violated that amendment a by depriving trump of due process rights. and, you know, the same is true of jack smith's two central indictments, david. -- federal indictments. in the classified documents, the j of case -- j6 case und

and our own gregg jarrett thinks biden's misdeeds could even force joe out of the presidential race.ce welcome to light as the house impeachment investigation continues. and he could not with the latest on that effort is house oversight committee chairman james comer. merry christmas. thanks for joining us. i want you to, you are my second favorite house committee oversight committee chairman there has ever been, just so you get that off my chest. >> i wish you work for "of the washington post" or something. [laughs] >> jason: that will never happen. but thank you. listen, one of the things that i just laugh about every time i sit here in the mainstream media, there's no evidence that joe biden has done anything wrong. but morning that has been thrown into the biden family business and all those around him without a product other than joe biden, is actually starting. when people ask you that question, how do you respond to them? >> i think most americans realize that something stinks here. most americans realize that we provided bank statements as hard evidence, statements that show

the book everyone consti ited stae right now.s righ fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett and former acting attorney general matthew whitaker. gregg jarret t bellows is not an attorney. she i think she ran for senate, couldn't couldn't win. she is appointed to thiss appoin position and. e she was likexc excited that shed did something no one else hason ever done before in her position. >> but there's lots of thing, t se that other people haven't done because you just shouldn't do them. telljust us your take on what ti really means at this point. >> well, she managedt. embarrasn herself in her bid for 15 minutes of fame. aunche she launched a full frontald assault on the constitution and our democratic principles. this is brazen election interference, ballot rigging ine and, disenfranchisement of some 300,000 voters in the state of maine. and it's happening tami because democrats read the polls. they know that joe biden i the s in deep trouble. >> so they're willing to do anything to ensure that he winsr by hook or by crook, if even it means bastardize the 14th amendment insurrection clause.

chris, fox news legal editor gregg jarrett says the vast majority of democrats hope biden will quit theresidential race, but i just don't know that we're any if closer to figure out who would take his place. do you see anyone emerging at this point, chris? >> well, the person who democrats have been counting on has really been gavin newsom, and i think that's really wishful thinking by the democrats. gash newsom, while young and energetic which is in sharp contrast to president joe biden, is someone who governs california which means he's going to have to answer for the different policies california's instituted over the years. when you awe him debating ron desantis, a lot of those policies came to the forefront, things that have caused an exodus from his state. while he's been trying to tamp down on some of the more radical legislation, vetoing measures that liberal activists have wanted, i still don't think that makes him palatable. democrats are in trouble. they thought that joe biden could actually one a general election. they made the deal knowing he was slower than before and and

fox news legal analyst fox gregg jarrett, fox news contributor jason chaffetz and the host of tom news i lahren is fearless on outkick. >> tomi lahren is with us. t how do wome start with, you kno, isn said,imes joe bide i never once discussed the farm business with my son,d fore my brother or anybody else forig that matter. how did we start there? how did it then become the the president was never in business with his son? how did it evolve even furthernt my father was not financially involved in the business, you know. >> can my f you explain the the evolution because i thinky i have a pretty good handle on a greg jarrett and that is tha handlt with each new piee of information that the house oversight committee or judiciary committee or ways and means committee came up ju, they had to come out with an excuse to explain away the previouslyexcuse. >> is that a good theory on my part? sure. absolutelypart julie. >> and, you know, joe biden continues to double down on his liesn on. ican and nearly 70% of americans don't believe that. >> they think he either committed actions that are il

here now with reaction, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett, along with harvard law professor alan dershowitz greg, we'll begin with you tonight. you've been following the story. you've been writing columns after column. i want to go to the heart of this issue. i have been calling the joe biden bribery and money laundering scandal allegations. does this take us one step closer tonight to two? >> joe biden, the president and his involvement and his lying to the country? yet does his complicity show on the evidence is mounting. >> joe biden, as you say, actively aided and abetted his son's schemes. >> he's been lying about it all along and everybody knows that and even lied about it yesterday. >> there's documents, testimony, white house logs, emails, text messages that prove that he talked by phone with hunter's clients, he met personally with his sons overseas partners. he even attended their meetings that were closely guarded. >> you know, joe biden appears to be complicit in pushing the biden brand, which was selling access to him, promises of influence. >> devon archer confirmed that joe s

fox news contributort book tom n and fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. tom homan so on our southern border, they found ten ieds in an alert, an internal memot to officers went out to be be on the lookout for explosives. this sounds like war zone, not the border of the world's hegemonic power. >> it is a war zone. and the biden administrationbide has empowered and enriched a criminal cartels in mexicoha who are actually terrorist organizations. >> ieds, they're not new to the criminal cartels. they're using since 2010 against the mexicasen and againt law enforcement. >> however, now it's come to the mexry and l border. and why is that? because the criminal cartels are in a violent becausel war , because they're fighting over ficause they're fighting over of responsibility. they're fighting. this is what. because you're making a record amount of money, namely smuggling amount of money in drug trafficking, the fentanyl, and a record amount of money in remount ofg when the childrenen made this much money. >> so now the cartels are fighting. each other to con

with more is fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. so i wan it get this straight. jack smith is saying i don't want president trump presentingg evidence that would impugn his political opponent. but the "new york times", the gold standard of all reportins," the liof liberals across the globe, says biden has opinions in the past. mr. biden privately told his close circle of advisersoldi trump a threat to democracy prosshould be prosecuted. >> yeah, i mean, that was the of taking out an adal on national television and runnintelevisig 24/7. >> look, many people believe clearly, including donald trump trump, that jack smith's case is politically drive, n. but the special counsel wants to silence trump from arguingnga what he believes. be lost on no. smith accusing trump of injecting politics intotics a prosecution that already reeks partisan politics. >> you know, trump shouldti be frecse to present a defense of his own choosing. that's fundamental in america. but jack smith is afraid of that. he wants to be both prosecutor and dictate the defense similar tenuously. >>

. >> and our own gregg jarrett, e biden's misdeeds could even force joe out of the e.lcial rac >> of course, more evidence will come to light as the house impeachmenomast investigae continues. >> and here now with the latesst on that effort is houseoversi oversight committee chairman james comer. merry christmas. thanks for joining us. i want you to know you are my se my second favorite house committee oversight te housecommittee chairman therr been. just so you get that off my chest. y the second best one ever. i wish you worked for for "the washington post" or somethiningtong. that'll never happen. but thanen.k you. one of the things that i just laugh about every time i see you here, the mainstream mediaie ,there's no evidence that joe biden has done anythin g wrong.rning >> but the money that's beenth flowing into the biden business and all those around him without a product, other than joe biden is absolutely stunning. >> when people ask you that question, how do you respond to the, how m? >> well, i think mostost am americans realize that somethinger stinks here.