i tell you what, respond to greta thundberg for me, respond to greta thundberg for me, respond to gretabe honest and then throw away dismissive comments like that. there is real progress here, and it is not enough. there is real progress. this climate —— glasgow climate pact has enshrined 1.5 degrees as the north star. that is —— that was unimaginable in madrid two years ago. it has got everybody committed to coming back to ratchet their commitments next year, the year after, their commitments next year, the yearafter, not their commitments next year, the year after, not waiting till 2025, because we know that 1.5 degrees is still not actually the sum of all ambition. and we have seen really substantive commitments through the last two weeks, through mitigation to adaptation and loss and damage. this is a significant step forward and it is not enough, so we should neither celebrate the saving of the world or dismiss this as a hot air, it is neither those, it is much more than that. , ., , than that. the uk still has the presidency — than that. the uk still has the presidency till _ than

activist greta thundberg tweete, cop-26 is over. here's a brief summary. blah, blah, blah. but the real work continues outside these halls and we will never give up, ever. cnn's phil black joins me now from glasgow. take us through in a bit more detail what's in it. >> reporter: kim, as a general rule, these conferences don't do transformational change. you have 200 countries pursuing their own national interests, while trying to achieve a consensus makes for a grinding, painful process. perhaps nothing reflects that more than this being the first time at almost 30 years at these conferences that there is specific language talking about the need to move away from coal. it is unprecedented. and even with that weakened language, it was supported and accepted by other countries that were disappointed by it, because they wanted to preserve other substance within the agreement. notably, as you touched on that very strong language based on the science about the need to contain global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius. the fact that science says pretty explicitly that in order to ach