of these new points of growth and the formation, in fact, multipolar world, we will talk with grigory karasinrman of the federation council committee on international affairs, goes on a video call with the fifth studio, grigory borisovich, hello, good afternoon anton, so, let's first talk about the fact that the united states allowed the armed forces of ukraine to carry out targeted strikes. american weapons against objects on the territory of our country were allowed, but without the use of long-range missiles, only in the border zone, but this follows from the actual statement of the us presidential advisor, john kirby, who said so. in what do you think, well, we can probably call it the ambiguity of this decision, yes, i would like to discuss it with you. country, what is all this polemic and rhetoric about? oleg, i want to tell you that these numerous and varied statements by the american military, political figures, comments by journalists, statements by ukrainian unfortunate politicians and the military, too, indicate that they simply want to fool us, entangle us in confusion with... so

discuss all of them with the chairman of the federation council committee on international affairs, grigory karasinry borisovich, hello, good afternoon, let's start with a missile strike on sevastopol, tell me, in your opinion, who should bear what responsibility for this? but the inherently disgusting strike by american missiles with cluster munitions on civilian objects in crimea, and even more so the strike on the beach where people, women, and children were resting, is, of course, comparable to the worst crimes of nazi germany, it has no equal, probably for a long time , the last 2 and a half years. so the reaction this is how we and all over the world expressed condolences and representatives of the united nations, unfortunately, the nato countries were a little modest in quotes, but conclusions will be drawn from this, because such an attitude towards civilian objects, towards people, 153 people were injured, four died there , on the beach, this is a mockery of common sense and in crimea is unbearable for our people, we will fight this, we will fight this with kindness and draw conclusions of

the head of the federation council committee on international affairs, grigory karasin, spoke on ourbout the causes and consequences of such western decisions. various statements by american military politicians, comments by journalists, statements by ukrainian unfortunate politicians and the military, too, testifies that they simply want to make a fool of themselves, entangle them in the intricacies of decision-making, while massive attacks are being carried out on our territory, on our people, on our cities. and no half-permits, permits with exceptions, and so on, will ever justify this case. we remember all this, record it, and in subsequent trials of those guilty of all these atrocities, we will operate with specific facts, and not with supposedly pronounced restrictions or supposedly spoken permissions. italian deputy prime minister matteo salvini said he was against it. so that his country would somehow intervene in the situation in ukraine, in particular by supplying weapons to kiev. he stated this while speaking at a pre-election rally in the city of bari. solviny added that

what needs to be said here, i really liked this speech by grigory borisovich karasin, he said it very specifics, that is, this is already it. concrete sanctions, therefore, if we are talking about the fact that we will saturate them with certain specifics means this already implies changes determined by changes in our policy. the second very important factor that inspires enormous optimism in relation to this is, of course, the statement of our president on june 6, when he said that north korea is our neighboring country, it is our neighboring country, we don’t care at all what is there, who is there will think about the development of our relations, now he says, what about the worker? did nothing, from this point of view it is possible to say that this initial, so to speak, conversation about these sanctions, in general, today no longer has a certain relevance, because in reality... so to speak, they themselves broke the promises that they made in their time in the council un security. it seems to me that there will still be very important questions, well, naturally, there will be qu

zelensky is not even close it was, and i, grigory borivich karasin, by the way, took part in the preparation eyes, i remember his entire delegation, i remember how i spoke with the chief of the general staff the then ukrainian muzhenko, told him where his troops were located under debayts, he didn’t know about it, had no idea, and... then we really thought that this minsk agreement would preserve peace and stability, it would serve to resolve this crisis that had formed at that time, but now there are tricks, it was all the other way around, it was the west that used the minsk agreements to pump ukraine up with weapons, to train its armed forces, for... you don’t understand, if this train accelerates, no one will stop him, i didn’t believe him then, because i was talking and he very energetically, very energetically convinced everyone that he was a friend of russia and understood perfectly well that not only about any ukraine in nato, but also about any soviet republics in general nato, that this cannot be discussed, in 1996 president clinton spoke at my center. and talked about how he belie

what needs to be said here, i really liked this speech by grigory borisovich karasin, he said it very is very important... if we say that we will saturate them with certain specifics, then this already implies changes in certain changes in our policy. the second very important factor that inspires enormous optimism regarding this is, of course, the statement of our president on june 6, when he said that north korea is our neighboring country, these are our neighbors, we do not care at all what is there, who is there will think about the development of our relations, he often says, why should the workforce and people be tormented? from my point of view, this will be absolutely breakthrough, so to speak, there will be things there, i do not rule out that there will be a conversation about renewing, maybe the treaty of friendship and cooperation of the year sixty-one, which after which khrushchev signed with kimmersen, in the nineties they said, that this agreement is already everything, it seems, but what was in this agreement, in this agreement there were vague security guarantees for