occurring their lifetime, poe made fun of griswold, griswold as horribly offended but he was simmering just beneath the surface waiting for him to die. and he said he had few or no friends and he went ton portray him as a mad man drunkard woman eyesing man with no morals, evil, despicable person. in his biography of poe he has episode after episode portraying him as a hopeless drunk. but poe's friends and his family came to his defense and said, no, this isn't true. this isn't the poe that we've known. and even thomas dunn english his own enemy said that the rumors of his opioid use are a businessless slander. over he -- baseless slander. over here we have one of his good friends and he recounted a strange episode in poe's life. in the last summer of 1849, poe is passing through philadelphia and showed up at his house terrified that people were trying to kill him. he said he heard people conspiring against him and he wanted him to cut off his mustache so nobody would brek recognize him. later poe said it was all just hallucination, it wasn't real, never mind. and sar tain wrote about t

now the judge has a hearing to see if griswold has a right to collect the money but get this new york law is actually on her side in this case. >>> by now you likely heard about the tide pod challenge and the mist fiing trend where people film themselves eating the toxic laundry pods hoping for viral fame and more and more people end up in the hospital because youtube and facebook are policing the internet taking down anything promoting the stunt. ask molly's irish grill and sports pub. the bethlehem bar found out the hard way as facebook banned photos of their tide pod shot. the $4 drink was reported several times after being seen by 6 million people on the social network. the tide pod shot is still on the menu, keeping people away from detergent since january 19th. finally, if you were watching "action news" at 4:00 and we hope you were. we revealed something that we found about amazon's alexa, turn out she is a big eagles fan. take a look. >> hey alexa who do you want to win the super bowl? >> fly eagles fly. >> we first told you that was no regional based response and tested it in

it done that in the contraceptive case, griswold, years ago.and i thought, although they have not this was before roe v. wade, that's what it was an interesting case. i thought they were protecting marital privacy and i thought that meant it made at least in the early stages of pregnancy it protected the right of the woman to make her own decisions about reproduction. but i also suggested that the state interest in regulating the situation would change after it became viable. because at that point you have a fetus that can survive outside the womb, and i suggested that viability might be the line that might separate impermissible state regulation impermissible state regulation. i put that in the opinion. to my astonishment i found out years later when the papers of some of the justices, justice powell came to be available to the public, he reported my opinion and recommend it to harry blackmun wrote the opinion, and he said i think that decision, my decision, in urging viability as the key point is a very strong argument, and it found its way i

the guy on the right is not clark griswold. sexually senator nunn. we get together 1990. general schwarzkopf is on the left. is a regional combat command. then general steiner who is the commander so can't. he did not give him actual authority over the forces. that still resides with the commander. so they're making the case that these are valuable. he pleads with him to give his forces the opportunity to take part. schwarzkopf is not known for liking special operation forces does not give them many important missions. so the guys feel stuck on the bench with support units and not been able to do the cool stuff they were hoping to do. the next event is 9/11. important for all americans but no more important than america's special operation forces. shortly after the attack president bush is trying to figure out how to get back at the taliban. he sends in the cia and army special forces to work with the northern alliance. there's some special forces who go on horseback. the americans are not prepared for afghanistan. the special operators are fluent in arabic and french bec

if they had said nothing or never decided griswold i don't know.but on the district court doing what i thought was the best decision for the future so after thinking long and hard that is where i came out but it was a close called and and still is. >> with a strong advocate with a woman's right to reproductive choice with roe v wade it is still very profoundly important law and it should be upheld and one of the questions i asked the supreme court nominees to the court whether they will continue to uphold that so the reasoning even though it was criticized remains very important despite medical advances which have created issues also. >> i recognize that talk about viability medical science will progress and that will come closer to conception. >> but behind that opinion was privacy. >> yes and that it was the underpinning. >> so let me ask you about the court of appeals about your contributions what would have been the highlight in terms of specific cases? >> i think i have written 1300 opinions it is hard to keep the whole body in front of you. s

if they never decided griswold whether it would have come out of the same way, i don't know that i wasthen on the district court doing my best to follow what i thought was the supreme court's decision and information for the future. so after thinking about it long and hard i thought it was a close call then and still is. i would say personally as a strong advocate to the reproductive choice, roe v. wade should have upheld the very profoundly important. one of the questions i ask supreme court nominees and others to the court are whether they will continue to uphold it and so i think that the reasoning even though it has been criticized remains very important and despite medical advances, which have created issues also. if you talk about the viability medical science is going to progress into the plaintiff viability is going to come closer to the conception. and i do have the opinion that would happen. >> host: that was the principle of the fourth amendment. it is the underpinning as it was for your opinion into the court's opinion. let me ask about the court of appeals in your contribu