griswold established the legal foundation that led to roe eight years later.orrect application of two famous cases from the 1920s that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. finally, in his testimony, he noted repeatedly that roe had been upheld by planned parenthood versus casey, describing it as president on precedent. when i asked him, would it be sufficient to overturn a long established precedent is five currentjustices believed established precedent is five current justices believed that established precedent is five currentjustices believed that it was wrongly decided? he emphatically said no. opponents frequently cite donald trump's campaign pledge to nominate onlyjudges who would overturn roe. the republican platform for all presidential campaigns have included this pledge since at least 1980. during this time, presidents, republican presidents, have appointed justices o'connor, and kennedy, to the supreme court. these are the very free justices, republican president appointed justices, who offered the decision which reaffirmed roe. further rol

in griswold we have a much similar mischief. the justices approach in that case became the intellectual jurisprudential foundation for many cases since then. roe versus wade on the right to an abortion, florence against -- and on sodomy, and also on same- sex marriage. to be perfectly clear, please do not forget this one point. i have no quarrel, and not expressing any quarrel with these policies. i agree with some of not all of them. they are not proper policies to be created by the court and inserted into the constitution. they are properly legislative matters to be resolved to the democratic process. policy is politics and politics is not the business of the court. the court has arrogated to itself -- every time it does so, it short-circuits valuable political debate and entrenches rather than resolves a significant political disagreement. judge ruth bader ginsburg described this effect of roe versus wade on the abortion reform movement as being something like the rest -- arrested development. it seems to have stopped the mom

griswold established the legal foundations that lead to roe eight years later.n describing griswold as settled law, judge kavanaugh observed that it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920s. meyer and pierce, that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. finally, in his testimony he noted repeatedly that roe had opinion upheld by planned parenthood versus casey, describing it as precedent on precedent. when i asked him would it be sufficient to overturn a long-established precedent if five current justices believed that it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said no. opponents frequently cite candidate donald trump's campaign pledge to nominate judges that would overturn roe. the republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least 1980. during this time, president -- republican respects have appointed justices o'connor, souter and kennedy to the supreme court. these are the very three justices, republican presidents appointed justices, who authored the casey decision which reaffirmed roe. further

griswold established the legal foundation that led to roe eight years later. in describing griswold as settled law, judge kavanaugh observed that it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920s, meyer and pierce, that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. finally, in his testimony, he noted repeatedly that roe had been upheld by planned parenthood versus casey, describing it as precedent on precedent. when i asked him would it be sufficient to overturn a long-established precedent if five current justices believed that it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said no. opponents frequently cite then-candidate donald trump's campaign pledge to nominate only judges who would overturn roe. the republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least 1980. during this time, republican presidents have appointed justices o'connor, suter and kennedy to the supreme court. these are the very three justices, republican presidents appointed justices, who authored the casey decision which reaffirmed roe. furthermor

griz filed a stablish the legal foundation that led to roe eight years later in describing griswold as settled law judge kavanaugh of serve said it was the correct application of two payments cases from the one nine hundred twenty. my year and peers that are not seriously challenged by anyone today finally in his testimony he noted repeated row had been up to help by planned parenthood versus casey describing it as president and president when i asked him what a piece of fish. to overturn of long established precedent it by current chester's says believed that it was wrongly decided he empathically said no. opponents frequently say then candidate donald trump's campaign pledge to nominate only judges who would overturn roe the republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least nineteen eighty during this time presidents republican presidents have appointed justices o'connor souter and kennedy and to the supreme court these are the very three justices republican president appointed justices who are third take a seat just said jim which really a pe

the judicial doctrine of privacy comes from a connecticut case, gris world -- griswold v. connecticut. in my state we prefer judges stay out of our private business. finally, when i'm walking across the state of connecticut, i'm talking an awful lot about the issue of gun violence. it's not just that the murder of 20 little first graders in sandy hook still hangs heavy over connecticut, it's that the murders in hart ford, new haven and bridgeport and suicides across our state continue unabated. it's not like everybody i meet when i'm walking across the state agrees with me on what we should do. when you walk east to west, you spend half your time in eastern connecticut, the part of the state where people love their guns and i get into spirited arguments about gun permits. but what there's relative agreement on is that it's our choice on how we should regulate guns. here's where judge kavanaugh's views really, really get outside the mainstream. his testimony before the judiciary committee suggests he's a second amendment radical believing that almost all restrictions on gun

griswold established the legal foundation that led to row eight years later.old is settled law, judge kavanaugh observed that it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920's. that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. finally, in his testimony he noted repeatedly that roe had been upheld by planned parenthood versus casey describing it as president on precedent. when i asked him would be sufficient to overturn a long-established precedent if five current justices believed that it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said no. cite donaldequently trump's campaign pledge to nominate only judges who would overturn roe v. wade. the platform for all candidates sincecluded this pledge at least 1980. --ing this time president republican presidents have nominated justices o'connor sooner and o'connor to the supreme court. these are the very three presidentspublican appointed who authored the casey this mission which reaffirmed roe v. wade. pro-choice groups vigorously justicesch of these nomination. but --en circulated stoppedwith the slogan

it was not clear if many of the cases he thought were wrongly decided, including the case of griswold that protects people's rights to access to contraception, it was not clear that he thought it was wrongly decided, meant he would vote to overrule them. those are two different questions. he said something that were quite remarkable and really, i think am inconsistent with what most americans felt comfortable with. for example, he talked about rights as being something of a zero-sum game. so if one person or one type of person has rights, that necessarily - does not necessarily mean that people have fewer rights. that is not necessarily in approach to thinking about rights that americans would embrace. host: this is the republican line, madalyn. caller: thank you for taking my call. , regardlessto say felt above judge , the way that they cannotand treated him, i see how anyone could say they christian or they had a heart. someone can talk about , they justmocrats criticized him like he was a nobody. and everybody knows he is very smart. host: ok. is there a history about the people co

griswold established the legal foundation that led to roe eight years later. in describing griswold as settled law, judge kavanaugh observed that it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920's, meyer and pierce that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. finally, in his testimony, he noted repeatedly that roe had been upheld by planned parenthood vs. casey, describing it as precedent unprecedent. when i asked him would it be sufficient to overturn a long-established precedent if five current justices believed that it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said no. opponents frequently cite then-candidate donald trump's campaign pledge to nominate only judges who would overturn roe. the republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least 1980. during this time presidents -- republican presidents have appointed justices o'connor, souter and kennedy to the supreme court. these are the very three justices republican president appointed justices who authored the casey decision which reaffirmed roe. fur

in describing griswold, judge kavanaugh observed it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920's -- myer and pierce -- that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. finally, in his testimony, he noted repeatedly that roe had been upheld by planned parenthood v. casey, describing it as precedent on precedent. when i asked him would it be sufficient to overturn a ifg-established precedent five current justices believed it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said no. cite thenfrequently candidate donald trump's campaign pledge to dominate only judges that would overturn roe. the republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least 1980. during this time, republican presidents have appointed souter, andonnor, kennedy to the supreme court. these other very three justices, republican president appointed justices, who offered the casey decision which reaffirmed roe. furthermore, pro-choice groups vigorously opposed each of these justices' nomination. incredibly, they even circulated buttons with the slogan "stop souter or women will

clear yesterday in her brilliant remarks in the senate who relies on precedent and understands under griswoldsus connecticut and roe versus wade, there are rules that have to be followed. do you think that's something that will affect the mid-terms as we go forward? >> you know what i think will affect the mid-terms? the really visceral disgusting attacks on kavanaugh who was a brill want pick strategically. president trump had to understand that he was -- even though gorsuch was not the most of pleasant confirmation, this would be uglier. they knew kavanaugh was a conservative, and they knew he was a bush guy as well. judge, what did it do? it galvanized factions of the republican party that have been at each other's throats. trump always gets sold short on his strategy. judge jeanine: the truth, dan, that you articulated so well. the republican party going into the mid terms is now more unified than it's been in decade. it was brilliant on so many levels. >> all the republican surge and energy. you actually see the democrats have screwed up their double-digit advantage with women. women are

roger griswold, we put tickets on ktvu.com to see this at the botero theater. look at it that's not for and anti-web links section and also find it on our mobile app. thank you for coming in.>> thank you for having me.>> we will be right back. >>> singapore airlines regain the title at the airline that met with world's longest nonstop flight. tonight singapore airlines flight 22 taking off from singapore flying at 9000 miles to a new worker, new jersey. rivers return trip is tomorrow. there are no coaches seats. just a business and premium economy class. the plane is configured for comfort with 141 seats. even the premium economy seats tilted back pretty far so you can sleep. the flight will take under 19 hours. to get started $2700. flock how many pilots? >> i'm sure there are rules. >>> airport police removed this woman after she tried to travel with a squirrel in her carry- on. the woman said it was her emotional support animals. flight attendant explained the animal that mcgee airline does not allow rodents but the woman refused to get off the flight headed

we had the mass murder in griswold by someone who was let out of prison early. i'm all for second chance, i'm all for giving people the right to correct themselves, but the safety of our communities comes first. i'm not sure the cost of law enforcement has gone down, i think it has gone up, we can look at early release but the program needs to be modified. >> i think second chance is working. i think crime is at an all-time low, recidivism is down because we are giving them an opportunity going forward, so i would continue on that plan carefully. i would like to say one other thing. i would look at other laws out there. i look at marijuana laws right now. i know how they can be unequally applied, and i think they can harm disproportionately people of color. that's one reason why i don't just want to decriminalize, i would like to legalize it carefully and regulated over it over time, in part because of the discriminatory effect on young people. mr. stefanowski: people say crime is at an all-time low, maybe the number of incidents is down. but you know what is ha

we had the mass murder in griswold by someone who was let out of prison early.'m all for second chance. i'm all for giving people the right to practice themselves, that the safety of our communities comes first. unless you're the cost of law enforcement has come down. i think it's got up. we can look at early release but the program needs to be modified modified. lamont: i think second chance is working, i think recidivism is down because we are giving people a second chance, giving them training, you become an opportunity going forward. i would continue on that plan carefully. i would just like to see one of the thing. i would take a look at some of the other laws. i look at the marijuana laws. i now have a can be unequally applied. they can also harm disappoint e of color. that's one of the reasons i don't just want to decriminalize pot it would like to legalize that carefully, regulate it over time in part because of the discomfort effect it has on young people and fabrics that some of them back. >> moderator: you want to jump in? stefanowski: i have to objec

clear yesterday in her brilliant remarks in the senate who relies on precedent and understands under griswoldsus connecticut and roe versus wade, there are rules that have to be followed. do you think that's something that will affect the mid-terms as we go forward? >> you know what i think will affect the mid-terms? the really visceral disgusting attacks on kavanaugh who was a brill want pick strategically. president trump had to understand that he was -- even though gorsuch was not the most of pleasant confirmation, this would be uglier. they knew kavanaugh was a conservative, and they knew he was a bush guy as well. judge, what did it do? it galvanized factions of the republican party that have been at each other's throats. trump always gets sold short on his strategy. judge jeanine: the truth, dan, that you articulated so well. the republican party going into the mid terms is now more unified than it's been in decade. it was brilliant on so many levels. >> all the republican surge and energy. you actually see the democrats have screwed up their double-digit advantage with women. women are

the judicial doctrine of privacy comes from a connecticut case, gris world -- griswold v. connecticut. in my state we prefer judges stay out of our private business. finally, when i'm walking across the state of connecticut, i'm talking an awful lot about the issue of gun violence. it's not just that the murder of 20 little first graders in sandy hook still hangs heavy over connecticut, it's that the murders in hart ford, new haven and bridgeport and suicides across our state continue unabated. it's not like everybody i meet when i'm walking across the state agrees with me on what we should do. when you walk east to west, you spend half your time in eastern connecticut, the part of the state where people love their guns and i get into spirited arguments about gun permits. but what there's relative agreement on is that it's our choice on how we should regulate guns. here's where judge kavanaugh's views really, really get outside the mainstream. his testimony before the judiciary committee suggests he's a second amendment radical believing that almost all restrictions on gun

it was not clear if many of the cases he thought were wrongly decided, including the case of griswoldprotects people's rights to access to contraception, it was not clear that he thought it was wrongly decided, meant he would vote to overrule them. those are two different questions. he said something that were quite remarkable and really, i think am inconsistent with what most americans felt comfortable with. for example, he talked about rights as being something of a zero-sum game. so if one person or one type of person has rights, that necessarily - does not necessarily mean that people have fewer rights. that is not necessarily in approach to thinking about rights that americans would embrace. host: this is the republican line, madalyn. caller: thank you for taking my call. , regardlessto say felt above judge , the way that they cannotand treated him, i see how anyone could say they christian or they had a heart. someone can talk about , they justmocrats criticized him like he was a nobody. and everybody knows he is very smart. host: ok. is there a history about the people coming o