wade, 50 years of the constitutional protection and now they want tob overturn griswold.t 59 your precedent protecting our right to contraception.we we have what i have described as an out of control supreme court majority that has no problem overturning decades here, there and just about everywhere based on their ideological agenda. justice alito meanwhile respects his wife's right to make her o decisions but he has no problem telling millions of womethe rest of w us what to do with our just think about it. do you see the irony of it and do you see the hot pockets he of th both of those justices and i'm talking talking aboutnd justice alito and thomas said the comstock act to civil law arrow law, civil law. it could be used to restrict access to reproductive care nationwide. this crusade against reproductive rights by these justices and the rest of their cohorts really is a republican obsession with power and control of a woman's body. as they work toward a national abortion ban republicans and their allies on the supreme court have given us every reason to believe contr

griswold surprising groups of people supported it. so, for example, large percentages of catholics and even some catholic activists supported griswold as a reasonable, all kind of middle ground decision. but how broad or narrow the right to privacy would be contested in the years to come? and in advocating for what might look like beyond that, you also had a very different landscape in terms of whether would be reproductive rights and what that would look like. in part, that had to do with the rise of a women's liberation movement, as it was called the national organization for women, which was one of the largest women's liberation, was founded in a washington d.c. hotel room in 1966 and selected betty friedan, who's pictured top one, who's then kind the closest thing to a feminist celebrity as its president. polly murray, who's pictured at bottom of pioneering lawyer and civil rights activist, co-founded the national organization for women with friedan. and within a year of the organization's founding began to argue that reproductive

so, for example, large catholic activists supported griswold as a decision.he right to privacy would be contested in the years to come? and in advocating for what might look like beyond that, you also had a very different landscape e reproductive rights and what that would look like. in part, that had to do with the rise of a women's liberation movement, as it was called the national organization for which was one of the largest women's liberation, was founded in a washington d.c. hotel room in 1966 and selected betty friedan, who's pictured top one, who's then kind the closest thing to a feminist president. bottom of pioneering lawyer and civil rights activist, co-founded the national or women with friedan. and within a year of the to argue that reproductive rights, women's rights and critically constituted panel rights. there was a bit of a fight to abortion. but after the organization did so, friedan would often describe abortion, as she put it, as a woman'sivil and would argue that there could be no full personhood for women untilthe ar reproduction. radi

we have made a lot of progress and 59 years later we have a long way to go but griswold vs.ecticut was a breakthrough. it was a glimpse of a nation that we can be. sadly, two years ago this monthx right-wing judicial activists sent us back in time. i'm referring to the supreme court's decision in dobbs, the crowning achievement of a republican-led decades-long decision to overrule roe v. wade and abolish reproductive rights in america. the ruling is the most irresponsible and dangerous decisions handed down by the supreme court. it ripped away a constitutional right from individuals and their families and handed it over to politicians. with the dobbs decision the ultraconservative majority on the court not only overruled a nearly 50-year-old precedent that had been reaffirmed over and over again, but also twisted the facts to reach the outcome mean by that? in his majority opinion, justice alito claimed abortion cannot be constitutionally protected because it is not, and i quote, deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition, close quote. judge alito is wrong again bec

griswold v connecticut giving the woman the right to have access to birth control.o eminent demain. the third one she mentioned with the national federation of independent civilians that authorizes obama care. they're coming for obama care, ivf, the national baptist convention said they're against, all of it. in tennessee, guns for teachers. so yourthey are against. all of it. your thoughts. >> no, absolutely. this is why she is so dangerous for tennessee women and girls. i mean, coming after healthcare, we are already at the top when it comes to maternal mortality. infant mortality. these things. it is because we have not expanded medicaid and women don't get the care that they need up to the point that they decide to start a family. it is important that a woman gets care her whole life so that she knows she is healthy when she decides it is time to start a family. they are already setting us behind the curve by being against healthcare for women. i mean everything that prevents unwanted pregnancy, they are against. and everything that they do is putting tennessee

griswold that we have this right.'ve been talking about it for the last many years now, really as so manys to be a nominee for a judicial branch, they all said this is all settled law. connecticut vs. griswold. we always ask that question. why? because connecticut vs. griswold was the basis that gave you this right to privacy. now, not only was that ign by the supreme court, it was amazing that when you think about the time before that, people didn't have access to contraception, it became such a day-to-day part of our lives. if it's such a day-to-day part of our lives, and the delivery of health care, then we should have the courage to say so and vote thisay today. if people don't, it's because they aren't done, and they don't want to protect this, and i guarantee you families deserve the privacy of knowing when and how they want to start their families. i ask my colleagues to support this legislation and support our health care system that has been working very well with the support of contraception. i thank the pre

wade was overturned, justice thomas said he would like to revisit griswold.s the ruling by the supreme court that allowed women to have access to contraception. so this bill today is merely codifying that. we are doing our job as legislators to put this in statute, that women have the fundamental right to access to contraception, nothing more and nothing less, and so republican colleagues, if they believe and this woman's right women's freedoms, and it's not just a woman's issue by the way. it's a couple's issue, a family's issue to decide when, where you want to have a family. it could be a medical issue, if god forbid you have cancer, a chronic disease. it's a fundamental right for doctors and women to make these decisions in the privacy of their office. >> your colleagues who say you're looking for an answer to a problem that doesn't exist, and i want to play for you what a couple of your republican colleagues had to say. >> who wants to ban contraception, like what -- where would ta pass? not mine. my state's a very pro-life state, butky tell you like no

maybe it could be the griswold decision that protected the right to use birth control.ose who think that's outlandish or impossible to happen just remember clarence thomas himself opened the door to this possibility in his concurring opinion the day roe was overturned. we're kidding ourselves if we think the hard right is simply overturning roe. and for all those who say ihappen remember people said that before dobbs that roe would never be overturned and of course unfortunately it was by the right wing maga court appointed by donald trump and our colleagues in the senate. tomorrow the senate will act. we'll vote move forward on the right to conception act. it should be a definition of what a -- if you want access to birth control or a health care provider wanting to prescribe birth control, the government has no right to interfere. doesn't that seem like common sense. access to birth control is something 90% of americans support. of course we're hearing the same predictable and retired retorts from the other side that birth control could never be at risk. that this is

latest news updates in just a few minutes by to now the whole thing at the supreme court overturn griswold, so they can prevent american women from contraception. they may say we wouldn't do that because of president. why would anyone believe them any sooner? chuck schumer raises question. americans are often asking lately why would anyone believe republicans anymore? yeah, when it comes to reproductive rights for public and say they are doing exactly what they have always campaign to do on sky. now here's an on this edition of $360.00 view. we're going to look at the latest on the battle for reproductive rights in america. contraception and it is creating a very lucky path for republicans on the campaign trail. let's get started. the supreme court over turning roe vs wade in june of 2022. has the lead democrats to victory in election since. no democrats have decided this topic is their best chance for continued success in 2024. but fearing the attention subsiding on the subject have introduced another aspect into the argument, the right of contraception and in vitro fertilization. now sen

. >> nobody is going to overturn griswold, who wants to ban contraception? where would that pass? it's not mine. my state is a pro life state. i can tell you, no way. >> reporter: senator hawley is talking about griswold, he's talking about another landmark decision out of the supreme court that in this case dealt with privacy and medication. it's similar and is often talked at in the same breath as roe was, katy. ro not just established the right to abortion access. it was considered one of the rulings that would not be struck down. now that we're in a post roe environment, it's why you're seeing democrats try to force votes like this on contraception in an attempt, even though it will fail, to just highlight where republicans are on this issue. >> clarence thomas of the supreme court talked about overturning griswold, and he also talked about potentially overturning gay marriage. all of those decisions based in the same law that roe v. wade was based in. ali vitali, thank you very much. >>> joining us, director of university of virginia senator politics and editor and chief of t

citing the precedents set by the 1965 supreme court decision griswold versus connecticut.d bluntly quote nobody is going to overturn griswold. no way. now the senator might have -- might have wanted to touch base with his fellow republicans because that's exactly what the party seems to be doing. that includes in holly's home state of missouri where republican lawmakers blocked a bill last month the widen access to birth control pills by falsely claiming they induce abortions. louisiana an anti-abortion group helped block legislation to enshine a right to birth control. and they did it by inaccurately equating emergency contraception with abortion drugs. idaho a think tank focused on quote biblical activism is currently pushing the state to ban access to emergency contraception and iuds by falsely claiming they can cause abortion. in total since 2022 republicans in at least 17 states have blocked largely democratic led attempts to pass laws assuring the right to birth control according to a "washington post" examination. and in order to fuel this nationwide attack on birth

precedents, including griswold, lawrence and obergefell. griswold is your right to birth control.re hopeful is the same sex marriage decision. let's end with something lighter. a congressman angrily speaking out about the trump verdict doesn't sound funny, but it is. if he brings his son to work and lets him sit behind him in the house chamber representative john rose of tennessee. he's on the left, told his six year old son that his younger brother was probably watching and that he should smile for the camera so his brother sees it. here is a bit of congressman rose's very serious speech. regardless of one's opinion of the current republican nominee, we'd be well served to remember the long and cherished tradition we have in this country of settling our political differences at the ballot box. no word if guy's little brother sam, who's three, saw the video, but marcus, i suspect he did. i think we all did. all right. it's going to be on social media for him to watch for years to come. thanks, scott. well, look, you know, we've been reporting this morning about what's going on in

jena griswold is the secretary of state of colorado. >>> still ahead, former senator doug jones of alabama and joe walsh of illinois trying to talk about the political response to the donald trump verdict and what it means for our party system. r party syste those who tried me felt more energy in just two weeks. -ugh. -here, i'll take that. woo hoo! ensure max protein, 30 grams protein, 1 gram sugar, 25 vitamins and minerals. and a new fiber blend with a prebiotic. (♪♪) everybody wants super straight, super white teeth. they want that hollywood white smile. new sensodyne clinical white provides 2 shades whiter teeth and 24/7 sensitivity protection. i think it's a great product. it's going to help a lot of patients. power outages can be unpredictable, inconvenient, and disruptive to your life, posing a real threat to your family's comfort and safety. when the power goes out, you have no lights, no refrigeration, no heating or air conditioning. the winds are not letting up at all here. we're going to see some power outages. number one thing to prepare for is extended power outages. are you p

the griswold knows was developed to protect the glider in rough landings4k parachute or was adapted foromen landing. the glider restricted areas. the intercom between top plane glider was introduced. blitz landings were out. glider pilots were taught to slow, constant rate of descent with a slow landing to a precis. many types of combat aircraft were suitable for towing the cg for a glider. the b-25 was used be the p-38 performed its task well. ■seven the pb y became a tow plane. note the take of the pb y before the glider. is a b-17 and dual to. tributo by a c 54. airborne aviation engineers trained in anticatir probable use for building landing strips and rebuilding bombed airdromes in france troop carrier airplanthat converted a matter of minutes into ambulanceand lessons learned ovs grew the doctrine expressed in water. pardon circular 113 employment of airborne and troop carrier forces doctrine was put into and circular 113 became the blueprint for all airborne operations. airborne and troop carrier units. our theater of operation forces. their employment must an integral part of t

issues about abortion$# access, said we need toof thomas it's reconsider other key precedents, like griswoldlows for married couples to use contraceptives. people are like great, we thought this was settled so long ago, just like abortion. that i democrats are really pushing on that this week, it's an interesting thing to watch in the senate, bringing a number of bills. republicans are calling the messaging bills, but the democrats are in a vulnerable position. it's not clear that they will hold onto power in the■ó senate and they find this to be an issue that voters really care about and there was a poll fr "the wall street journal" finding that suburban see abortion as the number one issue for 31% of them. you are right and they want to put republicans on record, where do you stand. they think it could help the vulnerable members of their party to be able to say i stand -- i'm here to fight for you you want abortion access, you want ivf, we are here fighting for you in the republicans are blocking everything. host: never a dull week. i should note that they are not in today. the house and

fema administrator dan griswold was on the ground in riodioso yesterday and i have to say the biden administrationas really pushed through these emergency declarations quickly, so that we can get families back on their feet. but it's been a hell of a week here. margaret, between dust, heat, flooding, these are not the only evacuations. we've got flooding evacuations in the north where the largest wildfire in the history of the united states, one of the largest wildfires in the history of the u.s., it's been really tough on new mexicans. i'm grateful to every first responder who puts them first and stands up to make sure they're as safe as we can make them. >> i know all of us wish your state residents well, as they deal with all of that. you are a border state. i wonder if all of this excessive heat is affecting the migrants crossing in from mexico? >> so we haven't seen the kind of surges outside of the ports of entry that folks in other states have seen. that's not to indicate at all that that doesn't still have some risk, but we haven't seen heat-related issues for asylum seekers. certainly not

and by the way, all the states held the 10th amendment police powers until 1965 in this country. griswold versus connecticut, which is it to radically federal overreach. but, but, and so i'm not even saying to regulate this at the national level. i'm just saying to go back to what this country always stood for, which is the principal, then under the police power of the 10th amendment. most states don't want, unless they're run by elite global lists that are really trying to kill nations and borders and stay and all those things. we shouldn't stand up for things that enter vate and destroy society. and those things which innovate and destroy the family, also innovate and destroy the society. and guess what? a bunch of young people running around without pants on impregnating one another and then slaughtering their babies is bad for society. it turns out that i just got the newspaper, it said that if any one shot, well, it didn't say that, that's the premise also dismantled the borders invoice. every, every republican says that we're supposed to be fiercely to say, well, if we're not engagi

comstock is a fedel a federal law that's been relatively dormant dormant since the griswold v. predated roe v. wade, legalizing contraception for people isenstat and beard after that for single individuals. it's pe an argument could be made. it's certainly being thought of by the justices, perhaps, some ustices, and others, that if one wants the in the mail distribution of to revitalize in order to do so. but comstock raises another issue that reallyly 1873 which tells us something. abortion and contraception was not illegal at the foundationing the pilgrims practiced contraception and in roe v. wade justice blackmon talks about that. in tiny stone's throw after slavery is over. ban, 1864 right before slavery comstock, 1873, are all part of a movement that can be read about that were realhe kind of fear of replacement. if you stop contraception abortion, that means that white women will have babies can forestall the browning of the united through the freedom that black people have gained. perhap thank for you that question. alan: heont. >> this isul nice to meet you all. thank

but the whole thing on the supreme court overturn griswold so they can prevent american women from contraception. they may say we wouldn't do that because of president why would anyone believe them any sooner? chuck schumer raises question.

comstock is a federal law and is a federal lawen relatively dormant since the griswold v.d beard after that for single individuals. it's possible an argument could it's certainly being thought of by the justices, perhaps, some of the justices,thers, that if one wants to stop$m in the mail and courier service ofe that comstock would be revitali. but comstock raises another issue that really quickly to get , 1873 which tells us something. abor contraception was not illegal at the foundationing of this country. the pilgrims practiced abortion contraception and in roe v.■çbot that. in 1873, it's a throw after slavery is over. the abortion ban, 1864 right before slavery, comstock, 1873, are all part of a movement that can be read about that were really about the kind eaplaceme. if you stop contraception and you stop that white women will have babies and you of the united st. perhaps that's for another conversation. thank for you that question. alan: here in the front. >> this is julie o'brien. thank you. i've always had this question about where is the separation of church and

they should revisit griswold.ights as lgbtq plus people in this country and our right to contraception so any time they say that these things are not on the table, look at what they are doing. we should be very concerned about what we are seeing and take it as a call to action. at the end of the day, we still live in a democracy. our votes still count. and there is something that we can do right now about how this court has gotten so far disconnected from its actual mission in our democracy. >> as i mentioned before, i was at the juneteenth event where i met your beautiful wife last night. but that's not the point why i'm bringing that up. i want to play something that vice president harris said last night. watch. >> across our nation, we witnessed a full-on attack on hard fought hard won freedoms and rights. including the freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body, the freedom to be who you are and love who you love openly and with pride. the freedom from fear of bigotry and hate. the freedom to lear

it out clarence thomas says as long as we're throwing out roe, let's take a look at throwing out griswold, which ten years earlier had protected access to contraception. in addition to that the speaker of the house and a majority of republicans in the house of representatives are cosponsors on a bill about life begins at conception that would actually make illegal certain forms of contraception, iuds, plan b. in addition to that there are extremist groups out there that are aggressively lobbying to take away access to contraception, and then we've got donald trump himself who just two weeks ago said, yeah, he was going to take a look at putting restrictions on contraception. and then as if all that were not enough, understand that today in the united states senate all but two republicans when given a chance to vote on what about a federal law to protect access to contraception -- that's all the bill really said, only two republicans said, yeah, i'll support that. the rest of them either voted no or ran for the hills so that they wouldn't have to say in public how they feel about taking aw

i have a bipartisan bill that would protect both griswold and roe and restore where we are pre-dobbsd on the zip code you live in. the super court said you can go to your state legislature when both of the state legislatures and country look at congress as 26% women. or they seek a discount on the legislature to do it when women are so unrepresented is -- and most of our legislators. we have a constitution. it is designed to protect even if the majority is against you, there is something you should get in this country even if you're just one person can't trample upon. virginia is one of the states -- few states that essentially -- there was the basic framework established biro, memo regulation of abortion pre-liability so significant ■:regulation. that is where the journey is, not everybody likes that. it is not pursuant to much. virginia has basically done that and that has put virginia in an unusual position. we are thought estate in the south that really still provides women at all the rights that grow guaranteed to them for half a century. as lopez, you alluded to this into tess

i've a bipartisan bill that would protect griswold and roe to restore it to where we are pre dobbs and't depend on what zip code you live in or who your state legislator is big enough to dobbs the supreme courtpe sad don't worry you can go to your state legislature when most of the same legislatures in the country will look at congress and it's mostly women. you can just count on the legislature to do s it right whn women are so underrepresented in most of our legislatures and that's why we have aof rights is designed to protect freedoms even if the majority is against you. they are something you should this country even if you are just one person that th■majority can't trample upon. virginia thank goodness is one of the state that essentially still follows a row. there were the states established by [roll call] minimal regulation pre viability andig more -- that's where virginia is in for some it's not enough and for some it's too much but that is put virginia in an unusual position because we are the last day in the south still provides women the rightsr that roe is guaranteed them.

and the supreme court 59 years ago to this day, june 7, the supreme court recognized the griswold v.1972, the supreme court expanded on that holding and wrote, if the right to privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or singles, to be free from unwarranted government intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child. that was the supreme court in 1972. and recognizing t fundamental right to contraception, the supreme court affirmed what we know the right to contraception is essential to americans' health and freedom. this decision was a step towards freedom and away from decades of reproductive coercion rooted in this nation's history. in 1927, the supreme court in buck v. bell approved forced sterilization in a decision steeped in ablism. federal funds were used to sterilize 100,000 to 150,000 women, half of whom were black teaching hospitals in new york and boston experimented on black and puerto rican practice for medical students. in recent history,mmigrant women in detention faced forced steriliz

griswold versus connecticut.ng behind it is very similar to the legal thinking behind roe, which, of course, was overturned in the dobbs decision. justice thomas, writing for the dobbs decision, said in future cases, we should reconsider all of this courts substantive due process precedents. biden white house continues to push for a cease fire in gaza. neither hamas nor israel have committed to it, even though hamas agreed to something earlier and the current plan, the white house says, was israel's idea. the proposal on the table is nearly identical to what hamas said it would accept just a few weeks ago, and it is now time for them to act. it is time for them to accept the deal. it is time to finalize this agreement and put an end to the suffering of israelis and palestinians alike. well, let's end with something lighter. a congressman angrily speaking out about the trump verdict doesn't sound amusing, but it is. if he brings his son to work and lets him sit behind him in the house chamber, representative john

justice clarence thomas a willingness to reopen this conversation specifically voted, referenced a griswold versus connecticut, right. >> in his footnote, and that was what made the birth control pill lead the gold, correct? >> by the way, the anniversary of that decision is tomorrow and that's part of the reason they wanted to do the bill. and so part of this was to be able to say we wanted to get republicans on the record to say, are you for access to contraception or not? all forms of contraception do you believe that people should be able to make that decision or not? and again, it? mirrors some of, the work that democrats are doing in the state. so one of the things that's going on here is that if one's beliefs, religious or otherwise, are that a fertilized egg is a life that some birth control methods affect that and so i mean, it's not a wild, it's not this button i might have been a messaging bill, but the issue itself is not out of nowhere. i think what's interesting is this is the rare issue where you've seen the language kind of change in terms of democrats have been able to repo

you, personally, as well as administrator griswold and your entire team for your response on maui, which is been a tremendous rest bonds. we have certainly felt that you have been full partners in this recovery. he wanted me to express his personal appreciation to you as well. you been in touch with him personally, you stayed in touch, and so thank you for your response. who visited personally himself to find out what was going on, and this committee and subcommittee responded in part by busing up a disaster relief fund, which needed to be done in the last supplemental as well as in the fy '24 bill. aside from many positive areas of progress, the one that is the missing piece is housing, as you well know. the history here is that the fires displaced about 12,000 people. for thousand of them went into some other form of housing, very unsatisfactory right away, and 8000 went into hotel rooms. of that 8000, we have, still today, about 2800 individuals, about 1100 families. they clearly don't want to be in those hotels anymore, and neither does fema. we want to move them out of those hotels.