we rely on ground truth from agencies — it wrong.to tell us - it wrong. we rely on ground truth from agencies to tell us when - it wrong. we rely on ground truth from agencies to tell us when we | from agencies to tell us when we mess. missed detections are misclassified.— mess. missed detections are misclassified. ., , , ., misclassified. the worry is that if the olice misclassified. the worry is that if the police often _ misclassified. the worry is that if the police often don't _ misclassified. the worry is that if the police often don't know- misclassified. the worry is that if the police often don't know for. misclassified. the worry is that if i the police often don't know for sure whether shot spotter got it right than they are not always reporting when the company gets it wrong. random accident public defender that specialises in forensics, he leaves busy accuracy on police feedback is outrageous and can lead to wrongful arrests. to outrageous and can lead to wrongful arrests. ., , . , ., ., arrests. to use customer feedback

we rely on ground truth from agencies to tell us when we miss, when we miss detections or when we misclassifynot rooted in scientific rigour — i.e., it has not been scrutinised, it hasn't been peer reviewed. do you think that is fair? it is so certainly a fact that there has not been an academic peer review of the service, but i would push back in saying that it is not been analysed — it has been analysed for 20 years across 100—plus customers that are using it every single day. here's the problem with that — often, it's pretty hard to tell whether a gunshot has been fired by simply listening to the audio. so it's actually pretty difficult to know whether there was a gunshot or not. mm—hm, yeah. i mean, it definitely could have been and it'sjust that we don't have anything to prove that it was, so we just clear up the call and that's pretty much it. right, just from listening to it, did you think it was? yeah, it sounded like a gunshot. yeah? sounded like it, but who knows for sure? right, and also, you are not an acoustic expert. yeah, exactly. ..analysed for 20 years across 100—plus custome

that is, we are relying on ground truth | that on?sifying-— or classifying. other people have said — or classifying. other people have said about _ or classifying. other people have said about the - or classifying. other people have said about the general state of 97% that it is not rooted in scientific rigour, i.e., it has not been scrutinised, peer reviewed. do you think that is fair? it is certainly _ you think that is fair? it is certainly a _ you think that is fair? it is certainly a factor - you think that is fair? it is certainly a factor that i you think that is fair? it is certainly a factor that has| you think that is fair? it 3 certainly a factor that has not been an academic peer review of the service but i would push backin the service but i would push back in saying it is not been analysed. it has been analysed 20 years across 100— plus customers that are using it every single day.— customers that are using it every single day. here's the problem _ every single day. here's the problem with _ every single day. here's the

reason that we need to continue to see an aggressive january 6th bipartisan commission pursue the ground truth of what happened that day >> reporter: it comes as the former president rallying in iowa this weekend hints at another run. >> we're using the same slogan, make america great again. >> reporter: and clings to the lie that triggered that insurrection, that the election was stolen, even though it was not. >> i never conceded. never. >> reporter: but state after state where the election was close conducted audits to check the vote totals. georgia even counted three times with all of it confirming again that joe biden won still, demonstrating mr. trump's hold on his party, this new dodge from a top gop leader. >> so you think that the election was stolen >> what i said was there were states that didn't follow their legislatively set rules. >> do you think the election was stolen? >> it is states that did not follow the laws set, which the constitution says they're supposed to follow. >> reporter: gop congresswoman liz cheney in response to that moment tweeted republicans have a duty to te

. >> it's always more we need to see an aggressive bipartisan permission pursue the ground truth of what happened that day. >> it comes's the former president rallying in iowa, hints at another run. >> we're using the same slogan, make america great again. >> reporter: and clings tow the lie that triggered the insurrection, the election was stolen even though it was not especially never conceded. 97. >> reporter: state after state where the election was close, conducted a vote they were demonstrating his dodge. >> would you sa i the election was stole season. >> what i said is there were states that didn't follow their legisl legislative rules. >> do you think it was not stole season. >> they did not follow rules that the state says they were to follow >> say they the duty of the stolen election are not true >> thanks to halle jackson for that report. >>> here's a spy story straight out of a hollywood script. a naval engineer and his wife are accused of selling secrets to a foreign agent, even hiked them in a peanut butter sandwich nbc's stephanie gosk is on the trail. >> reporter: this

. >> it's all the more reason we continue to see them pursue the ground truth of what happened. >> reporterg in iowa hints at another run. >> we're using the same slogan, make mark great. >> reporter: and clings to the lie that the election was stolen even though it was not. >> i never conceded, never. >> reporter: but state after state where the election was close, conducted audits to detect the vote totals, georgia even counted three times with all of it confirming again that joe biden won. still, demonstrating mr. trump's hold on this party, this new dodge from a top gop leader. >> are you saying the election was stolen? >> what i'm saying. >> do you think the election was stolen? >> it's the states which did not follow the laws set. >> our thanks to hallie jackson. and joining us now msnbc contributor juanita tolliver. great to see you. we have known for some time president trump obviously didn't react with much haste to tell his supporters to stop rioting at the capitol. we have these details in jonathan karl's new book. how significant do you think they are as the nation still comes t

so we have been able communicate our ground truth and they are making progress. the reported with their is their commander. and so that the reports that we're getting right now. >> but you're at 0% containment. all you. all right. erica hernandez with cal fire. thank you for helping us understand more about what's happening right now. i'm sure we'd like to stay in touch with your office throughout the evening. >> keep an eye on what's happening with this fire. thank you so much for that time. >> now we want to go live to kron four's dan thorn who is live in american canyon with the very latest on the scene that he's seeing there tonight. well, jonathan and pam are off of our home. our court here in american canyon. the fire burning up there on know preserve. this is new. will drive. >> and also the silver oak trail. we know this fire started about 2 hours ago as we just heard there from the cal fire commander that they have been making progress despite 150 acres burning so far. we actually did just get an update right now calfire saying that they are up to 25% co

i think the members of the select committee are determined to get to the ground truth but this is alsoortant in its own right. if the congress is unwilling to enforce its own subpoenas then that's one of the major checks and balances in the system that's cast aside. if republicans think they can acquiesce to stonewall congress here they're fooling themselves so this is about our own institutional prerogative and whether congress as the founders intended is a branch to check other the branches. >> is there reasons why the justice department might not prosecute? for example, there are concerns about setting a precedent that could bring out others in cases. >> if a former official and future administrations refuse to testify when they're lawfully compelled then they should be held to the same standard. really ought to be one standard. i can tell you if any constituents got a subpoena to appear in court or congress and refused the show up they would be prosecuted. and it shouldn't be different for the rich and powerful or friends of the former president. there's an erosion of the rule of l

i would suggest that you and the press corps must also be credited with telling unwanted but ground truths on what was going on in afghanistan through the evacuation in kabul and to date and without the amplification of our reports by the press, sigar would not have been as successful as it has been. we all know that u.s. agencies have not made honest reporting easy for us or for you about america's longest war. we have a recent example we talked about in this quarterly report that i would like to discuss replete with you today. as we reported today, shortly after the fall of kabul, state department wrote to me and other oversight agencies requesting that we temporarily suspend access to all of our audit inspection and financial reports. they were on our website. because the department was afraid that information included there in would put afghan allies at risk. let me be clear, i strongly believe that afghans who are at risk of reprisal due to their work for the united states government and news outlets and other groups should be protected. the protection of afghans at legitimate risk of

we're going to concentrate on getting the some folks out taxi ground truth that where we actually haveimeter. so we have a better idea of the exact acreage of what is actually burned. and let's go back to how this all just about 24 hours ago. cal fire was during a prescribed burn. soaking talk a little bit about. >> how that started where we are now. yes, fire participate. so with property owners and vegetation management program where we do feel reduction burns on private property with the cooperation of the property owner and yesterday and we were conducting one of those the burn was scheduled to be between 1520 acres. >> depending what our success was. and that right towards the we a little bit of a slop over. i'm outside primary containment line. that created a a fire that was got into some receptive fuel and that outpace the resources that we had a sign of the times that we ought minute. i brought an aircraft and we went to no you to get this thing under at that time. >> and have there been any homes threatened. i know you guys have evacuation orders in place. so where are where y

and and the ground truth and the policy interventions and do not center race and equity and most importantly, we feel that vulnerable communities to be leading the conversation to define what mapping and sis with the affordable allocation of resources and could like the housing element to be the voices that have been there and the housing element. and the planning department approved project and from the housing policy and the case in point and with the market-based housing development and strategy and to hold this accountability and with the broad-based and housing affordable stuff. >> thank you. seeing no other requests and the item is now before you. just a reminder that there is an informational item and there is no action by the commission. thank you. >> thanks so everyone involved and great job translating the koord naytors and all communities allowed to share tin put. i am still just a big point of pride that the commission is taking this seriously and putting in so much time. >> thank you, president koppel. i second you to that effort of the planning department with a really big task

thank you for accepting these ground truths with grace as you steer towards a ballot and any future transit measures. i yield the floor. thank you again for all your hard work. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> thank you. this is very important i ask you indulge me i think i'm qualified to speak on this and ask you not have them compete with me. i appreciate the work of bill and mike and i have been to a number of these meetings and they have taken an issue that is becoming clearer. i have used some of these examples such as washington metro and puget sound and portland, oregon and chicago of fare integrations and i ask you not look at this in a vacuum because there are changes. more people will choose public transit because personal automobiles are very expensive especially with the volatile price of oil. as more people get payment cards, these are things we can do where you don't have to have -- you can have a payment card and it will use the payment card numbers and identifier and everybody can have a very predictable sense of how much transit will cost whether it be a day pass or w

ground. okay, to continue speaking truth to power. ok. anything that speaks to power, these are the human rights or freedom of the media or the negatives, you know that this kind of alber algorithmic ecosystem that particular maria theresa does have an understandable problem with because she's been on the receiving end of lies and untruths. that have been propagated in that on that media platform by the people that is topical, but it's only topical, surely to the country. people in the countries in which maria, theresa and murat, off works. are you the philippines and russia, the old soviet union, eastern bloc countries. as well, there are other issues that are more relevant and more topical to the rest of us. i'm thinking about climate change for one because we're all experiencing year on year. and we have experienced this past 9 months so. so the real impact of something like climate change? yes, i think climate change is a hot topical issue. ah, it would have been perfectly possible, i think, for the peace prize committee to have decid

i asked him one question, do you know frank sinatra, he refused to answer that the grounds that a truthful answer would incriminate him. i showed him an order that basically gave him immunity forcing him to testify. i asked him again, do you know frank sinatra. he refused to answer the question and spent time in prison. that's the same thing they can do with steve bannon. now, keep in mind, the major strategy here on trump's behalf is to run the clock. he wants to get everybody going for months on end in courts and tied up. certainly the civil contempt doesn't do that, but it's certainly with either criminal or civil, he's still going to try and run the clock. but it's a lot harder to run the clock when you're sitting in prison. >> right. and the clock and leverage goes the other way. michelle, nick is reminding stuff of what we've been covering. there's more than one type of contempt. some people have actually been jailed under it, although the congressional version of that happens a little less often than others, than the prosecutorial. nick is absolutely right that this is part of what

i think a lot i of this comes down to what we've considered ground truth to be in terms of testing wheneverad is at its highest, which typically then means it's more useful as a kind of public health tool for looking at people who are most infectious are perhaps dangerous to others. hour most infectious are perhaps dangerous to others. most infectious are perhaps danerous to others. 2, 2 2, , dangerous to others. how much does it cost to make _ dangerous to others. how much does it cost to make one _ dangerous to others. how much does it cost to make one of _ dangerous to others. how much does it cost to make one of these - dangerous to others. how much does it cost to make one of these tests? i it cost to make one of these tests? lateral flow as a platform and there are many products in that area, it's probably the most scalable diagnostic platform that exists in earth and its incredibly cheap. we can see now that lateral flow can be made across the road for even $1, depending on what it's been used for, so we can utilise these tests for, so we can utilise these tests for public health at

thank you for accepting these ground truths with grace as you steer towards a ballot and any future transit measures. i yield the floor. thank you again for all your hard work. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> thank you. this is very important i ask you indulge me i think i'm qualified to speak on this and ask you not have them compete with me. i appreciate the work of bill and mike and i have been to a number of these meetings and they have taken an issue that is becoming clearer. i have used some of these examples such as washington metro and puget sound and portland, oregon and chicago of fare integrations and i ask you not look at this in a vacuum because there are changes. more people will choose public transit because personal automobiles are very expensive especially with the volatile price of oil. as more people get payment cards, these are things we can do where you don't have to have -- you can have a payment card and it will use the payment card numbers and identifier and everybody can have a very predictable sense of how much transit will cost whether it be a day pass or w

grounded, had the ability to speak truth to power. was a wonderful listener. he empowered everyone.ork in the military is legendary, his work in the white house is legendary, it is a national security advisor in his work as secretary of state, he proved to be one of the greatest diplomats in the world. and greatly respected. but what he actually did even beyond that was amazing, because he was the ultimate point of light in terms of making a difference. he led america's promise and the little red wagon campaign, he mentors literally hundreds of people and just on so much, and he and alma, the prime definition on what it means to be a supportive couple, they were a great complementary to each other, and you are going to miss him. and i respected colin powell very, very much. i'd great conversations with him when i was chief of staff and he was secretary of state. >> neil: i wonder, andy, i know we are tight for time, but he left the republican party, frustrated with the party particularly when donald trump became president saying that we had a constitution and we have to follow the c

grassley has a political agenda in this moment frankly that blinks on the reality, the truth of the facts on the ground which is that donald trump did what he did which is make efforts to get investigations going into an ongoing election. that is verboten under justice department policy, just to make it clear, because what we don't want is someone in the office at the white house taking the massive law enforcement authority of the justice department and fbi and saying, i do not like that person politically. i will use that against my political opponents. that is authoritarianism. that is less like democracy. that is this split between the justice department and the white house. there is very limited authorized communication because the idea is we want law enforcement, the police, prosecutors to make decisions based on facts and law, not based on who is in the inner circle and being blessed by whoever is in office. that is a really scary america. that is what i object to regardless of political party in this moment. host: our collars are interested in chatting with you. dallas, texas, democrat. host: yo

grassley has a political agenda in this moment frankly that is going to the reality and the truth of the facts on the groundd and that is make efforts to get investigations going into an ongoing election. and that's, under justice department because we don't want to make really clear, what we don't want is someone whose office of the white house taking the massive laws enforcement authority of the justice department and the fbi is saying, i like the person politically, going to use that against the massive power against my political opponents and that's authoritarian and less like democracy is what we had the split between the justice department and the white house predict very limited authorized medication because the ideas that we want law enforcement of whatt the police want prosecutors to make decisions based on facts, not based on who is in these inner circles and that by whoever is in office as a really scary america. that is what i object to regardless of political party in this moment pretty. >> this is a democrat out of dallas texas pretty. >> good morning pretty. [inaudible]. >> are you still ther

ground. that's correct. and in that case of sudan, and what was south sudan, there is truth to that but i think what needs toeral burhan and the military is that there is significant feeling of support that the military has — whether tacit or not — support from the region, from egypt, from the uae, from the saudis and likely russia, that they will be supported financially and diplomatically on the world stage. there needs to be direct language, public and privately, that that it is not a valid assumption, that they overturn the transition and the constitutional order and that cannot stand. we have seen these pictures of hundreds, thousands of people on the streets, especially in the capital khartoum. is there concern that this violence will spread? i think there is, personally. i think today was sort of behind—the—scenes, not reported on, was there were significant acts of violence against protesters, in areas far outside of khartoum. there was some pretty horrific video of protesters being dispersed with live fire in darfur. other protests were met with violence by the red sea. these places don't get a lot

ground. that's correct. in that case of sadhana what was south sudan, there is truth to that but i think what needs to be toldlitary is that there are significant feelings of support that the military has, whether tacit or not. supporting the region, egypt, the uae, the saudis and potentially russia that they will be supported financially, diplomatically on the world stage. there needs to be language, publicly, that it isn't a valid assumption, that they overturned the constitutional order and it cannot stand. we have seen images of hundreds of thousands of people on the streets, many in khartoum. is the concern that will spread? i think that is, personally. today was sort of behind—the—scenes, not reported on — significant acts of violence against protesters, areas of fire outside of khartoum. there was a terrific video of protesters being dispersed with live fire in some areas. either protests were met with violence by the red sea. these places don't get a lot of international media attention. they sometimes look attention. they sometimes look at saddam itself, so i think there is real danger that we will c

ground. we need leaders to step up and start speaking the truth to people about the elections.ected last year are not questioning the results of their own election. there is some hypocrisy there. be brave enough to speak to their constituents about how the elections are run. reporter: director of elections for fulton county, georgia. thank you so much. richard: thank you. ♪ judy: lastight we reported on the heightened interest in careers in the medical field including moves to train more nurses. tonight we look at the shortage of nurses affecting health-care care workers and hospitals. in the past few days, nurses and other workers in southern california and oregon authorized a potential strike against kaiser permanente, understaffing being part of the disputes. john yang is back with a report from south florida on how shortages are affecting hospitals there. >> tomorrow, we're down midship again. john: every morning dakota reds moves nurses around on the schedule for the nexteveral days to meet his hospital's daily needs. dakota: if you move right back to 11:11, you are covere

orwell and others, they talk about how the triumph of lies and propaganda over truth is actually a key part often in a ground swell before authoritarianism can fully break through. so we put together at the top of the show new on "the beat," first time airing right now that really remind people what republicans are now saying in many ways about the insurrection is not only a lie but it is very much an interpretation ally because they said other things immediately in the days after, with i goes to their moral culpability, which goes to people need to understand the truth so the propaganda does not become equated with the truth. that was a bit wound up. we put this together considering here, leaders of the party, not randos, right after the insurrection compared to now. >> the insurrection is not palpable and the president's comments didn't help the matter, it made it worse. >> i was born at night, but fought last night. so if i didn't accept the endorsement of a person that's got 91% of the republican voters in iowa, i wouldn't be too smart. >> the president bears responsibility for wednesday's attack on cong

who writes, it's long past time that democrats sees the high ground on values, including fair play, honesty, respect and nonviolence. in truth, a party that winks at violence and tries to undermine faith and elections is anti-american and anti-democratic. hold republicans accountable when they rationalize violence and demographic the importance of elections, take them to task is anti work an anti family for opposing necessities, such as subsidize child care for working, parents or paid family leave to take care of parents. that's how democrats can conceive consensus if not unity. task themselves as defenders of american values, and put republicans on defense. in iowa this weekend, we saw possible foreshadowing, of the presidential campaign of 2020, four with donald trump holding a rally in iowa, campaigning for, at minimum, attention. he was also campaigning to maintain his control, over the republican party, which was vividly demonstrated, by the abject feel itty of the oldest republican member of the united states senator, the 20th century version of chuck grassley in the united states senate, was a predictable conservativ

celebrating the censorship of alternative views on the grounds of science, science is about debating and questioning all kinds of hypotheses and letting the truthfrom that debate. this is the opposite of science, this is mandating orthodoxies and pieties be ingested and no challenges of questioning of them be permitted. it is not just -- for that reason it is incredibly despotic. the history of the pandemic from the start has been our authorities said things that turned out not to be true and they want to make it so you can no longer challenge those authorities when it comes to our most crucial debates. >> think of what science used to be in favor of, eugenics, lobotomized and people that had mental issues. there's all sorts of things scientists were saying were good, scientists in nazi germany thought a lot of things were appropriate to do, experiments on people and so forth. once you start doing that this goes beyond the current debate but folks at m s nbc, rachel maddow is able to infuse youtube's move or take it together with russia. >> the company is facing blowback and threats about this policy from another places the kremlin because the

kim wynman is respected on both sides of the aisle for telling truth to power for her election security experience on the groundon, for nearly a decade, and thurston county. it says they're trying to get someone who understands how elections work and doesn't care about politics and wants to be able to work with both republicans and democrats to ramp up election security efforts. >> and how are other election officials reacting? >> there's been praise from a number of officials. the national association of state election directors praised the pick as nonpartisan and interested in getting the facts right on elections. i think the other positive news that's been in terms of both republican and democrat election officials have signaled that they're behind this pick. >> all right. nice. thanks so much. >>> as trump and his mignons continue to try to undermine confidence in elections preparing to overturn another election in 2024, state and local election officials have been thrust into the national spotlight. and they and their families have been intimidated and threatened and even terrorized. >> i am a hunter, and

ground. we're empowering ourselves to be more efficient or quicker with our transactions. we can make mobile payments from our sons. the truth is that every device is a potential entry point for security attack. i think you can, but i went to lunch nationally with everything but only eventually there's malware on thousands, maybe sometimes millions each day. they use the cyber, they use the technology as an extension of traditional crime. artificial intelligence has not many main threat. this is due to the 3 laws of robotics. one of the things that's happening as a mini cyber implants right now, i'd be where is it really worried about it? most people, when equally b, you can put a chip in my brain. so there has been a lot of progress from the hacker side using ai and using other advanced technologies. there has been on the defensive slaton a with hello and welcome to cross talk. we're all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle would explain show biden's sudden drop in the polls as a candidate he promised to return to some form of normality. however, his current standing with the public is anything but is his agenda the pro

ground. we're empowering ourselves to be more efficient or quicker with our transactions. we can make mobile payments from our stands. the truth is that every device is a potential entry point for security attack. i think a eventually there's malware of thousands, maybe sometimes millions each day. they use the cyber, they use the technology as an extension of traditional crime. artificial intelligence has not many main threat. this is due to the 3 laws of robotics. one of the things that the b 5 are implants right now.

grounds of science. science is about debating and questioning all kinds of hypotheses and letting the truth emerge from thats is the opposite of science. this is mandating that orthodox and pieties be ingested that no challenges or questioning of them be permitted. it is not just antiscientific for that reason, but it's incredibly despotic. i mean, the history of the pandemic from the start has been that are authorities have said things that turned out to not be true freedom good intentions are not, and they want to make it so that you can no longer challenge those authorities when it comes to any of our most crucial debates. >> laura: think about science used to be in favor of. eugenics, lobotomized ring people that had, you know, mental issues. there are all sorts of things that scientists were saying, you know, good, we had scientists in nazi germany who thought a lot of things were appropriate to do, experiment on people and so forth. i mean, so once you start doing that, i think you're right, this goes way beyond this current debate, but folks over at msnbc, glenn, rachel maddow, she is somehow able to

truth for the world. and so these, if these 2 countries, these close allies and neighbors context, we find some common ground on fishing rights. where does that leave the rest of the world when the very future of our planet is at stake? lexi, thank you so much for that update. lexia brian live for us in paris. ok, let's get the perspective from the u. k. camp and bring in sonya guy go who is live for us in london. hello this sonya, how is this feud being viewed by those in the you can well, you could say so much being seen through the lens of bricks. it because it is of course, wholly tied up with that. and the question is exactly to what purpose is the u. k. doing it? is it doing it as an extension to try and sort of figure out what it's, what is able to do in the continuing mechanisms that are following that? but it is also to do with how it can maneuver more of its elbowing power as it were in the european union itself. and exactly how it's able to do that. now that have been newspaper headlines already in the very much pro bricks that press that would indicate that bar as johnson, the prime minister, onc

the truth about wendell willkie's unlikely fight for the presidency of the united states makes an even better one. republicans had found no ground upon which to stand to move the nation since the great 1936 new deal landslide with their humiliated candidate al landon yet the winds of advantage is change as the national economy barely staggered back to the so-called roosevelt recession the administration sneer catastrophic abandonment of keynesian balance budgets people remained unemployed and public const nation over the president layton -- latent supreme court persisted key legislation stumbled to pass it. hence when republicans awakened the stunning midterm 1938 congressional and statehouse successes no consensus prevailed or presidential candidate. among a small group of mostly eastern's however a twofold scenario emerged to scripted gop victory scenario for the 1948 election and then to find a surprise candidate unfettered by shop worn partisan dogma and politically ambidextrous enough to make reforms of the left palatable with the promise of prosperity of the right incredible to the left. just off stage with the party's nex

ground at the time that the 4 towers had no military purpose whatsoever. however, these railey army disagreed, claiming the buildings were being used for military purposes. so where does the truth lie? why with these towers singled out, bombed and destroyed. this is exactly one of the of the questions that have has to be asked by whatever an inquiry that should be held. ah, what was the primary goal of these attacks? was it really to, um, to damage military objects that were in those are buildings, or rather a show of force to intimidate the gas and population. and if the latter, and it does seem like the latter, and if the latter, that's an illegal attack and that's unlawful and might amount to a war crime. the fact that missiles from israeli jets struck the towers is undisputed. but what isn't clear is the reason behind the attacks or the process of how exactly a building is selected for destruction. one man who may have an idea is younger on both skills. he's a retired israeli military commander who worked as a special operations officer at the central command of the israeli army. when we know the 1st one, we know that there is a terror going to zation or is, or is it your a

we choose to look for common ground in we're allowing ourselves to be more efficient or quicker with our transactions. we can make mobile payments from our phones. the truth is that every device is a potential entry point for security attack. i think okay, but i went and the chairs are clear with everything but only eventually there's malware of thousands, maybe sometimes millions each day. they use the cyber they use. they think biology is an extension of traditional crime. artificial intelligence has not many main threat. this is due to the 3 laws of robotics. one of the things that's happening in the mini cyber implants right now, i'd be where they're really worried about it. most people would equally be you can't put a chip in my brain. so there has been a lot of progress from the hacker side using ai and using other advanced technologies to there has been on the defensive slaten. ah, what good catholic would it keep? the pope waiting, well, the president of the united states just decided to do so. as said they can't get it . congress actually agree on a budget bill or going to discuss also in a court of law, a new york judge has denied a union bid to

truthful. i'm santa hunter. talk to al jazeera. we are what gives you hope that it is going to be peace because the situation on the ground seems to be pointing, otherwise we listened. we were never on the whatever road to off migration. we meet with global news makers and talk about the stories that matter on al jazeera. we understand the differences and similarities of cultures, the cost, the same amount of what we've been using, kind of for that matter to you. ah . at least 20 people are killed as an earthquake hits southern pakistan. ah, i'm robot vincent. this is all the 0 live from doe hob, also coming up today is that day on historic day a boast for the fight against malaria the w.

grassley has a political agenda in this moment frankly that blinks on the reality, the truth of the facts on the groundch is that donald trump did what he did which is make efforts to get investigations going into an ongoing election. that is verboten under justice department policy, just to make it clear, because what we don't want is someone in the office at the white house taking the massive law enforcement authority of the justice department and fbi and saying, i do not like that person politically. i will use that against my political opponents. that is authoritarianism. that is less like democracy. that is this split between the justice department and the white house. there is very limited authorized communication because the idea is we want law enforcement, the police, prosecutors to make decisions based on facts and law, not based on who is in the inner circle and being blessed by whoever is in office. that is a really scary america. that is what i object to regardless of political party in this moment. host: our collars are interested in chatting with you. dallas, texas, democrat. host: you st

ground. ah, but i'm here today because i believe facebook's products harm children stoked division and we can our democracy tonight. a facebook whistleblower makes her parents before congress will mislead truthful media. regulations are $360.00 panel will decide plus the u. k. working to fight 5 were attacked, will it work? and major questions are circulating as an investigation is locked into exactly how top feds are investing and stocks all that. and.