. >> if you're wondering what the whole family looks like together there you have, gamora, gru and rockete. >> they're going to sweep all the costume contests. >> oh yeah, everybody just quit now. >>> think back to that day you first learned to ride a bicycle, when you finally got the hang of it. and then watch this video of darren bearclaw, a red bull athlete storming down this back country route. it's not even a route. he got up there, and decided to point himself down. >> yeah, can you please point out the routes? i don't see anything. >> there really isn't. he's making this up as he goes along, and it is crazy, look at the scenery in the background first of all. >> it's beautiful but also super ska i scary. i learned how to ride a bike on cobblestone roads in mexico because that's where i lived and the fell on the road and splat. >> this is part of a large expedition they took back in 2016 through british columbia, the yukon and alaska. areas of mountains that have never seen a mountain biker before. >> i wonder how he got to the top. >> i was wondering the same thing. as he nears the

that is why he tries with trust or dado to drive a wedge added that was the purpose when does gru and referring to that than they would breach that -- they would brief that to go down as on the greatest covert actions. when we doing about that? we don't have a perverse strategy. this information as a part of covert action that because of the national security act they cannot do that for united states of america so who should be responsible and who deals with of twitter feet below? and what can you do rightt now? is armed the ukrainians. said they create this narrative is a separatist movement. it is 900 and 20 russian tanks there is more takes the r ukrainians. and then to have those u.n. peacekeepers command. but in that bipartisan way but a hint the senate and house that they should be armenian the allies because vladimir putin does not care. he just sold weapons to turkey is a nato country food gives weapons to an adversary of they don't the bay will use them against you? did to show how they pushed back and that the allies have their back. >> the state department has suggested day

gru, russian military intelligence relaid material it acquired from dnc and senior democratic officials to wikilea wikileaks. candidate trump repeatedly talked about how much he loved wikileaks and how thrilled he was with the actions taken by wikileaks which we now know is on behalf of the russian government. mike pompeo, also praised wikileaks. once he became cia director, noted in first public comments after confirmed that wikileaks is a quote, hostile intelligence service, often abetted by russia. now today betsy woodruff of the "daily beast" reported that the daily firm, cambridge andit ka, run by family that financed, steve bannon has multimillion dollar stake, mike flynn worked for as well. ran data operations for the trump campaign. head of the group, ceo, wrote in e-mail last year that he reached out to wikileaks about hillary clinton during the campaign. according to e-mail described by two sources familiar with congressional investigation into this matter, head of cambridge analytica, reportedly told a third party he reached out to julian assange in wikibealeaks about his fir

to vladimir putin, what their relationship was or continued to be with the fsb and the svr and the gruhn, if you take a step back and think about the context of this meeting, it's during june of a presidential election. how did they secure a meeting with a presidential campaign. they said it was about russian adoptions. no one buys that the meeting was about adoptions or that the campaign would be willing to work with them. you're going to be comparing stories to look for inconsistencies. what was the prologue before this meeting and the epilogue after? what set up the meeting and what was the follow-up because it's hard to imagine this was just a one off. >> richard burr says they're sequencing the timing of the interviews with everyone else before they get to donald trump jr. help us understand what that means. >> that's a classic bottom-up investigation. i wish we were doing that in the house investigation. you want to start with the outside, they call them satellite witnesses, and get closer and closer to the center, so that way when you confront the individual in the center of the

now it's the fsb and the military side gru. the nsa didn't run kaspersky. i'm shocked we had so many government agencies running this. it makes me wonder how much information the russians have on us now. >> jon: the department of homeland security has ordered all u.s. agencies to get rid of kaspersky software. giving them 90 days to do it. slow motion fix. >> it would be better to operate without it than operate with it for right now. we're in less danger from it. >> jon: morgan wright. good to talk to you. >> melissa: president trump preparing to use the power of the pen to make sweeping changes to the healthcare system. our panel is up next to discuss what this move means for the future of obamacare. plus deadly wildfires are ravaging california prompting mass evacuations from communities in wine country and mother nature is not helping out. >> this is absolutely devastating. it is heartbreaking. it is crushing. for mom, the nation's largest senior living referral service. for the past five years, i've spoken with hundreds of families and visited senior c

either stole or acquired stolen e-mails because you's had roger stone in direct contact with the russian gru posing as guccifer 2, as well as roger stone in contact directly or indirectly with assange and wikileaks. you also had the opposition researcher peter smith who was in contact apparently with people in the trump campaign. as well as those on the dark web who were believed to be russians in possession of these stolen e-mails. and now this, the data arm affiliated with the campaign also reaching out to julian assange, someone that our current cia director has basically said is in league with russian intel. so that's the context of this. and with all of those connections going back and forth between the campaign and wikileaks and guccifer, obviously areas of intense investigation by our committee. >> as you point out, congressman, julian assange personally confirmed the report. he says he rejected the offer, though, from cambridge analytica. what does that tell you? >> well, you know, again, assange is not someone you can trust, so, you know, it may or may not be significant. he confirm

late may, gru asset vulcan who we are handling in athens, greece, received a cable from his headquarters saying you are to return to moscow. he decides to defect and we bring him safely to the u.s. early august, our kgb asset, arrested in moscow during a home leave. sometime between late august and early october, our asset in lisbon, portugal is also arrested in moscow also during a home leave. november 6, our kgb asset in washington d.c. boards a flight at dulles bound for moscow. over and back, short trip. we never see him again. again, early november. our kgb asset in west germany travels to east berlin for a three day conference. he disappears. and in 1986, february, our kgb asset in moscow is arrested. une or july, as best as we can tell, our g.r.u. asset in moscow is arrested. july 7, 1986, our long retired g.r.u. asset is arrested in moscow, one day after his 65th birthday. he is the highest ranking soviet intelligence officer this government has ever run. nd unfortunately, into 1987, our kgb asset in moscow, long etired, is arrested. so here we are, it is the end of 1985, and obv

court filings on papadopoulos and you see russians were his contacts, do you have any doubt they are gru, military intelligence of the kremlin? >> so it is almost impossible to overemphasize the importance of the secret plea deal by george papadopoulos. so this is classic cooperator. we now have found a cooperator. why is that significant? because he know he the russian intel he connections. he may not have actually understood who he was dealing with but this has the fingerprints of russian intelligence all over it. if you read through the complaint and read new york times reporting this morning, we've got papadopoulos talking to an unnamed campaign supervisor in the trump campaign saying the russians have dirt on hillary clinton and the unnamed campaign supervisor says back great work. the other russian fingerprint we see on this on the manafort and gates side is that as just said, they worked in the campaign in ukrainian former ukrainian presidentiana voef itch. why is that important? i believe he that is their first primer on how russian intelligence can manipulate an election and i b

gru, the russian military , whatigence organization the intelligence committee refers to the russians attempt elections, it will go down as the greatest covert actions campaigns in the history of modern russia because it created that wedge. now, what are we doing about it? we do not have a counter-covert strategy. disinformation is a part of covert action. in the united states, the cia is responsible for covert action but because of the national security act of 1947, they cannot operate in america. still who should be responsible to solve the problem? secretary clinton will not be able to deal with this her twitter feed alone. so we need to have the private sector and privat public sector working together. we need to arm the ukrainian. ,he russians invaded ukraine and they created this narrative in the past couple of years that it is a separatist movement. 920,000t, it is russians and tanks in eastern ukraine. there are more military in eastern ukraine and there are ukrainians. and now they are saying that they do not want you and peacekeepers to come in and solve the conflict. just l

does it matter if it was gru, fsvr or the prejudice protection group or any of these institutes that are affiliated with the government. i'm not sure that it does matter. there is an interesting complexion to your question. our intelligence service is an organized crime. although some people would say they're not as separate as they should be, but in fact they are. in russia, not so much. i think a fascinating question is to what degree has organized crime in russia had a hand in this as a proxy, and what is that relationship? i think that is a interesting question. it's not the question you asked, but it's the question i'm answering. >> well, the russians have a saying. [ speaking russian ] maybe yes, maybe no. i do think in particular when you're looking at cyber operations, when you're looking at an officer conducting those, who are they working for? their boss is going to get a cut on something, they're boss is going to make money, i'm going to make money. i think they're loyalty and motivation may not be the same. we always in intelligence have to guard against mering. they're j

connections, roger stone reaching out to wikileaks either drektly or indirectly, reaching out to the russian gru are an extraordinary number of connections between the campaign and those who are stealing the e-mails, those who are publishing the e-mails and a picture begins to emerge. there's still a lot of missing pieces. >> i've just got to say, based on my own personal contacts of the trump campaign during the summer of 2016, anybody in the trump campaign saying they did not depend on cambridge to get their data is completely contradicting the very people who are in charge of running the data side of the campaign who told mika and me that they were relying heavily on the cambridge analytica, one, to find key voters and two, to assure donors we're serious about this, we're not using -- we're not depending on the rmc. they have contempt for the rnc. to now say we were relying -- they had contempt for the rnc and basically said the rnc was nothing, they were backwards and we're having to build this all ourselves. they bragged about it all summer of 2016. they can't now say, oh, we relied on the