those wars were very profitable for the people you name for lucky raytheon, northrop grumman and the others are they have anything to learn. i'm afraid that right now, there's 2 major purposes that will keep the war. they can keep the war and ukraine going. as long as the war in afghanistan, not in the way that is being waged now. but by a kind of guerrilla, we're that we're supporting that we support, as we did against the soviets in afghanistan for 10 years. and he asked the ukrainian people would be ground to bits in the course of that as the afghans were . and yet it's very comfortable for the people who are supplying those weapons and keep going. there is one other major motives that effects these things. in particular, in europe, and that is that higher us, roland europe, who are not after all a european nation. and we has no particular rule in a european union. but in nato that's as the mafia says. cosa nostra our thing. we control natal pretty much, and nato gives us an excuse generation to sell enormous amounts of arms to now to the formerly warsaw pact, nations which had on

as you mentioned, northrop grumman, arethia, and they recently hit their 5 year hive. so as we talk about war, we also have separate who benefits from war. can you help me unpack that a little bit? who's really benefited? is the old earth, latin silken coolly bono, who benefits are going all the way back when you can name? let's just go in the last century. world war one. the loans by j. p. morgan to the british for arms, for the british. it had to deal or even had lost the war to some extent j. p. morgan would have gone bankrupt and wilson, i'm president and could not allow that to happen. that would have been a financial disaster, and that goes on from there on, in particular whoa, whoa, who benefited from vietnam going on as long as it did, or afghanistan. right now, the war that were supporting in yemen through arms to saudi arabia and the u. e. eyes keeping ej a truly genocidal war going on or enormous massacre. and i think with very little benefit except to the arms manufacturers. people ask, why don't we learn from our failures in vietnam and afghanistan and els

it means that you can't really justify new trident submarines or i, she be m's that northrop grumman is making a whole new life she be up against ian, or isis, or i, al, kato, ah, nature's don't cutters. as rationale for multi 1000000000 now dollar arms budget. only russia has the targets, any sophisticated arms to fight against. you don't need advance 5th generation fighters against people who don't have any aircraft or fighters of their own, or sophisticated ones. but russia and now china. and for the future in particular, to offer noxious arrival or a competitor, but shown who could be painted as an enemy against whom you have to defend. and of course, put now in the last shoe once has just been a bonanza for the armed people. because last you've made a russia look an offensive i enemy of some kind who has to be defended against, with the latest weapons, with new weapons. and of course, russia has its military industrial complex to maintenance fast. they remind me of the black arts poet, gills got herons that everybody loves peace. the problem is you can't make no money off of it.

according to asadollah alam, in july 1355 , the american grumman company, as the manufacturer of thecraft, intended to make a profitable deal with iran through a meeting with gholamreza through his influence. among the royal family, he was famous for his miserliness, with a lot of wealth shahrivar 1357 from iran, the spokesperson of the 1402 budget consolidation commission announced in the parliament the review of the notes related to taxes in the budget bill and said that mr. zarei, based on the approval of the consolidation commission, in the next year, subscribers to nomadic rural electricity and agricultural well electricity are allowed to increase by 10% . there were also residential units covered by the committee

according to asadullah alam, in 1355, the american grumman company, as the manufacturer of the f14 aircraft , intended to make a profitable deal with iran through the meeting with gholamreza and using his influence . he was very rich in september 1357 hello to farsi, i am welcome in parsiban. we examine news events from the perspective of preserving the persian language and the law prohibiting the use of foreign names and terms . in the next sentence, he amended it to the air between two parties, and if we want to have a democracy, it seemed right to say the persian equivalents of the minister of ukraine, what had he done, the three groups of yasir front , yas tractor, now whatever we put, the head of the party house has a desired idea like someone they are in between candidates, mr. mottaki could not use the equivalent position of the word ferangi instead of the opposite group , so that we are in the position of the opposition. he said and corrected the staff of the central bank, it was enlightening that there was a list of the exit question , why should azar aviation organization hear a w

it can be seen, look outside, you can see five of the last available f14s, from the symbol of grummane manufacturer of this fighter, they delivered 712 f14s, or up to 79 of them to iran and another 633 to the us army, but why today ? only 5 of them left envelopes where else are they from this database in 2007, it shows that million dollar banks are much easier for iran than having five f14 fighter jets, and this is one of the 633 tactics that make him a nursing company in a report written by the ministry of defense in at first, he wanted to sell some of the 14s and their parts, like other base aircraft, but after being sensitive to iran, he decided to destroy the cost of each paper, estimated at $900,000 , so that the american government can make sure that none of their parts reaches iran. it shows that if iran wants to cut off the tanks, it will it makes it and if they want to overhaul it, it prepares it again . iranians still fly after most of their parts were eaten by america so that the iranians would not use them. now they fly with parts made in iran. quality and free shipping al

according to asadollah alam, in 1355, the american grumman company had a season as the manufacturer ofaircraft, and through the meeting with gholamreza and taking advantage of the influence of the lucrative deal with iran benz , it was known for being stingy among the royal family. a lot of wealth in september 1357 outside of these 60 pages, the first page of sacrifice is there, that oath is the pleasure of meeting there, first stand up for justice , stand up again first, you have the page of service to the people.

in 1355, alam american grumman company as the manufacturer of the f14 aircraft, and through meeting witheza and using his influence , made a profitable deal with iran benz among the royal family. wide family of convicts and on the eve of the anniversary of the victory of the islamic revolution, many of the convicts and defendants were sentenced to fall . in tonight's special interview, we will examine which convicts were pardoned by the leader of the revolution.

just so happens that black growth has tens of billions invested in lockheed martin re ethan northrop grumman and other major us arms manufacturers. ukraine is the major market for that produce as russia has to respond to washington's deliveries more aggressively. you see where this is going, right? black rock puts fortunes into companies that are literally used to add fuel to the war in ukraine, which only leads to more devastation and more for black rock to rebuild an ingenious plan, devised in the highest echelons of power. see, black rocks managing director has been hired by the us treasury department, specifically to shape us economic policy on russia and ukraine. but rebuilding is just the very tip of this capitalist ice bag. the real profit lies in ukraine's soil. the country is a gold mine, or rather, a titanium mine, and ukraine happens to be quite rich in titanium, just like russia or china, washington's key rivals and potential enemies. altogether. ukraine sits proudly in 4th place globally in terms of total assets, the value of natural resources, including natural gas, with black

s. weapons companies. northrop grumman, raytheon, lockheed martin, and boeing have $66000000.00, was a congressional approval last october, $55000000000.00 center in the past 12 months. so who is getting the money? where is the money going? is the money really going to the united states weapons makers? ah, now despite a bombardment of western sanctions, rushes economy is actually predicted to grow this year. the i m f says it will normally increased by point 3 percent in 2023. at the same time, the u. n's financial agency delivered a blow to britain's economic hopes with its g d p forecast to move into negative tertiary artie country to chris and discuss all that with me earlier. we've heard that dealing, glean prophecy, coming out of every single western news channel and head of state for, for the past year. but clearly not true. i mean, here i've got the statistics union. i mean, the, the more interesting thing is they're saying that the russian economy, you know, it's going to, it's going to grow this year by not point 3 percent. the probably the most interesting thing is that pro

number of people in our congress that own shares and right the on and united technologies and northrop grumman. they're all making money. and so sadly, there's a small percentage of the people in the united states and great britain and other western countries that are, are making big money on this conflict. arsie, an exclusive interview with the russian ambassador to india, and which he said that nato, this file shouldn't possesses indirect slit to russian and asia, pacific security stating its defensive nature, a nato chose of offensive actions against russia. so similarly, it's attempts to spread its influence. here to the asia pacific should not mislead anyone with russia and china as the 2 obvious adversary's. there are less obvious targets as well, like the unity of the region at large tre, between russia and india really messy last year. despite western sanctions, russia has become, is the largest oil supplier. meanwhile, india has been investing in petroleum and natural gas projects in the russian far east, the russian on buses in the again. so the western sanctions have actually cataly

number of people in our congress that own shares and right the on and united technologies and northrop grumman. they're all making money. and so sadly, there's a small percentage of the people when united states and great britain and other western countries that are, are making big money on this conflict was he had an exclusive interview with the russian ambassador to india in which he said, but nick did expansion possesses a direct threat to russian and asian. pacific security is a preview. you can watch the full interview throughout the day. nato's negative role is evident. despite russia's objections, are, the block continued its expansion. eastwards creating day, the direct from threats to the russian security. stating its defensive nature or nato chose of offensive actions against russia. so similarly, it's attempts to spread its influence. here to the asia pacific should not mislead anyone. with russia and china as the 2 of vis adversary's. there are less obvious targets as well. like the unity of the region at large. in our perception, it's going to divide, the region will japanese it's

s. weapons companies. northrop grumman, raytheon, lockheed martin, and boeing have $66000000.00, was a congressional approval last october, $55000000000.00 center in the past 12 months to who is getting the money. where is the money going? is the money really going to the united states weapons makers and some that well placed people in the key of zalinski regime and cab? or ment i rushes miniature defense as it has obtained thousands of documents confirming us bio weapons development in ukraine. no one is still se during the period of the special military operation. russian servicemen received more than $20000.00 documents, reference an analytical materials and interviewed eye witnesses and participants in american mil to biological programs. this materials confirmed a focus of the pentagon on the creation of biological weapons competence, and they're testing on the population of ukraine and other states along the perimeter of our borders less well that is in line with numerous other statements of u. s. involvement in biological laboratories through out ukraine. opposed about those a

number of people in our congress that own shares and right the on and united technologies and northrop grumman. they're all making money. and so sadly, there's a small percentage of the people in the united states and great britain and other western countries that are, are making big money on this conflict with the latest episode of going underground with action returns. so you really might want to watch it after discussing with american political commentary, jimmy door, a number of subjects, but most importantly, perhaps that of the roots of the conflict in ukraine and mister door. he says the coffee was provoked by nato as well as by kiev, which has long been shelling civilian areas and bon bass going back at least 2014. you can watch or the full interview or the saturday here when i see for now a small preview. what they're doing, so they're unwittingly using the american the, the people of ukraine has cannon fodder and a proxy and economic proxy war. what we did was provoke this invasion, and the german chancellor just admitted that we provoked this invasion in 2014 the united states over

s. weapons companies. northrop grumman, raytheon, lockheed martin, and boeing have $66000000000.00. was a congressional approval last october, 55000000000 center in the past 12 months. so who is getting the money? where is the money going? is the money really going to the united states weapons makers and some well placed people in the key of zalinski regime and kev civil rights lawyer and really host robert patio? believe there is a question about jurisdiction that's other conflicts in the past. i've seen mercenaries remaining on accountable for war crimes. on the question is really going to be whether or not there's jurisdiction over the absentee. he's taken. what we often fee will. many of the mercenary group is a very they are very murky questions about the jurisdiction as to who has the ability to prosecute them. part of the reasons we've seen more reliance on private armies and mercenary in the last 2 decades. for example, the us will, blackwater, and other mercenaries during the iraq and afghanistan war is because people often escape prosecution for not just settle crimes and

and northrop grumman, they're all making money. and so sadly, there's a small percentage of the people in united states and in great britain, another western countries that are, are making big money on this conflict. and the like this episode of go, he's on the ground. i've seen really fancy discuss latham physical compensated doing to a number of subjects, including the roots of the crane. conflicts door says a coffee. it was provoked by nato, as was bike eve, which has long been committing violence against peaceful civilians and the number we can wash the full interview this saturday here on r c. in the meantime, his 8 sneak peak, but they're doing so they're unwittingly using the american, but the people of ukraine has cannon fodder and a proxy and economic proxy war. what we did was provoke this invasion, and the german chancellor just admitted that we provoked this invasion in 2014 the united states over through the democratically elected government of ukraine. why did they do that? the people who say that i'm aiding russia so

number of people in our congress that own shares and right the on and united technologies and northrop grumman. they're all making money. and so sadly, there's a small percentage of the people when united states and great britain and other western countries that are, are making big money on this conflict of gary underground ice sheet rock sounds he discussed with american business commentators. jimmy, though a number of subjects, including the roots of the grain conflicts dog, says the conflict was provoked by nature as was why keith, which has long been showing civilian areas in the dumbest, who watched the full interview this saturday. here on our team, in the meantime is a sneak peak, but they're doing so they're unwittingly using the american. the people of ukraine has cannon fodder and a proxy and economic proxy war. what we did was provoke this invasion, and the german chancellor just admitted that we provoked this invasion in 2014 the united states over through the democratically elected government are view brain. why did they do that for the people who say that i'm aiding russia someho

s. weapons companies. northrop grumman, raytheon, lockheed martin, and boeing have $66000000000.00. was a congressional approval last october, 55000000000 center in the past 12 months to who is getting the money. where is the money going? is the money really going to the united states weapons makers and some well placed people in the key of zalinski regime and kev. now, despite a bombardment of western sanctions, russia's economy is actually predicted to grow this year. the i m f says it'll increase by point 3 percent in 2023. at the same time, the us financial agency delivered a blow to britain's economic coast, but forecasts of its gdp contracting by point 6 percent. that's all against the backdrop of european politicians. profit ice and the end of the russian economy since last spring was to dive deeper into the map and see which one this to, to buy artsy caught you, peter, chris, sam's. hi there, chris. hey, yes. not exactly. going to plan them for western states in their own words, they wanted to destroy the economy, bring russia to its needs, pick us through what the i m f rep

s. weapons companies. northrop grumman, raytheon, lockheed martin, and boeing have $66000000.00, was a congressional approval last october, $55000000000.00 center in the past 12 months. so who is getting the money? where is the money going? is the money really going to the united states weapons makers and some well placed people in the key of zalinski regime and kev key as security services have conducted a wave of rates on the number of ukrainian officials and the oligarchy in the country. it comes after several others in the government resigned from office last week. let's go through some of this because large steel embezzlement schemes were apparently uncovered into and partly ukrainian energy companies worth or on $1000000000.00 during another raid up the head of kiev tax department. huge sums of cash refined, the leader of the department was discovered to be part of a number of multi $1000000.00 illegal enrichment ventures. several ukrainian defense ministry officials were also found to be involved in cases worth millions in local currency. it all comes out of the us treasury de

weapons companies, northrop grumman, raytheon, lockheed martin, and boeing have $66000000000.00. was a congressional approval last october, 55000000000 sent in the past of 12 months. well, where is this money going? he appeared on our program, the bookshop group appearing to want funding. so who is getting the money? where is the money going? is the money really going to the united states weapons makers and some well placed people in the key of zelinski regime and care? what it, what do you think actually what, what's, what's melbourne's goal? that m m g, g, g, think he is in ukraine for perhaps personal purposes. i mean, can you believe him when he says that he wants to protect ukraine? you got to remember that in the united states, but much more arguably in europe and britain where there is no free speech. there is no free press. the entire publics are arguably being brainwashed about what the ukraine conflict is actually above. they don't even know, and if you watch the going underground interview on rumble, you'll see the surprise of ceo and he milburn arguably when i mention

northrop grumman up 2%. l3 shares, we've got those about 21/2%. remember when we basically said we were having the bootlegged version of a fed meeting, this is where jay powell was pushed and prodded by david rubenstein on where interest rates might go from here. and forget 5% peak rate. and they are placing big-money bets on a 6% peak rate. david rubenstein joins us in studio on what he read from powell's body language, where the fit is ready to reach, let's get to the markets. the nasdaq is down 86 points, the s&p poked his head up to join the dow in the green, both have been swinging like pendulums. the dow is up one hundred 47. it has crossed the unchanged line 41 times, the s&p 500 has been swinging the back-and-forth crossing the line 59 times. why the indecisiveness? it could be the fed. even as consumer sentiment climbs to a 13 month high the major averages are heading for their worst we can two months, the dow is on place for third losing week out of the last four, the nasdaq down 2. 5%, the nasdaq is on track for its first losing week of

. >> northp grumman pulled back. your out look? >> it will have a good year and people are under estimating the situation in ukraine and they'll have to reup and we'll have to build more armaments and they are a great stock in that environment. how about john in new york, john >> caller: boo-yah, jim. what's up? >> boo-yah, john not much, just doing the show. what's going on we you >> caller: not muchment here with my dad just watching the show how are you? >> i'm good. what's going on? >> caller: not much. we started to use the platform and rent our condo in st. pete i was in at $170 and sold before it dipped. i want to know if i should get back into airbnb. >> yes, airbnb had an amazing quarter. we had stocks that would bounce back where there was misinteration from the ceo the ceo told you-all these things were good the analysts didn't believe it, the stock is going higher and not done going higher. trey in texas, trey? >> caller: jim, i took the position in energy transfer back in july. mistaking it for a red bull competitor an

down a little bit, but northrop grumman has had a positive month, lock ahead, nice month, boeing down a bit. that's one of the few adefense aerospace companies. the hot thing on wall street is bonds. short maturity treasury bonds, treasury bills i should say. those generally around 1-year to 2-year maturity, the etfs that own these like the ishare short treasury spider short term, vanguard, huge inflows everybody loves this 2-year treasury yield at 4.8% my mother brought it up to me over the weekend if your mother brings up something to you, pay a lot of the attention. >> it's true. >> it's seeping in. >> everybody is paying attention to bonds these days for a change bob, thank you very much >>> let's go to rick santelli in chicago. yields are falling rick >> yes you know what, these high yields are deflg capturing many investors' imaginations. be careful whether in a fund or hold a security, if you're holding a 2-year and happy with the rates, you might have to hold it to maturity should there be change to rate structure and therein lies the rub you need to be happy with the return 2

take, for example, defense giant northrop grumman listen in. >> we continue to grow and we're forecasting we have thousands of open jobs we are looking at silicon valley we are looking at amazon we are hiring entry level, we are hiring vets, we are hiring experienced. >> so, companies are -- that's just one example, are desperately looking for employees. we saw that with the 500,000 jobs added in january alone. which means the current tech job cuts are not necessarily indicative of the labor market. >> i think there's often this sort of fallacy that people get into just because a tech company is cutting jobs, doesn't mean they're cutting tech jobs, right? a lot of times it's recruiters, it's sales and marketing people who are most affected, not the engineers. but i guess the point is that a lot of nontech companies are still hiring tech workers. one of the questions i would have, are they hiring the sales and marketing people i'm guessing some of those, but it's different, right, if you're talking about just demand for workers who are technical. >> yeah, it is different however, i looked

my father was an accountant for the grumman corporation and my mother was one ofmo the first physicianassistants certifiers. in sportsmy and music including cheering from my beloved. broadcasting in my sophomore year at boston university changed my life. with the power of communication network to inform the public discourse and promote democratic values and was awakened to the important role government can play in ensuring that all voices are heard. after law school into public practice, i started nearly 35 year career of the public interest lawyer advocating for policies that ensure the modern communications networks are available to everyone regardless of who they are wherever they live. the past two decades i've worked towards the goal of assuring every u.s. household has robust and affordable broadband internet access. from 2013 to 2016 i was privileged to serve as counsel to thehe chairman tom wheeler where i gained the invaluable experience of working inside of the agency and learning the different tools needed to be an effective policymaker. today after my third confirmation hea