maybe you also paid attention to what the russian ambassador to belarus, gryzlov, er, is not the laste there in any russian schedules, but he said a very funny phrase that i paid attention to, he said from one on the one hand, banality, and on the other hand, only history will decide who was the traitor, and who was the hero, but i think that gryzlov, who actually knows a lot, is sometimes capable of this, it is quite abstract. but nevertheless, it is good to formulate something that is accurate, you can mean it. tell me what, now there is a report that putin spoke with lukashenko and thank you for that, i think that this is a good direction and if it is good, the usual one is in quotes. i think that, in any case, lukashenko is not the main player in that story and others agreed, but to show that it was lukashenka and someone who in this way is part of the internal russian agenda, in my opinion , is absolutely optimal for the kremlin well, in the end, i think that none of the russian elites wants to create such an impression a guarantor or mediator in all negotiations. since the situa