but gsa -- department of defense is gsa's largest customer. so we do help them and partner with them on i.t. and cyber security. we partner with almost every agency in providing them assistance. >> you know, i think this is fascinating. i think this will be one of the introductory meetings. i just, again, do not want to be in that spot where i have to -- it just gets passed -- the responsibility gets passed along. you know, where i would be completely comfortable that you two are collaborating and there isn't going to be finger pointing, i don't know what that's going to look like in five years or eight years, so we have to design these systems not based on the personalities of the people in front of us but based on clear lines of delineation and responsibility so that we better understand. this is an area that i think needs reform. i think anyone who has expected this, and we've talked about this, jeff, in my office and in this hearing work. i look forward to continuing to work with you all to understand what it is you want to do and helping

following the second fire to hit the site in four years, the future of the gsa has a speculation thattudent, told bbc radio scotland it would be rebuilt as a working at school, and that was non—negotiable. it is not up for a debate any more. what is up for debate now is how we fit into the whole tragedy that has happened to the entire government help community and sauchiehall street, and how to keep it as a working at school. this area has remained closed to local businesses and residents until recently. francis mckee, big president of the centre for contemporary art said they have been left in limbo. centre for contemporary art said they have been left in limbom centre for contemporary art said they have been left in limbo. it is indefinite, and the decision is coming —— the decisions coming with that at unhelpful, saying closed indefinitely is a disastrous thing to say to a business and everyone that works with them, so there could have been more thought about how it was communicated or made public, rather than declarations that they canjust remain rather than declarations that they

following the second fire to hit the site in four years, the future of the gsa has a speculation thatnt at the school, told bbc radio scotland it would be rebuilt as a working at school, and that was non—negotiable. it's not up for debate any more. what's up for debate now is how we fit in to the whole tragedy that has happened to the entire garnethill community and the sauchiehall street refurbishing, and how we do that as a working art school. but since the art school was engulfed by the huge blaze onjune the 15th, this part of glasgow has remained closed to both local businesses and, until recently, residents. francis mckee, director of the centre for contemporary arts, says they've been left in limbo. it's very indefinite, and i think sometimes the decisions coming with that aren't helpful, so when they said, you know, cca is closed indefinitely, that's a disastrous thing to say to a business and to everyone that works with that business. so there could have been more thought about how these things are communicated, or made public, rather than declarations that they can just remai

investigation that goes forward, including the russia investigation as part offer t t what role the gsahe white house played on the role in the fbi building and clearly this investigation. we decide what gaps are there, what needs to be done. i don't want the american public to think our job is to go in there in a manner in which the republicans did their investigations we would go forward. we're going to do the right thing. we're going to investigate what needs to be investigated and we're going to do it the right now. >> thanks very much for taking the time. >> any time. thank you much. >>> well, as we were just speaking there, the president has tweeted again and maybe fair to say gloves are off as far as dr. ford is concerned. he said the following, tweeted the following, i have no doubt that if the attack on dr. ford is as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local law enforcement authorities by either her or her loving parents. i ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time and place, exclamation point. we have jeffrey tubin ba

supreme court of the united states index in versus gsa in 1977 opinion by justice brennan had concluded that a former president still maintains a privilege over his records even after he leaves office. this was somewhat unusual because it was an argument in the case of those are government records. the current president and former tosident have thebecause right redact records for the issue is coming to head for the first time because it is a 12 year span of repose. when president bush came into office, there was a need to establish procedures, how is this going to work with two different presidents asserting privilege or having the right to review, no one really had a good idea how this was going to work in the goal of the order was merely to set forth procedures that specifically says in that it's not designed anyway to suggest whether or former president or current president schumer should not assert privilege over his records and you're quite right senator lady that there was initial concern by historians about the order and i think it was -- i would like to figure was based on a mis

gsa in opinion by justin brennan, had concluded that a former president still maintained a privilege over his records, even after he leaves office. this was somewhat unusual because there was an argument in the case that those are government records, but the court concluded that both the current president and the former president have the right to assert privilege to prevent the release of presidential records. that's obviously a complicated situation. the issue was coming to a head for the first time because there was a 12 year period. years after president reagan left office is when this president bush came into office and there was a need to establish procedures -- how is this going to work? two different presidents asserting privilege. no one had a good idea how this was going to work. was merely the order to set forth procedures. it specifically says in section 9 that it is not designed in any way to suggest whether a former president or current president should or should not assert privilege over his records. there quite right that was initial concern by historians about the or