three, since there is no comparable national level gsr for the general student bid to report gsr and fgr data simultaneously in press releases or data set tables, invites inappropriate comparisons and posted theers confusion among the general public. while the ncaa national office sought to protect its collegiate model. they labor within a system that too often depends on a special talented admission process, focuses on maintaining eligibility and results in athletes often clustering or being steered to majors conducive to their practice and competition or in other words work schedule. tellingly, several authorities within the ncaa and university govern fans structures, recognize clustering and scheduling of easy course as problems. in addition, contrary to the ncaa's public postureing, they are normal students. profit athletes tend in important respects to be physically, culturally and socially isolated from the campus community. they live in a tightly controlled parallel universe indicative of total institutions. through the steady drum beat of sophisticated and subtle institutiona

two, the gsr gsr consistently returns array 12 to 25% higher than esgr. as far back as 1991 the ncaa new that removing eligible eligible eligible dropouts are the worst transfers of athletes would leave school in good academic standards in the js or covert would result in markedly higher success rates. three, since there is no comparable national level gsr for the general student body trip or gsr and sgr data simultaneously in press releases or dataset tables invite inappropriate comparisons and fosters confusion among the general public. while the ncaa national offices sought to protect these collegiate models academic support staffs to often depend on an amorphous special talented mission -- admission process focuses on maintaining eligibility and results in athletes often clustering were being steered to majors conducive to their practice and competition or in other words work schedules. several authorities within the ncaa and university government structures recognize clustering and scheduling is a problem. in addition country to the ncaa public postu

two, the gsr consistently returned to rate 12% to 25% higher than the fgr. as far back as 1991, they knew removing drop-outs, transfers or athletes who leave school in good academic standing from the gfr cohort, would result in a remarkably higher success rate. three, since there's no comparable national level gfr for the general student body to report gfr and fgr data simultaneously in press releases or data set tables invites inappropriate comparisons and fosters confusion among the general public. while the national office has sought to protect its collegiate model, academic support staffs label in a system that too often depends on an amorms process and results in athletes often clustering or being steered to majors conducive of their practice or competition or in other words, work schedule. tellingly, several authorities in the ncaa and the university governance structures recognize clustering and scheduling of easy courses as a problem. in addition, contrary to the n ncaa's public posturing that they're just normal students profit athletes tend in impo

two, the gsr consistently returned to rate 12% to 25% higher than the fgr. as far back as 1991, they knew removing drop-outs, transfers or athletes who leave school in good academic standing from the gfr cohort, would result in a remarkably higher success rate. three, since there's no comparable national level gfr for the general student body, to report gfr and fgr data simultaneously in press releases or data set tables invites inappropriate comparisons and fosters confusion among the general public. while the national office has sought to protect its collegiate model, academic support staffs label in a system that too often depends on an amorms process, and results in athletes often clustering or being steered to majors conducive of their practice or competition, or in other words, work schedule. tellingly, several authorities in the ncaa and the university governance structures recognize clustering and scheduling of easy courses as a problem. in addition, contrary to the ncaa's public posturing that they're just normal students, profit athletes tend in im