because for life. girls i'm going materials by the name of kerimov, the former investigator of the gsunistry of internal affairs protected several criminal communities , resigned and settled in a house for 3 million dollars, where one lives and where his mistress periodically brings on the territory there is a house for the servants of the guard, the gardener’s maid lives in it, two former guards, which is more of a minus than a plus, the task of the guard is to predict to prevent more took, the larger the closet, the louder it falls to the end. calmly, i will conditionally do nothing with them. it's not the phone that's all off. max as you asked, it's an alarm clock. oh, give me some water, please. so that's how we work. at night to the house. it will be necessary to sneak in secretly ; the cameras write everything, but the hard disk with data located. in the same place in the server room. you just need to pull it out and take it with you. yes, but how do we even get there? our new colleague came up with something. through the fence from the roofs of the car , i would not really like

corruption in the laptop of the former head of the investigation department for the tver region of the gsukr. in moscow, they found a folder called pension. it contained a photograph of a sheet of paper with codes for accessing the cryptocurrency , presumably. this is a bribe from a group of hackers whose criminal case was in progress, tambov and if these data are confirmed, then this will be the largest bribe in the history of russian law enforcement a brutal attack or poaching in the khabarovsk territory, residents of remote villages of villages complain about the amur tigers, which have begun to increasingly go out to people , take advantage of this, illegal hunters, they kill predators listed in the red book and assure that it was self-defense. why is it important to preserve the population of amur tigers in the footsteps of poachers who destroy rare animals set off by alexander mostovaya listed in the red book , state sakhotnadzor inspectors noticed federal highways near the village on the side of the road solonetzic, that in the khabarovsk territory a small animal with brown eyes and

keane who goes on gender spectrum.org webinars total conflict of interest saying that middle coaches at gsuk iraq twhawrd girls are coming into the boys locker room. they are not boys. they are not girls. they are not girls. you only have boys in the locker room. this is what we are up against. >> jesse: you are up against a lot ani. i have a lot of respect for you and the other parents. if you stick together, you will definitely get the school board to change their ways. stay safe out there and thanks for joining us. >> thank you so much. >> have you ever been too confident overestimated your abilities? thought you could jump over the stream and ended up soaked instead? or maybe you were chris licketd and thought you could run a major news network? >> we have news now to report involving our own network. news to us here at cnn and you at home. cnn's chairman and ceo chris licketd is leaving the network. licht took over the network a little over a year ago. david zaslav the chairman of cnn's parent company warner brothers "discovery." he just made the announcement at network meeting. for no

as justice gsu said, i think there's a real question whether even if they're right that there's constitutionaluestions abt liciting or facilitating civil conduct, whether that mes the high threshold for over breadth. but i inmore fundamentally, they're not right about that. this crtas said in cases like pittsburgh press and kasam and williams that soliciting work inducing illegal activiti, en if they're only civilly illegal are not protected t first amendment. ani don't really hear them to be contesting that. instead eyant a special rule. they want to say it's ok to villy regulate that kind of solicitation and facilitation, buyocan't criminally punish it. and that sort mmatch is just not something that i know of any analog in this court first amendment's jurisprudence. what this court has always said beres that there are certain categories of speech that are unprotte and we think this is one of them. now, i take the point thatt's unusual to punish the ee or the conduct that solicits or facilitates underlying activity more stiffly than the activity, but that's not a first amendment rule. that's