is it going to be used for movement of migrants from our southern border to guantanamo bay? >> senator, one of our missions is to be able to handle any kind of mass migration event. that's a southcomm mission. we have experienced that in the past with migrants from cuba and haiti. part of the naval station, there's a field at part of the naval station in guantanamo bay is an unimproved field that could be subject to any kind of weather conditions, mud. so to get that film to a standard that if we had a mass migration, we could keep the migrants on cement pads instead of in the mud and have power and water for sanitation ready to go. we didn't currently there ahave facilities in the numbers. we also run an annual training drill. we actually send our army soldiers there to walk through the command and control in the interagency coordination that may be required. i'm very much involved in the details. that is for projected future mass migration event. there have been no discussion or no order given to me to prepare that site for any kind of southwest border flow. >> are you awa

specifically talking about guantÁnamo bay.d understand many of my friends on other side of the il think this process is too slow and doesn't move fast enough that this is an area we cannot afford to be at 80 percent or 85 percent correct 96 percent correct we have to be 100 percent correct it requires due diligence. more than anything else that we do and talking about guantÁnamo bay i was fortunate enough when i first came here four years ago to go on a trip to guantÁnamo bay. just like i visited the border. i was taking other people's words and i believe what other people told me. so i had a picture in my mind when i got there it was absolutely not true of what i had on my mind based on other people's thoughts. i will just tell you, and other places that references the closing of gitmo or bringing them to united states for medical treatment, there is a lot of different ways that we talk about. this is what i say. the numbers will shock you of how many there on - - i really dare. it's not a great number. so knowing how many pe

was nominated by gerald ford in 1975 notably he led the decision to allow terror suspects at guantanamo bay to plea for their freedom in u.s. courts.>>> capitol hill divided by backlash over presidents trumps racist tweets, the house has voted along party lines to condemn the president, a rare move but one with no real consequences. the resolution takes aim at the incendiary tweets that 4 women of color should go back to where they came from even though three of them were born in the united states and all are u.s. citizens. the democratic house resolution strongly condemns his racist comments that have legitimate honest and increased fear and hatred of new americans and people of color. president donald trump remains unapologetic and continues it attacks at a cabinet meeting. >> it's what they say abtry,t's hate our country and that's not good. it's not acceptable.>> some have criticized the presidents racist remark and only four republicans joined democrats to condemn the president>> these comments are disgraceful and disgusting and these comments are racist. >> we have an opportunity toda

. >> reporter: he voted to support abortion rights and to let prisoners at guantanamo bay challenge their detention. justice stevens insisted he didn't change and said it was the court that shifted to the right >> after nixon became president, every appointment to the court was more conservative than his or her predecessor. >> reporter: but some of his views did change at first a critic of affirmative action, he ended up supporting it in college admissions. initially a supporter of the death penalty, fairnessone of the >> with the benefit of dna evidence, we have learned that a substantial number of death sentences have been imposed erroneously. >> reporter: he dissented when the court said the second amendment provided an individual right to own a handgun and when the court okayed corporate and union contributions to support political campaigns. stevens remained unusually active, publishing his third book this year at age 99 until a stroke this week ended a remarkable american life pete williams, nbc news, at the supreme court. >>> we'll take a break here a lot more still ahead tonight.

when i was in miami, my wife went to guantanamo bay for three years so we could have thanksgiving dinnerith the troops down there. i took her to haiti, i took her to honduras once. maybe twice. maybe honduras and guatemala. once to peru. david: paris or london? gen. kelly: none of that. david: you have three children. you fathered three children. your oldest son is in the military still. gen. kelly: a lieutenant colonel in the marine corps. recently promoted. just back from his -- one of his tours in iraq. david: you have a daughter. what is she doing? gen. kelly: she was with the fbi. prior to that, she worked with the wounded men and women coming back from the wars. bethesda naval hospital. and then, she went into the fbi. she was with the hostage rescue team. she was one of the support people for several years. david: you had another son who lost his life in military combat. gen. kelly: he started off as an enlisted marine. he became a second lieutenant and was killed in afghanistan. david: did you and your wife say, having two sons in the marines was an awful sacrifice for any family

democrats want to place on funding for a border wall or allowing the transfer of detainees on guantÁnamo bayto the united states . there are democrats that also push for a vote on an amendment to limit president trump's ability to take military action against iran. they got that vote, it failed so that's not in the bill. however that's expected to be a major issue of the debate on the house floor this coming week and could be an issue in the committee if it is adopted. >> how do you see the house and senate come to some kind of agreement especially when you already have the division among democrats in the house and republicans who actually want much more funding? well, in the house is going to be -- looks to be a very narrow road to passage. republicans do not think keen of this bill. they have a lot of issues with it. in committee last month all but two republicans opposed this bill and it does not appear there will be many changes to the bill that's going to bring them on board like increasing the budget or changing really to the border guantÁnamo or nuclear weapons. i will talk to adam sm

. >> will have the high court decision to allow terror suspects at guantanamo bay to plead for theirrts. at the time of his retirement he was the second oldest serving justice in the history of the court. >> will have more on that coming up later this evening on our news on kpix5. but now let us check on the weather. >> we are just writing the line here for very typical uneventful weather. >>> i want to show you what that means. for small we go to the top and would take a look at mark and look at the clouds that have just shown up if you're with me at the top of 5:00 i was saying i was hard-pressed to find many of these clouds off the coast. but this is the time of day when the marine layer will literally materialize out of thin air like this. we are shooting to see the develop off the coast. i will switch. firstly that the numbers up in front of that gray. here is what we did for daytime highs primus just as hot as yesterday although on a technicality we were a little cooler in places. concord we brought it down a coup sasa94 today. yes a little bit of a drop but not as much as we w

i turn to page 4, accelerates closure of guantanamo bay detention facility, transfer of in guantanamo bay. this was under a democratic majority and with president obama in the white house, it prevented detained -- gitmo detainees from being transferred to the u.s. it was taken out in this bill. not exactly the way to build a bipartisan majority. on page 6, the headline is "protects against nuclear catastrophe," and underneath it says it prohibits the limit of low-yield nuke, it cuts $608 million. down a little lower it says it cuts $103 million from ground-based strategic deterrent. so we're going to prevent nuclear catastrophe by cutting ourself. doesn't talk about what the russians, the chinese, iranians, north koreans, or anybody else is doing. we prevent nuclear catastrophe by cutting ourselfs. so that's the -- ourselves. so that's the trend that this bill has taken when it approached the floor. i realize there are various points of view when the democratic caucus. i note a political article that says congressional progressive caucus are demanding a string of concessions from spea

those years he shaped public discourse on a breathtaking variety of issues, from the rights of guantÁnamo baydetainees to copyright law, to environmental regulation. whether the topic was flagburning, vote counting, or george carlin said seven dirty words, justice stevens voice which is often all throated weather was in the majority or the minority leaves the saw with a rich history of fine line and also a compassionate human being. with a sense of duty that earned him a bronze star in world war ii as a navy code breaker, and carried for to his retirement from the nation's highest court at the age of 90, justice stevens has truly lived the life of public service. and it goes on. he continues to write about legal issues and provocative ways including an op-ed piece he wrote after the parkland massacre for the near times entitled repeal the second amendment. [applause] i guess we'll have to talk about that so we got it right to. so everyone, please rise for great american, a living legend in our midst, justice john paul stevens. [applause] so how did i do? do have a dissenting opinion on that o

terror cases 2004-2008 challenging the bush administration's handling of terrorist suspects in guantanamo bay. he maintained a conservative principle never changed during his time on the court. rather it was the justice of those around him in the country also will so that we can conservative than handy. nonetheless justice john paul stevens could be counted on force thoughtful legal analysis. shortly before his death, president ford prepared to let history's judgment of his presidency rest on his selection of stevens to the supreme court. >> the legacy of candor, of insight, and of craft. >> mike: for more on the high court of justice stevens time, let's bring in cary severino from the crisis network. she's got a brand-new book out about justice kavanaugh call justus on trail, carrie, great to have you. >> good to be here. your reflections on the life and times of justice john paul stevens? he was the last of the greatest generation and he fought in world war ii and frequently referenced his opinion. one case he spoke about the importance of the flag and the first amendment and patriotism sho

years, he shipped public discourse on a breathtaking variety of issues come up from the rights of guantanamo bay detainees, to copyright laws, to environmental regulation. whether the topic was flagburning, vote counting, or george carlin's seven dirty words, justice stevens voice leaves us with a rich history of his fine mind and a compassionate human being. with a sense of duty that earned him a bronze star in world war , and a navy quote breaker carried forward to the nation's highest court at the age of 90, justice stevens has truly lived a life of public service. and it goes on. he continues to write about legal issues in provocative ways, including an op-ed piece he wrote after the parkland massacre for the new york times entitled "repeal the second amendment." [applause] frank: i guess we will have to talk about that and so many other things. we have to get right to it. so, everyone please rise for a , great american, a living legend in our midst, justice john paul stevens. [applause] frank how did i do? you have a dissenting opinion on that? or am i ok? [laughter] hon. stevens: you made

he has been held at guantanamo bay for nearly 13 years. lauren: how far left will they go?ht for the next round of debates. will bernie sanders and elizabeth warren kill any chance their party could have to attract swing voters? and fireworks over a katy perry song, why the singer is in trouble for one of her grammy-winning hits. keep it here on "fbn: a.m." ♪ you make me feel like i'm living a teenage dream. ♪ the way you turn me on. ♪ i can't sleep. ♪ let's run away and don't ever look back. ♪ don't ever look back. ♪ they customized my car insurance, so i only pay for what i need. then i won the lottery, got hair plugs, and started working out. and so can you! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ dear tech, let's talk. we have a pretty good relationship. you've done a lot of good for the world. but i feel like you have the potential to do so much more. can we build ai without bias? how do we bake security into everything we do? we need tech that helps people understand each other. that understands my business. we've got some work to do. and w

he is known for authoring the decision in 2004 to give prisoners in guantanamo bay the right to pleade funeral will b be tomorrow. all eyes on robert mueller as he heads to capitol hill this week for one of the most anticipated days. >> the report presents a very substantial evidence that the president is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and we have to let mueller present those facts to the american people and then see where we go from there because the administration must be held accountable. heather: but could democrats turn this into a 2020 campaign event? here to debate, daniel turner, president of power the future and mark levine, member of the virginia house of delegates. thank you for joining us. daniel, i'll start with you. do you think that democrats will turn into this a 2020 event? >> absolutely. it makes sense for them to try to do so because they don't have much else to run on and this is what they've been doing since 2016. i think the risk that both sides run here is that in recent polling there's been no interest clearly in impeachment so that's a democrat problem

they set up tent companies at go guantanamo bay at gitmo. it's extraordinary. that doesn't mean it's extraordinary for the conditions that have been reported out of these facilities to be present, that will have to change. but again, this is not a regular time when it comes to illegal immigration into our country, and we just simply have to take that into account in evaluating what's happening at the border. >> but don't you think, congressman -- i do take your point that this is an extraordinary circumstance. but these people are suffering, as the senator said -- >> and that's totally unacceptable. and what we need is for congress to fund new facilities that are compatible to the tiype of immigration we're getting into our country. it's not men crossing the border looking for work anymore. it's families, it's children. and these facilities aren't designed to hold them. and we need facilities that can hold these families while their cases are being adjudicated and processed. >> can i quickly jump in? >> very quickly, jacob. we've got to go to break. >> what the

well there's these are 2 very different things ecliptic muhammad is in guantanamo bay facing criminal charges for his role this is a civil lawsuit so the 2 don't necessarily overlap we haven't heard what the president might want to do in this case he has shown that he has a willingness to interfere in judicial proceedings where his predecessors did not his testimony though would be controversial if he was say able to help with this lawsuit the lawyers for saudi arabia would probably be able to paint a pretty damning picture because of his treatment it's widely believed and known that he was faced severe torture at the hands of the central intelligence agency in those secret prisons right after 911 so any of his testimony could be called into question this again is just now developing so we haven't heard any official reaction from the administration but if we do we'll pass that along or about even if the timing thanks very much the pentagon hit in washington d.c. well this all comes as the u.s. president signed a new law giving permanent benefits to 1st responders who became ill in the

it loosens the heinous restrictions on transferring prisoners from guantanamo bay. opposing this bill means we will be stuck with a senate version that omits these provisions. i thank chairman smith and members of the armed services committee for their hard work. . d i thank the ranking member i congratulate you both on producing a very strong, very positive bill. you did that together. do not abandon your work. i hope that it will pass. with resounding support from both sides of the aisle. our troops in harm's way deserve that affirmation, that trust, that faith, that commitment. let's not let them down. i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: members are reminded to direct their remarks to the chair. the gentleman from texas is recognized. >> i yield myself two minutes. the chair: the gentleman is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i appreciate the remarks of the majority leader. i know from some personal experience it is certainly not easy to hold your side of the aisle and the other side of the aisle together to have the sort 349, es l

naval base in guantanamo bay, cuba, who were seeking to challenge their detentions.ther ruled in favor of convicts with mental disabilities, who had been sentenced to death. and, during that 2011 newshour interview, he said he disagreed with the way some conservative justices interpret federal lawd e constitution. >> everybody agrees that it's apprriate to do everything w can to understand the original intent behind both statutes and constitutional provisions. anbut the notion that that provide the answer in all cases is what is incorrect. it sheds light on all cases, but it is just onef the tools you ve to use in trying to answer the question. >> woodruff: but often, stevens was in dissent. even in his final months of life, stevens lamented the court's 2000 "bush v. gore" ivling, which ended a florida recount and effey decided that year's presidential election. he disagreed sharply with how his conservative colleagues voted in the "heller" case loosening gun laws. and when i sat down with stevens this spring, for one of his final interviews, he said this about the 2

planes to guantanamo bay? i mean, is this just donald trump trying to play and energize his base? because logistically and practically, how do you, in fact, hold and contain these people if you were to do it, aside from the fact that given their rights, they do not have to engage in any conversation, open a door, at all. they do have rights in this country. >> want to piggyback on virtually everything erika just said. the goal here isn't thinking about the logistics or the mechanics of actual succeeding in law enforcement, the goal here is frightening people and that has been the administration's goal, frankly, from the president's first days as a presidential candidate when he was talking about mexicans being rapists and on and on and on. virtually every major policy priority of the administration has been targeted toward restricting legal immigration and driving immigrants into fear. so they started with a travel ban that largely directed at muslims on the earliest days of the administration. their biggest infrastructure priority has been building a wall that's, frankly, unneces

well there's these are 2 very different things ecliptic muhammad is in guantanamo bay facing criminal charges for his role this is a civil lawsuit so the 2 don't necessarily overlap we haven't heard what the president might want to do in this case he has shown that he has a willingness to interfere in judicial proceedings where his predecessors did not his testimony though would be controversial if he was say able to help with this lawsuit the lawyers for saudi arabia would probably be able to paint a pretty damning picture because of his treatment it's widely believed and known that he was faced severe torture at the hands of the central intelligence agency in those secret prisons right after 911 so any of his testimony could be called into question this again is just now developing so we haven't heard any official reaction from the administration but if we do we'll pass that along or about it even if the timing thanks very much they put it all in washington d.c. well this all comes as the u.s. president signed a new law giving permanent benefits to 1st responders who became ill in t

military base at guantanamo bay in cuba where he and 4 others are charged with war crimes he was subjugated to so-called subjected rather to so-called enhanced interrogations by the cia without a trial in 2008 the united states announced it will seek the death penalty against him and a year later it can best him pleaded guilty to the attacks he has not yet been convicted is fine as a former u.s. associate deputy attorney general who joins us from washington d.c. bruce thank you so much for your time how likely is it the prosecutors will take into consideration what the the victims in the lawsuit want. well i think there is a substantial likelihood that will occur the request is not irregular the united states regularly waived the death penalty in order to get extradition of suspects from the european union which has an absolute ban on the death penalty and prosecutors frequently offer such a waiver in order to obtain a guilty plea by a defendant this circumstance isn't identical but the idea of waiving the death penalty for some interest that the government believes is compelling is customa

military base at guantanamo bay in cuba where he and 4 others are charged with war crimes he was subjected to so-called enhanced interrogations by the cia without trial and 2008 the united states announced it will seek the death penalty against him a year later he confessed and pleaded guilty to those attacks he has not yet been convicted for his fine is a former u.s. associate deputy attorney general he says a deal with glee shaikh mohammed is highly possible. the request is not irregular the united states regularly waves the death penalty in order to get extradition of suspects from the european union which has an absolute ban on the death penalty and prosecutors frequently offer such a waiver in order to obtain a guilty plea by a defendant in this circumstance isn't identical but the idea of waiving the death penalty for some interest that the government believes is compelling is customary and in this case too we also have the display busy of the sentiment of congress and the american people in act one of the jessica legislation that in choosing between the victims of 911 and saudi arab

very few members of congress went down to guantanamo bay to tour the facility and when they did theyat to i.c.e. facilities but the same dynamics at play, very few people do what you do, griff go down and actually see what's happening and when they are honest about it they are shocked by the level of care and frankly compassion that most of these folks in that facility were criminals or at least charged with a criminal offense they get from our government it's a total misinformation campaign to make the president look bad. they didn't say the same thing about obama when those facilit ies existed. griff: and on that note of misinformation, tom homan, the former i.c.e. director put out an op-ed that nails a couple of here is the headline, i.c.e. detention facilities the left is working hard to keep critical information from you but here is a nugget that you really need to see and that is he says 72% of all migrants detained in an i.c.e. facility are congressionally mandated to be there, nearly 90% of them are convicted criminals, or facing pending criminal charges. pete: so we're prote

i illegal in italy, and some italian media have compared it to the treatment of detainees at guantanamo bay. police have denounced it and reassigned an officer involved. police say they confronted the two american over a stolen bag, allegedleing held ransom by the teens after a drug deal gone wrong. they say the man was stabbed 11 times. in a 911 itcall, a wss claimed the suspects fled the scene. how did they escape, asked the dispatcher, on a motor bike, on foot? on foot, on foot, says the caller. a surveillance video circulating widely intalian media and not verified by nbc news appears to shun two peopleng from the scene. elder and york were arrested nearby at their four-star hotel. police say they found a large kne hidden in a ceiling panel. a detention order identified elder as the main suspect. but during police interrogation, authorities say the teens blamed each other. elder's family have not yet seen their son. in a statement, they said what we know so far is that fin has been appointed an itaan public defender to handle his case. gloria, who lives next to the elders in san francis

blindfolding suspects is illegal and some italian media compared it to the treatment of detainees at guantanamo bay. police reassigned an officer involved elder's family haven't yet seen their son. in a statement they said what we know so far is that finn has been appointed an italian public defender to handle his case. a woman living next to them in california has known elder his whole life. >> finn's not that kind of kid i know things happen and people have tempers, but i've never seen it. >> reporter: guys, this case is already drawing comparisons to another famous one amanda knox who spent four years in an italian jail for killing her roommate before she was ultimately acquitted these suspects are accused of murder and attempted exhortation, but they've not been charged the lawyers say it could take weeks or months. sheinelle, lester? >> sarah harmon, thank you >>> time for a check of the weather. good morning to you, al roker. >> good morning, guys. thank you for getting your first national weather from us yesterday, a series of tornadoes, upwards of seven, striking through the upper midwest.

if you go to guantanamo bay, there are terrorists that are held that get better health care than thosekids who tried to cross the border into the united states. that needs to stop and the president should immediately ask doctors and nurses to go immediately down to the border and start taking care of these kids. what kind of country are we running where we have a president of the united states who is so focussed on hate and fear and division and what happened now, the end result is we have kids literally laying in their own is not with three-week-old diapers that haven't been changed. we need to tell this president that is not a sign of strength, mr. president, that is a sign of weakness. >> senator booker, a lot of people -- josÉ asked the president, what will you do with the fact that you will have families here. there has been a lot of talk about what you'll do in the first 100 days about legislation. what will you actually do with these families? how will you care for them and will they be detained or will they not be? >> this is a related and brief point. what we're talking about,

come in retired colonel, morris davis, former chief prosecutor at guantanamo bay.u okay with this? he helps the victims if we don't kill him? >> he seems to have had a change of heart. when i was the chief prosecutor about a dozen years ago his object testify was to be a martyr but apparently over the last dozen years he has decided he would rather live. so he is trying to leverage this to his advantage. stuart: as a prosecutor, are you okay with doing a deal like that? >> well prosecutors do deals all the time. i just find it hard to believe we would do a deal for someone like khalid sheikh mohammed who responsible for 3,000 deaths that we would take that off the table in a case like this, when it is such an extreme case. stuart: why has his trial not, i don't think his trial is over, why not? it is what, 18 years after the attack? >> yeah, it is really a shame that, particularly for the family members of the 9/11 victims that they have been denied justice for this long. september 2006 is when the high value detainees were transferred to gitmo, including khalid sh

- immigration, i worked a lot of tough issues in public office, pentagon, dhs, drone strikes, guantanamo baynswers to these problems. steve: you know, with this particular divided government we have right now, the democrats do not want to give donald trump even a little bit of a win? >> and the principle reason for that is president trump's own rhetoric. i believe. every time i think there might be an opportunity for getting something done, he frankly pours gasoline over the whole relationship, that they don't want to work with him because simply because of his rhetoric. brian: i think to a degree you're correct but i also think to a degree you're looking past democrats. i was on the border with congressman cuellar. he wants to work with the president, they're trying to primary him as a democrat. they are trying to marginalize him. he can't even get a meeting with his own leadership because he wants to do a deal. >> brian, i come back to this again, people in the trump administration are undermined by the president's open tweets. you had mark morgan on tv other day we need legislative fixes

which the court, by a vote of 6-3, rejected the bush administration's view that prisoners at guantanamo bay could be held beyond the reach of the law with no access to federal courts. and in 1984, in the landmark chevron case, justice stevens wrote an opinion for a unanimous consent supreme court about the deference owed to agencies for legal statutes, crafting framework that have been cited in 11,000 subsequent opinions. he was also brilliant in dissent. in his lengthy dissent in citizens united in 2010, justice stevens rejected the dangerous notion that corporation have essentially the same first amendment rights as individuals and should be allowed to spend potentially unlimited amounts of money on campaigns. president eisenhower famously said that he made only two mistakes as president, quote, and they are both sitting on the supreme court, end of quote. president ford felt just the opposite about his choice in justice stevens. in 2005, a year before his death, president ford wrote of justice stevens, and i quote, i'm prepared to allow history's judgment of my term in office to rest, if

moreover, this administration -- this administration is considering detaining migrants in guantanamo bay. this amendment would prevent children from being shipped an detained there. the mill tear should not be dragged into this detention crisis that this administration has created. mission readiness should always be the top priority for armed services. madam chair, i want to thank representative garr see ya of illinois, vargas of illinois, alexandria ocasio cortez of new ilana presslow and i encourage my colleagues to support this amendment, 15 words that protect ours children and helps put them in the arms of their families. er reserve the rest of my time. the chair: the gentlewoman reserves. for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> madam chair, i rise to claim time in on stoigs this amendment and yield myself such time as my consume. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you. liberals and progressives have launched a concerted attack on our defense authorization. they've attached a string of partisan plcy riders ke sined to gut d

or from guantanamo bay to the united states. democrats had also pushed for a vote on an amendment to limit president trump's ability to take military action against iran without congressional intervention. not in the that is bill however that is expected to be a major issue of debate on the house floor this coming week. it could be an issue in the conference committee if it is adopted. >> how do you see the house and senate coming to agreement? republicans want much more funding. >> in the house, it looks to be a very narrow road to passage. onublicans are not keen supporting this bill. they have a lot of issues with it. in committee last month, all but two republicans opposed this bill. it does not appear that there will be many changes to the bill that will bring them on board. ore increasing the budget changing provisions related to the border, guantanamo and nuclear weapons. to adam smith about this. he cannot count on -- while he is working with republicans, he cannot count on a lot of support from them. --looks like republ

, from guantanamo bay to the united states, i'm sorry. democrats had also pushed for a vote on an amendment to limit president trump's ability to take military action against iran without congressional authorization. they eventually got that vote. it failed, so that is not in the bill. however, that is expected to be a major issue of debate on the house floor this coming week and could be an issue in the conference committee if it is, in fact, adopted. host: how do you eventually see the house and senate coming to some kind of agreement, especially when you already have division among the democrats in the house and also republicans who want much more funding? connor: in the house, it looks to be a narrow road to passage. republicans do not seem keen on supporting this bill. they have a lot of issues with it. in committee last month, all but two republicans opposed this bill. it doesn't appear there are going to be many changes to the bill that are going to bring them on board, like increasing the budget or changing provisions related to t

guantanamo bay, the house bill would start to phase out at guantanamo bay instead of keeping an operation prayed the president wants to build a new facility dollars. >> the president treaty, the white house in an unusually long ten page statement of administration policy is to veto the defense authorization. as we wrap up, how did they work this out? ten pages of objection. how does that get worked out? >> i think the key for most everything in congress that are on their way. where do they come out there. the congress and the president have been able to come up with several deals since the 2011 to raise every year. they should be able to do to get but it's going to be a high wire act getting there. they will have to deal with an appropriate there is a lot of revisions that the white house doesn't like that which ones they would actually be no, they do not say. i think the find a solution but it will be were difficult than usual because you have different party controlling the two chambers which is not been the case. >> you can follow the house as it considers amendments to the fence autho