the dark and register, they send their extended families home and work here and go home to mexico or guatemala or wherever else once a year in an orderly fashion. by the way, this is what my farmers in california have been begging for for years. they wanted organized guest worker program so they could have workers for the time they need, pay them above the table fairly. there's no question there are jobs available and workers available, mostly from mexico, that can be paired up. republicans support that pairing but they wanted done under the law. there's no questions that the democrats want another wave of new democratic voters. this has been part of their plan. law-enforcement says they want to work on something else -- they deserve a program but they did not deserve an out on enforcing existing laws. >> if i could get into the politics of this, proposition 187 which you did not vote for -- correct? the city did not vote for it in california. it drove hispanics away from the republican party. hispanics that were driven away from the republican party in 2000 when barack obama was on the ticket

california were then and are now, including many legal citizens, latino citizens, whether from guatemala or mexico or other places, they are frustrated, too. they seeing their ability to move up and achieve the american dream stifled by an endless amount of people willing to work under the table for less without any control. everybody needs a system of laws. republicans are perfectly willing to have a guest worker program, but it has to be under the law and cannot include automatic amnesty. we have half a million people who are being reunited, mostly mexican and south americans, with people who are already here every year. we have half a million new emigrants that fit the category that people are talking about in granting amnesty for. it is pretty easy to say, are we going to make that 1 million or 400,000? we can have that debate about how many people we allowed to immigrate, but it should not be clogged with people who want a job temporarily. i think that is a very good point. you did not talk about the racial profiling that is so often asked about. i want to share something with you. in my dist

mexico and the united states to sue the state of arizona. they are nicaragua, peru, paraguay and guatemala. not exactly all champions of human or civil rights. they say illegals in arizona might mistreated. but here's the real kicker, our old state department has sided with these other nations against the american people. it has filed a declaration in the lawsuit saying the arizona law is causing an international incident and hurting foreign policy. now it's nine chris versus arizona. the nerve of our government to side with foreign powers and sue the american people, foreign countries have no business meddling in and dictating american national security. our government is on the wrong side. it should support and defend the constitution and the people of arizona. it should be not be siding with nations that have illeagues in our country. it's nine countries versus arizona. i cast my lot with the people of arizona. and that's just the way it is. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey rise? >> address the house for win minute. the speaker pro