roger stone made a tweet directly to guccifer 2.0. there are now allegations that roger stone colluded with guccifer 2.0 in the release of emails. host: we go to ohio, republican mine. guest: hello. caller: hello. i have a question. i want to know why "the washington examiner" is not investigating the dnc. guest: what about the dnc in particular? caller: the hacking. the one girl, i forget her name, but she was dealing with the ukrainians. they were dealing with the ukrainians, and stuff like that, why aren't you investigating the democrats? host: do you know anything about that? guest: i cannot speak to that woman you mentioned. i can tell you that for all media companies, and have worked in radio, nonprofit journalism, ,nd now i work for the examiner resources are very thin. i don't mean that as a criticism. it is just the media reality. not everything can be investigated. some of these things that i know the public is clamoring for investigations on, it would honestly take the resources of two or three people doing investigating fo

and with all of those connections going back and forth between the campaign and wikileaks and guccifer, obviously areas of intense investigation by our committee. >> as you point out, congressman, julian assange personally confirmed the report. he says he rejected the offer, though, from cambridge analytica. what does that tell you? >> well, you know, again, assange is not someone you can trust, so, you know, it may or may not be significant. he confirms the contact. we may or may not be able to believe what else he has to say on this score, but it certainly does show a willingness now of at least a third party to reach out to those that are in possession of thee stolen e-mails, those that are directly affiliated with russian intelligence or working indirectly with russian intelligence, and that shows certainly a willingness by multiple parties in the campaign similar to the trump tower meeting where they expressed a willingness in receiving dirt about hillary clinton. so on the trump campaign side, lots of overtures to the russians and russian intermediaries as well as wikileaks. and

roger stone made a tweet directly to guccifer 2.0.here are now allegations that roger stone colluded with guccifer 2.0 in the release of emails. host: we go to ohio, republican mine. guest: hello. caller: hello. i have a question. i want to know why "the washington examiner" is not investigating the dnc. guest: what about the dnc in particular? caller: the hacking. the one girl, i forget her name, but she was dealing with the ukrainians. they were dealing with the ukrainians, and stuff like that, why aren't you investigating the democrats? host: do you know anything about that? guest: i cannot speak to that woman you mentioned. i can tell you that for all media companies, and have worked in radio, nonprofit journalism, ,nd now i work for the examiner resources are very thin. i don't mean that as a criticism. it is just the media reality. not everything can be investigated. some of these things that i know the public is clamoring for investigations on, it would honestly take the resources of two or three people doing investigating for

and that my exchange with someone claiming to be guccifer 2.0 when viewed through the context, kept and benign and innocuous. >> roger stone is just one of the major former trump campaign associates under the prussia probe and this week he testified before the house intelligence committee in a closed hearing and denied any direct contact with wikileaks or with russian operatives during the 2016 laefrk election despite his tweets including this one foreshadowing the dump of e-mails. joining us is now a former prosecutor. thank you very much for being here. i want to take you back to october of 2016 when roger stone tweeted hillary clinton is done, wikileaks. and then on october 3, he two s tweeted i have total confidence that julian assange will educate the american people soon. and four days later, wikileaks released their first batch of e-mails that were hacked from john podesta, they did that right after the access hollywood tape happened and roger stone said he had been this contact with assange through an intermediary. does it square with his claim in the closed door testimony that