complementing the work of the other to a publishing reports on north korea, the most famous being "hidden gulag" looking at the prison camp system in north korea. but all three of these organizations combined roughly have a budget, combined, of not much more than a million dollars. so, again, really small underfunded organizations that are struggling to try and advance human rights. so again, you have a commitment of at least a verbal commitment at the government level, but not much action. and then you have ngos both in south korea and the united states struggling to advance human rights with very limited budgets with very small steps. i think we can see there is common values, a common approach being taken in north korea, but to date there has been a failure to coordinate activities. this raises, then, the question of what is the most effective vehicle for advancing human rights in a coordinated manner between seoul and washington. one logical vehicle is the united nations. after all, the u.n. has been passing resolutions every year in recent years condemning human rights in north korea. the