haden -- haden president bush and 18 president obama?ush and hating president obama? hate is hate. i want to say what i like about president obama, and if you do not like it, tough. greta: nancy pelosi and steny hoyer saying it is un-american to participate in some of these town halls, and i guess they need to be boisterous. i am sure you are able to say something about this. >bill: i am overly a boisterous. -- overly boisterous. at this juncture, i think this is ridiculous. the president has not been able to explain it. i do not know what is going to happen. i do not think the president knows what is going to happen. it could very well bank of the united states, causing our dollar -- it could very well bankrupt the united states. look. nancy pelosi is a right ideologue. that is to the woman is. she is a far left person -- she is a rank ideologue. she does not care about opposing points of view. all she wants to do is impose her far left values from california on the country. obviously, people do not want that, and they are going to obje

and that it was handled appropriately and other directors of the cia, including people like mike haden, who was leon panetta's immediate predecessor, has talked about it and said it's all a very shaky proposition that was well-handled, that he was not directed not to deal with the congress on this issue, that it's just not true. >> the cia released two other documents this week. khalid shaikh mohammed, preeminent source in al qaeda. while they say that the overall program got absolutely crucial information, they do not conclude whether the enhanced interrogation programs worked. they just are kind of agnostic on the program and then there's what president obama calls the core issue. >> could we have gotten to the same end without resorting to these techniques? and it doesn't answer the broader question, are we safer as a consequence of having used these techniques? >> well, these two reports are versions of the ones i asked for previously. there's actually one, the detainee report pivotal for the war against al qaeda, there's one that's more detailed that has not been released. the int

to get them from our adviser network, haden joins us, good to have you with us, verne. >> thank you.od to be with you. >> health care, obviously people get very nervous right now. there could be big changes and that could change how much money, for example, drug companies make or health insurance companies make. you do think this is the right time for two reasons. what's reason one? >> first reason is because there's a lot of concern as evidenced by the town hall meetings and so forth about the extremism of pelosi and company's proposals. to they're combating that. what will happen that, along with 17 testimonies who are somewhat moderate, they'll fashion a more moderate bill. it won't come out as extreme as it appears to be right now because of a lot of the protests, lobbying and so forth right now going on. there's serious moderates working over there in the corner trying to fashion a great bill. when that passes, and i think that's the kind that will pass, then the bull market will be relieved. i think it will help boost the market up the other is the baby boomer phenomena, where,

the former cia director michael haden, in his words, he said it would be destructive for it to happen. and also, where are you in determining about the investigation? >> we do have a deadline on monday, and we are working with our colleagues in the cia to release only those things that we think will be consistent with our national security interests, and yet responsive to what our responsibilities are as a result of that lawsuit, so we will not be doing anything that will endanger the american people or in some ways less and our national security. with regard to any ongoing decisions, we will speak to that when a decision is made. >> a question about lockerbie. what are your concerns that this decision by the scottish executive, what is your concern about the message this is sending to people that might consider doing this? that you can spend eight or nine years in jail and go back to libya? >> i suppose our counterparts in scotland would say that there are extenuating circumstances. perhaps a message should not be drawn from that. we expressed the concerns that we had that given the