>> many of the men in the documentary don't agree with hadley west's methods. >> do you say things tostreet or do you just look at our bodies? >> or her premise. >> you're trying to judge all men. >> i'm not judging all men. >> oh, yes, you are. >> i'm a balls to the wall kind of chick. i have an agenda. [ whistle ] >> do you always whistle at women on the street? >> only the good ones. >> so it was her ass you were checking out initially. >> yeah. >> why do you think they keep walking? >> because they don't want to hear that. >> why do you think they don't want to hear it? >> because they get constantly barraged with it. >> just being female and walking down the streets, being cat called, humiliated, degraded, that was intolerable to me. [ kissing sound ] >> who did that? did you do that? [ laughter ] >> do you always do that? >> oh, i do it all the time. >> so what are you trying to tell me when you make noises like that towards me? >> that i'm checking you out. >> i wore the same outfit in every city. i had a camera woman and a camera man following me usually across the street. i w

david: i want to get hadley in quickly to talk about chris christie.dy thought he would take advantage of terrorism issue as concern for americans. has he? >> for whatever reason chris christie part of the problem for him and several other credible candidates the field is too crowded. bottom line, 2015 is year of political outsider. you're right when it comes to foreign policy issues we will see a shift from people on the inside. takes that credibility and knowledge of inside how the system works to speak about those issues. david: fair and balanced, julie at last word. does it help hillary or hurter connection to the past for this. >> for hillary, obviously fact she was secretary of state from obama administration but says she can speak to the issues, been in briefings, and making decisions in ways nobody else can. chris christie, when you shut down major interstate bridge on 9/11 -- david: he didn't shut it down. commission proved that. >> a bunch of people in his administration -- david: love to open can of worms about to go to break. >> so much for

david: staying with you, hadley, i'm thinking perhaps candidates may want to rethink their attack on donald's refugee policy because of the fact he did so well with it? do you think they may pull back a little from their criticism? >> well, candidates will have to stick to whatever policy platforms they believe are best and explain to the american people why they would take a different position than mr. trump. if they agree with mr. trump, that's one thing. if they are talking about the issues they have to stand what they believe rather than changing going with flow of the tide. reflecting what is in public opinion polls is not a matter of principle. david: but that is what they're going for is votes. tony, criticized by a number of long-time supporters. rush limbaugh came out yesterday and suggested he went too far in his attacks against ted cruz. let's play the tape and get your reaction. >> genuine conservative even in the republican field would not go after cruz this way. so that is, i just raises a red flag for me. made me somewhat curious. david: did it raise a red flag for you

my question is hadley been able to link up with johnston in north carolina, could the war have been turned in the south's favor? guest: no. host: why not? guest: the south was fought out. the south had done more with longer and less than any army in history. they had worn out. able torally been escape my forces, he could not have lasted any longer than days. his men were starved, out of ammunition, barefoot, many of defeated in were everything except spirit. had generally been able to break loose from my forces, it would not have prolonged the war and certainly would not have changed the outcome of the war. host: generally? guest: i had a duty to try. i had a duty to my government and my men, but in retrospect, general grant is absolutely right. by the time i would reach general johnson, there's no telling how many men i would have had left. men every mile because they were exhausted and starving. they could not go any further. if i had managed to escape general grant here, i'm convinced he would have caught up with me before i made it into the valley. host: how many days in advance to beg

cnbc's hadley gamble reports from dubai. hadley? the fallout of donald trump's comments continued here in dubai over the weekend with one saudi prince calling him a disgrace to america and businesses here looking to cut ties with his billion-dollar brand. >> donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states. >> reporter: just days after his controversial remarks were criticized by rival candidates, there are now questions over just how much they'll hurt his bottom line. >> how's my hair look in. >> reporter: after years of hawking everything from luxury real estate to his own children, some of his international part nerls are now seeing red. dub dubai's landmark group said they're removing all trump products and another property seems uncertain about whether all the hype will help or hurt their sales. now, this is the project that's marketed as the beverly hills of dubai complete with a trump golf course. as of late last week, the local developer removed all trace of trump logo. >> i

hadley gamble reports from dubai. >> reporter: serious implications for middle east economies, none morean in the uae. this currency is pegged to the dollar. the central bank is limited when it comes to formulating an independent monetary policy. local banks have said they're going to be raising interest rates in anticipation of the fed's decision. i got the chance to catch up with the vice chairman for more. >> the fed decision now doesn't have really an impact on abu dhabi but it does have an impact on markets and i think the fed has done a good job in preserving the stock market, the motivation and the confidence. that they raise the rates today, next week, three months or a year. it's not an issue. america is doing much better and america is leading and allowing other financial centers not to collapse and consolidate itself. so on the interest rate, it's not really a concern if you talk about long term. volatility is perfect, you like that, up and down for a broker rage house like ours, it's profit annual. >> reporter: it will slow from 4% in 2014 to 3% in 2015. it kept gcc countries

hadley barrett do that? these --k some of black lives matter or other campaigns, i'm even thinking recently about the backlash to snl for having donald trump on. people are pointing out that he said a lot of different things that probably offend a lot of different communities, but in particular the fact that snl who is been around for 40 something years, has managed to have two or three latino cast members ever. nobody else is funny, i guess? is a consciousness raising of saying, you will have donald trump on, he said all of this stuff, demonstrably not true. this is an organization and a show that has been on for decades that is barely managed to diversify beyond black and white people. to me, that is a way to sort of cut across. even if you left donald trump, i think that backspace question about why snl has failed to find anyone other than white or african-american people to be on their show, is something that i think you would often think, will that is actually a pretty good question. this a country wher

hadley confirmed that burns reserved on the question. >> it took great pains to say, we're not saying you could do that in every case. burns seems to be the only -- the only case that you have and burns involved this really peculiar situation of hawaii with a tremendous military temporary population. >> i read burns as reserving on it completely, to not choose one way or the other. it certainly did say that you do not have to use the census to draw districts. this supports our position. it certainly says you can protect eligible voters. that supports our position. and further, back to your honor's question about tradition. if tradition were the rule baker would have come out the other way. before baker for centuries geography was the basis. the court said in baker, as a matter of jurisdiction and in reynolds as a matter of equal protection law that tradition doesn't trump the individual rights of a voter to be protected. and we don't have to guess about that because we know from standing. in all of those cases standing was predicated on the right of the voter. it would be unusual if s

we walked through north hampton, then hadley and apple hearst where we stopped at the -- amhurst where we stopped at the survival center. since 1976 they welcomed everyone who's come through their doors with open arms and a kind word. they helped those who are struggling to meet their basic needs. all of their services are free. they run a food pantry, community meal program, drop-in health clinic, jobs fairs and a host of other important programs. after our brief visit, it was back to the pavement through sundayer lynn and deerfield before finally ending in greenfield. we walked a total of 26 miles on day two and along the way we felt incredible support of the western massachusetts community. people stopped us along the way to add canned food and other donations from their shopping cart. they came out of their homes, businesses, schools, or they stopped their cars along the road to offer words of encouragement and along the way we raised more than $150,000 for the food bank of western massachusetts who dwribts undreds of pounds of food. we were sore and tired but exhilarated by people

caller: i think bush hadley 42,000 on the no-fly list, and president obama has 730,000 on the no-fly list. the nra has been all for the gun checks -- you know, they have to check to make sure you can buy weapon. as far as putting a gps on their , and people will, like obama, got complete control the united states, they could run you down, no matter where you are, and take your weapons. fernand, texas, gun owner. caller: the question i would like to pose is i think the loss control,as far as gun i think they just need to be enforced. process, ihe vetting just think it needs to be a little more stringent. as they come into our country, not allowing them for a certain amount of years to obtain a weapon. it is not just them being able to buy one once they get in the country. that is not the reason they are coming here. they can go on the street and acquire a weapon. there was a little more stringent and lengthy time frame , i think if they were to filing within that time, we would be able to exclude them from being able to obtain a weapon. we have not heard any proposals like that on the