why, i don't know. >> hagerman isn't the only bus aide who wanted to testify on nancy's behalf.sue coates had also been her aide during the months that the kids claim the abuse was taking place. >> i begged bradley every day, put me on the stand, please. i was her aide. i know how she behaved. >> then there was eddie soto, another coworker of nancy's. he wanted the jury to hear about the night that margie grondin told him a secret. >> margie did come to my house, knock on my door. she did told me in the beginning of the investigation that the little girl was saying, no, that didn't happen. i said, margie if this is -- this is serious. she's changing the story. you need to -- you need to speak up. >> the prosecutor, however, objected, and the judge threw that testimony out. >> they said, no, this is hearsay stuff. we don't want to hear this. as a matter of fact, i think i was, i got kicked out of that bench so fast that it -- i -- it wasn't, it wasn't right. >> so much monday morning quarterbacking, regret, and recrimination, and yet as it turned out, perhaps the most potent piec

joininging us now todd hagerman. so how did dimon do what do you think? >> i think he did pretty well, frankly. very relaxed. it was very typical jamie dimon. very are tick nut his answers, didn't seem to get ruffled by any of the questions, and clearly laid out for the committee today, you know, what happened, how they are trying to remedy the situation. and again how they are trying to move forward without this ever happening again. >> susie: you know that everybody was expecting for this to be a tough grilling, a faceoff between lawmakers, and it didn't turn out that way. do you think that's one of the reasons why j.p. morgan's stock was up today? >> yes, absolutely. that's part of it. clearly the way the hearing went and very cordial, a lot of respect towards mr. dimon himself, is certainly gave a little life to the stock today. but i think there was another element as well in terms of the broker dealer space today, and i think that is the fact that within the testimony today in the line of questioning congress really didn't imply that there would be

todd hagerman. >> i want to hear from a jpmorgan shareholder as well.ichael scanlin owns about 350,000 shares of jpmorgan. good to have you with us. >> thanks for having me. >> even though the optics of all this might seem challenging, we should mention the stock is up. i'm wondering if you think this is an opportunity to buy more or if it's sufficiently hitting with the stock, that is? what's your view? >> from a valuation metric, i mean, clearly the stock has been hit well and above over the $2 billion loss initially announced. it's probably gotten a little worse. there is probably a multiple point discould want you've got to put on the stock now from a credibility standpoint. when you look at the stock over the next 12 months plus, if the u.s. continues to muddle along the stock should work. everybody had a chance to panic the day that the news hit and shareholders certainly panicked. we have seen the stock hit. but if you can sort of put that in more of a time arbitrage opportunity going forward, this company is going to generate strong returns. >>

. >> let's bring in tom hagerman, a financial services analyst. he has a mutual rating on j.p. what are you watching now, todd, as you see dimon up there? as an analyst, what are you most sensitive to? >> i think today with the most sensitive topic is really what i expect to see the difference between the hearing today relative to last week with the senate. clearly as i watched a little testimony this morning, with respect to the various regulatory agencies, i think that just serves as a precursor today that the testimony, the q&a, is going to be a lot more challenging today and much more probing than what we saw last week from the senate. >> we should point out we're not bringing you exactly what jamie dimon is saying at the moment because we already got it and know it is almost identical as was delivered last week. what is the achilles heel here in your view, todd? >> i think the achilles heel is really as we heard a little bit this morning from the committee, there is a lot more focus on the spirit of dodd-frank, what its intended to address, and how it is actually being app