even hal rogers. he said it would be absurd to try to meet the country's needs at sequestration levels. theseis no appetite for cuts that would emerge if we could not do it statutorily. if we get a one-year deal that is appropriate and suitable, absolutely. >> i am going to ask about an issue emboldening a lot of members of your caucus. impeachment. you have said you think this is inevitable. think over the next several months could galvanize the rest of your caucus to that position? do you think that needs to happen this year or is there a chance they would be willing to do this in 2020 even though it is an election year? ask i think it would be unfortunate if we had to wait until next year. started impeachment process in the election year. it could happen that way. our leadership might decide the only way to get public sentiment is to wait a little while. what other evidence emerges from these investigations. i cosponsored a resolution last time. i am convinced the president has committed multiple i

even hal rogers said it would be absurd to try to meet the country's needs at sequestration levels. there is no appetite for these are coney and -- drug coney and -- draconian cuts that would emerge if we could not do it statutorily. if we get a one-year deal that is appropriate and suitable, absolutely. >> i am going to ask about an issue emboldening a lot of members of your caucus. that is the issue of impeachment. you have said in the past you think this is inevitable. it is something that democrats are going to have to begin, starting to forcibly remove the president. what do you think over the next several months could galvanize the rest of your caucus to that position? and do you think that needs to happen this year or is there a chance the caucus would be willing to do this in 2020 even though it is an election year? >> i think it would be unfortunate if we had to wait until next year. wait until next year to start the impeachment process in the election year. i think that would be unfortunate. it could happen that way. ultimately, our leadership might decide the only way to

and also like to thank my colleagues, adam smith, hahl rogers and jeff forten ber -- hal rogers and jeff fortenberry for their support on this issue. it's paramount we get this policy you right, to show america's commitment and continued leadership in foreign -- strong foreign policy that benefits all. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman yields. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. mrs. lowey: i yield back -- ms. granger: i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentlewoman from texas yields. the gentlewoman from new york. mrs. lowey: mr. chairman, i yield back -- i yield myself the balance of the time. before i close, i want to thank the staff for their tireless work, particularly steve, craig higgins, aaron, dean, jason, and marin, phil, liz, wendy. and all those who i didn't include, i thank all the other staff that have been so really remarkable in this very important work. th this bill, we have forged division that stands in stark bleak budget of the administration. this will strengthen communities, improve lives, help repair our standing in the world, and i ur

hal rogers of kentucky, 1981. steny hoyer, democrat from maryland, 1981.ard calling in from massachusetts. supports term limits. go ahead. caller: just a comment. twain summed it up properly when he said politicians in diapers should be changed frequently and for the same reason. thank you. we'll get to patrick from south dakota. go ahead. caller: i just had a question for both guests. you seem to offer term limits as this silver bullet for the disconnect americans feel for their congress. why is it specifically term limits that can resolve this problem? and to casey, you mentioned if we do have term limits, new congresspeople and senators will defer to outside interests. special interests are are already a problem in the status quo problem. why do term limits make this worse? order ofwill start in the questions asked. guest: we're not saying it is a silver bullet, but it is a huge part of the reform needed to fix this broken system. one reason we are so enthusiastic about term limits is it has worked very well at the state level. there are 15 state legisl

in the decade since, thanks in no small part to former appropriations committee chairman hal rogers, and former speaker ryan, 10, 20, 30 accounts have made thousands of investments in persistent poverty counties totaling billions of dollars. one of those investments was in brownsfield cleanup at the at the for the urban, kentucky, which is in escrow. -- in estell. estell county, kentucky, in the sixth congressional district of kentucky. represented by mr. barr. community groups have long sought to restore this theater, which chosed in 1993, but previously were unable to address the community. thanks to 10-20-30, the river city players and community at the -- a community theater group, is working to reopen the venue which has the po ten lrble -- potential to contribute to the revitalization of the entire area. in addition to the expansion of the 10-20-30 formula in the bill i appreciate the language in the committee report which is express support for new targeted census for high poverty tracks that may be not be persistent poverty counties but often just as much in need. i look forwa