joy halverson, a california veterinarian, specializes in animal dna. >> it will not be as unique a profiles i might get from blood or saliva or hair with a root, but it will still allow me to say, yes, this sample matches the reference dog or it doesn't match the reference dog. >> halverson performed a pcr test, which stands for polymerase chain reaction. >> it's basically like taking one page out of a book and ignoring the rest of the book and xeroxing that page a million times. and now you have that page in so much quantity that you can see it. >> then the sample was sequenced to get a visual representation of the dna type. when she compared the dna from the hair in the ammunition box to a sample of keisha's hair, she found a haplotype in both sets that was extremely rare, occurring only in 1 in 300 dogs. >> the chance of having that match just by random was pretty low. combined with i'm sure the circumstances of the case, if i were sitting on the jury, i would find that to be a compelling piece of evidence in the case. >> this was forensic proof that rich was in possession of an item st