and destroy hama. you know, victoria, apparently these bodies were recovered under a tunnel in rafah, you know, after these six were recovered, these bodies, there's apparently about 101 other hostages. i mean, what are the chances that they're alive? i mean, we have to remain hopeful, and there should be somewhere between five and now seven americans that are amongst them. and that's why this matters to us here at home. i mean, it matters to us because israel is a great and good ally. but also these are american citizens and so, you know, we have to be be hugely vigilant about this. and wonder if there was something else we could have done over the summer to save. hirsh. i mean, this was such a public case. his parents spoke at the dnc, and it just it's mind boggling to me that that we would have let this go so far that hamas would have been willing to, to let that particularly precious hostage what should have been a precious, precious hostage to them die. and you know, when you talk about the hostag

the united states strongly condemns hamas' brutality. it is long, long past time this council do the same. make no mistake -- we can condemn hamas for what they are, and still have empathy for the suffering palestinians in gaza, men, women, and children who are also experiencing agony. while sinwar hides in tunnels underneath the ground and his henchmen murder hostages, palestinians --palestinian civilians are living in a hell on earth. their lives continue to be put at risk by his cowardice and intransigence. as president biden has made clear, hamas' leadership will pay for their crimes. they must be held accountable. they cannot control gaza. at the same time, we know that the best way to rescue the remaining hostages and alleviate the suffering of palestinian civilians is through a negotiated ceasefire deal, one that will release the hostages and create conditions to enable a surge in lifesaving aid in gaza. colleagues, we cannot lose patience with diplomacy. diplomacy is not a matter of snapping our fingers and -- voila. it takes har

keep fighting hamas? caller: i think that hamas is a threat to israel.y do not recognize israel as do other n.g.o.'s and other nations, and they call for the demise or elimination of israel. you can't negotiate with people who sit across the table and don't recognize you. so, yes, i think israel has a right to defend itself. hamas pulled the trigger to start this. and sadly hamas needs to be eliminated. thank you for your time. i will let other people get on. host: president biden was asked if he thought prime minister netanyahu's doing enough to secure a hostage release deal. and the white house press secretary was asked about that at the press briefing. here she is. >> what more could prime minister netanyahu be doing to get a deal done? >> i don't have anything to add or any color or anything more specific to add to what the president said yesterday. he was asked a direct question. he answered it. don't have anything else to add. we are going to continue to do, continue to have conversations on next steps with our co-immediate maters as i mentioned mo

"the hamas is still going strong, i mean, and the objective wasn't to suffocate hamas, it was to destroyin uh the occupied palestine, because the israelis, the settlers are feeling more tension than ever, they're feeling that their army and their state is incapable of reaching objectives, incapable of putting a strategy together, incapable of giving promises and keeping these promises, i mean, and that will create a feeling of insecurity within occupied palestine, and i hope it will push the settlers to leave this land that doesn't belong to them, well with that we are going to see how the... finus activists on social uh on israeli social media actually described netanyahu as liar working to reject the deal and get rid of the captives. sagev: there is no corridor more important than the lives of the people whom israel abandon in gaza. princess, tunnels have existed in the philadelphia corridor for 30 years. you have. how does netanyahu find every possible way to lie to us, deceive us and mislead us? ahmad, netanyahu is the greatest liar, he has taken israel back to the 1948 lines with be

why would they sue hamas?i think that you know they they didn't leave any choice for the people in gaza, any people who would be under these conditions would actually join a resistance movement to protect themselves, when you see all these children being killed, slaughtered, all this destruction and it's ongoing war that is pointless, so people will join. the resistance and that is, you know, big backfire. i mean, people are more committed, not only in ghazza, but in many places around the world too. well, with that, let's go ahead and move on. the occupation army not only suffers in gaza, but has also fallen into the fear of the west bank camps, whose armed brigades resist fiercely and remind the occupation of the second intifalda more than 20 years ago. 20 שנה כרגע המבצע מתרכז בג'נין ובטולקרם, כי יש שם התגברות של הטרור, אנחנו מדברים על שלושה רכבי תופת בתוך ארבעה ימים, ובמערכת הביטחון מעריכים שאנחנו נראה את זה יותר, יותר מחבלים מתאבדים, יותר רכבי טופת, יותר מטענים, ולפי כך המבצע צפוי להימשך, במיוחד לפני תקופת

hamas dug, dig many, many tunnels there.smuggle their weapons from egypt, they hide, sadly, our hostages in those tunnels so we had to go into rafah. all the, you know, prophesies about what would happen if we enter rafah were a mistake. we saw that there were no civilian casualties in rafah. the terrorists continued to hide there. so, again, it was a mistake to apply pressure on israel, and from now on after we've with seen how they executed our civilians including an american hostage, we should all be united in supporting israel to chase and hunt down theseville terrorists, cruel terrorists. pete: yeah. i said it from day one, i hope israel kills every last member of hamas and in doing so gets every hostage back. >> each and and every one of them, and we should remember a ceasefire is a word that sounds positive, but a ceasefire means that that hamas can survive and get a free pass after what they have done, and that will be a terrible mistake. a ceasefire only if we should, if we maintain the possibility to to eradicate h

hamas is wrong. at the time when i said there was a quarrel about the refusal, i said that we will all stand and come and serve immediately on the day we need to in everyone's saw where we will and i said we would all come and i said we would all come and serve and they also think it is an illusion that we will, because of that, when we are in a situation where this is an existential situation, you would think that we would just give up because people are, sort of, casting aspersions? no, i would sort of, casting aspersions? no, iwould not sort of, casting aspersions? no, i would not give into this pressure and our people will not give in to the pressure because most of our people understand it and it does not matter what you see on the screens. i am telling him, forget it. it will not happen. we need it's incumbent upon us to stand united and we have to act together so that the other side will understand that it is to understand that we will not give in to the things that are essential and crucial.

or the israelis hamas always say no. >> former secretary of state mike pompeo after hamas savagely murderedostages. demanding israel cave to hamas demand. this is a dangerous reward for terrorism. what a message to our 23478s. >> the united states under president biden has virtually no leverage ons israelis right now. is he a lame duck president. >> there are also cracks in president biden's years' long effort to make vladimir putin pariah. red carpet welcome ceremony in mongolia despite international criminal warrant for arrest. the party to the icc. >> looking forward to support mongolia. we think it's important that they uphold their international obligation. >> president biden ignored questions today. [shouting questions] >> mr. president, what more should netanyahu be doing, sir? >> peter: officials insist he isn't trying to have it both ways. >> why is he harder on benjamin than he is on the terrorist leader of hamas? >> the president has been very, very clear about hammonds leaders and what they have done. hamas is responsible. they have more american blood on their hands. the presid

if you want to destroy hamas abilities, you cannot let hamas rearm. you cannot -- it is not only to prevent them from terrorizing us, attacking us. . it is to prevent,'s or any other terrorist organization from terrorizing the people of gaza. gaza cannot have a future if gaza remains porous and you can enable rearmament of terrorists through the philadelphi corridor . the second thing is to release the hostages. you cannot prevent if you leave this corridor, you cannot prevent hamas from only smuggling weapons in, you cannot prevent them from not smuggling terrorists out. it is walking distance. they can easily smuggle hostages out here through the sinai desert in egypt. it is -- the distance is meters away. they cross. they don't even have to go underground. they disappear. they end up in iran or in yemen. they are gone forever. you need something to squeeze them. to prevent them. to put pressure on them to release their many hostages. if you want to release the hostages, you have got to control the philadelphi corridor . the third goal of ensuring w

if the idf is about to discover hamas fighters or where the hostages are located, that hamas is to kill them. and benjamin netanyahu whom the organizing premise of his world is to contain himself in power. to do that, he needs 64 seats, which he has, including the acquiescence and support of two extremist ministers, that basically saying they are going to bolt the government if he makes any deal. the idf senior leadership got into a screaming match with the prime minister at a cabinet meeting last week and said you have a choice, reading the hostages or stay in the philadelphi corridor . the administration is in a strategic cul-de-sac. we saw the president and a statement, he said we need a cease-fire now. kamala harris, i know she didn't intend this. she issued a tough condemnation of hamas but she also, essentially, validated the prime minister's own narrative by saying that hamas cannot govern gaza, which trips into the issue of his conception, false and impossible conception of total victory. i think the of menstruation, frankly, 70 days before one of the most consequential election

but what about hamas?n't their leaders who are accused of war crimes being taken to the icj? genocide is defined as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. the convention outlines five punishable acts, one of which is the direct and public incitement or call to action to commit genocide. this crime is also illegal under israeli national law. the deputy speaker, a member of the prime minister's likud party, made these comments weeks after the icj's order. he'd previously called to burn gaza in a post on x. he said he deleted it following a request from the platform, but he didn't apologise. and controversial comments have been made even by members of the government. this call by israel's national security minister was made just two days after the icj ruling. before becoming a minister, mr ben—gvir was convicted on eight charges, including inciting violence and supporting a terrorist organisation. the minister has been calling for palestini

hamas did not want a deal.pposition leader yair lapid accused mr netanyahu of deciding not to save the hostages. our middle east correspondent lucy williamson reports from jerusalem. hamas would protect them as assets, the argument went. these younger, fitter hostages were the ones who would survive. instead, israel's army says they were shot by hamas in a tunnel under rafa as israeli forces battled above them. almog sarusi. alexander lobanov. ori danino. eden yerushalmi, whose last words to her sister were, "they've caught me. " carmel gat, a therapist, was described by other hostages as their guardian angel. and hersh goldberg—polin, a 23—year—old us—israeli citizen. translation: while israel is conducting l intensive negotiations with the mediators in a supreme effort to reach a deal, hamas continues to firmly refuse any offer. he who murders hostages does not want a deal. a red flag at the protest today. a message to the prime minister. the last red line has been crossed. hostages were dying, they said, as

so hamas has got to go. [applause] >> just imagine for those who say, well, hamas has to stay, it has to be part of a post-war gaza. imagine in a post-war situation in world war ii, imagine allowing the defeated nazis in 1945 to rebuild germany. it's inconceivable, it's ridiculous, it didn't happen then, it's not going to happen now. [applause] >> this is why israel will reject any rule for hamas in a post-war gaza. we don't seek to resettle gaza. what we seek is demilitarized and deradicalized gaza, only then, only then can we ensure that this round of fighting will be the last round of fighting. we are ready to work with regional and other partners to support a local civilian administration in gaza, committed to peace co-existence. as for the hostages, i have a message for their hamas captors. let them go. let them go, all of them. those alive today must be returned alive. and the remains of those whom you brutally killed must be returned to their families. those families here with us today, and others in

certainly surely know if some of your staff were hamas operatives.s an information that we have not received. you might recall in the past, there have been allegations about 19 staff of the unrwa who allegedly might have participated to the horrendous attack of october 7th. there has been an investigation and the investigation did not end up conclusive. we have also received later on a letter from the israeli authorities about 100 staff, allegedly members of the hamas, and i have immediately told them, "i take this allegation seriously, "can you help us to look into it?" so far, we haven't received any response. i mean, it's a profound problem for you right now, isn't it, that israel clearly doesn't see unwra as a good faith actor, as a neutral player in gaza? i think the profound problem goes beyond that, stephen. there is a deliberate attempt to eliminate and to dismantle the agency, and the real reason behind this has nothing to do with neutrality issues. there are political considerations behind it. ultimately, there is a desire to strip the pale

hamas refused. on august 16, after the united states updated the deal framework, israel once again agreed. once again, hamas refused. in recent days, israel engaged in negotiations, hamas has remained steadfast in its rejection of all proposals. and yet the international community continues to direct wrath at israel as though we are the ones holding the hostages. as though we are the one standing in the way of their freedom. after all, it is easier to criticize democratic government then confront the reality of dealing with terrorists. the terrorists do not sit at this table to defend their actions. they have proxies, their apologists, to do that for them. where is your outrage? where is your condemnation of hamas for these atrocities? hostagetaking is a violation of international humanitarian law. a violation of resolutions including 2474. hamas has violated three of the resolutions that call for the release of hostages. unless and until this council condemns hamas and designates them for what they

and that hamas is increasing the demands, that is completely untrue, it's a lie, hamas have basic demands, these are the demands from day one, hamas did not change any demands, now when it comes to the actual standards, the standards are set forth by security council resolution that was passed on the 10th of june, security council resolution 2,735, that must be very clear, and i hope that the international media will fail it. in creating this deceatful story, this deceatful israeli campaign uh talking about the fact that you know you know that there are some obstacles by but saying that these obstacles are mainly the responsibility of hamas and that's a lie, there is a lie specifically because when we follow through the western media we see that they are claiming that hamas uh killed the hostages in cold blood in the tunnels, this is this was coming from one of the major... uh western a channels and others saying that it is hamas that keeps changing its mood and despite the fact that zianist israel killed the top negotiator. yes, well we we must maybe clarify here that when there is negot

and what hamas has, hamas mostly has rockets, but hizballah has large arsenal of rockets, missiles, long range missiles and hizbullah has not used a bit of it and it can crush israel and the occupied palestinian territories and the israeli military positions, but it is still waiting and it it has not unleashed all of its power on israeli regime, because hezballah is not the one who wants war, israely regime wants war, and this is clear because every time in the region israel has done provocations, not the resistance action action, resistance access factions, so the situation, as i said, is because of occupation of the palestinian lands and israeli genocide in the gaza strip and talking about diplomacy and talking about uh negotiations from the israeli side is nonsense because whenever a ceasefire deal was near israeli prime minister set forth a non-negotiable measure such as the philadelphia corridor which as we know cuts uh it's in southern gaza strip. and it's 14 about 14 kilometers and it separates egypt and the gaza strip, it said that it wants presence there even its own minist

so, hamas has got to go.hose who say, well, hamas has to stay, it has to be start of a post—war gaza. imagine in a post—war situation in world war ii, imagine allowing the defeated nazis in 1945 to rebuild germany. it is inconceivable, it is ridiculous. it didn't happen then, it isn't going to happen now. this is why israel will reject any rule for hamas in a post—war gaza. we don't seek to resettle gaza. what we seek is a demilitarised and deradicalise gaza. only then can we ensure that this round of fighting will be the last round of fighting. we are ready to work with regional and other partners to support a local civilian administration in gaza committed to peaceful coexistence. as for the hostages, i have a message for the hamas captors— let them go. let them go, all of them. those alive today must be returned alive. and the remains of those whom you brutally killed must be returned to their families. those families who are before us today and others in israel deserve to have a resting place for their lo

hamas is still acting in gaza, — that. hamas is still acting in gaza, israel— that.ter hanras— gaza, israel still going after hamas targets _ gaza, israel still going after hamas targets in _ gaza, israel still going after hamas targets in he's - gaza, israel still going after hamas targets in he's going gaza, israel still going after i hamas targets in he's going to keep— hamas targets in he's going to keep doing _ hamas targets in he's going to keep doing that. _ hamas targets in he's going to keep doing that. there - hamas targets in he's going to keep doing that. there is- hamas targets in he's going to keep doing that. there is not. keep doing that. there is not that— keep doing that. there is not that much— keep doing that. there is not that much ambiguity- keep doing that. there is not that much ambiguity in - keep doing that. there is not that much ambiguity in that. that much ambiguity in that sense — that much ambiguity in that sense for— that much ambiguity in that sense for them _ that much ambiguity in that sense for them when - that much ambiguity in th

negotiation won't work with hamas. "wall street journal" editorial board hamas murdered six hostages. israel blamed. they were killed in rafah where biden and harris had threats and withheld weapons. they argue the choices are heavy and israel's leaders don't need u u.s. -- israel is offering strategic concessions and risk soldiers' lives to free hostages. the u.s. pressure should be on hamas who took hostages and murder them. why ask israel for more concessions? say enough is enough with hamas. you execute hostages. we'll come down with the full force and might of the israeli military on you with the full backing of the united states. stop the equivocating. support the hostages by saying hamas, you have to let them go. >> that was the approach we took during the trump administration. voters have a choice in november what kind of foreign policy they want. >> john: by then it might be too late. >> it might be. this is not just about israel defending israel. america needs to step up to protect american citizens, too. doz

~ . ., , hamas? indeed. what gaza is seeinu hamas? indeed. what gaza is seeing in _ hamas? indeed.g in around one - hamas? indeed. what gaza is seeing in around one hour i hamas? indeed. what gaza is| seeing in around one hour and hamas? indeed. what gaza is l seeing in around one hour and a half, the pause in fighting — the palestinians did not see any pause in fighting since november. so this is a big moment for the people in gaza to see a pause in fighting. and as louise, your interview with louise she said it is not only three day, three days in the middle of gaza, three days in southern gaza, and three days in northern gaza. so we are talking about more than ten days with the extra days. this is, of course, giving hope to the people of gaza, giving hope to the people, the families of the hostages, who requested also that the polio vaccination would be including the hostages, as they are living in gaza. they are exposed to the pandemic there, the polio pandemic. so they should be included as well in this campaign. stay with us. ijust campaign. stay with us. i just want to bring

and hamas cannot control gaza. so making clear in there that any agreement that they can come to as part of these hostage negotiations cannot include the eventuality of hamas returning control over for gaza. i think it's interesting in both of these statements, there is no pressure either implied or explicit on netanyahu to come to a deal. i think american officials see what's playing out in israel today and think that pressure is very much coming from inside his own country. that's a very, very good point and we've heard time and time again from u.s. >> officials saying the sides agree in principle but clearly as close as the u.s. says they are, there's some there's some real sticking points, real details that both israel and hamas are still a part on how far apart we don't exactly know. kevin liptak. thank you very much. nic robertson in israel. thanks to you as well. let's talk more about these developments with former hostage negotiator gershon baskin the middle east director for the international communities o

hamas did not want a deal.ition leader yair lapid accused mr netanyahu of deciding not to save the hostages. jon donnison reports from jerusalem on what we know about the israeli hostages. six more dead israeli hostages in gaza. carmel gat, who was a0. alexander lobanov, 32. almog sarusi, aged 27. eden yerushalmi, 24. ori danino, who was 25. and the youngest, hersh goldberg—polin, just 23, who was also an american citizen. with broken hearts, the goldberg—polin family is devastated to announce the death of their son and brother, hersh. they thank you all for your love and support and ask for privacy at this time. just a few days ago, his mother, rachel, had called for his release. hersh, we are working day and night and we will never stop. but she will never see her only son alive again. israel's military says the six bodies were found in a tunnel under rafah in the south of gaza. its chief spokesperson, daniel hagari, said they had recently been brutally murdered by hamas. the islamist group today denied that,

knows, even netanyahu knows that hamas can't be defeated. because hamas is not one person, hamas is not 10 people, hamas is an ideology, hamas cannot be defeated, if it's military power fades away, and i think it can't be, the ideology will be there, one palestinian is killed, two more will join hamas, they say that the palestinian authority can be the ruler of the gaza history, but even in the occupied west bank are people are angry with palestinian authority. they have seen that palestinian authority cannot do anything, it is backing away and backing down when israel commits crimes in the occupied west bank, it can't control the gaza strip, hamas can't be defeated as we all know, because as i said it is an ideology, and israel wants to commit these kinds of crimes because israel and the us want to buy time to put pressure on the palestinians and for netanyahu to evade corruption charges, evade the uh anger of israeli society and israeli settlers. and it wants to evade that, but eventually the access of resistance may pressure the israeli regime to a ceasefire, i think. thank you for t

do the people still support hamas? what is the vibe like? >> trey: yeah, majority of people in gaza and west bank do support hamas. it is not just military organization, but a political organization. it has large swaths of support in gaza and west bank. >> brian: in your book, you talk about, you met the hersh family, this struck home in your book black saturday. unfortunately, that would have to be in your paperback. >> trey: i think a lot of people want you to take a time as a jou journalist on the ground. only side i take is side of truth. the truth is october attack was largest slaughter of jews since the holocaust. i write about this in" black saturday" and i speak with israel's defense minister g gallant about the war, i speak with israeli soldiers and civilians and hostages dragged into gaza on october 7 and released in the november ceasefire deal. i speak with hamas leadership, with palestinian doctors and civilians to give readers insight. these interviews were conducted in realtime s, i went to the ga strip. the back cover is a tun

not hamas but mahmoud and as. this is a man he claims he wants peace but refuses to condemn the massacre of october 7 and he is paying millions. the more you murder, the more you get paid. and he still wages diplomatic warfare a against israel's right to exist and defend itself and they amount do the same thing. if you don't defend yourself, you can't exist. standing at this podium 40 years ago, i told the sponsors of that outrageous resolution to expel israel, gentlemen, shut your fan atism -- fanaticism at the door. today i tell you who shamefully check your fanaticism at the door. this continues to be a moral stain on the united nations. it made this ones respected institution con temperature toous. this u.n. house of darkness and home court. they know in this swamp of antisemitic bile there is an automatic majority willing to demonize the jewish state and antiisrael society, any false charge, any outlandish allege can muster a majority. in the last aid, twhr is more resolutions passed against resolution in thi

but hamas is not that interested.s is a war that is sponsored by iran, and the only way that we are ever going to get a lasting resolution is if we cut the snake off at the head and until and unless the administration makes clear that israel can exact a preemptive cost on iran if the aggression continues either in gaza, if the aggression continues in southern lebanon, the until and unless the administration makes clear that israel has the right to defend itself by taking a preemptive strike against iran and iran's armies in hezbollah and in gaza, this is not going to come to an end. every time the administration tells israel to de-escalate, it is a signal to iran, and it's a signal to hezbollah and hamas that they can escalate on their own terms because they know the they know israel will not have the backing of the west, so it's very clear you can look at what happened in, in, in southern lebanon last week when hezbollah was going to launch 6000 missiles on israel. israel went in and took a preemptive strike. it didn

has one word answer essentially supports hamas, a cease-fire gives hamas a big win. democrats urging kamala harris to rethink israel policy. they want a harris administration to halt israel's big to obliterate the tariffs. they see israel as the villain. they want to initiate a large number of muslim voters. domestic politics are more important. hamas takes hundreds of hostages. that is an outrage. they are brutalized. israelis get close to freedom, they should six and claim it is is relapse fault and they do it again if they try another rescue. with the election so closely anti-semites are returning to college campus, hamas supporters have the run of the street in new york and the administration pressures is real to vote easy on terrorists. from a jewish man on the sidelines at hamas demonstration, role it. >> how long this is handled by president biden and kamala harris, will it change how you vote? >> i am a single policy voter. isn't kamala the one who said she sympathizes with the human emotion of these protesters? are you sympathizing with terrorism? where is p

hamas has promised to do.ou, first of all, what we had over the years until we left. this is egypt. israel is here. you see the gaza strip. the distance to tel aviv. it is just meters to the villages near it. this was the international border of israel. please enlarge it. if you look at it enlarged, you see we control it. here in the bottom, the philadelphia line, it is all in our control. now if what happened is when we left gaza, the liens remain. they have tried, but the land border, nothing gets through. but the minute we left the gaza strip back then and left this line, it is actually the border between. we left it and we had no blockage from massive insertion of war material. must see shaped shaped to create and manufacture weapons. all by iran financing it and planning it. and all these things you see here came through the strip mine and became a huge threat because there was no blockage there. that is what happened. and therefore, the question i have been asked if it was so b bad, why didn't you conque

will the fighting will of hamas and pitts leaders break, or will we get the leader of hamas?the kill him before, or will there be some kind of deal made? it's one of these three options. i hope that israel won't cave for pressure against hamas, and i hope that we will be able to defeat this very horrible and cruel enemy because hamas shouldn't be allowed to see the light of another day at the end of the fighting here. joey: jonathan, on that point looking forward and how this develops after this, this was an absolute tragedy. how does this affect the ceasefire that the biden-harris administration has been pushing publicly so hard for the last several weeks? does this create leverage for hamas? does it give israel an opportunity to say, nope, we're not interested? how do you think it affects that? >> well, basically any talk of ceasefire, you know, there are two parties who would like to see a ceasefire, i think, hamas because it will allow them to almost emerge victorious and, of course, the families of the hostages. and these are two different sides of the spectrum. in my mi

but what about hamas? aren't their leaders who are accused of war crimes being taken to the icj? genocide is defined as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. the convention outlines five punishable acts, one of which is the direct and public incitement or call to action to commit genocide. this crime is also illegal under israeli national law. the deputy speaker, a member of the prime minister's likud party, made these comments weeks after the ch's order. he'd previously called to burn gaza in a post on x. he said he deleted it following a request from the platform, but he didn't apologise. and controversial comments have been made even by members of the government. this call by israel's national security minister was made just two days after the icj ruling. before becoming a minister, mr ben—gvir was convicted on eight charges, including inciting violence and supporting a terrorist organisation. the minister has been calling for palest

hamas saying it is in their porch— hamas saying it is in their porch to _ hamas saying it is in theireement. so, that still seems to be in a spiral— so, that still seems to be in a spiral of— so, that still seems to be in a spiral of neither side really accepting that they might be the obstacle.— accepting that they might be the obstacle. accepting that they might be theobstacle. ., , ., , , the obstacle. how precarious is the obstacle. how precarious is the position — the obstacle. how precarious is the position of— the obstacle. how precarious is the position of the _ the obstacle. how precarious is the position of the prime - the position of the prime minister benjamin netanyahu given how divided we have seen the country has become? and these disagreements within his own cabinet, notably this slang match that we have heard reports of with his defence minister over the philadelphia corridor. ~ . ., , corridor. which was extraordinary, - corridor. which was extraordinary, yes. | corridor. which was i extraordinary, yes. it corridor. which was _ extraordinary, yes. it happened in the

donald trump squeezed hamas and every other terrorist group.her way he squeezed them, ending american funding for the un's incredible unrest. that organization, trump cut that off. kamala harris back sanctions for relief for iran, back tens of billions of dollars of money, backed hundreds of millions which tripled, humanitarian aid for hamas, building out their headquarters under the floors of hospitals in gaza, and the anti-semitic human rights council. he can cheer for that. kamala harris backed america's rejoining of the council which is one of the greatest sources of anti-semitism, donald trump put a end to the palestinian pay for sway. here we go. kamala harris backed all kinds of loopholes that allowed pay to sway to continue. kamala has it. donald trump moved to the us embassy to jerusalem and recognized that city as the capital of israel. kamala harris backed russia on israel to reopen a palestinian consulate in jerusalem and paved the way to a divided city, donald trump issued an executive order to send a simple message to every colleg

and that hamas is increasing the demands, that is completely untrue, it's a lie, hamas have basic demands, these are the demands from day one, hamas did not change any demands, now when it comes to the actual standards, the standards are set forth by security council resolution that was passed on the 10th of june, security council resolution 2735, that must be very clear and i hope that the international media will fail in creating this deceatful story. this deceatful israeli campaign uh talking about the fact that you know uh you know that there are some obstacles by but saying that these obstacles are mainly the responsibility of hamas and that's a lie, there is a lie specifically because when we follow through the western media we see that they are claiming that hamas uh killed the hostages in cold blood in the tunnels, this is this was coming from one of the major western india channels and oters saying that... it is hamas that keeps changing its mood and despite the fact that zinist israel killed the top negotiator yes, well we must maybe clarify here that when there is negotiations,

>> not hamas. >> ainsley: israel killed anymore not hamas?y had hamas flags there at this event at this protest. hamas flags. it's a terrorist organization. >> well, a part -- one of the things that kamala harris and others are doing is trying to win over. that was voters. many of which are located in michigan. it didn't stop kamala harris from secretly meeting last week with that radical anti-semitic mayor over in dearborn, michigan. they are trying to have it both ways. we stand firmly behind israel. we'll don't like netanyahu. you will hear from the president shortly on that. his one word response does damage and heartened hamas. alexis mcadams went right to the heart of the pro-israel protesters. and she talked about -- and she talked to them. listen to this. >> how all this is being handled by president biden and kamala harris, will it change how you vote? >> i wasn't such a political person. now i'm a single policy voter. israel straight through and through. isn't kamala the one who says she sympathizes with the human emotion of these p

hamas refuses to do that. obstacle to end of the war is hamas.cle to release of hostages is hamas. the ones who butchered and are slaying, murdering six people in cold blood, riddling them with bullets and firing bullets into their heads is hamas, not israel, not me. we will do everything we can to fight these savages and it is savagery that endangers israel and all democracies and if we come to the point where -- i have red lines. they were set before this massacre, this latest murder. they become redder. i have areas of flexibility, i've given to my negotiating team and i stand by them. to make concessions after the murders, it is license to kill hostages. hamas understands kill hostages, get concessions, that is wrong, not the right way to do it. governments have responsibility to do the right thing. your heart goes out, our hearts were shattered and torn when we saw this, we have responsibility of judgement to do what is important to secure future of the country. we can't let iran resupply terrorists in gaza and have to continue to put pressu