how do you want to handel that? are you going to do something more provocative or overt to slow this time line down? which most people are thinking along the lines of a military strike? is that a possibility if you're going to do that? what would the implications be, what would the likely counter be if you were to do that? is there more negotiating that can be done in delaying strategies that would be more successful and fruit will. and because the iranians get a vote in this, if they decide they want to go ahead and announce they're moving in this way, what are the implications to something like that. i think in the context, you have to worry about ten years of war, a country that's war weary. a world that's in financial discourse so to speak, and challenge. the likelihood of a strategy that would deny the iranians is a strategy that involves an invasion and change of strategies in iran. the idea that that's going to happen in the same year you get a new chinese government, new french government, new united states

of being the world's greatest nuclear power, we will be threatened by a puny nuclear power with a handelful of nuclear weapons? >> well, phillip, i think that's a very good question, there are a lot of people who have thought through the end game. we're so far from the end game right now, it's hard to visualize getting to the top of the mountain. i call the top of the mountain where you would have no nuclear weapons. we really can't see the top of the mountain now. it's fogged in. and we've got some avalanches coming down the mountain. i think we've got to strive to get to base camp, and getting to base camp is going to require countries going together to base camp. if we get to base camp, which would require a lot of steps beyond where we are now, would require dealing with north korea, would require dealing with iran, it would require dealing with securing nuclear material all over the globe. it would require a comprehensive test man treaty ratification by all countries. it would require a lot of those things. the world is going to look different then if we did all that. it's going to req

00 is almost here, flash studio lights it's time for last call, steven chu gave himself an a for handelingjimmy fallon is on another grading scale. >> i guess yesterday energy secretary steven chu said he would give himself an a for controlling the cost of gas. on behalf of americans i would like to give him an f, and a u. >> that is your last call. lights are blinking and we're closing down shop. rush limbaugh will go on the record, you don't want to miss it. right now make sure you

everyone here should get your own facebook page, get your own twitter handel, and to make sure you have access to -- handle, and to make sure you have access to a blog. social mean it can engage our constituencies and grow the women's movement in ways that were previously unheard of, in ways we are doing through her vote. at mom's rising, we can seen how, -- moms rising, we can see how supporting our organization can support other organizations. we are calling on the power of american women for real economic and health justice for all in the 2012 election. i want everybody to leave this room know when you can be a media outlet. for the first time in history, you can be your own media outlet. [applause] and i want everyone in this room to remember that some elections, particularly local elections, are won or lost by fewer boats -- votes than the average person has friends on facebook. we can bring wittman's voices forward and we can have an impact -- spring women's -- forward ands voices we can have an impact. it is not time to sideline women. we do not want to be on the sidelines any mo